Slashdot Mirror


Wikileaks To Sell Hugo Chavez' Email

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Wikileaks seems to be a bit hard-up for cash, so they're trying a little experiment. They plan to auction off an archive with three years worth of Hugo Chavez' email. The winner will get a period of embargoed access to break any stories they can find in the files, while Wikileaks will later publish the archive in full. Wikileaks plans to use the profits for their legal defense fund, but they may run into trouble because most reputable news outlets have policies against paying sources."

15 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Risky... by someme2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wikileaks plans to use the profits for a small but capable force of mercenaries to protect their collective asses.

    IFYPFY.

    --
    You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
    Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    1. Re:Risky... by Maelwryth · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I fixed your post for you"

      Thats lucky, I thought it was "I Find Your Porn For You".

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
  2. Chavez' regret by bobdotorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's kicking himself for not using the same email backup system as The Whitehouse.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  3. It's a slippery slope that will eventually lead to by NZheretic · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a slippery slope that will eventually lead to something like this.

  4. Re:They pay photographers by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Journalists don't create stories, they document existing events. The problem is that wikileaks doesn't need to provide an incentive for people to create false documents.

  5. The "Dead Kennedys" have prior art on this ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.lyricstime.com/dead-kennedys-stealing-people-s-mail-lyrics.html

    "Dead Kennedys sue Wikileaks!"

    Now that is a headline!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. I just found one of those emails by atari2600 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Castro,

    Bush sucks. Thanks for the cigars.

    Hugs,

    Hugo.

    PS: No you can't have my Hummer.

  7. incorrect apostrophe use by Zashi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Okay, so I'm just another grammar Nazi. Okay, so this is at the bottom of the thread and will probably go unnoticed. That's fine. But I have to get this off my chest.

    WTF.

    worth of Hugo Chavez' email.

    It's bad enough when people throw in an apostrophe for no reason when a word ends in s. I can at least see the logic. "Oh golly gee, this word ends in an s, I probably need an apostrophe." This is, obviously, not how you decide if an apostrophe is needed, but at least it's closer than what this person did.

    For the uninitiated, the following is correct usage:

    worth of Hugo Chavez's email.

    At this point in the game of battling bad grammar and usage, I'll offer some extremely oversimplified rules for possessive apostrophe usage:
    1. Regardless of what the word is or how it ends, if it's singular to make it possessive you add an apostrophe and an S. E.G. "the abacus's beads" or "the Nazi's obsessiveness".
    2. Regardless of what the word is or how it ends, if it is pluralized by adding an S or ES, simply add an apostrophe to the end of the word to make it possessive. E.G. "all of the abacuses' owners" "the Nazis' collective obsessions".

    Note: For my fellow Nazis who may try catch me on something: Abacus can be pluralized as abacuses or abaci. Also, please forgive any typos and use of passive voice.

    --
    Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
  8. Re:Reputable news sources by MrHanky · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello, as a freelance Sun reporter, I'll quote you on that: 'Unnamed sources claim some of the emails were sexually explicit and addressed to a former Big Brother contestant'. Hope that's OK with you, and if it's not you can just piss off. Thank you.

  9. Re:Reputable news sources by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    > There are plenty of disreputable news sources around, but would their readership be interested in Hugo Chavez's email?

    Well, the CIA is kind of a news source, whose very select readership is likely to be interested in any dirt they can put their spin on.

  10. Re:They pay photographers by jdgeorge · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess the difference is that a photographer creates the photograph, but how is this different to paying for, say, the Hitler Diaries?

    It's much more like paying for Hitler Diaries 2, which was "created" by the filmmakers. The first one, at least, was based on the book.

    Contrast with Sisterhood of the Traveling Boots, which was entirely based on the.... oh, never mind.

  11. Re:That's what bothers me by novalogic · · Score: 3, Funny

    You just need to yell, "My god! It's coming right for us!" and you'll be fine.

    --
    --
  12. Re:They pay photographers by xstonedogx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude borrowed my car and I was all, like, okay, but no smoking in it. He brought back the car and it, like, totally REEKED of smoke. And I was all, dude, you smoked in my car, and he was like, no hablo. And I'm like, dude, I know you hablo because you asked me to borrow my car and he was like que? And I'm like, dude, whatever, you are suck a jerk.

  13. Re:That's what bothers me by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Private stuff should stay private. I think that's one of the rare rules that are globally accepted, even partially cross-species.

    All sorts of things come to mind thinking about "cross-species" email.

    No, I'm sure you didn't really mean that...

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. These should provide conclusive evidence!!! by AskFirefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    of Chavez' connection to former officials in the Nigerian government! Wait'll that story breaks!!

    --
    I'm not a human, but I play one on T.V.