Slashdot Mirror


China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Websites

krou sends in a Guardian (UK) article reporting that overnight talks with the International Olympic Committee have resulted in the Chinese government lifting a ban on websites such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the BBC Chinese language service "in Beijing, Shanghai and possibly further afield." Websites with information on the Falun Gong, Chinese dissidents, the Tibetan government in exile, and the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests are still inaccessible. (We've been discussing Chinese Olympic censorship right along.) Quoting: "A spokesman for Amnesty International said: 'It's good news that our site has been unblocked in Olympic venues and perhaps elsewhere in Beijing, but it is still a long way from the "complete media freedom" promised. It seems public outrage has succeeded where the IOC's "quiet diplomacy" had failed.' Chinese engineers quoted in an article in the Atlantic Monthly said they had been told to prepare to unblock access for a list of specific internet protocol addresses to used by foreign visitors. But Andrew Lih, a new media author in Beijing, said it seemed the authorities might have simply decided it was easier to lift blocks for everyone. 'It's possible [to block individual locations] but would be very complicated,' he said."

133 comments

  1. U-Turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

    1. Re:U-Turn? by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

      So that's more like a L-turn then?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:U-Turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bent like a wonton, I'd say...

    3. Re:U-Turn? by databyss · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you mean?

      We've always been at war with the Eurasians.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    4. Re:U-Turn? by angryfirelord · · Score: 0

      So that's more like a L-turn then?

      Or an R-turn done three times?

    5. Re:U-Turn? by mrboyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come the end of the game and everyone will see it's just a roundabout...

    6. Re:U-Turn? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank you for admitting that China is a rightwing paradise, the kind everyone is heading for by letting corporate mafiosos control our countries.

      And for admitting that freedom is "left" of that kind of fascism on the political spectrum.

      Anonymous Cowards have their uses, even if they don't realize it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:U-Turn? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      So do Docs. But posting isn't one of them.

    8. Re:U-Turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's no turn at all, the ban will be back as soon as the olympic games end. This is a minor PR move which has no long-term effect. I mean come on, we've seen complete bans on entire genres of media this year in China. Is that all okay because a couple of wankers from the west are allowed to freely browse during the olympics?

      This is really irresponsible reporting.

    9. Re:U-Turn? by Luke_22 · · Score: 1

      Not even a hard left, imho.
      My father was in China some time ago, he said internet for business tuorists like him was "normal", but if you went out of your hotel, you started to have lots of restrictions.
      I think it's the same here. Internet will be "semi-free" just for tourists, and -obviously- just for the olimpic games...

      in short, nothing new...

      --
      "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I said I didn't know." -- Mark Twain
    10. Re:U-Turn? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

      What about a big T for Totalitarian state.

      The whole Olympic torch relay really summed it up, armed guards protecting the torch from protesters around the world showing the true face of authority in China, a group of thugs prepared to put down anyone or anything that gets in their way. Meanwhile our companies undermine what little democracy and freedom we have remaining with outsourcing and business policies that validate the way the Chinese government conducts it's affairs. This whole Olympics is a farce, but I doubt you will see America or anyone else for that matter boycott it, as they should.

      Politicians carry on about saving the face of the Chinese Government as being a way for them to change which is bullshit. Everything they do is covered by a thin veneer of politeness that covers systemic brutality and oppression. "Sure you can protest at the Olympics" if you apply in person, 5 days in advance and if you are a foreigner you have to apply in Chinese. Any vestige of Left is long gone and replaced by the deception of the worldwide criminal plutocracy, where owning the game IS the game. Meanwhile the Chinese government rely on politeness to manipulate the whole world while they mock our rapidly dwindling freedom.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  2. What better way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What better way to nail subversives ?

    Let them convict themselves by allowing that whicvh is is deemed illegal in China ?
    The Historical approach..

  3. Interesting... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't they say they were going to spy on visitors' traffic too? Nothing about that here, maybe they're hoping we'll forget.

    If I was going, I'd take tor with me on my laptop. Also I'd buy a laptop first.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      If I was going, I'd take a laptop, get Tor, a few packet sniffers, and a spare router an analyze the thing. Then probably post a script that DoSes the firewall.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Interesting... by cshake · · Score: 1

      Let's worry about the US gov't taps on any data going through the backbones they have access to, which is any traffic through North America.
      If anyone sends any sort of sensitive data, anywhere in the world, it should be encrypted.

    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      American visitor dies in a robbery.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god the internet-user of the west is never spied on at home...

    5. Re:Interesting... by ashleyv · · Score: 1

      I agree, sounds like a slight L turn at best. I sure get plenty of their folks on my site. I was there last year, couldn't believe how many people gave me their email address (dying for someone to link with). Ash

      --
      ashley http://www.flowerpaintingsonline.com/
    6. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want secrecy, use pigeon.

  4. I confirm it! by vivaoporto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right now I'm browsing the sites mentioned on TFA and nothing happ&/"$%& NO CARRIER

    1. Re:I confirm it! by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      Who do you think you are? Netcraft?

      --
      +0 Meh
  5. For foreign vistors only during the olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe these useless reporters could do some real investigative reporting on dissent treatment while they are there and see how long it takes the hammer to come down rather than the useless nationalist sporting nonsense.

