Slashdot Mirror


Jail 'Greedy' Scam Victims, Says Nigerian Diplomat

AcidAUS writes with this nearly unbelievable snippet from today's Sydney Morning Herald: "The Nigerian high commissioner in Australia says people who are ripped off by so-called Nigerian scams are just as guilty as the fraudsters and should be jailed. Responding to a story in yesterday's Herald, which revealed Australians lose at least $36 million a year to the online scams, Sunday Olu Agbi said Australians had failed to heed repeated warnings not to deal with shady characters on the internet."

46 of 809 comments (clear)

  1. dumb people lose money, not freedom by Dan+B. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are dumb enough to fall for one of the oldest fraud methods in existence, you deserve to lose you money, but not your freedom.

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
    1. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A fool and his money are soon parted...

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    2. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are dumb enough to fall for one of the oldest fraud methods in existence, you deserve to lose you money, but not your freedom.

      I don't know if it's as clear cut as that. Typically the victims of this scam agree to break the law in some way, in some cases to participate in committing a massive financial fraud. Kind of like those guys who sell crappy speakers dressed up as the expensive ones, and justify the low price by hinting that they are stolen. If the speakers were in fact stolen people would be breaking the law by buying them, so why is it different if they just believe that they are stolen?

      No, I don't really think these poor suckers should go to jail, I just don't think it's unbelievable to even suggest that, as the summary says.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by gnick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are dumb enough to fall for one of the oldest fraud methods in existence, you deserve to lose you money, but not your freedom.

      Devil's advocate:
      Well, they did attempt to commit a crime. If punished, they earned it unless they really thought that what they were doing was somehow legal. If it was made clear to them that the deal was shady and they attempted to go through with it, what difference does it make whether the person at the other end is a scamster or an undercover cop conducting a sting?

      Answer to my own question:
      1) The victim was actively pursued and persuaded to take part in the illegal activity. That sounds a helluva lot like entrapment.
      2) Records of the victim's communications should be inadmissible unless they make a habit out of this kind of crime and there's a warrant to snoop. As far as their attempted fraudulent financial transactions? I dunno, IANAL.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Typically the victims of this scam agree to break the law in some way,

      Exactly right. Bust em all for attempted wire fraud to start with and go from there. You have to work both ends of the supply and demand on these things, especially since on end is typically in lawless parts of the world like Nigeria but one end is typically in a country where people have enough cash to be worth trying to rip off.

      Way too many stupid people think they can try to work those deals, in the belief that they can prevent being ripped off if it is a scam and in the hope they might just hit the one that is 'legit.' These idiots don't understand what is actually happening, that it is usually an identity theft happening. Put the threat of jail time for even TRYING to hook up with the "Nigerean minister of finance" and we might take a bite outta crime. Same for all the other spam scams involving illegal acts. We have to get serious about stopping this crap.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Detritus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, they don't deserve to lose their money. Not everyone is born with above-average intelligence and a skeptical view of their fellow man. By definition, a large percentage of the population is stupid. That doesn't mean that they deserve to be victimized by the criminal classes of society.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Haoie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that Nigerian scams [and its variants] existed before 1992.

      The internet just made it a lot more visible.

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    7. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, they're very lucky. If the scam wasn't a scam they'd be rotting away in some Nigerian jail for money laundering or fraud. Instead, all they lost was money.

    8. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by mellon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just dumb people. It's your mom or dad, if they wind up with some kind of aging-related disease that affects their judgement. Or you, in a few years. Losing everything because of that is a pretty harsh outcome.

    9. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just don't get how people are stupid enough to fall for #1. A check is just a piece of paper until it's cashed. Offer to void it and send it back to them through the mail. If they refuse, they're obviously shady, so just hang up. I guess it's the same reason people fall for all scams: they let their greed get in the way of their common sense.

      #2 is a little more understandable since people tend to trust people in uniform, but giving anyone the kind of information they would need to steal your identity is just foolish unless you initiated the interaction yourself (say, by calling the gas company directly).

    10. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by statusbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A fool and his money are best parted, because the last thing you want in this world are fools with economic power.

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    11. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      If you're going to be a pedant, try to pay attention first. He did not say that below average intelligence was required to fall for it. He said both an above average intelligence and a skeptical view were. Obviously the set of people not meeting those qualifications will be more than half the population, and perhaps quite a bit more than half. And he said only a "large percentage."

      So thank you for your grade-school-quality pedantry.

