Slashdot Mirror


First Review of Intel's New Classmate PC

An anonymous reader writes "Intel gave the press a sneak preview of its 3rd generation Classmate PC at IDF. It looks like this guy managed to kidnap the only working sample for a while and write up a full report. It looks like a major departure from the original, with a rotating touch screen and Atom processor. There's no official word on pricing yet, but no doubt the OLPC guys will try to rain on Intel's parade."

79 comments

  1. meanwhile, OLPC firmware gets edits to support XP by schwaang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Among other things, of course.
    OLPC seems to be plugging away as hard as ever since all that angst over XP.

    And some users are figuring out how to install regular linux desktops in an easier way. (Sugar's pretty hard for expert users to get used to.)

    Obligatory on-topic snark: does ClassmatePC come with a virus checker?

  2. Intel's parade? by Durindana · · Score: 0

    no doubt the OLPC guys will try to rain on Intel's parade

    Wow... frankly, that's pretty dick.

    1. Re:Intel's parade? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it were inevitable, surely anonymous could have had the taste to wait for it to happen, then crow about it?

    2. Re:Intel's parade? by rhyder128k · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those heartless corporate bastards at OLPC would love to steal some of Intel's glory by cloning their flagship humanitarian effort.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    3. Re:Intel's parade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize this is parody, but you're ignorant.

      Intel was doing humanitarian efforts before OLPC was ever dreamed up.

      They have an entire non-profit corporation that handles this stuff.

      Maybe you anti-corporate Pro-Nix armchair warriors would care to taste reality?

      Probably not, but something has to get you out of your parents basement... someday.

    4. Re:Intel's parade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right that Intel was doing "humanitarian" efforts before OLPC. In fact, one of the reason I try to avoid Intel products is because I once read on their website to whom they were giving some of their money. The "problem" (from my point of view) was only a minor part of their total donation program, but it was still something I judged as unacceptable.

      I'm not sure if Intel still give money to those people, in fact I'm not sure if the contribution was voluntary or simply a really bad mistake, but damage was done for me.

    5. Re:Intel's parade? by mspohr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought the whole purpose of the creation of the Classmate was to rain on the OLPC parade....

      (I think there's an 'In Russia...' joke in here somewhere.)

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  3. Let's remember who started the parade by bl8n8r · · Score: 5, Informative

    OLPC started the whole sub-mini notebook craze. It was Wintel that did the raining*. It's bad enough the American monopolies had to get their greedy paws in the OLPC pie; let's at least keep the facts straight.

    [*] - http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4472654.ece

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Informative

      the American monopolies

      American monopoly. Not plural. Intel isn't a monopoly anymore with AMD becoming more than just a clone manufacturer of x86 CPUs. And actually in most physical stores, AMD is just as common, if not more common than Intel CPUs. MS on the other hand, clearly has a monopoly.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      WTF? The OLPC may have started th fad but Wintel mini-laptops existed well before OLPC ever started tooting their own horn. The Gateway Handbook, the Toshiba Libretto's, the OQO, the various UMPCs, the list goes on and on.

    3. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Intel isn't a monopoly anymore with AMD becoming more than just a clone manufacturer of x86 CPUs.

      I suppose those various anti-trust investigations in various countries were just a horrible case of mistaken identity?

      Yeah, that's it; they were actually after the other Intel that has a monopoly in the earwax removal market but they always get it confused with the perfectly innocent chip maker.

    4. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by Belial6 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Craze is right. Toshiba was making sub-notebooks over a decade ago. The OLPC is just a con job to make people think that they are donating to charity when all they are really doing is paying for someone else's R&D. At the end of the day, the OLPC is too expensive for an inferior machine.

      Oh, and did you even read the link you gave? That thing claims that we were promised a $100 laptop with a high res color display and a cool Star Trek keyboard. It claims we were promised this on a computer that was solar powered. It also claims that the OLPCs were going to be donated, but as far as I have ever heard, they were in fact be sold to poor countries. If you want to convince people of your way of thinking, you might not want to link to articles that argue against your point.

    5. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by fermion · · Score: 1
      It depends what you call the sub-mini notebook. My first two mini notebooks were the Tandy 100 and 200. Could do most of what a the microcomputer could do, but at a fraction of the cost. Ten year later there was the Apple eMate. None of these ran the same OS as the bigger machines, but we were not compulsive about every machine we owned running the same OS. That did not happen until MS convinced the masses that this was necessary.

      So, the one laptop per child may usher some interesting innovations, but it is increasingly looking like it will just push the price of a laptop down even further, and since MS is the only OS provider that can provide software at negative net cost, at least for a while, this means that MS will gain even more traction into the market. I wish OLPC would have worked, but everyone seemed to be using it solely to renegotiate terms with MS.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative
      WTF? The OLPC may have started th fad but Wintel mini-laptops existed well before OLPC ever started tooting their own horn.