    1. Re:For foreign vistors only during the olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few reporters will actually do anything to get them in hot water. Especially in a place like China.

  6. More Accurately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

    Title is way too optimistic.

    1. Re:More Accurately by Kleinbottler · · Score: 4, Informative

      China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

      Title is way too optimistic.

      Totally agree. As an expat Beijing resident with press connections the story moves by the day. Bottom line is that while generally open at the moment (i.e. in the Olympic press center) there are still sites that are blocked including a China blog at a major US news outlet. The Chinese generally allow VPN but if you go to certain sites you will still be stopped. Free proxy servers are tissue paper and generally not useful. The authorities, from observation and experience, can and do target individual computers. The Chinese are getting cleverer and more subtle at "shaping" the internet landscape and where you can go. Overall bottom line is that whatever little concessions might be made to the press center users the control of internet access will get worse not better. People who give credit to the Chinese for the access they have allowed are living in lalaland. The Chinese are grudging every concession and reneging whenever they can.

  7. Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean people actually doing something had more effect than other people talking about doing something? Color me shocked.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by jo42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      China's Olympic ambitions falter with protests
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080802/ap_on_re_as/china_battered_hopes

      said Wu Jiaxiang, a former government researcher and now a blogger and businessman. "We care less about human rights than other countries and more about sovereignty. That's bound to create an awkward feeling among other countries."

      They just don't get it, do they...

    2. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      epic fail, to be sure.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    3. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by operagost · · Score: 1

      In other news, Wu Jiaxiang was found dead in his apartment today; an apparent suicide.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by corbettw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Every single one of the Chinese interviewed for that article needs to take a ride on the Waaaahmbulance. "Oh no, other countries are criticizing us, they don't like us, who's going to take us the prom now?" An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful.

      No one forced them to host the Olympics, no one forced them to open their borders to our media (and our disdain). The only good thing I can say about the Chinese at this point is, at least they're not Muslims, because then they'd be burning down embassies and strapping bombs to their chests.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Every single one of the Chinese interviewed for that article needs to take a ride on the Waaaahmbulance. "Oh no, other countries are criticizing us, they don't like us, who's going to take us the prom now?" An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful.

      Don't you think for a second that the communist party made sure no one who didn't perfectly toe the party line would be interviewed???

      Unless there is **TOTAL** freedom of speech, not a single statement by anyone in China can be trusted.

    6. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, you're confused. The suicide was in the USA, something about anthrax...

    7. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In the wake of the tragic earthquake that hit China, I'd be tempted to go a little easier on China during the games. But now the government is using bribery and intimidation by the police to try to silence the parents of those children killed by faulty school construction.

      I can't imagine any worse torture than that. Your child was killed by a substandard building, put up by a corrupt government. And every month, you get a cash payment, a pension that reminds you of that fact. And it reminds you that instead of seeking justice, instead of standing up for what was right and for your child, you've taken the easy way out. Maybe you're a good citizen, but by signing that form, you've admitted you've abandoned all attempts to be a good parent. I mean, I would want my parents to move on past my death, but I wouldn't want them to be bought off either, I'd want them to tell the government "hey, fuck you buddy". And if I lost a child, I'd want to fight to fix whatever led to that, not just sit there in silence. I don't know. I'd like to think that's what I'd do, anyway, but with a whole nation telling me to be silent, would I have the strength?

      I don't know the answer, but this just makes me despise the Chinese government with a renewed passion. And for anyone who cares to stand up and protest this while the Olympics are happening- for the Chinese government's attempt to paint a big happy face over all its atrocities and indecencies against its people and against the human condition, I applaud you, and I wish you well.

    8. Re:Public outrage trumps diplomacy? by invalid_user · · Score: 1

      An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful... (...) ... The only good thing I can say about the Chinese at this point is, at least they're not Muslims, because then they'd be burning down embassies and strapping bombs to their chests.

      Very insightful.

      I have been spending much thoughts as well comparing the Muslims with the Chinese. Both have a gripe with the west. Both have an education that imprints on their citizens/believers on how the west and others (in the case of china, Japan; in the case of Muslims, Israel) are to be blamed for their people's situation.

      Nevertheless, one big difference between these two peoples is that the Chinese believes in reciprocity and is eager to be integrated. On the other hand, Muslims completely lack understanding of reciprocity, and have no intention to align themselves with the world, believing that the world should all hail their superior culture instead. (And what a "culture" that is!)

  8. Phooey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Andrew Lih, a new media author in Beijing, said it seemed the authorities might have simply decided it was easier to lift blocks for everyone. 'It's possible [to block individual locations] but would be very complicated,' he said."

    So, in other words, we'd do it if we could but we can't.

  9. Makes little difference by eebra82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sincerely hope that the Olympic Committee doesn't think this is a major success. As long as China remains blocking web sites and other types of censorship, they should be banned from ever setting up the Olympic Games while such governing is taking place.

    I'm looking forward to the Olympic Games in North Korea 2012. Apparently, Kim Jong Il is expected to beat 52 world records.

    1. Re:Makes little difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olympics 2012 will be in London, not N.Korea.

    2. Re:Makes little difference by negRo_slim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I am full of hope for the armored train races. I maintain a good outlook that Kim shall triumph over his competitors.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:Makes little difference by abstract+daddy · · Score: 1

      Woosh.

