Slashdot Mirror


Rocket Racing League Flights With Armadillo Engine

Toren Altair mentions that the Rocket Racing League has video and pictures available from their recent flight tests of new Armadillo Aerospace liquid oxygen-alcohol engines. "Founded in 2005 by two-time Indianapolis 500 winning team partner Granger Whitelaw and X PRIZE Chairman and CEO Peter H. Diamandis, MD, the Rocket Racing League (RRL) is a new entertainment sports league that combines the exhilaration of racing with the power of rocket engines. To be held at venues across the country, the Rocket Racing League will feature multiple races pitting up to 10 Rocket Racers going head to head in a 4-lap, multiple elimination heat format on a 5-mile 'Formula One'-like closed circuit raceway in the sky."

73 comments

  1. Good luck with that. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Funny

    Little things zooming around up in the sky. Sounds like a pain in the neck to me.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Good luck with that. by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like a big pile of awesome to me.

      Speed? - Check!
      Noise? - Check!
      Engineering? - Check!
      Potential for large explosions? - Check!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll explain the joke to the bozo who modded the parent troll. See, he means literally a pain in the neck, from all that looking up at the sky. Not killer funny, but not bad for a prist fost.

    3. Re:Good luck with that. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      as some one noted, (thanks!) I wasn't trolling, I was making a joke. did you ever go to an airshow? You look UP all the time and your neck hurts. See? It's a PAIN IN THE NECK. Fuck - you people have zero sense of humour sometimes. Was it knock down drag out funny? No, but I thought it was clever, and did it in like 5 seconds...

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    4. Re:Good luck with that. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      So, who gets to fly the pace car?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Good luck with that. by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      DIBS!

    6. Re:Good luck with that. by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      That's why you bring a blanket and lay down on your back.

    7. Re:Good luck with that. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Have you no reclining chairs??

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:Good luck with that. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I'd rather wait for the ESPN coverage... now that's 1 minute of show and 5 mins of self-promotion.
      What a pain in the neck!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    9. Re:Good luck with that. by mweather · · Score: 1

      Then watch it on TV. NASCAR doesn't exactly make it's money on ticket sales, I doubt the RRL will either.

  2. Engrish? Do You Even Attempt It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Makes flights?
    Tests flights?
    Has flights?
    Launches flights?

    Oh, fuck it. It's Slashdot. As long as there are words in the headline the "editors" will let it through.

    1. Re:Engrish? Do You Even Attempt It? by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? The headline just states that the story is about the flights the Armadillo engine made.

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    2. Re:Engrish? Do You Even Attempt It? by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a perfectly cromulent English flutzpah!

    3. Re:Engrish? Do You Even Attempt It? by jaguth · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Engrish is when grammatical or spelling errors are made from translating from a foreign language to English. What we would call today's mishap title is just a plain grammatical error from an English speaking chap.

  3. Oxygen Alcohol? by jebrew · · Score: 2, Funny

    Liquid Oxygen Alcohol? You could call it Sky...maybe make it catchy and throw in a spare 'y'

    Weekend's coming up, where can I get some?

  4. Cool but... by zerosomething · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very cool but not sure it's quite as cool as the XCOR Rocket Powered Aeroplane. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MQvUCrjtmw and http://www.xcor.com/

    --
    It all starts at 0
    1. Re:Cool but... by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 1

      Which is not quite as cool as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTk_0lY0XxM

      In other words, everyone has to start somewhere...

    2. Re:Cool but... by Karrde45 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's got more power than the XCOR engine, which is why RRL is switching to Armadillo as its primary engine manufacturer.

  5. Armadillos with rockets and alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like the sound of that.

  6. What is wrong with Forumla One? by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Already cars are at the outer most limits of traction and control.

    Is this simply a bid for more spectacularly "entertaining" wrecks?

    Air races do not seem to be subject to the same rate of catastrophic wrecks as Formula One racing (or NASCAR for that matter), but ROCKETS? It seems to me that the margin of error is lowly being minimized to the points that wrecks are almost a certainty.

    But, then again, who would go watch NASCAR if there wasn't wrecks? Even as a race fan, I find NASCAR as interesting as the commercials shown while watching it.

    1. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by imbaczek · · Score: 1

      F1 isn't much more interesting. Actually, the cars don't crash nearly as much, so it's even less interesting. Besides, calling those things "cars" is pushing it.

      I'd rather have a 24 hours of Rocket Propelled Le Mans.

    2. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Zerth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference between this and NASCAR is that, yah, occaisonally one of the wrecks will try to mount the fence or a wheel will land in the stands.

      But when a wreck happens in this, you'll have a rocket propelled plane falling from the sky. It might lawndart into the stands or it might "safely" crash off in a field.

      Or it might go corkscrewing off towards the nearest building and everyone will be all "9/11!!!eleventy!!!"

