Slashdot Mirror


New Search Engine Cuil Takes Aim At Google

theodp writes "CNET reports that Cuil (pronounced 'Cool'), a startup founded by the husband-and-wife team of Xift creator Tom Costello and former Google search architect Anna Patterson, is launching a new search engine today that claims to index three times as many Web pages as Google." Running a few searches left me underwhelmed with the content of the results (hitting the next-page button on a search with a listed 62,200,000 results — for "seattle" — got me the unexpected error message "We didn't find any results for 'seattle.'"), but pleased with the actual layout of the results when it worked, so I hope the kinks are worked out. Update 7/28 18:30 GMT by SM: corrected Tom Costello's accreditation, he wasn't a professor at Stanford as the linked story suggests, just did some research there as a grad student. Thanks to the Stanford CS department for pointing this out.

11 of 649 comments (clear)

  1. pretty, but not yet sooo useful by mwanaheri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    what I miss most is any sort of 'advanced' search, like the restriction on TLDs etc.

    --
    Idha khatabahum lijahiluna qalu salaman
  2. The seattle bug by gzipped_tar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    seems to be fixed.

    I also tried Tiananmen and was returned a blank face (I'm in China). This is many Chinese people's first benchmark at a new search engine. For me, the result is expected, since the Great Firewall is a hybrid of generic and Google/Yahoo/etc-targeted implementations.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  3. Not impressed so far by g-san · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The layout is pretty, the related results is nice, but the main function... the results... they suck. I was searching for an uncommon sailboat and there were 0 pages returned. Google returns results for the same query... On other searches, the domain name no longer resolved, there were 404s, I got a page that was last visited in 1997, just junk. The results summary needs to be cleaned up also, lots of funky symbols in the results are just noise.

    This is the same reason I stopped using Altavista way back when. I don't buy this 120 billion pages thing. You know you can get every article on slashdot on games.slashdot.org, tech.slashdot.org, politics.slashdot.org, etc... I bet they include all those, and every other site that allows you to view message threads 8 different ways. But no results for my first query!

    It could be a while before someone is going to beat google at searching. I really do like the alternative approach to displaying search results, so I will at least keep my eye on it.

  4. Invisible... by wild_quinine · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It doesn't seem like I've been using Google for very long. I remember the first search engine that I really came to rely on was AltaVista. Looking back at the waybackmachine, I can tell that I only used AltaVista for six months at most. Which means, by inference, that I've now been using google for nine years. I use it every day, and don't even realise that I'm doing it. And the fact that I've barely even noticed it yet is a credit to how little, for a company so large, Google throw shit at my window.

    There's a lot of talk about how Google is in decline, and I won't comment on that, because every company has its tipping point. But for them to have been a invaluable (and in many cases incomparable) tool in my life for the best part of a decade and to have remained almost invisible as an agent in that process takes some doing.

    In fact, the most insidious thing about Google may well be that any new attempts at reorganizing the layout of a traditional search engine, such as cuil is now attempting, seem like deliberate contrivances. And probably are.

  5. No problems? by Evildonald · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just "cuiled" the phrase "problems with linq to sql".. and it suggested there were no pages at all. Google however knows there are TERRIBLE problems with LINQ to SQL and served me 3,180,000 results. To say there are no problems with linq to sql is not very cuil at all.

  6. Really only 43,684,588 pages? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does Cuil claim to have "2,784 results" to my search yet display only one? Does it mean we have to divide the impressive 121,617,892,992 claimed index web pages by 2,784 to obtain the astoundingly round number of 43,684,588? What are the odds that the result of this division would be an integer number?

    1 out of 2,784.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  7. Very Interesting Privacy Policy by baboonlogic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Privacy Policy:

    Privacy is a hot topic these days, and we want you to feel totally comfortable using our service, so our privacy policy is very simple: when you search with Cuil, we do not collect any personally identifiable information, period. We have no idea who sends queries: not by name, not by IP address, and not by cookies (more on this later). Your search history is your business, not ours.

    Way to go!

  8. Oh please... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't blame Google for using job market and IT industry supply and demand forces to fill whatever positions they need.

    Google found a niche, exploited it for all what is worth, and are so efficient at it that they can allow themselves to get the best talent money can buy.

    Please grow up, that is how a job market is supposed to work. If the rest of the IT industry can't come with innovative ideas good enough to attract new investment and bright people, it is hardly Google's fault.

    When Google comes crashing (yeah, we know, all companies do, thanks for the insight genius) it will be for more important reasons than treating well, even lavishly, their employees.

    At the moment it seems to be working, so I really don't see why they should change. I am not saying that all companies should provide whatever Google provides, but I am sure that morale in many companies would be increased immeasurably if they put a few pool tables around and some comfy sofas were to nap or to have a chat.

    Most companies forget their employees are human and that it is important to give a degree of human empathy to your employees.

    When the bad times come all those extras can be taken away, but to do so at a time when business is brisk is nonsense. It just shows why they are billionaires and some around here are unsatisfied middle managers or angry technicians.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  9. Re:Tried it by etnoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like the search engine associates weird images with the search results. I tried googling for my full name, found my blog alright, but what the heck? I get an image with the text "My sucess with Scientology" together with the search result. I am not a scientologist, and haven't even mentioned the cult on the blog.
    Makes me distrust the search engine...

    --
    Quantum hacker.
  10. Cannot sensibly deal with multiple terms by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A search for western hindu in google gives:
    • Hindunet: The Hindu Universe: Western followers of Hinduism
    • A Vision for Hinduism: Beyond Hindu Nationalism - Google Books Result
    • IngentaConnect Hindu Medical Practice in Sixteenth-Century Western ...

    On cuili we get:

    • Western ~ National Gazette
    • CNN.com - Many Chinese want Western companies to be ...
    • Typhoon in western Japan forces 300 households to ...

    Google gives much more relevant hits

  11. Their real failure was chosing a nonverbable noun. by Delzuma · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do they really think "Cuil that for me" and "Did you cuil Jon Katz" lately is going to take off? Right off the bat I would have gone with Plex. Hell, "Plex: it's what's next", rolls off the tongue. Same for "After Google there's Plex". Anyway if they really want to take over Google they have to consider how to enter the modern lexicon and Cuil just isn't going to cut it. Today John McCain announced he was learning how to use the Cuil. nope.