Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation CPU Refrigerators

Iddo Genuth writes "Researchers at Purdue University are developing a miniature refrigeration system, small enough to fit inside laptop computers. According to the researchers, the implementation of miniature refrigeration systems in computers can dramatically increase the amount of heat removed from the microchips, therefore boosting performance while simultaneously shrinking the size of computers."

49 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The implementation of miniature refrigeration systems in computers can dramatically increase the amount of heat removed from the microchips.

    Of course, the next step will be to dramatically increase the heat output of high-end CPUs. Aren't arms races fun?

    1. Re:Excellent by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Funny

      This will pave the way for the Year of Linux on the Desktop! (or Laptop)

      with apologies to our aquatic, flightless and mostly cold-loving friend

    2. Re:Excellent by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought the next step would be to dramatically decrease the size of beer cans to fit in these miniature refrigerators.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean the Year of Vista on the Desktop? A more unattainable goal, and more related to the issue of insane heat generation...

    4. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or dramatically increase the size of beer cans to fit these inside. I'm not interested in "Fun Size" beers.

      (Fun for who? Beer companies?)

    5. Re:Excellent by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you EVER want to DECREASE the size of a beer can?!?!

      Blasphemer...

    6. Re:Excellent by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

      You removed the water.

    7. Re:Excellent by somersault · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think multi-core is going to cut it, it seems to me each processor needs it's own mememory and bandwidth to do massive calculations, and then sends the results of this information to where it is needed.

      While multi-core isn't amazingly effective for doing 'massive calculations' of the variety that scientists usually do (compared to a supercomputer with thousands of nodes anyway), it is great for general purpose computing. It definitely helps for everyday use - whenever I use a single core computer (even with a high clockspeed), I notice the difference in responsiveness, especially when booting into Windows and all the system tray apps are loading, or running lots of applications at the same time. You have to remember that even if you're just running a single application on your dekstop, there are plenty of background processes too.

      Not that I want to dissuade you from researching into more efficient processor methodologies, even if it's only for specific tasks - go ahead :) But when you get down to it, most tasks your average computer user does during the day are neither suitable for parallelisation, nor are they considered highly specialised. I'm just thinking of web browsing, chatting, checking email. Modern games do involve lots of operations that 20 years ago would be considered 'specialised', like 3D sound, graphics and physics processing, but we already have specialised processors for all of these things.

      I'm really wondering if anyone has done any research into the geometry of information processing functions, of what can be specifically offloaded and what should not

      I don't think you're giving the guys at places like Intel and AMD much credit.. if they hadn't thought about stuff like that then where did the idea for 'hyperthreading' and different CPU 'pipelines' come from? To me it seems that the only things that have changed in the last couple of decades is that we've gone from having computers that were mainly designed for integer arithmetic as far as hardware was concerned, to having computers with addons for floating point calculation, and now we have units capable of massively parallel floating point calculations and amazing amounts of memory bandwidth (graphics cards and supercomputers), and now we are getting APIs like CUDA to make use of graphics cards to do more supercomputer like things with our graphics cards. I'm not a CPU design engineer though, so the true progression is probably a bit more complex ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Excellent by b4upoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Condensation is a wonderful by product of refrigeration. The love of PC electronics for oozing water is well known. Perhaps refrigeration is not the best idea inside a PC case.

    9. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he's creating a Doll Party House, equipped with miniature kegs and hot chicks.

    10. Re:Excellent by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Already exists to some extent. Anybody who uses their system as a PVR knows the virtues of specialized chips. I have a TV Tuner, and it does MPEG2 encoding on board. You can record encoded video without even pushing your actual CPU above 10%. I remember trying to do the same thing with a TV Tuner without onboard encoding chips, and you could only encode at very low bitrates, and even then you'd have dropped frames and out of sync audio. For tasks that are extremely calculation intensive that you do often, it's generally a really good idea to get specialized chips. However, I can't think of any other processing that gets done on most computers regularly to justify creating a specialized chip that doesn't already exist. Sound, graphics, physics, video encoding, all have their own processors. What's left?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Excellent by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To put it simply: That is not a big problem, there are many ways around it. The big problem, I would say, is that refrigeration requires energy which is in short supply for laptops. Whats even worse is that refrigeration allows the computer itself to consume more energy, which creates a circle that just isnt sustainable.