      I can't wait to see their insurance rates.

    3. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or it might go corkscrewing off towards the nearest building and everyone will be all "9/11!!!eleventy!!!"

      "9/"? Why would people be yelling "9/" for?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine always used to say that F1 would be more fun if they started the race with half of the cars going rounf the track in the opposite direction.

      That'd be potentially even more spectacular for rocket plane races...

    5. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the parent: I'm getting a sense of whooshiness from your comment. Not a strong sense but just a definite tingle.

      For the grandparent: Lawndart into the stands? Hell yeah! As a member of the NASCAR crowd allow me to say we loves us some lawndarts. Dunno why they had to go and pull em off the market. Guess all them city kids don't know about the "What goes up must come down" aspect of lawndarts.

    6. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      For the parent: I'm getting a sense of whooshiness from your comment. Not a strong sense but just a definite tingle.

      Yeah, see, the joke was he was typing a bunch of exclamation marks in the typical joking fashion of the kiddie pounding on the 1 key including even typing out 'eleventy', and see i chose to act like the leading 1s were just un-shifted exclamation marks, so 9/11 becomes 9/, and now I had to explain it so nm.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Or it might go corkscrewing off towards the nearest building and everyone will be all "9/11!!!eleventy!!!"

      Or they just might, you know, hold the races somewhere where there aren't any buildings to crash into.

    8. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You just know as soon as there are flying cars someone's going to fly one into a parking structure.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    9. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by moogleii · · Score: 1

      Not really. Tires in F1 have grooves in them to limit their maximum traction potential (though I hear they are returning to slicks). Also, AWD is banned. Dynamic aero mods are also banned (as opposed to fixed wings, etc).

    10. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. So the whooshiness was in... wait... I mean over my head.

      Thanks for clearing that up. :)

    11. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It was a pretty retarded joke to begin with, but you're welcome. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      You made me snort pop into my sinuses. Damn that stings. And the bubbling noises...

    13. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by berboot · · Score: 2, Informative

      2008 is the last year they will have the grooved tires. Next year, they'll allow full slicks again, but the aero requirements will be much more stringent (I've heard some people say that the new cars will have half as much downforce). All of this is part of Bernie's plan to make F1 cheaper for the smaller teams to participate (see Super Aguri Honda's withdrawl from the series.)

    14. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      I've seen Formula One races that appeared to do exactly that.

      Laguna Seco is a good example. Bottom of the Corkscrew you often find half the pack facing the other direction.

    15. Re:What is wrong with Forumla One? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      F1, and other races, can be fascinating and interesting, whey they shoot the race from helicopter.

      Seeing it from above so that you see the whole track and all the racers at once is interesting.
      Seeing a few cars take a corner, or following same two or three cars as they battle for first position for half an hour, isn't.
      The boring ground level shots are totally worthless, but for some reason that's what they show 99.9% of the time when they show a race of any kind on TV.

      For this same reason, I'd never go and actually see a race, unless I can afford to hire a helicopter for the duration. =P

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  7. This is an Outrage! by frostilicus2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're burning alcohol!

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
    1. Re:This is an Outrage! by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

      Yep, nearly pure ethanol. A real shame, except that it's denatured. Wouldn't want to pay all that extra tax!

    2. Re:This is an Outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Old Russia, Alcohol burns you! .. ah wait ... that's going to happen with the public after the first crash too.

  8. Danger Will Robinson by vonkug · · Score: 1

    This would be awesome to watch, however, the overhead is probably prohibitively expensive-Insurance, Fuel, Insurance, Infrastructure, Advertising, Insurance, you know, the basics. I'll throw in MY venture capital (that's about $2.30 right now...)

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear a lack of them. -Isaac Asimov
  9. Re:Check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    also, he appears to be married

  10. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you troll 48 minutes ago?

  11. Armadillo? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    They're using the rocket engines off of the drilling vehicle in Armageddon?

    Not that I ever watched that movie. I just heard about it.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  12. John Carmack by pieisgood · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is he even human?

    --
    Eat sleep die
  13. from Doom to Rockets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting trivia for the /. crowd: Armadillo Aerospace was founded by John Carmack, id Software programmer.

    1. Re:from Doom to Rockets... by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a joke about rocket-whoring in here somewhere...

    2. Re:from Doom to Rockets... by MeepMeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interesting trivia for the /. crowd: Armadillo Aerospace was founded by John Carmack, id Software programmer.

      This is Slashdot...anyone in this 'crowd' who didn't know that Armadillo Aerospace was founded by JC (peace be upon him) needs to turn in their geek cred card for incineration.

    3. Re:from Doom to Rockets... by supernova_hq · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I hate it when you people ruin a good joke by stating that it's "in (t)here somewhere" instead of taking to time to actually make the joke.

