Slashdot Mirror


Locked iPhones Can Be Unlocked Without Password

snydeq writes "Private information stored in Apple's iPhone and protected by a lock code can be accessed by anyone with just a few button presses. Pressing the emergency call button at the unlock screen, followed by two taps on the home button, takes you to the iPhone's private 'favorites' page without the need to enter the unlock code, MacRumors user greenmymac has found. If the owner of the phone has favorite entries in their address book containing URLs, e-mail addresses or mobile phone numbers, then those entries can be used to launch the browser, mail application or SMS software, and gain access to private Web favorites, e-mail messages, and text messages stored in the phone, again without entering the unlock code."

40 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. CALL OUT THE DOGS by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quick, to the Apple-bashing-mobile

    1. Re:CALL OUT THE DOGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's just down from the Microsoft-bashing mobile and next to the Comcast-bashing mobile. They all look similar, so make sure you have the right keys, oh and replace the memes if you use them all. Gotta keep a fresh supply.

    2. Re:CALL OUT THE DOGS by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quick, to the Apple-bashing-mobile

      It's called the Applesauce-mobile, thank you.

    3. Re:CALL OUT THE DOGS by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick, to the Apple-bashing-mobile

      Holy annoyed fanbois, Batman!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:CALL OUT THE DOGS by BasharTeg · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's no need to fear! Apple Apologist Squad to the rescue!

      Quick, spin that security vulnerability into a feature! Now, follow up by making excuses for ridiculously overpriced hardware! Finish them off by implying that 6.5% PC market share growing to 7.2% PC market share is the new "Apple Revolution"!

      We've done it! Truths about the downsides to Apple products have been dismissed and discredited, and the comfort provided by our elitism can continue for years to come. Well done Apple Apologist Squad!

    5. Re:CALL OUT THE DOGS by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the apologist proudly demonstrating he's no different.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  2. Not quite... by daybot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pressing the emergency call button at the unlock screen, followed by two taps on the home button, takes you to the iPhone's private 'favorites' page without the need to enter the unlock code

    Not quite - it takes you to Favorites or iPod depending on your double-tap shortcut setting. If it's set to the home screen then you are just prompted for the passcode. See here

    1. Re:Not quite... by tgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And on top of that, mine IS set to Favorites and double clicking while locked goes to the iPod controls anyway. When unlocked it goes to Favorites.

    2. Re:Not quite... by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do see the behavior described: Emergency call, then double press takes me to my phone "Favorites". From the favorites, I can look up the details of of those address book entries and bring up Safari or Mail.

      From Safari opened this way, I can get to my bookmarks. And I suspect that from Mail (haven't tested it yet), I could get to all of my contacts. All of this with completely by-passing the PIN.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  3. Just tested... by Elindor · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a way to prevent this - set the Home Button to go to Home when double clicked - this simply drops it back to the PIN request (Or, if it's in iPod mode, bring up the basic iPod controls)

  4. The easier and more complete way by Brilthor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually all you need to do is call the iphone, then when the call ends you are back at the home screen unrestricted. On a slightly unrelated note most security articles seem to point out the obvious flaws instead of the clever ones (clearly the iphone lock function is only a slight deterrent)

    1. Re:The easier and more complete way by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      clearly the iphone lock function is only a slight deterrent

      Exactly, I think everyone at Slashdot knows that if someone has physical access to your hardware, you've already lost the security game.

    2. Re:The easier and more complete way by Teese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually all you need to do is call the iphone, then when the call ends you are back at the home screen unrestricted. On a slightly unrelated note most security articles seem to point out the obvious flaws instead of the clever ones (clearly the iphone lock function is only a slight deterrent)

      That's interesting.

      typical behavior when you realize you've lost your phone: Call it, and see if you can hear the ring.

      Now when that happens, the person who stole it can answer and say "thanks for unlocking your phone!"

      --
      "I'm a Genius!"*


      *Not an actual Genius
    3. Re:The easier and more complete way by shitzu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually all you need to do is call the iphone, then when the call ends you are back at the home screen unrestricted.

      No it does not. It still asks for the code after the call has ended.

    4. Re:The easier and more complete way by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Informative

      My iphone blanks and when it wake it it prompts for the code. This is on 2.0.1

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    5. Re:The easier and more complete way by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually the security lock works pretty reliable on just about any Nokia phone I ever owned.

      Sure, you could factory reset it, but, alas, that requires access to the keyboard, which is locked.

      You can call the phone and accept calls while locked, but that's it. After the call it goes back into locked mode.