      You want to know why Wintel hates OLPC and astroturfs so vindictively, yet we love them?

      • Gateway HandBook 486DX2-50 RRP: AU$2899
      • Toshiba Libretto RRP: AU$3,999.00
      • OQO model 02 RRP: AU$2,134.99
      • OLPC RRP: AU$240.00
      • ASUS eee PC RRP: AU$449.00

      Got it yet?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    7. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      MS on the other hand, clearly has a monopoly.

      Oh, clearly. I mean it's not as if I can pick from one of a hundred alternate operating systems ranging from mainstream (Apple, several Linux distros) to obscure. Definitely a monopoly, because I literally have no choices but to buy Microsoft products. Apple doesn't exist. There aren't dozens of Linux distros for various purposes. It's just crazy how much of a monopoly Microsoft has.

    8. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Flamebait is unfair on this post. It is validly pointing out that the GP calls MS a monopoly while excusing Intel. There are far more viable alternatives to MS products than there are to Intel. Intel at the moment, only has AMD, which only challenges it in its server space. AMD is not a realistic competitor, as things stand, in the laptop space.

      MS on the other hand is embattled even in the desktop space, its traditional area of total hegemonic dominance.

      --
      I hate printers.
    9. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Ok, thats fair, but I can't go into any major retailer and get a system that isn't Windows.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    10. Re:Let's remember who started the parade by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      the olpc is not a laptop but an education project.

  4. Are these kind of devises more for the show or ... by BlueTrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are these kind of devises more for the show or are they really useful.

    Personally, I always find myself writing notes faster with a pen and paper. I have tried several alternatives ranging from Palm, Pocket PCs, having a laptop with me ... but from my point of view nothing beat having a pen and a paper to take quick notes, making a drawing, ... during a speech/course.

    If anybody here know a good solution, I would be glad to know how I could find a good replacement. My principal issue with paper notes is that it is easy to lose and take more time to classify them.

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
  5. What? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, why, if they still insist on sticking to XP do they have an application as part of the GUI but clearly still have the XP bar at the bottom? Wouldn't it be better for a system that is supposed to be low end and cheap to at least use the normal XP GUI or a totally different shell?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

  6. Only working sample? Really? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then how come in one of the photo the laptop has the "intel inside" sticker and in another photo it's not there?

    1. Re:Only working sample? Really? by slater86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What Intel Sticker? **Jedi Hand Wave**

      very valid point though :-)

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
  7. Rotating screen by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That tiny pivot in the middle seems like a good target for kids to break the computer.

    1. Re:Rotating screen by Gates82 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While for children it may be a cause for concern it seems to work fine on my X61 tablet and I have a 3 year old who is pretty rough with it when in tablet mode (though he does not rotate the screen yet). I must say that with this connection and a few other tablet function based components that my new X series is not nearly as ironclad as my old A31 was.

      --
      So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's Sister?

    2. Re:Rotating screen by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      The XO-1 has that same issue

    3. Re:Rotating screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it's not quite the same issue. As steveha said under a different thread:

      From the photos, it's a pretty conventional clamshell, which means lots of connections running through the hinge so the motherboard can be in the base and the display in the lid; the OLPC design has motherboard and display in the lid, so that all that needs to run through the hinge is basically a USB cable. Teen-aged kids, armed with simple screwdrivers, can take apart two broken OLPC laptops, swap parts, and produce a working OLPC laptop. I really doubt this will be possible with the Classmate.

    4. Re:Rotating screen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all the ventilation slots for sand to get into...

      --
      No sig today...
  8. I remember... by pembo13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when this was about bring open devices to poor, but not too poor, children. Now it's just a new first-world toy.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:I remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, kind of like how the UN's plan to eliminate poverty is really a plan to funnel money to several high level bureaucrats...

    2. Re:I remember... by TheSeer2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far as I know OLPC hasn't ended. And... why can't we have both? There's helping the poor but why shouldn't those that can afford better computers be allowed to buy them?

  9. XP to prepare kids for adult life by ericferris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA: I can understand why a Windows environment would be considered desirable in an educational tool, since the children will be learning to use the OS and applications that theyâ(TM)ll be encountering in their adult life.

    What a brillant insight!

    See, a kid using Windows XP in high school will encounter Windows XP applications in ten or fifteen years. Why, he will work with only Windows XP his whole adult life. Otherwise, he'd have to be trained to be flexible and to learn by himself as soon as high school.