    4. Re:Makes little difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about North Korea as if it has any kind of resamblence to China just achieves one thing. It helps us all realize how clueless and uneducated you are. United Wankers of the West, manipulated by the free press :) How ironic is that...

    5. Re:Makes little difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the logic here. What does this web site blocking which is irrelevant to Olympic has something to do with Olympic?

      Let me guess. Someone is so nervous about something that is not under their control and understand. Or losing the competition with China?

      Welcome to to new World!

    6. Re:Makes little difference by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      That's cos we have more CCTV cameras in London than N.Korea.

  10. BOYCOTT THE OLYMPICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Tibet!

    1. Re:BOYCOTT THE OLYMPICS by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      See, here is the thing. If we boycott the Olympics, we end up ignoring the major human rights violations. Sure, the Chinese government may end up getting a tad richer, but if some US press person realizes that the Internet there in China is filtered, they might report about it on national news, then some guy who is high ranking realizes that that is what the ISPs here in the US are doing, therefore, in order to not seem like the Chinese government, they end up stop blocking BT/Usenet, everyone wins.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:BOYCOTT THE OLYMPICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're so right. Look how attendance at the Berlin Olympics stopped Hitler right in his tracks. Why, the British and American press was positively awash with descriptions of Nazi abuses.

      N.B. Godwin is not a law of physics. And if you ask, "How does the free world react to an oppressive regime putting on a dazzling global event?" then 1936 is your best answer, and can be summarised as "it enjoys the show".

    3. Re:BOYCOTT THE OLYMPICS by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Sold!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:BOYCOTT THE OLYMPICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK TIBET AND FUCK YOU!!!!!

      I sick you you tibet cunts crying all the time.

      fuck off back to your gutter

  11. Chinese Government to populous: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We are no longer filtering Western propaganda. We want to show you how corrupt the Westerners are and how they lie.

    We are a peace loving people who love freedom and human rights. The Western Countries are saying bad things about us because they want to keep us down.

    Now, considering how nationalistic the Chinese folks are and how they consider that they should in fact rule the World, and the PC folks out there who are offended easily (they like it because they like to bully people), I expect this post to be modded down into oblivion. See current issue of the New Yorker for an article regarding the Chinese (especially younger folk's) attitude.

    1. Re:Chinese Government to populous: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nationalistic pricks who would enjoy ruling the world? Man, you're confused, this article is about the Beijing Olympics, not the Atlanta ones. Get one with your times... duh...

      "The Western Countries are saying bad things about us because they want to keep us down."

      If you really find this sentence ridiculous, then you're a tool. And the sad thing about a tool in a free society is that nobody will eve be able to help you.

      Kill yourself, now.

    2. Re:Chinese Government to populous: by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      Nyoro~n :(

      ...waits for negative moderation...

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    3. Re:Chinese Government to populous: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trollerskates.

  12. How to Lift a Ban For Commies by Nymz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Ban 1000s of websites
    2) Unban 3 of them
    3) Claim the ban is lifted, as the other sites are only inaccessible
    4) Fail!!!

    Note: for those not familiar with the pun - For Dummies

    1. Re:How to Lift a Ban For Commies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Ban 1000s of websites
      2) Unban 3 of them
      3) Claim the ban is lifted, as the other sites are only inaccessible
      4) Profit!

  13. Tempest in a teapot by mu11ing1t0ver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

    1. Re:Tempest in a teapot by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      iptables -A OUTPUT -s x.x.x.x/x -d x.x.x.x/x -j DROP

      The above seems to work just fine, granted this is iptables but I would be very disappointed in CISCO if their switches/routers/firewalls couldn't support something as simple this. Makes me wonder if 'engineers' are just making up the difficulty level because they too are tired of this...

    2. Re:Tempest in a teapot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, my mother taught me how to setup a VPN. She did that by talking in a language she and a friend on-line made up so that nobody would understand them. She got her friend to setup a VPN with her and now I hope I am old enough to be able to understand concepts such as VPN and SSH.
      </sarcasm_for_dummies>

  14. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see how Falungong or dalailama has anything to do with Olympics. Come on people, watch the sports! Stop bullshitting about politics.

    1. Re:What's the point? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      AC: I don't see how Falungong or dalailama has anything to do with Olympics. Come on people, watch the sports! Stop bullshitting about politics.

      If you don't see the connection between the Olympics and politics, then I'd be surprised if you had ever paid attention to the Olympics at all.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spoken in true chinaman style

  15. Why Tor? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Chinese firewall doesn't block encrypted traffic. A far superior solution is to simply VPN to somewhere. That's what I do when traveling if I am in any location that I don't completely trust (airport or hotel network for example). I SSH to a server I have at home and tunnel traffic through the connection. It is then as though I was surfing at my house.

    1. Re:Why Tor? by slashgrim · · Score: 0

      Yes, because encryption has never been broken. /sarcasm

    2. Re:Why Tor? by The+FNP · · Score: 1

      yeah, but OpenSSH allows you to pick your desired key length, so if you're using your own setup it can be as secure as possible assuming customs didn't install a keylogger, or even notice your Linux partition.

      --The FNP

    3. Re:Why Tor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't buy a house in China.

    4. Re:Why Tor? by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use XP. I've used a VPN connection (using it as my default gateway) from Shanghai to Houston. But browsing the web is much faster through a strait RDP session back to my desktop.

