Slashdot Mirror


No Gap Found In Math Abilities of Girls, Boys

sciencehabit writes "For anyone who still believes that boys are better at math than girls, a massive new study published today in Science shows there's no difference. 'Among students with the highest test scores, the team did find that white boys outnumbered white girls by about two to one. Among Asians, however, that result was nearly reversed. Hyde says that suggests that cultural and social factors, not gender alone, influence how well students perform on tests.' But the researchers do note a disturbing trend towards omitting harder kinds of math questions from standardized tests."

26 of 701 comments (clear)

  1. Can it be time? by gcnaddict · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want more women in my IT department! Too bad nothing will come from this...

    (even if anything does come from this, it'll probably take a decade or two, which makes me feel old already)

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Can it be time? by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      From memory, the reproduction rate of "smart" people isn't even at replacement levels.

      Which doesn't make them very smart, does it?

  2. What! by rob1980 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next they'd have you believe that girls fart and use the internet too... I'm not buying it!

    1. Re:What! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my wife goes to the bathroom,

      Nothing good ever begins with that phrase...

  3. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a boy, and I've met girls who I'm better at math than.

    Therefore boys are better at math than girls.

    Heh, stupid girls probably can't even follow simple basic logic like that ;-)

    1. Re:Nonsense by digitrev · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can follow the logic, just not the logic that led you to the structure of your first sentence.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    2. Re:Nonsense by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree. He should have used "whom" as the object of "than." :P

  4. Explanation by sjonke · · Score: 4, Funny

    The math in this study was done by girls.

    --
    --- What?
  5. Almost in MN by peipas · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was just commenting about this with a coworker this morning, and how the Minneapolis Star Tribune indicates Minnesota high school girls are still lagging behind boys. I said we just need to bump down the high school boys' performance a couple notches and we'll be good: no child left behind!

    1. Re:Almost in MN by kabocox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I said we just need to bump down the high school boys' performance a couple notches and we'll be good: no child left behind!

      Shouldn't it be "No child out ahead?"

  6. easy deduction: by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    white boys should breed with asian girls, creating an uberrace of math chomping supergenius kids

    i for one welcome our eurasian einsteinchan overlords

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Re:The Important Question.... by gparent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because obviously if it was conducted by a male, it will be biased toward boys and if it was conducted by a female, it will be biased toward girls, right?

    Thus, I hereby suggest hiring a transsexual robot to lead the next survey.

  8. Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    White girls are stupid.

  9. Re:The Important Question.... by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

    No you insensitive clod, because if it was done by men the quantification would be way off!

  10. Re:No surprise by bigplrbear · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trust me, I know lots of girls who aren't afraid to touch IT

  11. Re:So if you want american kids with best math sco by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aye! Aye! Aye!

    I volunteer to be part of this experiment. Infact, I will give it my all!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  12. Remember what Barbie said: by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Math is hard! Let's go shopping!"

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  13. Missed the point by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    They focused in skin color... hair color would had lead to a more eath-shaking conclusion.

  14. obligatory xkcd ref by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  15. Re:What? by AP31R0N · · Score: 5, Funny

    Americans are better at counting than Brits, as Brits seem to think there is more than one math.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  16. Re:A root cause you'll never hear about by BlueZombie · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is nothing wrong with glorifying a large breasted bimbo. Appreciate everyone for their talents. Even if that talent consists of attractively stuffing a sweater!

  17. Re:I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You must be new here.

  18. Re:What? by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

    It also says boys do 7% better in the maths portion of the SATs, but writes it off as a statistical illusion due to more girls doing the test (they don't know how averages work?).

    They wanted to do the statistics and provide figures. But the study was done by a group of 5 women - The math was too hard. =)

    That's why a 7% gap with 1.5 million participants is just a "statistical illusion". If their confidence boundary with that many data points equates 7% with "Zip. Zilch. Nada.", their standard deviations must have been huge.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  19. Re:What? by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, I might have misunderstood feminism, but I thought the point was to increase choices and achievement not force new equally restrictive constraints on women while also screwing over men to achieve it.

    > Seriously, I might have misunderstood feminism, but I thought the point was to increase choices and achievement while also screwing over men to achieve it.

    There, fixed that for you. :)

  20. Re:I, for one by Lane.exe · · Score: 2, Funny
    OH MY GOD YOU POOR VICTIM

    Maybe when you've been on the receiving end of oppression for 10,000 years, maybe when you live in a society that isn't geared toward promoting the dominance of your sex, maybe when you weren't raised in an environment of almost absolute privilege, you get to complain. But on the whole, the fact that you might be complaining that women are smarter than you and dominate a few areas of the job market, while still lagging significantly behind in most others, is just fucking pathetic. Grow a pair, be a man.

    --
    IAALS.
  21. Re:Conflicting results? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone see anything wrong with this? Their results may be true, but that doesn't mean the study was valid.

    But the study had a politically correct result! It must be valid! Blasphemer.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"