    This brilliant insight also explains why Vista has failed on the marketplace. Why, when the average worker left high school school in the 80s, all the Apple IIs and C-64s in the school computer labs were running only Windows XP! No wonder he refuses Vista!

    Thank God we have good, insightful journalists in this country. Otherwise, we might see all kind of crap printed on the web.

    Note: yes, that was sarcasm. All of it. Thank you for noticing.

    --
    Fantasy: http://ferrisfantasy.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your saying that having experience with windows is a bad thing? Given that the OLPC OS has 0% use in any business wouldn't windows be a better thing to have a basic grasp of?

    2. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by cbdougla · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, what he's saying is that it's not about learning to use a computer, it's about using a computer to facilitate learning. Computer skills are fairly transferable. If you can learn the basics, learning to use another computer is fairly easy.

    3. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (not the same AC as grandparent)

      You seem to forget that the OLPC was supposed to be an educational tool, not a cheap laptop.

      It was not about giving children an early experience with business software, it was about educating them, through constructivism.

      Even if we forget the educational side, even if we assume winxp will be out there for a hundred years, yes, it is better for kids to learn to adapt to any OS than just have them trained in WinXP.

    4. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yet most elementary schools and high schools are 90% Mac based...

      I think students should be exposed to all the current OS's they may encounter in the workplace (XP, Vista, Mac, Linux) during their schooling, not just what-ever the teachers are able to figure out.

    5. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a typo. Like "they'll be encountering in their adult life", would be "they'll be encountering in their life with adults". Meaning if we turn this crap over to schoolkids, they'll turn their survival skills into home-support for our paying customers. God knows MS needs something like that.

      Side-note: do we have any well-researched stats of how savvy kids are with computers? For a long time we had a presumption that kids would naturally turn into mini-experts. The kids who we born with a mouse at home are 23 now -- can't say I've noticed. Seems we get the same number of geeks as before, and the greater mass just use the boxes more & quicker than their parents, but no smarter.

      I'm miffed. I thought it was a sure thing my niece would take over the family IT duties. She was bright, read books, was on the bloody box nearly all the time, but turned out just as hopeless with maintenance and upgrades as her parents.

    6. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by westlake · · Score: 1
      This brilliant insight also explains why Vista has failed on the marketplace.
      .

      Vista hasn't failed in the home and SOHO markets: Top Operating System Share Trend In these - global - webstats Vista is the only OS showing any significant growth at all.

      See, a kid using Windows XP in high school will encounter Windows XP applications in ten or fifteen years.

      He will most likely be using apps that will be recognizable descendants of those first published for the Mac OS in 1984 and Win 3.1 in 1992 and Win 95 in 1995.

      Microsoft Office Ultimate for full-time students in the U.S. is $60:

      Microsoft Office Word 2007, Microsoft Office Excel 2007, Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2007, Microsoft Office Outlook 2007, Microsoft Office Access 2007, Microsoft Office Publisher 2007, Office OneNote 2007, Office Groove 2007 and Microsoft Office InfoPath 2007

      The apps might in the cloud.

      But I'll take the odds that the office of 2019 or 2025 isn't going to look all that different from the office of 2008.

      ______

      Net Applications isn't tracking licenses - it is tracking users:

      160 million hits to its clients's websites each moth

      Additional estimates about the website population:

      76% participate in pay per click programs to drive traffic to their sites
      # 43% are commerce sites
      # 18% are corporate sites
      # 10% are content sites
      # 29% classify themselves as other (includes gov, org, search engine marketers etc..)
      About Our Market Share Statistics

    7. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by Zerth · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to those numbers, vista is a failure. It isn't success if you're primarily gaining usershare through hardware failure.

      From September to July on that chart, the xp+vista+2k goes from ~90.4% to ~89.6% I was almost "generous" and went to lump "other" in on the assumption it was 95/98, but then the drop would be nearly 1.5%

      A .8% loss isn't horrible, but Macs grew 1.12% and Linux grew .33%

      If Vista is growing(in gross numbers, as opposed to percentages), Linux and Mac are growing faster in relative terms according to your chart.

    8. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista hasn't failed in the home and SOHO markets: Top Operating System Share Trend In these - global - webstats Vista is the only OS showing any significant growth at all.

      Oh boy. Because I know that no one actually uses Vista, I suspect someone has taken these steps...

      Step 1 - Find a list of commercial sites tracked by this tracking service (maybe write an advanced program to crawl through web pages).

      Step 2 - Virtualize Windows (or any other OS) so that it is running many times.

      Step 3- Use IP spoofing and hit all these pages recursively at randomized time delays.

      Step 4 - ????

      Step 5 - Profit from the dodgy stats.