      You would think screen refreshes would take more bandwidth then redirecting HTTP requests, but that doesn't seem to be the case in my experience.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Why Tor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is most likely latency. It can take quite a few separate requests to load a modern, complex web page, so whereas over RDP it effectively instantly renders, then transmits the final document, over VPN, it has to make several requests (which most likely have huge latency, so add significant delay) before it can finish rendering.

      Just a tip: I used to use RDP until I tried FreeNX on Linux. A much more pleasant browsing experience.

  16. consistent inconsistencies by Cheeze · · Score: 1

    At least they are being consistent about being inconsistent.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  17. Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by jopsen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

    The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

    1. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by pxlmusic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    2. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      seriously?

      i guess i shouldn't be surprised, though.

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    3. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is that the average Chinese doesn't care. China is like a mix of 1984 and Brave New World. There are strict laws, and people are too caught up in the high life of capitalism to pay attention.

    4. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by lumierang · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

      The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

      The ordinary citizens in China (at least those over 20) know quite well what happened on Tiananmen in 1989,just talk to any Chinese cab driver.

      Most Chinese don't think it has much relevance to today's business. While they agree the government in 1989 committed horrible crimes, hell it is two decades ago and both China and Chinese government has changed a lot. Most of Chinese are happy with the current government.

      As for Tiananmen square most think it will resolve over time . Even a lot of 1989 demostrators support the Chinese government.Here is an interesting interview.

      Here I quote the most relevent part

      " Q. But what Deng achieved - could he not have done it within a more democratic system? Did there have to be the ruthlessness?

      After going to the US for five or six years, I saw that the level of democracy there can only happen in a society with a certain level of education. What the people of China now need is leadership. China is one century behind the US, and you canâ(TM)t expect us to change that fast.

      This is why many Asians resent it when Americans try to insist that the Chinese adopt their style of democracy. Shanghai may be ready, but if you go out to the surrounding areas, youâ(TM)ll see it just isnâ(TM)t possible, that it will take more time. I believe that one day, China will have Taiwan-style democracy, but it has to be built on a strong economy.

      Q. I agree that Western-style democracy isnâ(TM)t right for China today. But canâ(TM)t there be a compromise? Canâ(TM)t the government be strong, without tolerating abuse of the poor by corrupt officials, without tolerating the marginalization of AIDS victims, without arresting kids who write about government reform on the Internet?

      The way we view human rights is so different from the Westâ(TM)s. We have 1.3 billion people and many of them go hungry. Putting food on the table and a roof over its peopleâ(TM)s heads is what our government has to worry about. AIDS, corruption, the Internet - that is all secondary to the leadership of 1.3 billion people. If I were running China today, I would not be able to hear all the different parties. I would have to have my own agenda and stick to that agenda. I believe that if a secret vote were held today most people in China would vote for the CCP.

      For more than 150 years, starting with the Opium Wars, our national pride has been bullied by the Europeans, the Russians, then the Japanese. Now China is an economic and a military power. And it has no intentions of being aggressive. So I am not giving up my Chinese citizenship. Ten years ago I would have jumped to do that.

      Looking back, I firmly believe the government did the right thing, though they could have handled it better. We paid a high price. Our leaders in 1989 could have shown greater human skills and greater negotiating skills. But letâ(TM)s live with Communism for now and change things one thing at a time. The Chinese now have a much better life than they did 100 years ago. Not so long ago, my house was the first in our hutong to have a television set. The whole neighborhood would come to our backyard and sit on the ground to watch. It was just a 9-inch TV, and we put a la

    5. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      I would argue that anyone who's in their early teens during '89 knows well what happened (I was). Quite frankly, now a day with the economic opportunity everywhere, few CARE TO REMEMBER (unfortunately). Many would argue that it was an unorganized uprising of bunch of young hot heads doomed to fail. Human right is important, but most Chinese, I would sadly argue, do not hold it nearly in such high places as the west does.

      You are right though, average citizen doesn't know what VPN is. Then again, same situation in US.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    6. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm ordinary Chinese surrounding with countless ordinary Chinese. Guess what? We all believe Westerner are brain washed by their media. We know exactly what happened in TianAnMen. No one supports it now. And why do ordinary Chinese want to read English web site? You want to read Chinese web?

      I can get more world news in China TV than that from CNN. Who has blocked more?

    7. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by freakxx · · Score: 1

      "Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk...."

      Why don't you use Firefox? I think, Firefox-3 is pretty cool and you must give it a try. It also highlights spelling mistakes like "og".

    8. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Which makes it easier to tag and pay even closer attempt to those that *do* use VPN's

    9. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by Daemonax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not actually true. I'm currently living in southern China, and the common people know what happened... The problem is that it's a social taboo to mention it, they're scared to talk about it, and they'll get angry if a foreigner brings it up and reminds them. It's a rather sad state of affairs, but I have met some people here that are very critical of the current situation with regards to freedom of speech and are willing to talk about the problems the country has. It's a shame that the common people won't talk about it though. They say they love their country, but I don't think they know what that really means. I myself love China, I love the people, the food, the mountains, the rivers, the old buildings and lots more... But there are problems with China, and I hope they'll be fixed soon.

    10. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by nairbv · · Score: 1

      You're right that the average Chinese citizen can't VPN out. Not only do they not know how, but they don't have a box in the US to VPN to, don't realize what site it is they're missing, and possibly can't even read the English on the site anyways.

