Slashdot Mirror


Bottom of the Barrel Book Reviews — The Lost Blogs

We get a lot of books for review here at Slashdot. Most are sent out to users on our reviewer list within a few weeks. Others become part of an impressive wall of books on my desk before they find a home. There are a choice few however that are doomed to never see the inside of a Fedex box. This is mostly due to the complete and utter stupidity or absurdness of their subject matter. I've decided to give these failed intellectual endeavors a chance and explore just how big a waste of time a book can be. We start scraping the bottom of the barrel with a little number written by Paul Davidson called, The Lost Blogs. Read below to find out just how bad it got.

I used to work at a restaurant in college. After I was there for a year it was my job to help train new employees. One evening they had me train a nice young girl on the dessert station. The dessert station was one of the easiest places to work all you did was bake and slice pies and make the occasional ice cream sundae. An order for a hot fudge sundae came through the ticket machine so I got out a bowl and got her started. We used hot fudge packets that had to be warmed up in the microwave before being squeezed out onto the top of the ice cream. I told my new young trainee that the hot fudge needed a thirty second bath of microwaves and to get me when it was done and I'd show her how to pipe on the whip cream all fancy like. After a few minutes she came up to me and said that the ice cream had all melted, so she tried it a second time with the same melting results. I looked over both bowls of liquid ice cream and asked her how they melted so fast? I asked her to make another one while I watched to see what she was doing wrong. She scooped out the ice cream, opened up a packet of fudge squeezed it out and put the whole bowl into the microwave. I didn't know what to say. She microwaved ice cream six times that night while I watched, not once did it occur to her that ice cream would melt in a microwave. I comped the mans bill for the sundae he never got and had a good portion of the restaurant employees gathered to see if the trainee would ever solve the melting mystery. She never did and until I opened the first page of The Lost Blogs the six sundaes in the microwave was the stupidest thing I have ever seen.

The book starts off with a rambling two page acknowledgments section that drunkenly wanders from subjects like the South Beach diet to petty theft. It pauses to discuss the difference between Abe Vigoda and Bea Arthur and finally embarrasses Paul's family by forever linking them in ink with this sham of a book. This section does serve a valuable purpose however. Anyone with any level of discernment would be so turned off by it's incoherent nature that they would be saved the agony of reading The Lost Blogs. Discernment is not a luxury I had, so it was with much regret that I read on. The premise behind The Lost Blogs, like talking fruit and a submarine for babies, seems like a good idea until you see it in action. Quoting the back of the book, "What if the most famous, brilliant, obsessive, dumb and evil people throughout history had blogs? Wonder how Charles Lindbergh kept busy during his transatlantic fight? Wonder how Napoleon could possibly have reached the keyboard? In The Lost Blogs, you'll read the intimate weblogs of 175 iconic historical figures writing about their stupid pets, shaving rituals primate romances and plans for world domination-just like any other blogger...maybe even you!"

What it delivers is 271 pages of nonsense that is reminiscent of an assignment in your high school creative writing class. Many of the blogs are a few hundred words or less, which was fine with me since most of them are historically inaccurate. Alexander The Great's blog talks about how great his blog is. Joseph Stalin's blog talks about how he's going to purge his blog of all links. I assume because he purged his country of ethnic minorities, political opponents and other undesirables, killing millions. Hilarious! Samuel Morse just has five paragraphs of dots and dashes. Noah has a list of animals he still needs. Louis Pasteur talks about how germy his keyboard is. Herman Melville is obsessed with fighting a giant black cockroach that lives in his toilet (alright I kind of like that one). Fifty-one out of the first 100 words in the Howard Hughes blog are urine. That's over half urine! I took this as a metaphor for the whole book. Lastly, Jim Morrison posts the lyrics to a new song he's working on called, Light the Fire

You know I've opened up the flume
and thrown inside a rubber tire
so can you please just follow through
and finally, please, start the fire

Come on baby, light the fire
Come on baby, light the fire
but please don't light the house on fire.

I know that somewhere Weird Al is crying. I could go on and on but you get the idea.

It seems to me that anyone with nothing to do, I mean absolutely nothing, could sit down with a few beers, a note pad and Wikipedia and crank out something like The Lost blogs. Lets pray that they don't. Almost every historical figure in the book has surviving writings that you can read. Some have a huge amount that you can sift through. So in addition to being inaccurate and unamusing The Lost Blogs is also redundant. My favorite part of this book is that I finished it and never have to open it again. The Lost Blogs is an exercise in mental masturbation that doesn't have the decency to let you finish. It is the bottom of the barrel.

30 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Goggles &c by Goaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? We're supposed to read a book review in white-on-teal?

  2. What gives? by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't putting Idle stories on the front page detract from the "stuff that matters" claim of /.?

    1. Re:What gives? by Zadaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. I was much happier when this stuff was hidden in a dark corner of Slashdot Labs.

      If they'd pull idle off the front page and off the newsfeed I'd even be willing to use all of those mod points responsibly instead of throwing them around randomly.

    2. Re:What gives? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The big problem with idle so far for me is that there is no scope for comments. What are we supposed to say about this story, for example?