    9. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by bit01 · · Score: 1

      He will most likely be using apps that will be recognizable descendants of those first published for the Mac OS in 1984 and Win 3.1 in 1992 and Win 95 in 1995

      In other words: "I never look at alternatives because I'm going to be running the same OS for the rest of eternity".

      Yep, M$ loves it when schools subsidize M$ with free M$ product training. Typical M$ alley-cat ethics. No wonder M$ has so many enemies.

      ---

      DRM breaks ownership, the basis of capitalism and the free market.

    10. Re:XP to prepare kids for adult life by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Student discounts for software aren't really the developing trend. The shift will be to supply school notebooks complete with all (operating system, applications, simulations and digital texts) the required software in order to prevent the inevitable high corporate profit school budget blow out and this includes the back end server environment.

      Schools the get sucked into buying piece meal will quickly see the discounts evaporative in the next cycle, 6 months or one year down track and be paying thousands of dollars for server and applications software per user.

      Long term discounted supply has to be enforced. Which is exactly what FOSS supplies, free yesterday, free today, free tomorrow and naturally enough free in one, two, five, ten and even one hundred years time. People have had lots of experience getting burnt by disappearing corporate discounts, or hidden server software blow outs and enforced audited user licence fees complete with mandatory inspections.

      So will the BSA be conducting random school yard audits to scan for illegally installed software on children's computers or will schools take the sensible easy approach use pre-installed FOSS and avoid the whole exorbitantly costly and privacy invasive issue.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  10. I need an adult! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like this guy managed to kidnap the only working sample ...

    Someone kidnapped my Classmate! Amber alert! Amber alert!

  11. Zero mention of OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The review doesn't mention OLPC once, and we're supposed to take it even remotely seriously? Why would that possibly happen if not for a requirement from Intel that the review not mention the OLPC.

    That's like reviewing a portable music player and not comparing it against an iPod. Once a product has that kind of mindshare, it's just irresponsible not to compare.

    (verification word: reinvent. yeah, that's about right)

  12. Intel vs. OLPC by steveha · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's no official word on pricing yet, but no doubt the OLPC guys will try to rain on Intel's parade.

    Huh?

    Let's do a quick review.

    0) OLPC starts working on a laptop. It has a non-Intel chip and is designed for ultra power efficiency.
    1) Intel starts working on their own laptop. Intel's of course has an Intel CPU; and it is designed to run Windows.
    2) Official Intel sales people start trying to sell the Classmate to countries that are considering the OLPC laptop. In at least one case, an Intel sales person went to a country that had already agreed to buy OLPC laptops, and said in effect "That thing won't even run Windows... you sure you really want it?" At the time, Intel was officially a member of OLPC. (Rogue sales people? Evil corporate double-dealing? You decide.)

    Now, what's up with "no doubt the OLPC guys will try to rain on Intel's parade"? The OLPC guys are the overbearing bullies and Intel is the underdog here?

    I'm sure there are markets for something like the Classmate PC. I don't think it's the best choice for places with no electric infrastructure. And it has a cooling fan, so I don't think it's the best choice for places that are really hot, humid, and/or dusty. And I'm sure it costs about twice as much as the OLPC, so I don't think it's the best choice for the truly poor markets. And it almost certainly is much harder to repair than the OLPC design.[1] Hmmm. Am I raining on Intel's parade?

    All that said, the world is a large place full of lots of kids. No way can OLPC crank out enough computers to help everyone. If Intel can sell their computer into the more affluent areas, they can make money. If their sales people can leave the OLPC markets alone, maybe Intel and OLPC can just get along.

    P.S. I suspect that neither OLPC nor Intel will have the last word on educational computers for the masses. I'm starting to think that the best design would be a simple tablet that actually does cost $100 or less, and probably runs an ARM chip or something for crazy long battery life.

    steveha

    [1] From the photos, it's a pretty conventional clamshell, which means lots of connections running through the hinge so the motherboard can be in the base and the display in the lid; the OLPC design has motherboard and display in the lid, so that all that needs to run through the hinge is basically a USB cable. Teen-aged kids, armed with simple screwdrivers, can take apart two broken OLPC laptops, swap parts, and produce a working OLPC laptop. I really doubt this will be possible with the Classmate.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teen-aged kids, armed with simple screwdrivers, can take apart two broken OLPC laptops, swap parts, and produce a working OLPC laptop. I really doubt this will be possible with the Classmate.

      That's certainly a feature I demand in a laptop!

    2. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it has a cooling fan, so I don't think it's the best choice for places that are really hot, humid, and/or dusty.

