Slashdot Mirror


If Linux Fails, Blame Jim Zemlin

darthcamaro writes "Everyone asks who runs Linux — to which the normal answer is either Linus Torvalds or 'the community.' But (as Master Yoda once said) — There is another. His name is Jim Zemlin and he is the Executive Director of The Linux Foundation." From the interview linked above: "'I want to be a thousand percent confident that this organization will be around for the next 30 to 50 years because Linux isn't going away,' Zemlin said. 'It's everywhere, and there is no doubt that Linux will be an important platform in the future and we're only at the beginning on the embedded and mobile side. It will be my screwup if we don't have an organization that can help coordinate and grow the development of the Linux platform.'"

19 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Re:linux sucks by samcan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will have to ask you to turn in your Nerd credentials.

  2. Re:linux sucks by McGiraf · · Score: 5, Funny

    That makes Linux better than your girlfriend.

  3. The desktop years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we blame Jim Zemlin for every year that hasn't been the year of the linux desktop?

    $IsDesktopLinuxYear = false; //this never changes
    while(!$IsDesktopLinuxYear) {

      Slap("Jim Zemlin");
      Sleep(31536000); // omg epic design
    }

  4. Re:linux sucks by r00b · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux is my girlfriend you insensitive clod.

  5. Re:Not useful in 30 years by McGiraf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well one would hope that Linux would have evolved in 30 years. Maybe not one line of code from now will still be in it, maybe be it will no be written in C anymore, maybe the kernel version is going to be 2.8 (more likely 2.6.5665454871125114-rc89) but it could well be still around.

  6. Re:Strategy? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

    >Do they have a strategy against software patents?

    This is a natural benefit of "twenty year sustainability."

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  7. Re:linux sucks by McGiraf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me too, but Windows goes down on me more often.

  8. Re:Not useful in 30 years by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, Windows 1.0 and Windows Vista share almost nothing in common.

    It share new font install dialog

  9. Master Yoda... by dubz · · Score: 3, Funny

    But (as Master Yoda once said) â" There is another. His name is Jim Zemlin and he is the Executive Director of The Linux Foundation."

    Another there is. Jim Zemlin his name is ...

  10. Re:Not useful in 30 years by Repossessed · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always figured HURD will be ready about the same time Linux finally becomes unmaintainable.

    Which means Linux needs to last a lot more than 30 more years.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  11. Re:Wow, he does think rather highly of himself... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suppose he's going to give it 110% so he can be 1000% confident Linux will be on 500% of all mobile devices.

    I was going to say something else but I've forgotten his name already.

  12. Re:linux sucks by nawcom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows goes down on you? Windows usually locks up on me. Rigor mortis ftw.

  13. Yes but... by nganju · · Score: 2, Funny

    does he run linux?

    Sorry, had to be said.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  14. Re:Not useful in 30 years by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe not one line of code from now will still be in it

    But it will still be SCO's IP!

  15. Re:linux sucks by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

    atleast she's tight, everytime I've used Windows lately it's been one open hole after another.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  16. Re:linux sucks by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 3, Funny

    Winston, your wisdom is infinite :).

  17. Re:Not useful in 30 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1988 - There comes a time that we have to get rid of UNIX and come up with something better. Today isn't the time to do it, and perhaps 20 years down the road isn't time to do it either, but eventually we have to come up with something that addresses some of the flaws of UNIX.

    2008 - There comes a time that we have to get rid of UNIX and come up with something better. Today isn't the time to do it, and perhaps 20 years down the road isn't time to do it either, but eventually we have to come up with something that addresses some of the flaws of UNIX.

    2028 - There comes a time that we have to get rid of UNIX and come up with something better. Today isn't the time to do it, and perhaps 20 years down the road isn't time to do it either, but eventually we have to come up with something that addresses some of the flaws of UNIX.

    2048 - There comes a time that we have to get rid of UNIX and come up with something better. Today isn't the time to do it, and perhaps 20 years down the road isn't time to do it either, but eventually we have to come up with something that addresses some of the flaws of UNIX.

    ...

    2568 - There comes a time that we have to get rid of UNIX and come up with something better. Today isn't the time to do it, and perhaps 20 years down the road isn't time to do it either, but eventually we have to come up with something that addresses some of the flaws of UNIX.

    ...

    If not now, when?

  18. Re:Wow, he does think rather highly of himself... by MRe_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's obviously 50% sure about the first 20 years, and not so much thereafter.
    Probably quit realistic. I should get out Nostradamus to see wat he has to say about it.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  19. Re:linux sucks by pcutilisateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my lord, it seems Linux is a having threesome with us.