      BUT, I've been living here for a year studying Chinese, and most of the Chinese people I've talked to DO know what happened in 1989. I mean, it wasn't even all that long ago. People would remember that kind of stuff, even if it wasn't discussed in their schools. I do get the impression that it is in fact discussed in schools, though I'm sure their spin on it is a bit different then ours.

    11. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1

      I'm living in China right now. I just asked my 23 year old Chinese girlfriend if most people know about the Tiananmen Square riots, and she said "everyone knows, but we don't know the details, like how many people were killed." From my (admittedly short) time living in China, my analysis of Chinese knowledge of their government's actions is this: I think Chinese hear the big stories, like how the Sichuan schools were poorly constructed. On the other hand, they don't hear about all the little things, like how the Chinese government recently gunned down five Uighur "terrorists", or how they sentenced someone who posted pictures of schools that fell in the earthquake to one year of forced labor without a trial, etc, etc.

      Oh, and a lot of the ones I talk to know about proxies, but don't care enough--or are too lazy--to circumvent the firewall. I mean, if you'd never used Wikipedia, then Wikipedia being blocked isn't such a big deal, since you don't know what you're missing. (Wikipedia is just an example, as it has worked in China for a few months now I think.)

      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    12. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the "little stories" are probably not newsworthy as they are common occurrence.

      I admit I haven't heard about the "little things" you mentioned, but regarding the one year imprisonment without trial, I think it's called "re-education through labour", and it's a weird kind of "administrative sanction" which happens always, so it wouldn't be much news to the Chinese people.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    13. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The problem is that ignorant Westerners assume that the Chinese don't know what happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989. First of all, they call it the "June 4 Incident", which as an educated, liberal person, you know already. Second, the generally accepted viewpoint is that the government stepped in and saved Chinese society from dangerous radicals, which of course as an educated person, you know as well. And of course you are well aware that it is not illegal to access blocked websites, the government merely makes it difficult. Do you seriously expect the average Western citizen to be able to educate himself about China, given the total lack of censorship in Western society?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      "og" is the Danish word for "and", sorry about the typo... It's just that when I type too fast some simple words like "and" end up in Danish...

    15. Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      We all believe Westerner are brain washed by their media.

      And westerners believe the Chinese are brainwashed by their media.

      Problem is, we're both right.

  18. its not just the internet by Lilo-x · · Score: 0

    remember the Chinese Government is not just censoring the net, they are censoring every other avenue of the media, you can watch BBC news in China but every now and then it blacks out for 20 minutes when they have cut something they don't agree with,

    the internet in china due to the nature of the internet is a lot harder to moderate so they need to be much more opressive about it and it therefore is much more obvious

    The ties need to be lifted on the mediums that are 100 years old before the net will ever get liberated.

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this is mine
  19. NEWS FLASH: CHINA LISTENS TO WORD by Jacob91 · · Score: 1

    See what a little pressure does to a country in the spotlight.

    all we need now is some way to make the Tiananmen Square "incident" essential to reporting on the games

    maybe that will count for something against the indoctrination of the chinese people

    1. Re:NEWS FLASH: CHINA LISTENS TO WORD by The+FNP · · Score: 1

      All we need is a new Olympic Event -- Tank Pulling. See it's a "sporting event" and I'm sure every foreign reporter could get the parallels. (We may even get some highly memorable "parody" stills.)

      --The FNP

    2. Re:NEWS FLASH: CHINA LISTENS TO WORD by Jacob91 · · Score: 1

      All we need is a new Olympic Event -- Tank Pulling. See it's a "sporting event" and I'm sure every foreign reporter could get the parallels. (We may even get some highly memorable "parody" stills.)

      --The FNP

      or, the "Tank Face Down"

      attire is obviously a suit and briefcase...

      how long will YOU last?

    3. Re:NEWS FLASH: CHINA LISTENS TO WORD by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Maybe, you are indoctrinated.

      Read up on other posts by people who actually have been in China and spoken to the people there.

      Reporting on an incident which is almost history as "news" is just idiotic. It should be on history books, and taught as such, not as a political tool for anybody, including you.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  20. The Dude... by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    The Dude: Walter, the chinaman who peed on my rug, I can't go give him a bill, so what the fuck are you talking about?

    Walter Sobchak: What the fuck are you talking about? The chinaman is not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT... Also, Dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  21. IOC Negotiation Strategy 1a by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Whenever it faces a country big enough, strong enough or mean enough to stand up to it, the brave men of the IOC have a standard negotiation strategy that can best be summed up as "I'll blow you now. You can pay me back later."

    To absolutely nobody's surprise, the IOC is still waiting for its first oral experience that doesn't involve gargling with 3 gallons of Listerine afterward.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  22. Re:What better way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... Must be it. I mean, it couldn't be an host country trying to please the commitee at least a little. There must be some kind of terribly efficient strategy behind all this...

  23. You really think China can break AES? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what SSH (and most VPNs) use. It is the most tested cryptosystem in history. It has been signed off on by, well, everyone pretty much in the crypto field. After years of concerted effort, still no way to break it has been found.

    Now if you want to life in AFDB land, go right ahead. However it seems extremely unlikely that anyone, much less the Chinese government, can break AES. As such, a VPN is a good solution.