      Not necessarily. Can be the opposite - the G3 iMacs were notorious for intermittent crashes during heat waves. And dust? If it's not a sealed unit, that's always a problem. At least a fanned machine can be set up to keep piles from forming. Put a grille on the intake and make it visible so people know to wipe it off once in a while.

      The actual downside of fans is noise and failure rates.

    3. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by tylerni7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Believe it or not, these laptops aren't made for you, they are made for developing countries. So while you may sarcastically think that it's unnecessary to swap out parts from one laptop and put them in another, especially when you can take it to a repair shop or send it back to the manufacturer, I hope you realize that for the intended markets of these computers, that isn't possible. (as an aside, I'm writing this from an XO-1 that I replaced the screen in, I'd like to see you do that to your own laptop)
      And as for the other AC claiming that fans can be good... I guarantee you the XO does not overheat. They have tested them at 68 C, far hotter than it would get in the real world http://www.olpcnews.com/hardware/screen/olpc_job_breaking_xo-1.html and considering the laptop is completely sealed, dust and sand are completely non-threatening, as is rain.
      The classmate has a lot to live up to if it wants to replace the XO.

    4. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      And it has a cooling fan, so I don't think it's the best choice for places that are really hot, humid, and/or dusty.

      Not necessarily. Can be the opposite

      Yeah, can be but IS NOT in this case. We are not talking in the abstract, we are talking about the OLPC XO, which is in fact designed to run without a fan, and does in fact have a sealed case (even a sealed keyboard). When you fold down the antenna ears, you seal all the exposed ports. Check it.

      OLPC wanted super long battery life, and the low-power CPU turns out to be low-heat as well. OLPC accepted a slow CPU to gain durability and battery life.

      Intel, on the other hand, wanted to run Windows fast, above all else.

      The actual downside of fans is noise and failure rates.

      Never mind the noise, the failure rate is what they cared about. If you live in a hot climate, and the little cooling fan inside your computer dies as they always do, your computer is unusable. They didn't want that.

    5. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      0) OLPC starts working on a laptop. It has a non-Intel chip and is designed for ultra power efficiency.
      1) Intel starts working on their own laptop. Intel's of course has an Intel CPU; and it is designed to run Windows.

      What's annoying is your timeline (and the fact you counted from zero). You have no idea when Intel began working on the classmate or if the idea was already in the works. Yes, they were part of OLPC- but if they had already invested serious money into their own program, can you blame them for backing out?

      They are a business, and the only reason their practice can be seen as wrong is because OLPCs were supposed to save the poor...

    6. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by steveha · · Score: 1

      You have no idea when Intel began working on the classmate or if the idea was already in the works.

      Actually, I do, because I have been reading the news coverage. I challenge you to present even one link to even one news story that shows the Classmate even being discussed before the OLPC project came along.

      There are so many links I could give you... here's one. Be sure to read page 5.

      http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4472654.ece

      From page 5:

      Intel will tie itself in knots rather than admit its laptop was a response to OLPC's.

      My Intel spokesperson, Agnes Kwan, seems to exist to evade the issue. I played e-mail ping-pong with her over several days. She was trying to avoid giving me any dates that would show the Classmate came after the XO. This included sending me a bizarre and barely literate "ethnographic" study of computing in the developed world. In the end, all she would say about the timeline of the Classmate was: "It's hard to pinpoint a start date with the nature of ethnographic research in which ethnographers collect data over a long period of time." Sorry?

      Many in the industry says the Classmate was intended to be an XO killer and that's how Intel behaved.

      Yes, they were part of OLPC- but if they had already invested serious money into their own program, can you blame them for backing out?

      Yes, I can blame them, and I do. It's their right to sell their products in any market they choose. It's my right to be disgusted when they use predatory sales tactics to sabotage a non-profit that is trying to help kids learn. From page 5 again:

      Their formidable global sales operation charged into any market in which OLPC might get a foothold, trashing the XO and pushing the Classmate. Nigeria, where Negroponte had one of his handshake deals with President Obasanjo, was a typical example. In August 2006, Craig Barrett, Intel chairman, wrote a hard-sell letter to Obasanjo asking for a meeting in which he could explain their World Ahead programme, "which is chartered to extend PC access to the world's next billion users". This programme had been launched in May 2006, 15 months after the OLPC announcement at Davos - bit of a dead giveaway there, Craig. Barrett's letter was backed up by documents listing "the shortcoming of the OLPC approach".

      These documents having been leaked, they became a significant embarrassment to Intel. Here was a mighty company trying to crush a philanthropic project.

      But then, they agreed to come on board the OLPC project. And even as they were members of OLPC, their sales people kept on undermining the OLPC. I don't like that.

      They are a business, and the only reason their practice can be seen as wrong is because OLPCs were supposed to save the poor...