      I'm not claiming it's 100% unhackable. Maybe you could flash the firmware (I wouldn't know). But in any case the security is not quite as innane as what Apple has implemented.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    6. Re:The easier and more complete way by Brilthor · · Score: 2, Informative

      just tested again; I can't seem to re-create it, it was an observation I made a couple days ago, apparently missed something doesn't change the fact that you just need to plug it into a computer to get the data anyways

    7. Re:The easier and more complete way by tha_mink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, I think everyone at Slashdot knows that if someone has physical access to your hardware, you've already lost the security game.

      I don't know if that applies to the Blackberry family. 10 tries and the phone wipes itself out to factory settings only to be recovered by the enterprise BES server. Haven't read a whole lot about holes in that strategy.

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    8. Re:The easier and more complete way by ballwall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, blackberry seems pretty good at it.

    9. Re:The easier and more complete way by Teese · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now when that happens, the person who stole it can answer and say "thanks for unlocking your phone!"

      ...if the parent's claim were actually true. It's not.

      Well, that's good to hear.

      (as an aside: I shall no longer consider Brilthor a reliable source. Do you hear that Brilthor? Your credibility has been attacked by cduffy! cduffy has a 3 digit slashdot ID, yours is 6. I implicitly trust cduffy over Brilthor - unless new evidence is presented. Or a lower ID backs Brilthor. Then I'm going to be confused.)

      --
      "I'm a Genius!"*


      *Not an actual Genius
    10. Re:The easier and more complete way by Bonkers54 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I haven't owned a nokia phone for quite a while, but this method definitely worked on both monochrome nokia phones I owned. These are the variety with snake built-in.

      When you're at the lock screen, just type in *3001#12345# and now you're at the service menu. All you have to do is scroll down to the menu item for the lock code, select it, and your super secure lock code is now staring back at you in plaintext. Power cycle the phone, type in the code, and you've now got an unlocked phone.

    11. Re:The easier and more complete way by rsborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually all you need to do is call the iphone, then when the call ends you are back at the home screen unrestricted. On a slightly unrelated note most security articles seem to point out the obvious flaws instead of the clever ones (clearly the iphone lock function is only a slight deterrent)

      That's interesting. typical behavior when you realize you've lost your phone: Call it, and see if you can hear the ring. Now when that happens, the person who stole it can answer and say "thanks for unlocking your phone!"

      I just tried this, and although hanging up will eject you... if *while in-call*, the phone user navigates to any non-phone app (ie, safari) then hangs up the call, the phone won't re-lock.

      This is unfortunate, but I can't think of an easy way to make the phone usable and secure for this use-case... which brings up the interesting point... Is the password really secure? Is it reasonable to expect PC-level security for what is, primarily, a phone?

      If someone stole my old Nokia or Sony-Erricson, which didn't really have passwords, they would also have all my contact information, and calendar details. If it's a company phone and you're reasonably sure you lost the phone, shouldn't the first move be to remotely de-activate the phone, then try to find it afterwards?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  5. Re:Back door anyone? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nothing more than a nice backdoor left in there by apple so that they have constant access to your phone.

    Yes, because when Apple wants to access my iPhone, they're going to come to my house, pick up the phone, and start pushing buttons....

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  6. Re:Back door anyone? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't sound impossible to me, considering how many /.er's buttons Apple manages to push remotely.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  7. Re:This just in by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    funny because thats not the case in normal phones. 3 pins wrong and your out, sure you might be able to get round it if you were a gang of phone thieves but with the iphone anybody can get round it and they dont even need your phone for that long

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  8. Re:not really surprising by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had mod points I probably would have modded it 'Troll' as well. Not because I somehow love Apple products or own an iPhone and feel that need to justify my purchase but because the language in the post makes it seem as though the iPhone is only a kid's toy. Swap iPhone and Blackberry around and it's still a Troll, but he's just trolling a different audience. He could have made the exact same point by changing his wording and suggesting that this is a reason why he would not recommend using the iPhone in a business setting. Same message, but the language isn't anywhere near as inflammatory.

    Can I assume whoever modded the comment 'insightful' has something against Apple and decided to take a shot at them rather than modding unbiased?

  9. Re:not really surprising by Coraon · · Score: 4, Funny

    My guess too. Mac zealots are a strange tribe, if you tell them apple cant do something they get really bent out of shape. And just because I feel like burning more Karma listen up Mac fan boys: Steve Jobs cannot walk on water, he's just a mortal man.

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  10. This is a classic sandbox bug. by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've run into all kinds of "kiosk" applications on every platform where this kind of bug exists, from bulletin board systems using applications with shell escapes in the '70s and '80s through "telnet:" URLs in restricted freenix front ends to embedded browsers on dektop operating systems. You can also use similar tricks to get past Apple's kiosk attract mode on Macs in computer stores, an I've run into them in a number of PC vendor demo modes over the years.