      This basic idea has been around for ages, and it has never been put to use simply because it creates more problems than it solves. Do we really need more CPU power in laptops? Is that really what we need from them? No, improved human interface devices, uptime and bandwidth are more important goals.

    12. Re:Excellent by Dekker3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      .. i think it was a reference to tux ("our aquatic, flightless and mostly cold-loving friend"), living on the cpu, in the mini-fridge.
      ha-ha, i'd say, but... naw.

      now... if we're putting fridges in our computers, we might as well grab a beer and start running unix. i mean, who cares what you're trying to run when you're drunk?

  2. Re:Hotter? by treeves · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, but heat flow != temperature.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  3. How much juice? by fyoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And how much electricity will this consume? It may not be that appealing to laptop users if it eats significantly into their battery life. And for servers many colo companies are finding themselves less constrained by space than by available electricity.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
    1. Re:How much juice? by megaditto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Could be pretty damn efficient if it's a heat pump.

      A good AC unit usually consumes less than 10 times the energy it moves (a 1 kW window unit rated for 40,000 BTUs for example), but that depends how much colder the inside needs to be compared to the outside air.

      In case of CPU coolers (cooling things hotter than ambient air), one could even GENERATE electricity if the size and cost of the "cooler" is not a concern (A thick diamond heatpipe to conduct heat away to distant thermocouples is how I would do it).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:How much juice? by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      one could even GENERATE electricity

      1) Build a data center
      2) Rent it out
      3) Generate Electricity
      4) Profit!

      So now we know why Google wants all the data of the world running on their servers. They are not competing with Microsoft. They are competing with the oil industry.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. Revolutionary by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 4, Funny

    the implementation of miniature refrigeration systems in computers can dramatically increase the amount of heat removed from the microchips, therefore boosting performance

    Really? So my CPU will perform faster if I put it in a refigerator?

    1. Re:Revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, if you take advantage of the extra heat absorption by overclocking the CPU to run faster.

    2. Re:Revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So it's the overclocking (i.e., increasing the clock frequency) that makes your CPU run faster, not the fact that it's cooler, as the article implies. And some CPUs generate more heat than other CPUs with lower clock speeds, so that relationship isn't a linear one, either.

      Also, most modern high-end CPUs can't be overclocked by much, regardless of how cold you make them. The problem isn't heat, the problem is how fast the transistors can switch while remaining in sync. Sure, if you buy a low-end CPU from a high-end "family", you can usually overclock it a lot, because it's basically identical to a high-end models (just set to a lower speed at the factory). But, again, that has nothing to do with temperature, and temperature itself does not have any influence on a CPU's performance.

    3. Re:Revolutionary by billcopc · · Score: 2, Funny

      most modern high-end CPUs can't be overclocked by much, regardless of how cold you make them

      The half-dozen Core-2 Q6600s I've taken from 2.4ghz to 3.6ghz would argue otherwise, as would the QX9650 that I pushed to 4.7ghz. But hey, what do I know, right ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Revolutionary by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been my experience with many modern laptops that they tend to slow down when they near their shutdown temperatures. I don't know if it's a direct result of the heat or some software actually slowing the processor to try and generate less heat or something else, but when both my Dell and Toshiba get near their shutdown temperatures (somewhere around 90C) they both slow noticably. They both speed up again if their internal temperatures start to drop.

      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
  5. Condensation? by SoapBox17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't air conditioning units tend to produce a bit of water condensation during cooling? I guess we'll have to start emptying the water out of our PCs....

    1. Re:Condensation? by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Only because they cool below the dew point - which, in turn, is dependent on the humidity levels.