      I have no problem with businesses making money. Heck, I like making money myself. But I have a serious problem with a business sabotaging a non-profit.

      Seriously, do a few Google searches and read about this stuff before you spend any more of your time defending Intel's behavior toward OLPC. They are a big company and not everything they do is evil (the Xorg guys have good things to say about how Intel cooperates with them, for example). But their behavior towards OLPC has been contemptible.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    7. Re:Intel vs. OLPC by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I dont think he was sarcastic.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  13. When will people learn? by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:

    I can understand why a Windows environment would be considered desirable in an educational tool, since the children will be learning to use the OS and applications that theyâ(TM)ll be encountering in their adult life.

    That's quite the prediction there, predicting what OS is going to be in predominant use when today's 7-year-olds enter the knowledge workforce in 15+ years. And even if the author turns out to be correct, and Windows is still in predominant use beyond 2020, it's highly doubtful that whatever version is in use then is going to come close to resembling Windows XP.

    Really, at the age group these systems are targeted towards, the operating system shouldn't matter. The ideal of these systems isn't to teach operating system usage, but to use interactive applications for sharing information and teaching non-computer skills. You could do that with OS/2, and it's not going to impair anyone's ability to learn how to use an OS in the future. Heck, I started back at that age on a Commodore PET, and it certainly hasn't affected my ability to use a modern day OS.

    Yaz.

    1. Re:When will people learn? by lee1026 · · Score: 0

      The current UIs sticking around is hardly unthinkable: Windows 95 came out 13 years ago, and someone who is used to 95 would find it extremely easy to pick up windows xp or vista.

    2. Re:When will people learn? by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The current UIs sticking around is hardly unthinkable: Windows 95 came out 13 years ago, and someone who is used to 95 would find it extremely easy to pick up windows xp or vista.

      By 2020, the current Windows UI will be 25 years old. And one of the big complaints you tend to get from people who have moved directly from the Win 9X line to XP or Vista is that many of the default views (particularly the Control Panel's default view) has changed so drastically that it's difficult to figure out where to configure specific settings.

      So again, this is a completely useless reason for using Windows on systems designed for kids. I doubt the Windows UI is going to last 25 years without change -- and if it does, Microsoft will by then be so unimportant in the computing world that nobody is going to be using their OS anyhow.

      Yaz.

    3. Re:When will people learn? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't know, Vista resembles win 95. The user differences are really not that different.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:When will people learn? by $pace6host · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know, Vista resembles win 95. The user differences are really not that different.

      You're right, at the heart, they're really not all that different. Would you say that Gnome or KDE is more or less different from Vista than Win 95 is different from Vista? With the tendency of all of the user interfaces to copy from one another, I think KDE and Gnome are probably closer to Vista than 95 was.

      Personally, I'd say that since most of the current user interfaces use the same basic window, icon, mouse/touchscreen/touchpad, pointer and keyboard paradigm, they'd leave any current student in about the same position for the world of 15 years from now -- and let us hope there's some progress made on user interfaces between now and then, both for Microsoft and competitors (proprietary AND free / open source).

      Like Yaz, I learned to use computers in the 80s on TRS-80, Apple IIe, and C64 computers - and I don't have a problem with Vista, Gnome, KDE or OSX today. Most of those systems didn't even have mice! The basic concepts are more important than the particulars.

    5. Re:When will people learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Yaz, I learned to use computers in the 80s on TRS-80, Apple IIe, and C64 computers - and I don't have a problem with Vista, Gnome, KDE or OSX today. Most of those systems didn't even have mice! The basic concepts are more important than the particulars.

      Ok .. so I dont know about Vista, but KDE, XP, and OS X are indeed all alike. GNOME however si another kind of fish, just in its early days, but clearly not in the same soup with the aforementioned 3.

    6. Re:When will people learn? by highacnumber · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      I can understand why a Windows environment would be considered desirable in an educational tool, since the children will be learning to use the OS and applications that theyâ(TM)ll be encountering in their adult life.

      Heck, I started back at that age on a Commodore PET, and it certainly hasn't affected my ability to use a modern day OS.

      Yaz.

      Actually, starting on a PET probably helped you learn other things. For the same reason, starting with linux is a good idea.

    7. Re:When will people learn? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Actually, starting on a PET probably helped you learn other things. For the same reason, starting with linux is a good idea.

      True, but then again I had the aptitude for the skill. Not every child will, and I don't think it's advantageous to make every little kid into a computer scientist.

