Slashdot Mirror


Americans Refusing To Wait For Mainstream EVs

hazehead writes "The growing trend of folks refusing to wait for big-car manufacturers to deliver mainstream electric vehicles is starting to get some press. From DIY tinkerers in Atlanta trying to keep money from going overseas (or simply from leaving their wallets) to a guy in Oregon building an open source Civic conversion kit, Americans are taking energy policy in their own grease-stained hands."

13 of 779 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It does get arround the immediate problem of rising gasoline prices. Fact is coal is much cheaper per unit energy than oil and afaict the US mines most of it's own coal supply whereas they are having to import ever increasing ammounts of oil. It also moves polloution out of cities and iirc big power plants have much tighter emmisions controls than motor vehircles and those controls are much easier to enforce.

    It won't help with global warming though :(

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  2. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But not all power generated in the US is from coal and fossil fuels. My power is generated via Hydroelectric. There are Windmills popping up left and right. Except for trying to say no to all fossil fuels the trick is to reduce the need for it. fossil fuels are easy to transport and offer a lot of energy. Nuclear has to many left wing hippies who think of it as a bomb waiting to happen stopping it from popping up next door (Aka a field 10 miles away from you) Solar isn't ready neither are others. But even a dirty coal power plant is probably more efficient then a gas power car.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually it does help a little. Pollution can be better controlled at a single point than at many thousands of points. Economies of scale can also be implemented.

    And just as importantly, that single point doesn't have to move, and thus doesn't pay an efficiency cost due to having to move the extra mass of any emissions controls.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  4. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by DuckDodgers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the article.

    A lot of people want to eliminate petroleum imports, and consider environmental protection a lesser priority or no priority at all.

    I know plenty of conservatives that scoff at the idea of environmental protection and global warming but who still have a strong interest in electric cars, alternative fuel vehicles, and hybrids as a means of cutting the trade deficit and reducing the leverage that OPEC has over our foreign policy.

  5. Cooking Oil in CA. That's California by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not necessarily the regulators. There are folks out in California (where else!) trying to get biofuel off the ground. They collect old frying oil and refine it and burn it in diesel engines. Unfortunately, the local businesses that collect said oil (for a fee) from those restaurants are petitioning the CA legislature to make it crime unless your licensed because it's a ''public health hazard'' if anyone but them collect this horrible and dangerous cooking oil!

    Please, you Californians, if you see any of that horseshit on the ballot, please oh please vote it down!

  6. Re:Cost Effective? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you assume that gas prices stay the same for the next 7 years.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  7. I want one of THESE to go with my Tesla... by nsayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love an electric car. But a few times a year, I drive from the Bay Area to San Diego. This is the perfect solution to the problem.

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The DOE did a study stating that 76% of vehicles in the US could be converted to electric with no additional generation capacity required, due to the base load power available at night that goes unused.

  10. Re:yes it does by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Charging station? Charging station??? Come on... get a little DIY action going on here: Build your own charging station using solar paneling on the roof (and a windshield sunblocker that also has solar paneling) and you should be able to get considerable amounts of charge from the sun every day.

    Or maybe you should see if your company would consider it a valuable perk?

    Or... why not see this as an opportunity? Build your own charging system (big sucker) and charge your other friends at work to use it. Use electrolysis to break water into Hydrogen and Oxygen, burn both, and charge the cars with that.

    Where there's a demand, offering a supply is almost always accompanied with profits.

    --
    Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  11. odd by Weezul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is still both cheaper and more environmentally friendly to buy a use car with good millage.

    EVs make the best sports cars, period. Nothing competes with electric for performance. We should have been making electric sports cars 15 years ago. But soon Tesla & co. will finally push the internal combustion engine out of the high performance market.

    After EVs are dominating the sports car world they weill trickle down rapidly.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  12. Re:Still doesnt solve jack by init100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    its also very unsafe to be driving around with a tank full of highly exlposive gas

    And this is different from driving around with a tank full of highly explosive gasoline because...?

    In the long run, electric will be the better choice. We can get electricity from a number of sources, which abstracts that away from the engineering of the vehicle. An h2 powered car will have significantly fewer of sources

    Since one of those sources in the hydrogen case is electricity, I don't see the number of sources to be fewer than in the case of battery-powered cars.

    Please criticize valid points of hydrogen as an energy storage medium instead of making up silly points that can be refuted in an instant.

  13. Electric cars arent fun just for the enviroment. by miffo.swe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dad bought an electric Renault a couple of years ago and after i took it for a spin i was totally lost. First of all an electric car has a very flat torque curve, it accelerates pretty evenly from standstill to 90 Km/h. Its easy to drive it very smoothly and elegantly. The next thing is sound, the car is dead silent until you hit 60+ km/h and road noise starts. Electric cars arent all about the enviroment.

    Myself i really want one but sadly you cant buy one no matter how much you are willing to spend. The demand is here but for some strange reason no western or japanese manufacturer wants the money. The Chinese on the other hand are getting up to speed very quickly and at current pace of development it wont be long before their EV's start pouring into the west.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400