NOAA Requires License For Photos of the Earth
Teancum writes "In an interesting show of the level of regulations private spacecraft designers have to go through, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has demanded that American participants of the Google Lunar X Prize obtain a license if their spacecraft are 'capable of actively or passively sensing the Earth's surface, including
bodies of water, from space by making use of the properties of the electromagnetic waves emitted, reflected, or diffracted by the sensed objects.' What prompted NOAA to ask for this license came from a visit by the XPrize staff to the NOAA offices in Maryland. What is going to happen when 'space tourists' bring their private cameras along for the ride?"
As if RIAA and MPAA weren't enough, now this NOAA: Who's come next, AAA?
That's the Budweiser Moon© now, they paid for the naming rights.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
I can totally understand this, If my Florida was flapping in the breeze I wouldn't want people taking snapshots either.
That would seem to include eyesight. I guess everyone will need to fly blind.
What are they gonna do, shoot down your satellites? Doubtful. They have NO AA.
God spoke to me.
it's not ridiculous at all.
when you think about it, taking a photo of the earth from space isn't (conceptually) any different from walking into a store a stealing a CD.
Same thing.
I, for one, never welcomed our road to hell paving overlords.
Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
Saying "if other people make money doing X, we're going to pass a law preventing you from doing X for free" never has good intentions.
Of course it does! Outlawing designated drivers forces people to use taxis, which helps the economy. Only allowing only professional movers to take furniture in and out of houses prevents injuries to out-of-shape people. And of course, making every babysitter get registered as a state-certified child care provider would reduce the risk of harm to the children, and would also keep for-profit day cares in business, which means more jobs.
See, nothing but good intentions!