      The PET had the added advantage in that it was much more limited as to what you could do with it, and you had to learn how to interact with the system at a relatively low level if you were to do something as simple as load a progam. There were no hard drives, GUIs (or much in the way of graphics at all for that matter), online help, audio, etc. The barriers to entry were higher in some regards, but lower in others (it wasn't that hard to get into writing a game of some sort, for example, as you didn't have to worry about audio or graphics, for example, and the end result could be nearly "state of the art" and impress your friends).

      XP may be an adequate OS for the Classmate, depending on what sorts of applications they intend to target it for -- my comments shouldn't be read as being anti-Windows. However, using "it's the OS everyone uses in the working world"[0] as the rationale simply doesn't hold up to any real logic.

      Yaz.

  14. Re:meanwhile, OLPC firmware gets edits to support by bstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought the XP version that was allowed on low cost PCs had restrictions that prohibited using touch screens. Did Microsoft change those rules?

  15. Two Photo Sessions? by Nymz · · Score: 1

    One session has a round gray carpet table, missing Intel sticker, and 11 Quick Launcher icons. The other session has a hard Formica table, the Intel sticker, and 9 Quick Launcher icons.

  16. Not bad at all by tuomoks · · Score: 1

    Looks decent and maybe useful for more than kids. Now - why to think kids are stupid or something. I'm not talking about XP, I can see it running in such machine. Of course Linux gives much more with much less money but a computer is just a computer? My kids have used (my) computers since they were three, never broke anything, boys built their own at age of 8, have no problems whatever OS they have to use, even the one who doesn't care about computers but cars (you know how many separate computers can be in a modern car like new Porches?) And the computers when they were 3 were not PCs - two terminals hanging on two X.25 lines to several big systems, other toys came later.

    Kids and computers are like kids and languages - they have no problems at pre-school age to learn 3 or 4 foreign languages in a couple of months in right environment just for fun - seen that! Try that when over 20. Same with computers - if they find it fun, they can learn anything. And most kids never break things, they are just (maybe) a little more accident prone and schools up to college are a harsh environment, more than most workplaces - heh! I wonder if this would tolerate the adults, leaving the notebook top of the car, driving over it or sometimes even shooting the damn computer?

  17. OLPC is about the software, not the hardware... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Why does nobody seem to be able to figure this out?

    The idea behind OLPC is to teach, not to teach how to use a PC.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:OLPC is about the software, not the hardware... by deanston · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a high level, yes, but the stumbling block up to this point is that they cannot figure the hardware piece out to make it cheap but good. For $200, my XO is barely better than a USB stick, and less than 6 months later, my iPhone is 10 time the 'computer' the XO is, with just half the screen. Not taking Steve Jobs' offer for FREE OS X and then substituting with XP is IMO the single greatest disservice to the high tech education of the children around the world whom the OLPC claims to want to help.

    2. Re:OLPC is about the software, not the hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is everyone complaining about Sugar then?

    3. Re:OLPC is about the software, not the hardware... by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      so you mean not prohibiting the children and their teachers and the governments from knowing what the laptops actually do and being able to fix problems is a a disservice? how much were you paid for that post?

    4. Re:OLPC is about the software, not the hardware... by deanston · · Score: 1

      With XP, I supposed they will have to fix a lot of problems, don't they? Are you insinuating with Apple/OS X they will have no problems? How much are YOU getting paid? I donated a XO laptop with the $400 Give-1-Get-1 deal because I believed in the cause and the idea of low cost Linux. The switch to XP is a fraud and insult to my donation. How much have you donated to OLPC?

  18. no kidding by r00t · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it will have to ship with Vista.

  19. Re:Are these kind of devises more for the show or by bryxal · · Score: 1

    Have you tried a Tablet PC. The pricier ones work great. Just don't buy a cheap ones (HP had some awful ones for 800USD a while back and it turned a lot of people off them, personally Toshiba's have worked great, YMMV) you'll have a hard time writing. You need to pay ~1500-2000USD to get something that will really work well.

  20. Keyboard layouts by TedRiot · · Score: 1

    What's with the keyboard layouts on subnotebooks lately? Are they trying to slowly make the right shift key unusable enough that it can be removed completely? I, for one really, really don't want the arrow up to be on the left side of right shift.

    And why have three keys on the right side of P and two keys on the right side of L and have the enter be the wrong shape.

    To be fair, I also hate the HP laptop layout I'm using at the moment where home, pgup, pgdn and end are on the right side of bs, enter and right shift. I like the layout on my Lenovo shich has these extra keys basically below right shift and above backspace where they are not constantly hit accidentally when typing.

  21. Re:Are these kind of devises more for the show or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Personally, I always find myself writing notes faster with a pen and paper.

    I am as quick when using an already booted computer ...

