The policy I mentioned above only applies to open areas. For closed areas it's a no-phone-at-all/leave-it-outside-the-room policy.
The policies have been evolving though. It used to be much stricter in the days when cameras were the exception rather than the rule. Now it's an attempt to balance the prevalence of smartphones with the needs of security. The real problem seems to be that at the government level the rules are vague and poorly worded at best leaving implementation to the local offices.
Sure. Of course they can. All I'd need to do is a factory restore and not allow iTunes to restore the backup files and I'd be golden.
But the truth is 99% of the job for security is a combination of preventing accidental disclosures and preventing malicious outside parties from trying to compromise hardware. We have clearances and there's a level of basic trust that goes with that. They'll fully admit that if someone on the inside is fully dedicated to causing problems there's not much they can do - at least initially.
My company does a lot of DoD work. The policy is: no personally owned electronics may connect to company assets. Ever. We can have personal smartphones (but no notebooks or tablets) as long as they do not have a functional camera. For Android phones the only option is to remove the camera or JBWeld over the lens. For my new iPhone the local AT&T store enabled restrictions on the camera with a password only they know and gave me a letter as such. That's good enough for our security folks. It's not a perfect situation as disabling the camera kills things like having Siri dial phone numbers for me (as apparently that somehow involves Facetime) but it's better than any sort of destruction. Plus I was able to get the camera un-disabled (yeah, I know) when I went on vacation for a week and then have it re-disabled.
The PX-100's are excellent, but their strain relief at the plug end sucks sucks SUCKS. I'm on my 5th? 6th? pair of them now and after a year or two of admittedly heavy use I lose one channel.
But I've tried other on-ear headphones (can't stand earbuds for long periods of time) and none come close to the PX-100s for comfort and sound.
It stinks having to buy a new pair every 18 months or so, but having phones on and music playing is the only thing that gets me through my work day.
It's like after music CDs were introduced that cost a whole 12-13 dollars each. But that was only because manufacturing plants were scarce and demand was low. Once production ramped up and demand increased then prices naturally went....
Hopefully at the same press conference they'll announce a service pack to fix the buggy abomination known as iOS 4 (although knowing Apple they'll make you pay for it).
I made the mistake of "upgrading" my iPod Touch to 4 and now it won't work through the USB port on my car stereo. Google "ios 4 car stereo problems" and you'll see a huge Apple thread with people posting about this.
I like my iPod Touch (as close as I'll ever get to an iPhone).
To give you an example of what I'm talking about here, I read Oliver Sachs excellent memoir "Uncle Tungsten" where he recounts his childhood discovery and fascination with chemistry and science in general. He talk about going down to a local store in London around the WWII era and buying sodium, phosphorus, and I think even uranium ore. Then he goes home and experiments and mixes and burns and almost blows his house up in the process - yet he learns a lot and does it mostly on his own using his own creativity.
Nowadays if you build a little rocket in your backyard and set it off, you're liable to get a visit from Homeland Security and be branded a potential terrorist.
This is yet another example of the dangers inherent in over-parenting. "Don't climb that tree!" "Don't find out what dirt tastes like!" "Don't take the toy apart!"
This naturally evolves into the adult version. "Don't take pictures of that bridge!" "Don't try to find out what's behind that wall!" "Don't question anything your leaders tell you!"
Funny you should mention that. The old style lead-acid batteries are being swapped out now for new style lead-acid batteries (valve-regulated). I think it was a matter of the old supplier no longer making them.
Um, the Navy sort of does. Every nuclear submarine out there has a big diesel engine and an array of batteries on it. They are for use when the big tea kettle is down for maintenance and/or emergency situations.
Hell, I built those submarines (well, not all of them and I had help) and I can't have a camera at work. I hate having to shop on the "special" shelf at the phone store.
In the interest of completeness USS Ohio is no longer SSBN-726, it is now SSGN-726. It was converted a few years back from a Trident-carrying boomer to a "slow attack" capable of carrying 100+ Tomahawks, plus some SEAL capabilities.