      Now, of course, you will take up some other irrelevant argument to foolishly attempt to defend yourself.

    12. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given the magnitude of the sums purportedly to be funneled out of these poor countries, the "victims" in these cases are more analogous to someone who takes money and a gun from someone to kill another person but when they pull the trigger the (rigged) gun blows up on them. Sure, they got hurt, but they should still go to jail for the attempted murder and conspiracy. Wire fraud is illegal. Why shouldn't attempted wire fraud be? Just because they lost some money too?

    13. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A fool and his money are best parted, because the last thing you want in this world are fools with economic power.

      True, but having leeches who live off of others and don't mind wrecking a stranger's life isn't any better.

      Someone willing to cheat a fool is probably willing to cheat you too, and there are plenty of fools in positions that will let them do it.

    14. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by GradiusCVK · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1: Entrapment is when a law enforcement official convinces you to break the law. If a drug dealer walks up to you on the street and convinces you to buy a kilo of heroin, you're going to jail buddy.
      2: Making a habit out of something is irrelevant. In fact, a person's history of criminality is inadmissible as evidence for or against them (thanks to the Constitution, I think). It may be used in determining their punishment if convicted, but not in determining their guilt. Only evidence relating to their current trial is admissible for that. That said, records of their communications directly related to the current trial are most certainly admissible, and the police would no doubt get a warrant to obtain that obvious source of information.

      As far as their attempted fraudulent financial transactions...

      ...they are illegal. Look up "fraud".

      I dunno, IANAL

      No kidding... neither am, I but this is pretty basic stuff here. How does something like that earn +5 insightful??

    15. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by nickname29 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one thing I can't *stand* is tax evaders!

      Yeah I know. Tax evaders are evil - they are withholding money from the state that could be used to finance our wars in Iraq!

      Personally I feel that any american that is paying tax is just as guilty as Bush for the war in Iraq. If you do not like the war, stop paying tax (pay it into a trust until they stop).

    16. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by Alioth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The unintended consequence of this will be to deter the reporting of any attempted financial scam (such as reporting boiler rooms) because the victim will fear that if they did something wrong they may get prosecuted. Indeed, boiler room scammers would probably use this as a threat to continue being suckered and NOT report it (even though the scamee in these instances is not attempting anything illegal - but if they can be suckered in by a boiler room, they can also be suckered in by a boiler room claiming they are now part of a fraud themselves).

    17. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by jacquesm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In general there is a really simple rule to protect yourself from scams: If you did not initiate the transaction it is with high probability a scam.

    18. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by joto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just don't get how people are stupid enough to fall for #1. A check is just a piece of paper until it's cashed. Offer to void it and send it back to them through the mail.

      It is stupid to fall for #1, but it's not dishonest. And a lot of people really are not very smart. Or they have too positive a view of humanity to distrust someone who makes such a reasonable request.

      It is dishonest. An honest person would throw the cheque away. Why would you even bother cashing the cheque if it wasn't your money? The only reason would be greed. Only people who want "something for nothing" are going to go for this kind of fraud. Exactly the same people who fall for the nigerian scam.

      Where is the "positive view of humanity" in someone who is so greedy that they'd rather cash in $500 just because someone erroneously sent them a cheque, instead of just tearing it apart? I would describe such a person as "selfish" and "greedy", not "nice".

    19. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by mcvos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is dishonest. An honest person would throw the cheque away. Why would you even bother cashing the cheque if it wasn't your money? The only reason would be greed.

      Not quite understanding how cheques work is also a possible reason. Few people use cheques nowadays, so a lot of people won't have any experience with them, and might think it's the cheque itself that's worth something.

      Ofcourse even then simply sending the cheque back makes more sense, but a lot of people just aren't very logical thinkers.

    20. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by zotz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "#2 is a little more understandable since people tend to trust people in uniform, but giving anyone the kind of information they would need to steal your identity is just foolish unless you initiated the interaction yourself (say, by calling the gas company directly)."

      Perhaps, but what is truly foolish is to set up the system where an identity can be stolen with such easily obtained information.

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    21. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually they have been around since at least the 1700's when the masses learned to read and write.

      As to the point about charging the ones getting caught. They should be charged with conspericy to commint a crime since that is what they are usually agreeing to do.

    22. Re:dumb people lose money, not freedom by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is dishonest. An honest person would throw the cheque away.

