Slashdot Mirror


Watchmen Delayed, Or Worse

whisper_jeff writes "Due to some potential copyright issues, The Watchmen might be delayed, or worse. It seems that Fox claims it still owns copyrights which would prevent Warner Bros from releasing the movie. US District Court Judge Gary Feess decided that Fox had enough of a case that he's willing to hear things out. The geek in me hopes that it will be resolved quickly and the movie will hit theaters on time."

4 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Aren't Fox... by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe they did and just wanted to keep it to themselves after the trailers circulated for a bit.. build the hype before making demands?

    Unless Fox learned of this production through said hype, Warner could use this as evidence of Fox's prejudicial delay. It's probably not enough for estoppel by laches, but it might convince the judge to rule less favorably to Fox. But aren't Fox Warner's attorneys anyway?

  2. They realized it. This is SOP. by ClayJar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They did, but if you show your hand early enough, the project is simply scrapped and you don't get any money. You have to wait until the project is all but released (with tons of money already spent) before you come forward with your claims, as that way the choice becomes "Buy us off with some of the money or lose *everything*."

    The only item of significance here is that apparently Fox is asking for a large enough amount of money that WB sees fit to argue the point in court instead of just paying and being done with it. It is likely, then, that Fox believes the movie will perform better than WB believes it will perform, as that would be the basis for the amount they demanded versus the amount WB would be willing to pay.

    Basically, then, this is just business as usual, and the headlines are simply being used by either side to try to put more pressure on the opposing side. In the end, the movie will certainly be released. If WB wins the case, Fox should have asked for a smaller windfall. If Fox wins the case, WB should've settled for the earlier Fox offer. Someone loses (maybe both do), but we don't have to care.

  3. Money by gambit3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    None of this "or worse" crap. We all know it's about the money. Fox won't do anything that doesn't make them money, and for them to make money, they need this movie to be released. With Fox as partners, of course.

  4. Re:Copyright Law by falcon5768 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They dont own the rights though, they own the rights to EVERYTHING THIS ONE PRODUCER MAKES. Basically they claimed that anything this producer, produces is Fox property, even AFTER killing the guys hopes of working at fox. They did this one before with Dukes of Hazzard and got 17 mill out of it. they are doing it again with Watchmen now.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."