    1. Re:You really think China can break AES? by caluml · · Score: 1

      it seems extremely unlikely that anyone, much less the Chinese government, can break AES.

      Why the "much less"? I would put China in the top 5 of countries I would expect to have the ability and desire to have a good go at breaking an algorithm.

    2. Re:You really think China can break AES? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because they are new to the cryptography game and don't have the computing resources of many other countries. It seems extremely unlikely that even the NSA can break AES (given that they've certified it for top secret data) and when it comes to crypto, they are the best in the business. They are to information espionage what the KGB was to physical espionage. If I'd bet on anyone being able to figure out how to break a cryptosystem without anyone else knowing, the NSA would be my bet.

      Regardless, my primary point is I find it extremely unlikely AES has been broken. It is an open algorithm that underwent an exceedingly rigorous selection process. Because of that, it was scrutinized. Once it was selected and made the official AES standard, it then underwent even more. As I said, it's the most tested cryptosystem out there. Thus far, it has held up wonderfully. So basically for a break to happen, there'd have to be a new field of math developed that would allow for some new way of attacking it. That seems very unlikely to happen, and I find it unlikely the MSS have already done so.

    3. Re:You really think China can break AES? by flosofl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they are new to the cryptography game and don't have the computing resources of many other countries.

      Well, these days raw computing power is only one way of breaking crypto. In fact, I'd say that it would be the tool of last resort. Much more common is looking for mathematical flaws in the algorithms. And when it comes to raw talent in mathematics, I'd put China up there at the top of the heap with the NSA.

      Remember that Chinese researchers are the ones that discovered collision weaknesses in MD5 and SHA-1, and then found a computationally low (relatively speaking) method of creating arbitrary collisions with those same algorithms. Yes, they were "just" hash algorithms, but they need to be just as robust as symmetric crypto algorithms. So if there *is* a weakness in AES, I would be willing to bet that the Chinese already know it. (I'm not saying there is, AES should do the job fine over there).

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    4. Re:You really think China can break AES? by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what system is used. Security always comes down to the weakest link. I don't know what OS is predominant but given China's history of piracy I would guess it is Windows. How secure is that?

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  24. Re:What better way? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (1) Allow the entire region freedom online while the Olympics are going on
    (2) Profit!
    (2) Remember which of your own citizens accessed dissedent material,keep tabs on 'em.
    (3) After the Olympics leaves China consult the list of new dissidents.
    (4) Have them quietly made into unpersons.

  25. Sure, The Leopard Can Change it Spots by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, I get it. China feels like it is getting a black eye. So they think they can put makeup on that black eye by suddenly opening access. We're not fooled. They are a censoring country and they're going to stay that way. The Leopard can't change his spots and China is not going to change what they're doing.

    1. Re:Sure, The Leopard Can Change it Spots by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is that western countries desire to be like them. (censorship)

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Sure, The Leopard Can Change it Spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do leopards have to do with The Internet?
      (sorry, I couldn't help myself :)

  26. could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in China it's obvious when a site has been censored. At least in China it's fairly clear when whole domains are/aren't blocked.

    Back in England, there's a two step censorship system, with flagged sites re-routed to a proxy server which may or may not deliver according to specific URL. And if the site is censored, you get a faked 404. It's called Cleanfeed, and it's implemented (via government-backed IWF) by many major ISPs.

    It is claimed that the system is restricted to blocking child pornography, and because no government-backed scheme or Act in Britain has ever been used for a wider purpose than originally intended - such as using the Terrorism Act 2000 to perform stop-and-search or to disperse small groups of protestors - we can be assured that that's how it'll stay. I, for one, sleep safely at night, knowing that the IWF has dozens of employees dedicated to spending their working hours looking at child porn so that no-one else has to. God bless the Queen!

  27. Why is some temporary window dressing important? by quixote9 · · Score: 1

    That's all any of this is. The minute the ad for China -- aka the 2008 Olympics -- is over, it'll be right back to status quo ante.

    And the public outrage won't be any more evident than it was before. It's only one billion or so PRC citizens being kept in the dark, not several hundred reporters.

  28. Pressure Works by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    This small advance for freedom (for some privileged people) in a tiny sector of China (in Beijing) for a brief, extraordinary period (while the whole world is watching) is better than nothing. And it's the result of pressure on China's mafia government by people who expect freedom, and won't accept less. Not even in a tiny sector for a brief, extraordinary period.

    This tiny victory might not last long at all. But it does prove that there's at least one way it can be done.

    Now the harder part is finding the other ways. For everyone, everywhere in China. That last.

    The proof of concept, though, is the hole in the balloon. Better than nothing, and perhaps the window into a future with the whole jail's walls down.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Pressure Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China's "mafia" government has been killing a whole lot less people lately than the U.S. You are a hypocrite of the worse sort.

    2. Re:Pressure Works by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, I have done quite a lot to stop both China's mafia government and the US mafia government. One doesn't cancel the other: they each make it twice as bad.

      What have you done to stop either, other than whine about the US mafia government (as a lame excuse for China's mafia government)? Anonymous hypocrite Coward.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Pressure Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One doesn't cancel the other: they each make it twice as bad.

      Not "twice" as bad. At the moment, the U.S. is ten times, perhaps one hundred times, worse than China -- if you go by recent body counts. If there is an ultimate definition of evil, the U.S. is far closer to it.

