Slashdot Mirror


Hot Water, Hot Earth

Calopteryx notes a New Scientist article on the discovery of "supercritical" water emerging from a vent in the Atlantic Ocean at 407 deg. C (765 deg. F). One of its discoverers actually said, "It's water, but not as we know it"; it's the hottest water ever found on earth. The cause seems to be a huge bubble of magma beneath the ocean floor, 3 km below the sea surface. Meanwhile Nymz shares a journal entry on a hot spot on land: a 2-acre patch in Ventura county, in California, that has heated up to 433 deg. C (812 deg. F). Here geologists blame buried hydrocarbons burning as they get access to air through cracks in the ground. That high temperature was measured a foot below the ground surface.

28 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Start drillin'! by RayMarron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Burning hydrocarbons?! Sounds like a good place to put a combo drill/refinery/gas station!

    --
    ON DELETE CASCADE
    1. Re:Start drillin'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pretty difficult I'd imagine, since that sort of thing always seems to attract the attention of deep sea monsters.

    2. Re:Start drillin'! by philspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, in "There will be blood" they were able to get oil from a well that was gushing out oil, on fire ABOVE ground, by using a cool battering ram thing with a steel drum that had a bunch of dynamite in it. Push it up to the geyser of fire, it explodes, I guess it either disperses all the oxygen or maybe just the high-temperature gasses, and voila, you have just a regular old oil spout, not flaming, ready to be tapped.

      So

      1. Push a bomb into the ground
      2. Blow it up
      3. ???
      4. Drink a milkshake.

    3. Re:Start drillin'! by Noexit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everything you need to know about oil well fires. http://www.redadair.com/

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    4. Re:Start drillin'! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder how difficult/reliable it would be to harness those deep sea monsters.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Start drillin'! by drik00 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, that's how they still put out oil well fires. However, if you ever seen oil "gushing" these days, that's a huge, huge problem. That stuff only happened back pre-1950's or so when they use "spudders" to drill without significant drilling fluid. These days, using rotary drilling, such heavy "mud" is used while drilling that blow-outs should never occur, as they can obviously be ridiculously dangerous.

      I, personally, can't wait for Al Gore to propose a new tax because the earth is burning its own petroleum without any heed to environmental impact. SHAAAAAAAAAAAME, SHAAAAAAAME!

      J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    6. Re:Start drillin'! by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It works two ways. Firstly it causes a break in the flow of oil, and secondly it uses much of the available oxygen. There are other ways to but out a well fire:

      Dousing with copious amounts of water
      Raising the plume- Inserting one metal casing 30 to 40 feet high over the well head (thus raising the flame above the ground). Liquid nitrogen or water is then forced in at the bottom to reduce the oxygen supply and put out the fire.
      Drill relief wells to redirect the oil and make the fire smaller (and easier to extinguish with water).
      Using a jet engine to direct high pressure water and air over the well.
      Using dynamite to 'blow out' the fire by blasting fuel and oxygen from the flame and consuming oxygen in the combustion. This was one of the earliest effective methods and is still widely used. The first use was by Myron Kinley's father in California in 1913
      Dry Chemical (mainly Purple K) can be used on small well fires such as those in refineries.

      The above was stolen from wikipedia (duh!) and there is actually a page for oil well fires:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_well_fire

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    7. Re:Start drillin'! by Drakonik · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can already hear the drums in the deep.

    8. Re:Start drillin'! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

      That reminds me of an old joke:

      There's this oil fire going on, so they call Red Adair up and ask him how much it will cost to put it out. Red, being the world-famous guy that he is, rattles off a number that's much too expensive, so they end up going with one of his cheaper competitors.

      So, these guys show up, get briefed, and then proceed directly in their truck right to the heart of the fire. There they stop, and all the guys jump out and start stamping on the fire with their feet! They do this long enough, and what do you know, they put the fire out.

      Of course, the oil guys are just completely awestruck, and ask the heard fire chief guy if they're off to celebrate another job well done. The head fire chief guy replies "Hell no. First thing we're going to do is fix the brakes on the truck."

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    9. Re:Start drillin'! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

      I brought a deep sea monster home from the bar last night, and I didn't notice any difficulty in obtaining it at all.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  2. The Year Was 1977 ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think I saw a special about black smokers on TV, I believe they were discovered in 1977 and I remember watching an interview of miniature sub (Alvin) pilot explaining that his temperature sensor melted when they came upon one of them and he decided to get a reading. If I recall the anecdote correctly, they were slowly drifting toward it as his friend explained to him that the hull of their craft was made of the same metal as the thermometer. He then very carefully began to operate the propellers in reverse.

    I think it was even back then that speculation began of life starting around this geothermal energy. That these minerals only populated the sea and made for nutrient rich sea water in which life could propagate.

    The only news here is that the 400 ÂC has been passed on record. I think everyone knew these could get insanely hot.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Year Was 1977 ... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've often wondered how difficult it would be to harness for a energy source. The water around these vents is supposed to be 500+ degrees. The way I'm thinking there should some kind of chimney effect as the water is heated it should rise. By tapping into the heat of this rising water we should be able to extract the energy with out damaging the ecosystem around the vent.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:The Year Was 1977 ... by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was Alvin, and the concern was the windows were made of plexiglas rather than quartz. Looks like Google Books has an excerpt of the page.

    3. Re:The Year Was 1977 ... by Teun · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The biggest problem is probably the great depth at which the installation needs to be build and the distance it would be from the customer.

      Especially after the 1973 energy crisis a lot of experiments have been done around the world to harness this Geothermal energy.

      For example in Italy near the famous Vesuvius, Campi Flegreii, a couple of wells were drilled (between 1200 and 2000 m. deep) and the natural aquifers produced successfully.

