Slashdot Mirror


Google's Knol, Expert Wiki, Goes Live

Brian Jordan and other readers sent in word that Google has taken the wraps off Knol, its expert-written challenger to Wikipedia. (We discussed Knol when it was announced last year.) Wired has an in-depth look. Knol's distinctions from Wikipedia are that authors are identified by their real names (and verified), and that they can share in ad revenue if they choose to. The service initially features a lot of medical articles, which is interesting considering that Medipedia also launched today. This medical wiki is backed by Harvard's and Stanford's medical schools.

11 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Losing Anonymity? by SomeJoel · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should write the algebra entry.

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
  2. Re:Online Resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except when the sources are bad. Take this knol article, for instance

    http://knol.google.com/k/hunter-handsfield/safe-sex/nAi5F17X/WdH0tg#

    This safe sex page doesn't even mention that going into IT can ensure a 100% avoidance of STDS. And they call themselves experts!

  3. Should be an article on conjunctions by MarkTraceur · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the content policy:
    "Pedophilia, Incest and Bestiality:
    Users may not publish written, image, audio or video content that promotes pedophilia, incest and bestiality."

    They never said we couldn't promote pedophilia, incest, OR bestiality. First person to get an apology from Google for this gets bonus points :) Screenshot or it didn't happen!

  4. Knol on Wikipedia, Wikipedia on Knol by Glasswire · · Score: 5, Funny

    Knol on Wikipedia is pretty empty. Whereas
    Wikipedia on Knol is very informative.
    Is that an indicator?

  5. Re:Losing Anonymity? by strawberryutopia · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not a problem for readers, but you can see why it's attractive for a company like Google. They could never put out a Wikipedia for fear of being seen as The Enemy by people who think the moon landings are fake or that cellphones are making the bees return to their home planet.

    Cellphones? I thought it was the Daleks.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar...
    -Lucy-
  6. Re:Losing Anonymity? by hostyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or the entry for Knol-it-all

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  7. Re:Losing Anonymity? by j01123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should write the algebra entry.

    No way, he improperly uses upper-case letters for variables. I'll write the "algebra" entry using "x" and "y" and he can write an "Algebra" entry using "X" and "Y".

  8. Re:Losing Anonymity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Relax. It's just his poetry.

  9. Re:Not bad, but it's missing something by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wikipedia definitely suffers from the problem of having a lot of know nothing jackasses writing articles, random defacements, and a lot of useless crap.

    I don't mind, I'm used to that. I've been reading slashdot for 10 years.

  10. Re:Losing Anonymity? 8-bit? Haiku? by R4wBon3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for pointing that out.. Otherwise I would've continued to think he was writing an on-topic poem on his 8-bit terminal.

  11. Re:Wikipedia ^ ~Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...smear yogurt over the victims nipples.

    Ooooh, that works for seizures too?