Good question. Almost as good as what was a guy that sits on a space propulsion committee doing teaching Gaussian quadrature to a bunch of slacker engineers?
I may have combined a couple of his papers on that one, I'll have to look when I get home. It may have been one using fusion and one using anti-matter. I loved hearing his stories about some of the papers he had to review as part of the committee, some were downright interesting, but most seemed to involve some sort of device that pissed-off the 2nd law of thermodyamics and annoyed conservation of energy.
One of my grad school profs worked on a project like this. The concept involved a ship farting (for lack of a more appropriate term) out a series of small fusion bombs. When they went off the heat would cause the shielding at the rear of the ship to sublimate, and this ablation process would drive the ship. As I recall there were only two teensy problems with this: 1) even with the best shielding material available today, the intense heat from the detonation would still cause the maximum heat in the shield to occur at a depth greater than the surface (i.e. the shield would come off in great blobs instead of the slow steady ablation required for thrust) and 2) the amount of anti-matter required for the devices was only about a million times the total amount ever produced on Earth.
Oh man, I use that at least 3 times a week. Best $15 I ever spent (well, technical bookwise that is). Although it's up to $25 now, it's still a bargain.
I'd also add Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain and the Machine Design handbook.
Slashdot Mirror
The policy I mentioned above only applies to open areas. For closed areas it's a no-phone-at-all/leave-it-outside-the-room policy.
The policies have been evolving though. It used to be much stricter in the days when cameras were the exception rather than the rule. Now it's an attempt to balance the prevalence of smartphones with the needs of security. The real problem seems to be that at the government level the rules are vague and poorly worded at best leaving implementation to the local offices.
Sure. Of course they can. All I'd need to do is a factory restore and not allow iTunes to restore the backup files and I'd be golden.
But the truth is 99% of the job for security is a combination of preventing accidental disclosures and preventing malicious outside parties from trying to compromise hardware. We have clearances and there's a level of basic trust that goes with that. They'll fully admit that if someone on the inside is fully dedicated to causing problems there's not much they can do - at least initially.
My company does a lot of DoD work. The policy is: no personally owned electronics may connect to company assets. Ever. We can have personal smartphones (but no notebooks or tablets) as long as they do not have a functional camera. For Android phones the only option is to remove the camera or JBWeld over the lens. For my new iPhone the local AT&T store enabled restrictions on the camera with a password only they know and gave me a letter as such. That's good enough for our security folks. It's not a perfect situation as disabling the camera kills things like having Siri dial phone numbers for me (as apparently that somehow involves Facetime) but it's better than any sort of destruction. Plus I was able to get the camera un-disabled (yeah, I know) when I went on vacation for a week and then have it re-disabled.
No no. If "It's A Wondeful Life" taught us nothing else, it's "When a red sprite steals your breath, an angel dies a fiery death."
Angelic atmospheric re-entry. Easy enough.
The PX-100's are excellent, but their strain relief at the plug end sucks sucks SUCKS. I'm on my 5th? 6th? pair of them now and after a year or two of admittedly heavy use I lose one channel.
But I've tried other on-ear headphones (can't stand earbuds for long periods of time) and none come close to the PX-100s for comfort and sound.
It stinks having to buy a new pair every 18 months or so, but having phones on and music playing is the only thing that gets me through my work day.
*raises hand*
That definitely would've made those debugging sessions a lot more fun.
Nope.
Two old LA's are already positioned to become new MTS's. Don't need a third.
This is a big shame. I can't wait for the safety bulletins to come out after this.
Unless you multiply it by its complex conjugate - then shit gets real**.
** sorry xkcd.
Was that Mr. Noodle or Mr. Noodle's brother Mr. Noodle?**
I'm sure prices will drop soon.
It's like after music CDs were introduced that cost a whole 12-13 dollars each. But that was only because manufacturing plants were scarce and demand was low. Once production ramped up and demand increased then prices naturally went ....
Oh bother.