      The owner of the check tells you to cash it. How is that dishonest? You seem to be confusing "wrong" or "immoral" or some other subjective measure with the objective "dishonest." The person that cashes the check never lies, never cheats, and never takes more than what is offered first by someone else. That can't be dishonest, even if you otherwise look down upon their actions.

      I would describe such a person as "selfish" and "greedy", not "nice".

      Fine, call them all those things. But don't call them dishonest, as that's an incorrect characterization.

  2. I guess this has some merit... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I applaud his forward thinking in trying to get rid of stupid people, but I really don't think jail is an option. We're just gonna have to put up with them. Sorry man.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    1. Re:I guess this has some merit... by ancientt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually they provide a significant form of revenue. Whoever came up with the lottery was a genius!

      "Today we are announcing a state tax on stupi... er, a state lottery!"

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  3. Well said... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It's hard to con an honest man."

    1. Re:Well said... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed a bit of the point by fixating on just one kind of scam.

      Scammers can go around saying they don't have any money at all.

      All a scammer has to con an honest person is say that they need money for their family, even if no family is there. They can even have pictures of some family that really isn't theirs, or are really estranged. In some areas, fake panhandlers live better than the people that they con, even though no one gains anything buy giving them money.

    2. Re:Well said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If he'd told you the truth, you would never have given him any money, so he made creative use of the fact that you are more willing to give money to a stranded college student than to a person that really needs it. So after all, perhaps you are the motherfucker.

      Many people seem to assume that other people become dishonest for the fun of it or because they are evil when in fact they are just totally despaired. Of course, there are also people who manage to remain honest, but this is definitely not encouraged in our hypocritical society. By the same token, beggars have to try to look ugly, unwashed, and dress in old, dirty clothes. If they look healthy, wash themselves and take care of their clothes, almost nobody will give them money. That's how it works.

  4. Re:why not...? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why not block all automatic financial/bank transactions with Nigeria? Make it so some body has to sign for it, etc.

    heck....if both parties are "guilty", why not put road-blocks to block both?

    Why not RTFM?

    "Professor Olu Agbi said there were almost 140 million people in Nigeria and fewer than 0.1 per cent were involved."

    That's a great idea! Let's make it harder for the 99.9% of law abiding people because of a couple of jack-asses. Furthermore let's make sure we invest a lot of government money to put this new sign-off system in place... at least $36M+/year to make it extra ironic.

  5. Re:You can't jail people for stupidity. by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RTFA. He isn't suggesting people be jailed for stupidity, he's suggesting they be jailed for willingly aiding in a crime (or at least believing they are).

    It's articles like this where the summary has completely missed the point that really highlights just how bad slashdotters are when it comes to reading articles. TFA is short and clear about the what the man was really suggesting and yet already some 90% of (non-joke) comments are about how stupidity isn't a crime.

    And shame on the slashdot editor who posted this. I can't believe anyone could miss the point of the article so badly, so either he didn't read it or he deliberately went with a misleading summary for the extra "outrage" comments.

    I'll post the pertinent bit here to save everyone the terrible inconvenience of clicking the article link:

    In one version, the scammer poses as a government worker who has embezzled millions of dollars and is offering victims a percentage if they help retrieve the money by providing a relatively small amount of money for bribes or other charges.

    Professor Olu Agbi said "greedy" Australians who tried to partake in these crimes - even though they are scams - should be arrested as well.

    "People who send their money are as guilty as those who are asking them to send the money," he said.

    Not so outrageous now is it?

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
  6. Re:I Will Be Rich in a Few Weeks by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Swing and a miss. Gotta try harder for a Funny mod.

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  7. Re:Just to be clear... by hkz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, but the victims are innocent until proven guilty. They haven't _yet_ undertaken anything criminal, just arguably shown intent. I don't want to be a stickler, but that means they get the benefit of the doubt.

  8. This is offensive. Stupidity is not a crime. by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jailing the victim is asinine and a sure sign that the authorities are lazy and stupid themselves.

    How is this any different to saying that a girl that goes into a rough neighbourhood in a mini-skirt and is raped should also be jailed? Just because someone puts themself in a position where they are easy prey doesn't mean that we should lash out against them if we find it difficult to prosecute the criminal.

    What they'll do is make it a crime to send money. A few years ago they made it illegal in NSW, Australia to leave your car unlocked. The rationale was that stolen cars were being used to commit crime and a deterent was needed to stop people making their cars easy to steal. Never mind the inconvenient fact that glass windows are trivial to break. Personally I think this had more to do with car insurance fraud than a crime epidemic. So now rushing to work and forgetting to lock your car makes you a criminal, rather than just making you negligent (and possibly causing you to forfeit an insurance claim).

    I think people who don't understand their role as a public servant and propose solutions like making a victim a criminal should be sacked, if not jailed themselves.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:This is offensive. Stupidity is not a crime. by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it would be more similar to jailing the prostitute who was raped for prostitution.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:This is offensive. Stupidity is not a crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this any different to saying that a girl that goes into a rough neighborhood in a mini-skirt and is raped should also be jailed?

      The difference is that walking around in a miniskirt, and even visiting your lover and having sex, is not illegal (certain middle-eastern countries notwithstanding).

      But one of those "help me get money out of the country" scans, if it were a real legitimate proposition, is still very much illegal, in that if it were ever carried out all parties involved could be found guilty of money laundering and such.

    3. Re:This is offensive. Stupidity is not a crime. by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jailing the victim is asinine and a sure sign that the authorities are lazy and stupid themselves.

      Most of these scams basically boil down to "give me $ and together we can steal/embezzle/defraud $$$". So the "victim" hands over $ and then the conman vanishes. But the "victim" willingly joined a conspiracy to commit a crime. Joining a conspiracy is often a crime in itself even if the "actual" crime never occurs. The scams usually present the crime as victimless (owner of the money deceased, no inheritors) or morally justified (money from an evil regime), but anyone with a minimal degree of honesty can still see that it is wrong.

      How is this any different to saying that a girl that goes into a rough neighbourhood in a mini-skirt and is raped should also be jailed?

      Totally different. The girl in the mini-skirt is totally innocent, the "victim" of these scams is usually not totally innocent. It's really no different than if I say to you "give me $50 so I can buy a lockpick and then we'll rob this house together" and then disappear with your $50.

    4. Re:This is offensive. Stupidity is not a crime. by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of these scams basically boil down to "give me $ and together we can steal/embezzle/defraud $$$". So the "victim" hands over $ and then the conman vanishes. But the "victim" willingly joined a conspiracy to commit a crime.

      Most of the victims of the crime have no understanding of either how the scam is suppose to work, nor what the scammer is offering, or they'd never part with their money. These are stupid people who don't know what they're doing and are usually negligent in checking whether it is in fact illegal rather than agreeing to commit a crime.

      It's the same as these idiots that SMS to mobile phone companies that charge for messages each way and then are inundated with hundreds of messages charged at several dollars each. Strictly speaking they agreed to download that porn snippet or ring tone or mobile phone game and are liable for the amount but it's clearly a scam nonetheless, and if the victim understood how it worked they wouldn't participate.

      Totally different. The girl in the mini-skirt is totally innocent ...until you make it a crime to wear a miniskirt, or go out late at night alone.

      the "victim" of these scams is usually not totally innocent.

      The victim of the scam is usually some poor moron that doesn't have 2 spare braincells to rub together.

      It's really no different than if I say to you "give me $50 so I can buy a lockpick and then we'll rob this house together" and then disappear with your $50.

      Except that people understand how lockpicks work and how the crime works. A better analogy would be a guy offering to help you by buying you a hunting knife if you'll help him pick one out for himself, then he steals the hunting knife from the store while you have the sales person distracted, meets you outside, robs you at knife-point, and stabs you to death.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  9. He's deflecting Nigeria's stigma by banffbug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I somehow doubt he actually believes in jailing these people. He's simply pointing out their guilt, to reduce the guilt of his own country's people.

  10. You're misreading that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > WRONG. The scammer wants to make money from the deal. How are they going to coax the mark into giving them money when they claim to already have lots.

    He's saying that honest people are also easy to scam, but that you have to use different methods on them (e.g. via fake charity scams).

    He's not saying that the people who got scammed in 419 scams like those in this story are honest (they usually have you agree to break some financial law).

  11. Re:If you think Entrapment is OK... by Gorshkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a reason for laws against entrapment.

    Entrapment is when agents of the government - ie, law enforcement officials - trick somebody into breaking the law.

    If a cop talks somebody into breaking into a bank and then arrests him, the case will be thrown out for entrapment.

    But if I double-dog dare somebody to break into a bank and they do so, the only thing I'm guilty of is having an idiot for a friend.

