Slashdot Mirror


GENI To Replace Internet, Gets $12M Funding

Postglobalism writes "A massive project to redesign and rebuild the Internet from scratch is inching along with $12 million in government funding and donations of network capacity by two major research organizations. Many researchers want to rethink the Internet's underlying architecture, saying a 'clean-slate' approach is the only way to truly address security and other challenges that have cropped up since the Internet's birth in 1969."

14 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Do we have enough...? by oahazmatt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do we have enough porn for an entirely new Internet?

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:Do we have enough...? by argent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Porn is not a problem. We have the technology. We can rebuild it.

    2. Re:Do we have enough...? by Palidase · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do we have enough porn for an entirely new Internet?

      If you build it, they will.... It's just too easy.

    3. Re:Do we have enough...? by strelitsa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not rebuild it - erect it.

      (snicker, snort)

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
  2. Translation: by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They need to ditch this open, uncontrollable Internet for something the governments have more control over.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Translation: by crescente · · Score: 5, Funny

      New internet has DRM built in! It's for your own protection. Really.

  3. Inertia by Sancho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For better or worse, I think that we're stuck with what we've got. We'd really be better off improving the Internet we have (DNSSEC, end-to-end encryption on all protocols by default, PKI for the masses) than redesigning it from the ground up.

  4. Won't ever happen by dlgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, once you read past the sensationalist headlines, the article just says that they are establishing a very high capacity research network to study new protocols, not trying to create a parallel infrastructure. However, that being said, trying to redesign the Internet's protocols from scratch isn't necessarily a bad idea, the current model is definitely showing its age. For example, TCP has a lot of issues on links with large bandwidth-delay products, resulting in lots of extensions and forks to support these links.

    The real problem is getting a critical mass to switch. Just look at the state of IPv6 support in home networking gear and the lack of implementation all over the web. My guess is that this will lead to some new standards that will maybe be used by people doing experiments with tons of data and nobody else. Don't expect to see this work coming to a router near you.

    1. Re:Won't ever happen by dlgeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      The grant is from the NSF, not the DoD which implies it is more scientific in nature.

      However, even if it was from the DoD or NSA, the government has a strong interest in improving US users' security, so as to protect US companies from foreign espionage. Look at the NSA's contribution to various crypto algorithms (agreed upon by the security community as positive) or to SELinux.

  5. Think of the rainforests by AsciiNaut · · Score: 5, Funny

    Typical. I've only just finished printing out the current Internet.

  6. Schedule a switch date now by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alright, you guys make this whole "new internet" thing, and we're you're done we'll just all switch to it all at the same time OK? We just need to schedule a date for when to switch to that new Internet thing. We should do it during a quiet time of the year, the month of December sounds appropriate, and I reckon it should take you guys quite a few years..

    How does December 21st, 2012 sound? I have nothing in my schedule for *that* day... Too apocalyptic maybe?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Schedule a switch date now by LaminatorX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm actually expecting to be pretty busy on the 21st, but my calendar's completely blank thereafter.

  7. Re:Stronger, Harder, Deeper, Faster by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A new and 'better' internet?

    I'm gonna go out on a limb here, and guess this 'new' more 'secure' internet will not allow for any type of anonymity, and more ease of tracking who says what and when in a more easily searched and archived format...both for government AND corporations.

    After all, the current internet, for some reason, seems not to have been designed with big business commerce nor strict government control. Something that obviously (rolls eyes) needs to be fixed the 2nd time around.

    I mean...the nerve of people getting on a system, where every computer is a peer, and can publish their thoughts willy-nilly and interconnect in ways not expressedly sanctioned by our government officials that obviously know what's better and safer for us.

    Not to mention how it is often used now to closely monitor and poke fun at said officials...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. Re:Stronger, Harder, Deeper, Faster by 12AU7A · · Score: 5, Interesting

        It's really easy to talk like that, but look at CB verses Ham Radio. The Internet we have today is like CB radio...anyone can transmit and receive. CB radio has its advantages and disadvantages. More serious radio users got into ham radio where users were more serious about radio communications, you were identified by a license, and it was highly regulated by the government. With the regulation came improved communications.

        CB is good for some, ham radio good for others. So too with this. They should have a general Internet like the noisy CB band, and the other Internet with more regulation and better communications.