Hopefully at the same press conference they'll announce a service pack to fix the buggy abomination known as iOS 4 (although knowing Apple they'll make you pay for it).
I made the mistake of "upgrading" my iPod Touch to 4 and now it won't work through the USB port on my car stereo. Google "ios 4 car stereo problems" and you'll see a huge Apple thread with people posting about this.
I like my iPod Touch (as close as I'll ever get to an iPhone).
To give you an example of what I'm talking about here, I read Oliver Sachs excellent memoir "Uncle Tungsten" where he recounts his childhood discovery and fascination with chemistry and science in general. He talk about going down to a local store in London around the WWII era and buying sodium, phosphorus, and I think even uranium ore. Then he goes home and experiments and mixes and burns and almost blows his house up in the process - yet he learns a lot and does it mostly on his own using his own creativity.
Nowadays if you build a little rocket in your backyard and set it off, you're liable to get a visit from Homeland Security and be branded a potential terrorist.
I'm not against security, but at what cost?
This is yet another example of the dangers inherent in over-parenting. "Don't climb that tree!" "Don't find out what dirt tastes like!" "Don't take the toy apart!"
This naturally evolves into the adult version. "Don't take pictures of that bridge!" "Don't try to find out what's behind that wall!" "Don't question anything your leaders tell you!"
It's all part of the plan.
Eddie Izzard was right!
Funny you should mention that. The old style lead-acid batteries are being swapped out now for new style lead-acid batteries (valve-regulated). I think it was a matter of the old supplier no longer making them.
For now. The Navy is working on an all-electric drive for surface ships and subs.
Not coincidently, General Atomics is involved in that too.
Um, the Navy sort of does. Every nuclear submarine out there has a big diesel engine and an array of batteries on it. They are for use when the big tea kettle is down for maintenance and/or emergency situations.
Hell, I built those submarines (well, not all of them and I had help) and I can't have a camera at work. I hate having to shop on the "special" shelf at the phone store.
In the interest of completeness USS Ohio is no longer SSBN-726, it is now SSGN-726. It was converted a few years back from a Trident-carrying boomer to a "slow attack" capable of carrying 100+ Tomahawks, plus some SEAL capabilities.
Good question. Almost as good as what was a guy that sits on a space propulsion committee doing teaching Gaussian quadrature to a bunch of slacker engineers?
I may have combined a couple of his papers on that one, I'll have to look when I get home. It may have been one using fusion and one using anti-matter. I loved hearing his stories about some of the papers he had to review as part of the committee, some were downright interesting, but most seemed to involve some sort of device that pissed-off the 2nd law of thermodyamics and annoyed conservation of energy.
One of my grad school profs worked on a project like this. The concept involved a ship farting (for lack of a more appropriate term) out a series of small fusion bombs. When they went off the heat would cause the shielding at the rear of the ship to sublimate, and this ablation process would drive the ship. As I recall there were only two teensy problems with this: 1) even with the best shielding material available today, the intense heat from the detonation would still cause the maximum heat in the shield to occur at a depth greater than the surface (i.e. the shield would come off in great blobs instead of the slow steady ablation required for thrust) and 2) the amount of anti-matter required for the devices was only about a million times the total amount ever produced on Earth.
But apart from that it worked like a champ.
Oh man, I use that at least 3 times a week. Best $15 I ever spent (well, technical bookwise that is). Although it's up to $25 now, it's still a bargain.
I'd also add Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain and the Machine Design handbook.
Don't blame me, I voted for Zathras.
Back in the 80's radio could play anything, in the Boston area the UHF TV stations played uncut R rated movies for a while.
Ah yes, WSBK. They're motto at the time could have been "All Three Stooges, All The Time." Good times. Good times.
I remember seeing "The Deer Hunter" uncut on that channel. Great googly-moogly but did that freak me out. Almost as bad as "Scared Straight."
Truth be told, Angelina would make a pretty good P.G.O.A.T.
I'm not sure what role Brad would play though. Maybe Himself? That could work, especially after his work in 12 Monkeys.