How Phishers Think, Act, and Make a Profit
whitehartstag writes with a write up of "the excellent session at Black Hat that detailed 'how phishers create sites, share info and code, and basically are lazy.' They store their stolen data 'on websites that they have hacked into, or on [publically available] sites like guestbooks. And even worse, they are not protecting their stolen data ... which means that all one needs to do to find this info is to reverse engineer a real phisher's website, look at their PHP script, and find out where they are storing the data.'"
I wish the article had good suggestions for how to prevent phishing attacks. Instead, it seems like this article is suggesting I can easily steal already stolen credit-card data.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
Hackers hacking hackers? That's a mouthful! What's next? Bankers banking bankers?
"...[Phishers] basically are lazy"
I'm lazy, maybe I could be a phisher king...
"...all one needs to do to find this info is to reverse engineer a real phisher's website, look at their PHP script..."
Shit, I instrinsically fail.
...does involve 'securing' data, just not in the way you think it does.
This article is an old Trope. In fact, Confucius once said: "Give a man a fish, he eats once. Teach a man to phish and he gets a post in /."
Let me get you started, 4111 1111 1111 1111. It even passes the mod 10 check!!
Engage brain before clicking.
The title and summary suggest that phishers are somehow less. Lazy? What, are drug dealers not lazy? Pimps more business savvy?
That is just bothering me. Anyone else think that is just wrong? Lazy? WTF exactly would a non-lazy phisher do? Setup a data center in the Caymans? Seriously!
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
Sounds like a coincidence to me. I charge way more than that to install any OS on any computer, as the job usually involves backup and migragation of the client's files, tracking down drivers, and other mundane stuff. For $35 it sounds like the guy was just trying to pickup some cash on the side. Even in the technical fields at my university I know there were *many* people who would never attempt something as trivial as installing an OS. Downloading and installing a printer driver is voodoo to those people, even though they themselves installed the printer via the 'quick setup poster' that came with it when it was new. Trying to show these sorts of people how to do this stuff themselves is an exercise in futility. I doubt the phisher in question would have the know-how to even be able to install Vista anyways...I heard they're quite lazy. :)
And even worse, they are not protecting their stolen data
Clearly, the answer is to pass a law requiring that phishers disclose all breaches of the personal data they have collected. That will undoubtly shame them into increasing their security to better protect our personal information.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
...they aren't protecting it? The fact that my personal information is in the hands of people with intentions of using it, is not as bad as them not protecting it? I'd hate to imagine the kinds of people that might get their hands on my personal information!
Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
"even who-is'd him for them in the e-mail (it appeared to be an Indian name).... I called the number on the ad... He had a thick Indian accent. Same guy? Coincidence?"
No way that was a coincidence. I mean, how many Indians are there?
With the advent of MPack and other tools from the RBN, it doesn't take a "hacker" anymore to phish. You buy a toolkit, you buy the exploit, you buy a trojan and the scripts for your server, and off you go. The reason why it's successful is simply that there are people who know less than the attacker about security.
Detach yourself from the idea that phishers are in any way required to be security gurus, or that they're in some way intimate with the inner workings of PCs or networks. Those that know how to code don't attack anymore. They sell their attacking toolkits to others who then conduct the attacks.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
No, it most certainly affects everybody, because if the phisher is good enough he is going to dupe many merchants out of thousands of dollars, and when the credit card companies issue chargebacks, it will put small businesses out of business, take those thousands of dollars out of the hands of the middle class and put them in the hands of some worthless hacker who is probably going to blow it on dope. It has a far reaching effect.
Idiots fooling around do all the dirty work, and the serious crooks just snatch all their work without them even knowing it.
I am guessing phishing is risky. I am guessing that only phishing can gather information in such a large scale. If this is true, then while the idiots are getting caught, the really smart people and gaining a ton of really useful information as we speak.
If this is the case, I would be *very* worried.
How long until some jokester does a phishing attack that submits the info to random slashdot threads?
ISO certified == THX certified
... I saw two white guys in a day. And was like, whoa -- are you folks following me?
Then I saw another one. I knew it. Never trust white guys.
-- A white guy (but just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean I'm not out to get me!)
Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.
Who would have thought such a thing? I thought that people who steal would make specific GUI's for them selves like you see in the movies and do all that other stuff.
OK, end the sarcasm. People who steal want to take a shortcut to the money. They want to have the money with the least possible effort. As the data they stole is not theirs and protecting them will take effort, why would they do it?
It is as if saying that you are surprised that if people rob your house they make a mess of it. Why would they not?
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
This like pretty much every other networking task imaginable requires a client(it connects the ssl connection and handles the routing as appropriate).
Cisco makes one, as do a number of other vendors(CheckPoint comes to mind, but only because it's the client I have to use for my work vpn connection).
All they're saying was that one of the vpn client vendors has a bug which allows an exploit of some description. If you don't have one, don't worry about it, if you do have one check yours and don't worry about anyone elses.
1. Hmmm, I want me some profit
2. Somebody set up us the phishing website
3. ???
4. Profit!
> Because obviously everyone has to nick-pick every fact...
Umm, yeah, that would be "nit-pick".
Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious