Slashdot Mirror


Diebold Admits Ohio Machines May Lose Votes

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Premier Election Solutions (a subsidiary of Diebold) has acknowledged a flaw that causes the systems to lose votes. It cannot be patched before the election and the machines are used in half of Ohio's counties, but they are issuing guidelines for avoiding the problem that presumably contain a work-around. While Diebold initially blamed anti-virus software for the glitch, they have now discovered that the bug was their own fault for not recording votes to memory when the cards are uploaded in 'certain circumstances' — something their initial analysis missed. It would be nice to hope that Ohio poll workers would be tech-savvy enough to make this a non-issue, but they had poll worker shortages last year and might need tech-savvy people to volunteer."

11 of 502 comments (clear)

  1. Blown way out of proportion by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get over it folks! It will only drop votes for Democrats. So clearly this is an isolated bug.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  2. LEAKED: Source code of innocent bug by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Turns out Diebold accidentally leaked a snippet of their C# source code that shows the conditions that the machines may fail to register votes:

    if(vote.Party == "Democrat" && democratvotes % 3)
    democratvotes++;

    Oopsie!

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  3. The circumstances? by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't blame me, I voted for a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM data WHERE name LIKE '%.

    1. Re:The circumstances? by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well geez, you could at least have inserted yourself as the winning candidate.

      *sigh* Supervillainy doesn't have the same draw it used to...

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:The circumstances? by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh man, you missed a prime opportunity for a Little Bobby Tables reference.

      http://xkcd.com/327/

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
  4. Re:Tea Party redux by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Want to really help? "Accidentally" run over the crate of voting machines, or allow it to fall off a bridge into a deep river. Do democracy a favor and destroy these abominations, you tech-savvy butterfingers!

    Ahem... before the election.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. Re:LEAKED: Source code of innocent bug by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only on Slashdot would you not only get a joke written in C#, but also multiple replies complaining that it's not technically sound.

  6. Re:"Flaw" or by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That was one of the links in the summary....

    In the what?

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  7. Certain Circumstances by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 5, Funny

    While Diebold initially blamed anti-virus software for the glitch, they have now discovered that the bug was their own fault for not recording votes to memory when the cards are uploaded in 'certain circumstances'

    "Certain circumstances" -- a.k.a "voting"

  8. Re:Tea Party redux by AlamedaStone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please mod parent up.

    Civil disobedience is where we need to be now, to prevent us bleeding-heart liberals from needing to learn how to care for small arms.

    --
    "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  9. Re:LEAKED: Source code of innocent bug by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Funny

    On Slashdot C# is the joke.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.