    4. Re:Pressure Works by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

      As I said, one doesn't cancel the other. "Twice" is obviously not a mathematical expression in that statement. And there aren't real body counts in either China's or the US' mass murders.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  29. wish I have mod points by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    +1 on Informative

    When I lived in China from 2003-06, I felt that every social issue there is so intrigue and inter-related that there's simply no solution than to wait out for population to shrink and grow economically prosperous on average. People I talked to about this issue generally have contradictory feelings -- on one hand they like the idea of "democracy" -- on the other they don't think it is the solution for China; they could point out failed examples like Mexico, India, Russia (under Yeltsin,) Philippines, Thai, eastern European countries, ... or maybe the US political system (long before Bush). In short democracy is good on principles but does not do much better on what the people found really matter -- quality of life, jobs, education, health care -- than China's current way of doing things.

    Given that there is no fool-proved democratic system for China's problems and full freedom in expression will eventually lead to call for democracy -- because it is always easier to motivate the disadvantageous mass on some bright promises (ref. to US elections) -- so people generally feel the currently level of control is OK even though they don't like it much.

    These are just some of contractions in China, like all other issues.

    1. Re:wish I have mod points by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      People I talked to about this issue generally have contradictory feelings -- on one hand they like the idea of "democracy" -- on the other they don't think it is the solution for China; they could point out failed examples like Mexico, India, Russia (under Yeltsin,) Philippines, Thai, eastern European countries, ... or maybe the US political system (long before Bush). In short democracy is good on principles but does not do much better on what the people found really matter -- quality of life, jobs, education, health care

      Democracy is absolutely dependent on an educated populace. When people are illiterate and have no access to balanced information that shows both the good points and the bad points, it is totally illusory to think that Democracy may flourish.

      Furthermore, there is the question of national characters and attitude. You mention the Philippines as a failure; why did the Philippines fail as a democracy, given that it's constitution is a carbon-copy of the American constitution! Surely, by now, the Philippines would have enjoyed tremenduous prosperity by now, yet it is dismally wallowing in the Turd-World country club. The reason, of course, is that the mentality of the people. The Philippines have been bludgeoned for three centuries by the spanish into becoming a scatholic country, and then the anglo-saxons par excellence impose an anglo-saxon (read: protestant) constitution on them. The effort was doomed to failure from the start, as scatholics do not believe in personal responsibility the way protestants do.

    2. Re:wish I have mod points by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Democracy is absolutely dependent on an educated populace. When people are illiterate and have no access to balanced information that shows both the good points and the bad points, it is totally illusory to think that Democracy may flourish.

      Agree with this.

      The Philippines have been bludgeoned for three centuries by the spanish into becoming a scatholic country

      not quite agree with this. at most, just a small excuse. you already provided most of the reason for the Philippines in your first paragraph.

    3. Re:wish I have mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is a failed democracy now?

      Really?

    4. Re:wish I have mod points by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But are the scatholics[sic] raging bigots like you are?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  30. Groovy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means that all that needs to be done is for Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the BBC Chinese language service to immediately and constantly start showing scenes of Falun Gong, Chinese dissidents, the Tibetan government in exile, and the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests.

  31. You are all naive by Hackerlish · · Score: 1

    If you haven't already noticed, China has a habit of promising not to do something, then going and doing it anyway. What makes you think this time is any different? It'd be just like them to turn it off anyway just before the games start.

    It's amazing how easily Western politicians and bureaucrats are duped.

    1. Re:You are all naive by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      In fact, my impression of the habit of the Chinese government (in the past, say, 30 years) is that they usually deliver what they promised.

      I really can't say the same of western politicians.

      Prove me wrong?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  32. Hook, Line and Sinker by Hackerlish · · Score: 1

    Proof. So there you go. Slashdot runs an article announcing China has lifted the ban, Slasdotters swallow it and then...
    "But the IOC warned that while these sites may be accessible to journalists in Beijing, the rest of the country would still be subject to China's filtered version of the Internet. Additionally, certain types of sites will remain blocked across all of China, including porn and those that are considered "subversive" or against national interests (such as sites related to the Falun Gong and many Tibetan organizations). Gosper attempted to justify this by adding, "That's normal in most countries in the world." Um, yeah... right." http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080801-china-opens-crack-in-great-firewall-for-olympic-presschina-opens-internet-for-press-ioc-declares-issue-solved.html

  33. Breaking news:"China lifts ban on Tiananmen sites" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (The Guardian)

    China lifts ban on Tiananmen sites

    Officials heed pressure from Olympic committee

            * Tania Branigan in Beijing
            * The Observer,
            * Sunday August 3 2008
            * Article history

    Websites on sensitive subjects such as the bloody crackdown on democracy protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989 were accessible in the Chinese capital yesterday as the authorities lifted more internet restrictions in order to meet their Olympic Games commitments.

    However, reporters questioned the International Olympic Committee's claim that the issue had been 'resolved', pointing out that many sites - such as those sympathising with Tibetan groups - could still not be accessed.

    Kevan Gosper, head of the IOC's press commission, described the changes as 'a work in progress', but acknowledged that some restrictions would remain.

