Slashdot Mirror


Apparent Suicide In Anthrax Case

penguin_dance passes along the news that a respected anthrax researcher, about to be indicted, has committed suicide. The FBI has been investigating the case since anthrax-contaminated letters were sent to the media and various politicians in 2001. The AP's coverage mentions that prosecutors intended to seek the death penalty. The suicide was not the one you might imagine if you've been following the story. "A top government scientist who helped the FBI analyze samples from the 2001 anthrax attacks has died in Maryland from an apparent suicide, just as the Justice Department was about to file criminal charges against him for the attacks, the Los Angeles Times has learned. Bruce E. Ivins, 62, who for the last 18 years worked at the government's elite biodefense research laboratories at Ft. Detrick, Md., had been informed of his impending prosecution... The extraordinary turn of events followed the government's payment in June of a settlement valued at $5.82 million to a former government scientist, Steven J. Hatfill, who was long targeted as the FBI's chief suspect despite a lack of any evidence that he had ever possessed anthrax."

9 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Even more to ponder on this by Jeff1946 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Salon has a updated story today http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/
    relating to false information provided to ABC news early on about the investigation. Really makes you wonder what was going on here.

  2. Re:Motive? by NorQue · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some of these Questions are kind of answered in this article: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html It's the same as with Saddam Husseins WMDs or his link Al Quaida. Your Government and your Media lied to you.

  3. Re:How do you spell, TERRORIST? by faloi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actualy... No.

    However, when Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont announced in May 2001 that he was leaving the Republican caucus to become an independent and would caucus with Democrats, this returned control of the body to the Democrats and Daschle again became Majority Leader.

    He was the Majority Leader during the anthrax attack because a Republican changed party affiliation and Daschle was the leader.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  4. Re:Motive? by revmf · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the AP story, they suspect he was trying to test his vaccine.

  5. Re:Oh, the irony by Whorhay · · Score: 2, Informative

    What amazes me about that incident is that he had the time to do all of that. The article I read earlier today seemed to indicate that the other passengers noticed what was going on almost immediately and hustled off the bus pretty fast. But apparently no one tried to stop him from continuing his violence against that victim. They found weapons with which to keep him contained on the bus until the authorities arrived but there was no indication of anyone trying to stop him when he actually was in the act of killing that person.

  6. Re:in this thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Funny to see circletimessquare saying this, a rabid supporter of Bush policies and doctrine. Of course, the "government" did not do it. Except the anthrax was a strain held only by the government. Of course, Bush had no hand in it. Except the targets of the terrorist attacks (the media and those who were against Bush's power grab) benefited Bush. I wish Bush, immediately on assuming power in January 2001, had not dismantled the anti-terrorism apparatus Bill Clinton had put in place. We might not have had to endure 9/11. The Bush administration decision to funnel $40 million dollars to Afghanistan in the early months of his administration is also something I wish he had not done. Diverting our forces to Iraq instead of finishing the job in Afghanistan, that would be something I think most of us wish for. George Bush should tell us who was in his energy meetings in 2001. Seems things changed in the energy market between then and now. Under Clinton gas was $1.50 per gallon and better. Under Bush, we get $3.75 per gallon and worse. I think I know who did not sell us out to the oil interests.

    The use of the Anthrax terrorist attacks to push forward foolhardy Bush policy (the invasion and occupation of Iraq, among others) needs greater scrutiny, especially the media complicity:

    Much more important than the general attempt to link the anthrax to Islamic terrorists, there was a specific intent -- indispensably aided by ABC News -- to link the anthrax attacks to Iraq and Saddam Hussein. In my view, and I've written about this several times and in great detail to no avail, the role played by ABC News in this episode is the single greatest, unresolved media scandal of this decade. [...]

    During the last week of October, 2001, ABC News, led by Brian Ross, continuously trumpeted the claim as their top news story that government tests conducted on the anthrax -- tests conducted at Ft. Detrick -- revealed that the anthrax sent to Daschele contained the chemical additive known as bentonite. ABC News, including Peter Jennings, repeatedly claimed that the presence of bentonite in the anthrax was compelling evidence that Iraq was responsible for the attacks, since -- as ABC variously claimed -- bentonite "is a trademark of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's biological weapons program" and "only one country, Iraq, has used bentonite to produce biological weapons."

    ABC News' claim -- which they said came at first from "three well-placed but separate sources," followed by "four well-placed and separate sources" -- was completely false from the beginning. There never was any bentonite detected in the anthrax

    ABC News did not acknowledge its false claim until six years later, in 2007. ABC News has failed to inform the public from where it got its false information. One need only look to the Bush administration to see who ABC News is protecting.

  7. Re:Prepare a press leak, Smitty, we have a patsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The contention is that he committed suicide by overdosing on Tylenol w/codeine. If so, he must have taken a fistful of pills, thus destroying his liver with the acetaminophen. Is it possible to ingest a lethal dose of codeine?

  8. Re:Oh, the irony by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Informative

    They got the things to use as weapons from a passing trucker who stopped, it's likely no one had anything with them on the bus.

    Anyway, I don't know if they knew it at the time, but it's not likely confronting him right away would have changed anything. It doesn't take too many stabs to the chest with a hunting knife to kill someone.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  9. Re:Motive? by Ardipithecus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ivins was under treatment for depression, with suicidal tendencies, and had just been institutionalized; not done for folks who are merely sad. Serious talk of suicide with a therapist will get you right in the hospital. Removed from the lab by cops and family and under a restraining order from a coworker. Beyond geeky /. behavior.

    It is quite possible for someone highly depressed to continue functioning in technical professions ("I've heard").

    He was already a suicide risk. Whether prompted by the possibility of disgrace or by an "I can get out of all this bs" moment, we'll never know.

    "Mentally ill" is well within the ballpark.