    When you build a sandbox you have to build it from the inside out. Never introduce anything to the sandbox unless you are absolutely certain that it doesn't have a backdoor. Not "unless you are certain you can close the backdoors"... sandbox programs have to be built around a model that "fails closed"... any action that increases privileges must require an explicit action from outside the program (such as installing a plugin). The amount of effort to build a sandbox out of components that default to an open mode and need to be "locked down" is so much greater that it's easier to reinvent the wheel than patch up the wrong kind of wheel to fit.

  11. Re:not really surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, he's just putting out a fire by using the time-honored "Gasoline Method".

  12. One question: Why only 4 digit pin? by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the 21st century. I can understand defaulting to 4 digit pin, but why can't I choose a longer pin? My gf's Blackberry allows you to enter a much longer string. I have over a 6 digit pin for my ATM card. Why exactly does Apple force people to only have a 4 digit pin for the phone?

    1. Re:One question: Why only 4 digit pin? by Rayeth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is that a human doing either is wasting their time. There are easier and more profitable things to do when you have the hardware in your hands (like sell it to someone else) than try to break into the home screen.

  13. Lame... by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a lame excuse! Just because iphone shits itself when it comes to security does not mean ALL OTHERS do the same. Go do some fucking research and come back later.

  14. Re:not really surprising by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Swap iPhone and Blackberry around and it's still a Troll, but he's just trolling a different audience.

    ... except, the way he said it, it is true.

    When you turn it around, the way you say it, it is trolling.

  15. Re:not really surprising by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    As you say, gasoline only burns when there is oxygen to help with the combustion. This is true for most of the real world. But if you were inside the reality distortion field, you might find that gasoline does NOT burn. I'm not sure. You'll have to ask an apple fanboy.

  16. Re:This just in by miratrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously you've never had a BlackBerry, where 10 wrong login attempts will cause the device to wipe itself out. And all memory contents are - afiak - encrypted even if you manage to take the damned thing apart and connect directly to the flash chips.

  17. Re:not really surprising by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My goodness the trolls are out in force today. Hopefully the meta-moderation fixes trolls with mod points, but nothing is perfect.

    The original claim essentially says that the iPhone is only for rich kids who have too much money on their hands and isn't good for business use at all. If you have an opinion, that's perfectly fine, but expressing it in such an inflamatory manner generally isn't; or at least it's frowned upon in polite, formal discussion.

    At least it's not surprising coming from your user name.

  18. Re:This just in by StrategicIrony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    haha. Yeah, but usually not with your pinky finger... in 1.2 seconds.

    woot!

    Good local security is not impenetrable, but should require discernible effort. For example, if I have full-disk encryption, it takes an absurd level of effort to read the contents of my drive.

    If I have an iPhone, it requires my pinky finger and 1.2 seconds.

    AppleSauce!

  19. Reading out "secure" blackberry data... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading out "secure" blackberry data...

    What's the model number? From that I can tell you whether or not I have a JTAG, or would have to borrow one from a friend. With a JTAG I can keep it from wiping itself and do anything with your data I want.

    If it's an 8000 series (not including the 8707), then it's a ARMv5TE PXA900, which is pretty easy to hack.

    Just because your average idiot can't hack something doesn't mean that it's magically unhackable. The value in the device is in the data it contains, not in the cost of the hardware.

    -- Terry

  20. Re:Local security does not exist by Ferzerp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only in the absence of encryption (which happens to be absent on an iPhone).

    My BlackBerry on the other hand, I can hand to someone with confidence that my data is safe for the foreseeable future (as with any encryption, it's only secure for as long as it would reasonably take to brute force the password)

  21. This is a known patched bug by SenorPhatnutZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi all, I just happened to be browsing apple dev center trying to figure out some details on the bonjour service. I'm not sure I like it running on my network so I wanted to know more... Found the apple security site which lists their known flaws and security bugs. Scrolling through happened to see this one, remembered this post and here ya all go:

    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1312?viewlocale=en_US

    or if you prefer:

            *

                Passcode Lock

                CVE-ID: CVE-2008-0034

                Available for: iPhone v1.0 through v1.1.2

              Impact: An unauthorized user may bypass the
    Passcode Lock and launch iPhone applications

                Description: The Passcode Lock feature is
    designed to prevent applications from being
    launched unless the correct passcode is entered.

    An implementation issue in the handling of
    emergency calls allows users with physical access
    to an iPhone to launch an application without the
    passcode. This update addresses the issue through
    an improved check on the state of the Passcode
    Lock.