    While some sites, including the BBC's Chinese-language service and Amnesty International, became available on Friday, yesterday's changes went much further. English-language accounts of the 1989 protests on the BBC and Wikipedia sites were accessible from outside the Olympic press centre yesterday. Some less detailed Chinese-language material could also be found.

    However, Wikipedia's 'Chinese democracy movement' page was inaccessible, and websites on banned spiritual movement the Falun Gong, the Tibetan government in exile, the International Campaign for Tibet and Free Tibet remained off limits last night.

    Under pressure from IOC officials, the authorities began unblocking sites following an outcry over censorship. While they routinely bar access to sites, they had promised that Olympic reporting would be 'free and unfettered'.

    It was unclear yesterday why the restrictions were so widely lifted when the original promise was made only to overseas journalists who would presumably be working in the main press centre and major hotels. But, with the opening ceremony on Friday, officials seemed keen to smooth over the row and stress that they welcomed foreign media.

    'The IOC put in place a working group with BOCOG (the Beijing Organising Committee for the Games of the XXIX Olympiad) to start examining those sites that the international media thought should be unblocked,' said Gosper.

    But he added that every country censored sites that it judged to be subversive or dangerous to national interests. 'The line between what could be considered as a national interest issue might be a bit blurred, but we will work on it and deal with any potential grievances,' he said.

    Challenged over IOC president Jacques Rogge's pledge that 'there will be no censorship on the internet', spokeswoman Giselle Davies insisted that the committee's position had not changed. Human Rights Watch spokesman Nicholas Bequelin said: 'Arbitrarily blocking and unblocking websites is not true respect for freedom of expression. The government can turn off the tap as soon as they want.'

    Jeremy Goldkorn, founder of the Beijing-based media website Danwei.org, said: 'The filtering programmes are probably turned up high - but because they are trying to make sure that foreign language sites that journalists care about don't get blocked, there are going to be lots of leaks in the system.'

    The IOC agreed yesterday to donate £2m to the earthquake-hit Sichuan region. A 6.1-strength aftershock on Friday - one of the largest since the main tremor on 12 May - injured 231 people.

  34. Let One Thousand Flowers Bloom by DrDNA · · Score: 1

    During the Cultural Revolution, Mao Tze Tung launched a program called "Let One Thousand Flowers Bloom", where he encouraged dialog and dissent. It was, in fact, a ploy to let the real enemies of the government identify themselves so they could be further repressed.

    I think what could be happening here is a short program to appease foreign countries while the Olympics take place, and where thought-criminals will be identified by their web-surfing behavior.

  35. Chinese people are not as stupid as you think by shuying · · Score: 1

    People DO know what happened on Tianmen Square in 1989. It was a tragedy. People died in that event, but as many as you may think or the biased western media propaganda machine wants you to believe. It would be a real disaster for China if those now infamous "student leaders" took control. People are now more interested in making money and would rather leave that tragedy behind.

  36. Re:No, it's a lie that was planned in advance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ick, it's like the country is run by Comcast.

  37. It's a trap by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when I see full retraction of internet bans.
    They're just trying to look good for the press, just like in all the other stories about china lately.

  38. Wonderful, these Olympics. by right+handed · · Score: 1

    Uplifting humanity with entertainment and cooperation with the totalitarian oppresion with the worlds most populous state. Remember, the great firewall of China was designed and built by US Firms and it is being implemented everywhere else too. 2012 is the year all major ISPs will strangle the internet by making it look like a calbe TV subscription.

    --
    M$, because life is too short to type icrosoft frequently.
  39. Facts instead of speculation by hweimer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I configured Tor to use a Chinese exit node. Here are my results:

    - Chinese Wikipedia: accessible (used to be blocked)
    - BBC Chinese (via bbcchinese.com): blocked
    - BBC Chinese (via direct URL): accessible
    - Article on Tibet in English Wikipedia: accessible (used to be blocked)
    - Human Rights in China: blocked

    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  40. Re:What better way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is not about nailing subversives. It is about manipulating the mind of Chinese people.

  41. Its Just Temporary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the olympics, they'll go back to being their good old RED COMMIE selves. And, we will continue to appease them because we're scared shit of them.

  42. Re:It is rude to tell the truth like that. by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1

    And that's why I am able to get my Internet Service through Parallax , Oh wait...

  43. Re:It is rude to tell the truth like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A surviving DSL company, what a cute little thing. I see they have managed to get around the ATT last mile block by using wireless. A whole two counties worth of freedom, I bet they get twice the usual inspection at the ATT splitters.

  44. http://www.freeproxyserver.ca/ by Smuttley · · Score: 1

    I think most people realise that as soon as the games are over any lifted restrictions will go straight back on.

    However, I was was in China for 3 months from January to April and found http://www.freeproxyserver.ca/ to work fine with all websites I tried it on.

    I'll be going back for another 4 months in October so I hope it's still working.

    Cheers,

    Alex

  45. Re:It is rude to tell the truth like that. by jwilcox154 · · Score: 1

    A surviving DSL company, what a cute little thing. I see they have managed to get around the ATT last mile block by using wireless. A whole two counties worth of freedom, I bet they get twice the usual inspection at the ATT splitters.

    Then there is also Bridgemaxx and Verizon on top of Comcast. This is in little ol' Richmond, IN. On top of that, there is also Hughesnet, StarBand, and WildBlue. Despite your wild claims Twitter, America is not run by Comcast.