      The problem that eventually killed the project was that this superheated water and steam (250-350 degC) carried lots of very nasty impurities like sulphurous compounds and Arsenic.

      Of the typical 25-35 mega Watts produced only 5 were actually available after proper disposal of the pollutants.

      Of course using natural fumaroles like they do in for example Iceland and Japan is an entirely different matter.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  3. When will people learn?!?!?! by BobMcD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Buy an electric car TODAY people! That petrol is causing the ocean to heat up... Wait, what? Magma? Really? Wasn't that around before we invented cars?

    Hang on folks, I'll have to get back to you...

    1. Re:When will people learn?!?!?! by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buy a magma car!

    2. Re:When will people learn?!?!?! by tthomas48 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realize that there's a difference between the roles of natural cycles, and millions of people burning hydrocarbons right?

      Perhaps I should explain. If I put a 100 pound weight on one side of scale and 100 pounds of gold on the other the scale should stay balanced right? I mean assuming this is scale is working like a scale should. Now suppose I put just one ounce of gold extra on the scale. It's just one ounce of gold right? Compared to the 100 pounds that's like a shaving. Shouldn't make much difference, but now the scale's off balance.

      That's what's going on in the world. Sure all these natural cycles are inputs. And what we humans do may be dwarfed by the natural cycles. But the natural cycles were more or less balanced (at least on a human time scale). In the past hundred years or so we've added quite a bit of extra input to one side of the scale. What we've added is minuscule compared to the natural cycles, but remember this is a balance that we're monkeying with. And the stakes are high enough that we might want to err on the side of caution.

    3. Re:When will people learn?!?!?! by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what a bullshit notion, that nature or the earth is in balance. The earth has been far, far hotter and far far colder and far, far wetter and far, far drier in the past. Even the Sahara dessert was heavily vegetated not even 12,000 years ago. The oceans have been rising since the last ice age.

  4. Seems like.... by bwcbwc · · Score: 4, Funny

    an awful lot of effort to go through for some parboiled prawns. The Ventura county site sounds like a great spot for a barbecue, though. Don't even have to bring any charcoal.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  5. Does this seem a bit obvious to anyone by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Informative

    As pressure increases, boiling point rises for (almost?) any substance.

    As heat increases, density decreases due to increased movement of the particles.

    Therefore, shouldn't water at the bottom of the ocean have an unusually high boiling point - and water which is heated to near that boiling point be much less dense?

    To me it seems like they're backing up existing thermodynamic properties with evidence

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  6. Supercritical water oxidation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once you put water under enough pressure (think 4000 PSI), you can pump almost an infite amount of heat into it without it undergoing a phase change. Useful for all sorts things, like breaking down any organic compound into constituant atoms. So the water in the story isn't the hottest on earth, only the hottest naturally occuring.

  7. Re:Can we still blame pollution for this? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    >Could this conceivably be used to power locomotivators (more commonly known as "iron horses") across large distances on metal rails? This could help solve that whole oil problem!

    This could help solve that whale oil problem!

    There. Fixed it for you.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  8. Re:Can we still blame pollution for this? by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, though, wouldn't the water just convert to steam at that point, even if it WAS under that much water?

    The term "supercritical" doesn't just make a nice-sounding buzzword to toss into the article.

    It literally means that you can make no meaningful distinction between the liquid and gaseous phases of the water at that pressure and temperature - You have something between the two phases with no phase-change energy transition separating them.


    As an aside, humans use supercritical water all the time, in power plants. This only counts as interesting because we've never seen it occur naturally before (most likely because we don't tend to hang out a lot in places at pressures above 22MPa).

  9. California hotspot by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    So can we conclude from this that Ventura==hot air?

    Of course, many Minnesotans already knew that... (and others learned it the hard way)

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  10. Re:Hot Water, Hot Earth by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    It sounds like hot fire is already present, throw in "hot heart" and you've got yourself a hot captain planet!

  11. Re:Can we still blame pollution for this? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 5, Informative
    That said, there's no reason it couldn't be converting to steam in small pockets and then the steam re-condenses as it comes in contact with cooler water.

    Actually there is a reason: it's "supercritical".

    For it to turn to steam would require a phase change between it and the surrounding water, and a supercritical fluid by definition has no distinct phase change between the liquid and gasous phases.

    You'd think that if the pressure would be high enough, a liquid would stay a liquid at any arbitrary temperature, but that's not what happens. If you have a vessel strong enough to withstand the increasing pressure, and you heat a liquid within it, that has a gasous phase above it, you first see boiling. Then, as the pressure in the gas phase rises, the boiling stops. But, if you keep heating it, an interesting thing happens: the line between liquid and gas phase disappears, and the fluid only has one phase. It is supercritical.

    In this case, boiling never starts because the pressure is high to begin with.

    Now, the supercritical water is much less dense than seawater (or plain water, for that matter), so it does rise, and if it cools slower than the pressure drops as it rises, yes, it might start to boil.

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
  12. Absent Temperture Scale by Nymz · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original article has since been updated with a picture, a map, and even a video. But the 800 degree temperature still lacks a -&deg-F designation IMO. Here was my original submission:

    Ground temperatures exceeding 800 degrees (C? F? HOT!) are being recorded at the Los Padres Forest in Ventura County, California. Geologists are uncertain why, but a popular theory is that hydrocarbons in some form (petroleum, gas, coal) are being exposed to air through cracks formed in dry ground. (Fuel + Oxygen + Heat = Fire Triangle) The last thing California needs are forest fires from below, after so recently fighting off forest fires from lightning above, so fire fighters are closely monitoring the area.

  13. Re:Burning Hydrocarbons by ThomConspicuous · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't the town that had to be condemned because the coal underground was ignited?

    That would be Centralia, Pennsylvania