Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Rinses SOAP Out of SQL Server 2008
Julie188 writes "A Microsoft SQL Server 2005 fan toppled over in surprise when he got this error message from SQL Server 2008 (he was running the SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor tool): 'In SQL Server 2008, SQL Server native SOAP has been deprecated and will be removed in a future SQL Server release ... Avoid use of SQL server native SOAP in new development work, and plan to modify applications that currently use it.' No more SOAP-based Web services for your SQL Server database? Native XML was only added in v.2005 and was much ballyhooed at that time."
as a developer on sql2005, i found very little use for it. the xml parsing and displaying functionality will remain in 2008, only the native xml webservices are being pulled. it made no sense anyway, it had nothing of the richness that asp.net web services offer and made most administrators nervous about its security (and rightly so!) why anyone in their right minds would have used it...i don't know!
--- blackironprison, where ignorance is bliss....
No more SOAP-based Web services for your SQL Server database?
Not exactly. It means no more SOAP-based Web services directly served from your SQL Server. Now you have to go back to using a web server application like god intended.
Developers: We can use your help.
Confucius say "Microsoft wrong again. Computer programmers need more soap, not less."
Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
Actually, SOAP was pushed heavily by Microsoft as part of .NET. Java took a more holistic approach and created APIs for SOAP, XML-RPC, REST, and many other services. There are about 3-4 different ways you can do each of them, with two of them being official or semi-official. (The reason for the break is that the methodology for providing such services was greatly enhanced by the attribute tags added in Java 1.6.)
If you're doing SOAP services, I'd blame the market for slurping up Microsoft's push rather than blaming your tools which happen to support the standard.
What's the old saying? "It's a poor craftsman who blames his tools?" ;-)
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)
Actually no: since SOAP version 1.2 SOAP is not an acronym anymore because it has nothing that is "simple".
I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
I think that poster's comment is a little misleading. From the article and linked materials it would appear that only integrated SOAP web services are deprecated, and not native XML as the poster implies.
Details of deprecated features here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143729.aspx
My girlfriend keeps insisting on me using SOAP before we interface - now I know its Microsofts fault.
Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
I don't get why Microsoft ever thought this was a good idea. Regardless of your opinion on SOAP (and I don't hate it nearly as much as some other folks here), having the SQL Server dishing it out directly was always kind of silly. Thats what a Web Server is for.
Removing silly code that just creates more places for security holes to hide is a good thing. Not doing it at all would have been better, but at least Microsoft is fixing that mistake now.
-- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
Dude, take it back. There are some things that just aren't said in polite society.
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?