      People who build active cooling into their computers (for overclocking) typically insulate the chip(s) and cooling block to keep air-exposed surfaces at or above ambient temperatures for just that reason.

      Also, even if it does produce condensation I'd say there's little reason to worry... just recycle the condensate to provide evaporative cooling on the (much hotter) heat sink side of the system.
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Condensation? by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention the reason you get condensation in a fridge is often that a single compressor operates both the fridge and freezer. Systems with different compressors for the two systems are more segregated, and have less condensation problems. Each system stays at a controlled humidity level.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  6. Side Question??? by TheCastro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whenever I hear about new cooling solutions I remember a few years back someone had developed that liquid (or gel) that you could submerge computers and tvs into, but it wouldn't fry them. Everyone was talking about using this nonbonding liquid to cool computers and use to put out fires in places with paintings since it didn't ruin the paint. Does anyone know or remember what I'm talking about, or do I just sound like a crazy man,HAHAHAHAHAH! P.S. Bill Gates probably bought it to throw away.

    1. Re:Side Question??? by jaxtherat · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    2. Re:Side Question??? by SQL+Error · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think he's probably thinking of Fluorinert, which was used to cool the Cray 2.

  7. It still drains the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Regardless of the cooling ability, it will put the same load on the laptop's battery, likely a little bit more because it has to run the compressors.

    And that heat still needs to be dumped somewhere...

    I guess this would be great for certain difficult hot-spots on the board, but a well-designed heat sink can usually handle it. The trade-off is that it adds more weight.

  8. It costs something like $300/gallon by localroger · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember a piece linked here where a couple of morons immersed a computer in the stuff and cooled it with liquid nitrogen, oblivious to the fact that liquid nitrogen was cold enough to freeze the stuff. I was thinking "one small room air conditioner..." Apparently the miniaturized and practical version of that is what TFA is, although I say that as conjecture since I haven't read TFA.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  9. Hype by MojoRilla · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The article says:

    The researchers developed an analytical model for designing tiny compressors that pump refrigerants using penny-sized diaphragms. This model has been validated with experimental data.

    Translation:
    This is completely impractical hype so far. We are looking for grant and startup money.

  10. Re:Hotter? by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah I don't get this, the heat need to leave the laptop somehow, and since the refrigerator will have to be within the laptop the heat remains inside it. Also since the refrigerator won't be 100% effecient this will both generate MORE heat and energy from the battery.

    Sure the CPU may get colder, but your lap will get warmer. Bad trade I'd say.

  11. An alternative... by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is to position the computer upside-down. Condensation does not form on the hot surfaces, only the cold surfaces. If the cold surfaces cause the water to drip away, there is no way for the water to interfere. Another option is to refrigerate the entire computer (which is done by overclockers), as the coldest point will then be far away, and you've the added bonus that the air will be very dry within a short timeframe.

    A third option would be to run copper from each chip surface to the refrigerator. The heat gradient will prevent any chip running hot, you only need one refrigerator, and you can handle the case of the heavy workloads shifting from one part of the system to another.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  12. Re:Hotter? by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah I don't get this, the heat need to leave the laptop somehow, and since the refrigerator will have to be within the laptop the heat remains inside it

    The refrigerator's exterior heat exchanging pipes don't have to be inside the refrigerator itself. They didn't give any technical specs, so what are you worried about? Surely if they are working on this project, they'll have thought or experienced this problem if they were putting all items in the same location.

    Also, consider that, to a point, the ambient heat inside a laptop can be higher, as long as the PUs are kept cool. Of course if this were the only consideration, eventually the ambient heat would screw all the components except for the processors, but, as I said, they've considered this already. I'm sure of it.

    --
    "Little is much when little you need."
  13. Re:Hotter? by txoof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course the cooling system will use power and generate heat, but that heat won't necessarily be as much as a fan. A fan uses power to dissipate heat and in the process generates heat. I don't know the proper thermodynamic way to state this, but it's possible to make a more or less efficient cooling system. For example, it would be exceedingly inefficient to use a V8 engine to cool a laptop. It would do a hell-of a job of cooling the thing, but it would generate a whole lot more heat and suck down a whole lot more energy than a small electric fan.