      "Thanks for your funny anecdote and warning us not to read this book none of us would ever have seen anyway!" /. is famed for the quality of the discussion, and so far the promoted idle stories aren't really providing any possibility for that. Heck, the summary/story does not even go so far as to pose a question, and defines the book in question as the bottom of the barrel, so what remains?

  3. Bottom of the Barrel Site Design by hardburn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    White text on green background make eyes bleed.

    The book sounds like something that could work if done right, it was just hobbled by bad implementation. That old Darth Side blog comes to mind as a good way to do essentially the same idea.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  4. You should have made the sunday yourself by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That poor customer never got his sunday just so you could watch the trainee fail six times? Six? Why?

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:You should have made the sunday yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That poor customer never got his sunday just so you could watch the trainee fail six times? Six? Why?

      Cause he's a jerk.

  5. Stand by for blasphemy by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I quite like the white on teal.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Stand by for blasphemy by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't especially mind the white on teal either. The painful part is the contrast when you scroll down to the comments section and it suddenly switches to black on white.

      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
  6. Please keep it off the frontpage by comp.sci · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "review" did not give me any useful information whatsoever, I was expecting at least some interesting insight or real argument but what I found was just unnecessary bashing of this one book. Please keep stuff like this without substance off the front page, there are plenty of articles and topics out there that deserve that spot.

  7. Samzenpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It appears that the primary purpose of idle.slashdot.org is to illustrate that samzenpus enjoys insulting people so much that he's willing to devote a lot of time and energy to it. You let her microwave ice cream all night. Hilarious. I hope I am one day blessed to work in the same place as you.

    Please, please, take these stories off the front page.

    Also, add my voice to the cries of white-on-teal outrage.

    1. Re:Samzenpus by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't want this idle.slashdot.org crap in the regular RSS feed as if it was an actual story.

      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
  8. Bad example by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's dumber, a rookie ruining ice cream six times or you watching it happen? I'm going with the latter. Did the owner know you were in the habit of letting employees flush his profits?

    1. Re:Bad example by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having everyone gather around to mock one employee is a classic team-building exercise, he saved the restaurant a bundle on training doing that himself.

  9. Re:did you fire her? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I was in charge, I'd have fired her supervisor.

    Sometimes people are stupid. You solve this by education.

  10. Re:Editors? by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "She scooped out the ice cream, opened up a packet of fudge squeezed it out and put the whole bowl into the microwave. I didn't know what to say."

    Maybe "No that's not what I meant, just heat the packet not everything."? You're not very good at training people are you?

  11. Re:Editors? by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, the fact that he made the error (many times) while specifically writing about stupid people is definitely what made it annoying enough to actually say something.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  12. The bottom of the barrel reviews itself by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow ... I'm speechless. The crappy design. The pretentious asshole of a reviewer. This idle section is the worst thing happened to slashdot since the days of Jon Katz. ... and by the way ... speaking to the reviewer for just a sec ... letting your employee fail once or twice is once thing, but watching her fail six times for your enjoyment is a sign of a true douche bag. Is it any surprise that you are writing crappy reviews of shitty books that no one wants to read?

  13. new tag: pleasestop by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure what the etiquette is for this, but I'd like to propose a new tag for these idle articles that hit the front page:

      pleasestop

    I, for one, will be tagging all future idle articles in this manner.

    -G

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
  14. Re:Editors? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, if he was training her to have low self-esteem when she realizes someone she trusts is letting her humiliate herself over and over, then he's great.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  15. Has it ever occurred to you... by eagee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought that first paragraph was an excerpt and not part of the review ... I thought, "Wow! This book really does suck!"

  16. so by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She never did

    And thus you utterly FAILED in your training duties. And heaped ridicule upon someone who did you no wrong or harm.

  17. Argh! My eyes! by brkello · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She never did and until I opened the first page of The Lost Blogs the six sundaes in the microwave was the stupidest thing I have ever seen.

    Use punctuation or form better sentences. This really hurt to read.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  18. Because of articles like this. by AltGrendel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am going to disable the Idle section in my user prefs.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  19. Editor Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Editor, please don't let this "reviewer" fail 6 times by writing 6 horribly written pretentious reviews. Stop him now, and tell him what not to do with words.

  20. Re:Editors? by WillKemp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and didn't correct her 6 times.

    And as he's standing there watching her and not telling her she's doing it wrong, it would be reasonable to assume that she's doing it right, but for some reason it's just not working. And if she was nervous (young and first day in the job) she probably wasn't thinking clearly enough to work it out herself.

    Hilarious!

    (Actually, being prepared to admit to it is even more hilarious!)

  21. Stop It! by alexborges · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jeeesus....

    Please, please, please make it STOP.

    --
    NO SIG
  22. You missed the conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You must have missed one of CmdrTaco's last posts in the Idle section, where he indicated that the whole thing is an idea from corporate (which wants to be more like Digg & Fark).

    The Slashdot editors want it to fail. Miserably.

  23. You Never Got The Man His Sundae? by aquatone282 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You dick!

    --
    What?
  24. Re:Editors? by philspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Her brain may have been devoted just then to "Why the *$%@ do they microwave the ice cream? How does this even work for them? Why are they all standing around looking at me instead of telling me what I'm doing wrong?"