  12. Be careful! Some scams are not as obvious. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I do NOT think that scam VICTIMS need to be jailed, whether they are greedy or not.

    Yes, you'd have to be a total numbskull to believe some of the stories that scammers use. But if you read the next paragraph, you'll see that even someone who isn't "stupid" can be fooled. Ridiculous and obvious scams come with stories that your uncle's long-lost twin (separated at birth) who lived in Zimbabwe and ran a diamond mine just died in a tragic car accident and you were the only beneficiary in his will, please email over your bank account number and routing info, or that Nigeria's silicon tycoon needs to transfer a billion dollars to a company in the United States but due to some extremely complicated circumstances related to a jacked up political climate, they need to park the funds in the bank account of someone who is trustworthy and you came highly recommended, and they'll leave you 1% of the money as a fee for your troubles (that comes out to ten million bucks), please email us your bank account number, routing info, a photocopy of your driver license and passport, etc., etc., etc., well, all I can say is that if you actually believe any of this shit, you need to be educated. Read about the so-called 419 Scam among others. Yes, you'd have to be "greedy" to fall for such a scam. Should you be jailed? No. You're still the victim of a crime.

    Some scams sound more realistic than the ones above. For example, I once received an email bearing a friend's email address as the "From:" address and claiming that he had lost his passport and/or wallet while on vacation in Africa, and due to complications with the local authorities, he needed to borrow $1000 to pay some fine and get out of jail (money which he would supposedly pay back upon returning home). I called my friend on the phone and it turned out that he was safe and sound here at home, not in Africa. Someone had jacked his email password or otherwise hacked into his email account. Apparently, everyone in his address book received such an email. This is the type of scam that even discerning people could fall for. You have to be really, really, really careful not to fall for some of this stuff.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  13. Re: Racist Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To do nothing about overt racism under the guise of apathy, makes you a tacit racist.

    It's not the nanny states job to stop racism or Slash Dot's, it's yours, and mine, and everybody's who cares about humanity.

    Quick, while a few are still alive, find a WW2 concentration camp survivor, talk to them about what it was like before Hitler came to power, they acted just like you.

  14. they arent victims, they're conspirators by CdBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact still stands that any simple moral analysis of the state of the 'victims' showed that they conspired to defraud either a sovereign state or certain inhabitants of one - and lost out as a result.

    Honesty in these cases would have saved them their losses

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  15. Jogging ain't illegal, wire-fraud is by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the nigerian scam we are talking about, the grand-daddy of them all AND the scam would involve the "victim" commiting fraud. This is illegal.

    Let me try this on you.

    Say a drug dealer sell you 1 kg of cocaine. Are you then a criminal and deserve to go to jail?

    Now say that drug dealer is a scammer and sells you a bag of baking powder instead. You however think it is cocaine, would you go to jail for this?

    Probably not, because it is NOT a crime to buy baking powder for an insane price. Morally? Maybe, after all, you thought you were dealing in drugs.

    But with the nigerian scam you tend to actually have to attempt to commit a crime, fraud to get it all going.

    Do you think people who buy "cheap" goods that are obviously stolen should be done for receiving?

    The nigerian guy is just upset that this scam is giving his country a bad rep when the victims are hardly victims but instead people who in their greed were ready to defraud the nigerian goverment. Let us not forget what the scam is, these "victims" were ready to steal millions from a 3rd world nation.

    Not everyone who falls for a scam deserves sympathy.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  16. You can't cure stupid... by RaigetheFury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but you CAN give it a direction. I've said this a thousand times. There will always be people stupid/desperate/greedy enough to do something like this. Hell, two good friends of mine who I always thought were very intelligent fell victim to an Amway like scam. (Same company different name).

    When I showed them all of the websites talking about the scam they realized what a big mistake was. At least they only lost $400. Most people who fall for this lose their life savings.

    My mother is internet stupid. She's not a dumb person this is just alien to her. I showed her the power of google to answer her questions and now she uses it all the time to research businesses that she wants to work with. In fact, I think google helped her become Internet savvy.

    I truly believe that people who fall for scams like this should be forced to serve time. Give them solid time to think about their actions and how society should be forced to help the Darwin award winners of today.

  17. The government by EvilIntelligence · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The biggest problem here is the Nigerian government. They are well aware that the 409 scams bring in millions of dollars a year into their economy, and is probably one of their biggest revenue streams for the country. Since they have little else to offer the world, they are not about to stop the money flow