    This thing might use less power and do a better job of moving power than a fan. I have no idea if this thing works better. If this device is more efficient than a fan (uses less energy and releases less heat), then it would be superior and would not make a lappy hotter. Otherwise, it's really only good for server applications where the heat can be pumped outside the box that holds the server.

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  14. bad idea by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First of all I've been saying for years, just screw the motherboard into the back of your mini-fridge and keep installing from there. You just open the door to put in a CD lol. But also, not all components can handle active cooling. My old laptop got really hot playing games. So I used ice packs under it to cool it. It got the temp way down but the hard drive died after about a month from the extreme hot-cold difference. I assume some external parts contracted while internal ones remained hot and expanded and some parts rubbed against other parts and it got damaged. I was able to get the data off after like 10 blue screens. So the moral of the story is, active cooling that can cool it lower than the surrounding air temperature is REALLY, REALLY BAD for some internal parts.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  15. Actually yea... by Kaeles · · Score: 2, Informative

    You need to remember that 90% of laptop CPUs will automatically downclock themselves if they are overheating (or over a certain temperature threshold.) They also do this if the cpu is more idle.

  16. Law of Unintended Consequences by Loopy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "In today's news, a new CPU refrigerant system causes massive data loss for users as hard drives overheat and fail prematurely from abnormally high case temperatures. Film at 11."

  17. Dump it near the Wifi module by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    And make your own hotspot.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  18. Active cooling means more heat output by giorgist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check the back of your fridge, it's hot.

    So by cooling by this method you may cool the cpu surface, butyou will produce alot more heat out of the laptop.

    Fried laps ?

    G

  19. Re:Nitrogen costs less than beer by billcopc · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're right, liquid nitrogen does not cost anywhere near $300/gallon, but the GP wasn't talking about nitrogen, they were talking about 3M Fluorinert, which does indeed cost an arm and a leg.

    The problem with these fluids is they can't keep up with today's processors. Immersing a PC in a vat of mineral oil won't magically cool the damned thing. You still need to extract the heat from that big pool of sludge; natural convection just doesn't cut it anymore. In fact, the fluid acts kind of like an insulator, because it moves so slowly that heat builds up right on your processor. You'd need propellers to move the flooz around, probably pump it through some sort of radiator.

    On the plus side, I could use my overclocked PCs to cook me some french fries for my poutine :)

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  20. Re:Hotter? by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, personally I don't care if my CPU is 45 degrees or 75 degrees as long as my lap isn't 70 degrees.

    And the sad fact with my MBP is that it probably is :D (no it's not but it's too hot.)
    I'd so take 5 mm fatter computer for better cooling :/

  21. Re:Hotter? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 3, Informative

    No they are called phase change systems. Much more expensive than water cooling.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  22. Re:Hotter? by KGIII · · Score: 4, Funny

    they've considered this already. I'm sure of it.

    More famous last words have ne'er been spoken.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Sure, they've made it small... by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but does it protect from nuclear blasts???

  25. Re:Why must they be symetric? by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean like motherboard chipsets? These days the chipset is gradually being moved into the CPU die anyway, and even graphics are being integrated with the CPU die, so I don't think heat dissipation is the main problem there. As everything is made smaller, chips can be run on lower voltages and generate less heat anyway. For mobile devices you are pretty limited in how far you can spread things out as well. I did refer to desktop CPUs in the GP post, but that was me being a moron as I just found it easier to visualise a desktop layout than a laptop one, seeing as I haven't fully taken apart many laptops.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  26. Re:Hotter? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    We already deal with this with heat pipes. This is just using a heat pump instead of a heat pipe, active rather than passive. The goal is to move the heat away from the CPU core, to someplace you have more room for a heat sink and fan (like way over at a corner of the system instead of the middle of the motherboard.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Re:Reliabilty by Krneki · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it melts I can finally get a CPU tattoo.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.