    I have tried several alternatives ranging from Palm, Pocket PCs, having a laptop with me ... but from my point of view nothing beat having a pen and a paper to take quick notes, making a drawing, ... during a speech/course.

    For quick note taking, nothing beats paper and pencil, I believe. (To take audio recordings is annoying for your environment, and it takes much more time to rehear those notes than to read them written on paper or some electronic device.)

    If anybody here know a good solution, I would be glad to know how I could find a good replacement. My principal issue with paper notes is that it is easy to lose and take more time to classify them.

    Not that I have a good solution for you, but I use a bunch of text files (with descriptive names) as my main store of notes. When my computer is powered off, I use paper. Most important is to transcribe these notes as soon as possible to the searchable digital archive (and then immediately[1] destroy the paper note). Alternatively, mark the note as read.

    I dislike those fluorescent or bright yellow and green markers which some people use to highlight text (after copying, the highlighted text becomes hard to decipher; those markers are *not* useful for highlighting). But they are ideal for marking notes as read. ;) Just cross out your note; it is still readable in an emergency, but you know you can destroy it after your next backup.

    [1] Not immediately, but as soon as you've backed up your digital transcription.

  22. Hook em while they're young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distributing Windows platforms to kids in third-world countries.

    Windows - hook em while they're young.

  23. In what ways has the office changed? by westlake · · Score: 1
    In other words: "I never look at alternatives because I'm going to be running the same OS for the rest of eternity".
    .

    How difficult would it be the young woman who entered office work as a typist in 1888 to adapt to the office of 2008?

    The young man in accounting?

    Local museums have ledgers, correspondence and promotional material - paper ephemerals - from local businesses active in the 1850s ---and it is all quite familiar.

    You can turn the clock back another century to the fur-trading posts of the 1750s --- and still find nothing strange from a purely commercial point-of-view.

    MS Office is what it is because it is shaped by the requirements and traditions of clerical work that go back hundreds of years.

    That is why it is so very, very hard for projects like OpenOffice.org to come up with anything truly innovative - no matter how much money Big Daddy Sun pours into the bin.

    1. Re:In what ways has the office changed? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      ...

      MS Office is what it is because it is shaped by the requirements and traditions of clerical work that go back hundreds of years.

      Then how come all the talk about "retraining costs" from the M$ astroturfers whenever anybody suggests moving an office from M$ to an alternative? It's not true of course but they do so love to go on and on.

      That is why it is so very, very hard for projects like OpenOffice.org to come up with anything truly innovative -

      That is why it is so very, very hard for any software package to come up with anything truly innovative -

      Actually, there's innovation in office software all the time, most of it not at M$. e.g. LyX, GoogleDocs, gOffice or BuzzWord.

      no matter how much money Big Daddy Sun pours into the bin.

      Ah yes, marketing 101; if you can't make a decent argument try to throw the reader off with some emotive and selective associations. In reality Sun is not even remotely a "big daddy" compared to M$ and M$Office is not particularly innovative compared to OpenOffice (and earlier/other office software) as you try to imply.

      ---

      Monopolies = Industrial feudalism

  24. It isn't hardware failure that drives sales. by westlake · · Score: 1
    It isn't success if you're primarily gaining usershare through hardware failure.
    .

    It isn't hardware failure that drives the home and SOHO user to upgrade.

    It is the chance to massively upgrade hardware and software at the OEM price. The HP Quad Core 64 Bit Vista Premium PC with 4 GB RAM and NVIDIA 9600 graphics and 1 TB of storage is $1000 at Walmart.com.

    The Duo Core 32 Bit Vista Premium PC with 2 GB RAM starts at $329 at Walmart.com.

    A .8% loss isn't horrible, but Macs grew 1.12% and Linux grew 33%
    If Vista is growing(in gross numbers, as opposed to percentages), Linux and Mac are growing faster in relative terms according to your chart.

    Take a look at the numbers again and you will see OSX hitting a wall - a 5% share for the MacIntel that hasn't changed significantly in months.

    As for Linux, it seems to be settling back into a barely visible 0.02% growth each month, a pity, since it looked as if this might be the year when the mass market OEM Linux PC broke into the single digit

    Relative growth simply isn't very impressive when you begin from so small a base.

  25. Re:meanwhile, OLPC firmware gets edits to support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this new Classmate still come with the all important Trusted Platform Module?

    After all... Intel wants to make sure that third world kids are introduced to the wonders of hardware DRM nice and early.. no matter if it adds to the cost of the machine.

  26. A good dictophone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Newer ones are basically flash based mp3 players using a different recording codec. Most plug directly into the usb ports on your pc/laptop like a flash pen, so you can just chuck the files on to review or transcribe at a later time.

    If you've got some well trained Voice-rec software, even better.