      Then again, this is slashdot, the official slacker's forum.

  14. Confucious say by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    Confucious say "Rocket jump likely. Bring parachute."

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Confucious say by MRe_nl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rocket jump likely. Bring 100 Health, 100 Armor and "REGENERATION".

      Q: What does a alcohol-fueled Armadillo do when it explodes?
      A: Quad damage.

      Q: What do you say when an Armadillo-rocket kills seven?
      A: "Impressive".

      *ducks*

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  15. Now that's what I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...call pod racing!

  16. A lot of work to build rocket engines by heroine · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The 10 years it took Armadillo to reach this point just shows how hard to is to design a liquid fuelled rocket engine. As for the "rocket racing league" ever having an actual rocket race, don't hold your breath.

    1. Re:A lot of work to build rocket engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm calling bs.

      the fact that it took someone 10 years to build a toy doesn't imply that it is hard to build that toy.

      rocket racing league already had a race 4 weeks ago.

    2. Re:A lot of work to build rocket engines by BiggerBoat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a nitpick but it's actually only been 8 years. And they only switched over to cryogen/biprop engines 4 years ago. While there certainly is carryover from the lessons learned from the hydrogen peroxide work before that, they are fairly different regimes.

      This doesn't negate your point that it is difficult and has taken a while to get here; I just wanted to clarify.

  17. Debris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nascar crashes are controlled to an extent. What happens when these jets explode? Couldn't the debris harm the viewers easy?

  18. On/Off propulsion by chaim79 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was up at the EAA Oshkosh fly-in, they had one of these rocket powered aircraft showing off for the crowd. The most impressive part of the entire thing was the sound.

    First off he was at a decent altitude, there was about a 3 to 5 second delay between the engine turning off and the sound stopping. Even with that kind of distance the sound was Very loud, only close-in jets were louder. The sound of the rocket igniting was a standard "FOOM" kind of sound, and the running engine sound was also normal, but the sound the thing made when they shut off the engine was the weirdest I'd ever heard. It sounded like someone took some sound effects software and crossed the rocket sound with that of a balloon (when you stretch the opening to make that really high pitched, air-escaping, sound, then shut off/stop the air).

    The sound of the engine shutting off caught your attention more then the sound of it turning on or the sound of it running.

    One last note, there was no throttle on that plane, the choices were full on or full off, nothing inbetween.

    If these rocket racing courses are set out with some low-speed areas where they have to shut the engine off in order to make the turns, I will definitely be paying to watch these races, if nothing else for the sound of these rockets shutting off.

    --
    DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
    AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
    Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    1. Re:On/Off propulsion by evanbd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The racer flying was the XCOR plane; Carmack had theirs on display, but not flying. I don't know the details, but Carmack's engine may have a throttle -- he's done work with throttled engines for the Lunar Lander Challenge, and this engine is a related design. I believe Carmack's plane is larger, with a larger engine (but similar overall performance) compared to the XCOR plane.

      I'm not up to date, but the course the RRL was talking about was basically a climbing straight past the stands, an acrobatic turn at the top, and then a power-off glide for the back stretch, before a sharp turn and relighting the engine.

      For the XCOR engine, you can't leave the engine running nonstop for the full tank's worth of propellant while staying below Vne and at low altitude (ie on the race course) -- it just has too much thrust. The plan is several laps (3-6 or so, again I don't know current numbers) with the engine running ~1/3 of each lap, and then a pit stop and another round.

      Suffice to say, it should be a good show.

      I interned at XCOR and worked a little on their plane, but not recently; what I've said above is my recollection of what was publically available at the time, and may be wrong or out of date.

      You should see that engine up close... It's loud through earmuffs (well, really you feel it in your chest as much as your ears), and it's bright enough to compete with the noon desert sun.

  19. from hobby to practical? by houbou · · Score: 1

    Dare I say that maybe one day, because of these thrill seekers, we could see the evolution of transportation get to the point where the sky is everyone's new highway? :)

    1. Re:from hobby to practical? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      That was the first think that entered my mind when I started to watch that film!

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  20. Sounds like fun... by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    "...pitting up to 10 Rocket Racers going head to head in a 4-lap, multiple elimination heat format on a 5-mile 'Formula One'-like closed circuit raceway in the sky."

    Until one of these things explodes and showers burning fuel and shards of hot metal on all the upturned faces of the crowd...oh, wait, that will be even more...ah...fun.

    --
    Sig this!
  21. Hmmm, little disappointed. Where is the Hell? by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    I mean, this is something Carmack is involved in right? I keep waiting the whole article to read the words "... from Hell". Like "Rocket Racers will use a BFG mounted on their rocket powered craft to stop demons escaping from Hell". But nothing. Oh well, maybe next one.

  22. good fuel by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    In case you're wondering why they're using alcohol and oxygen, it's cuz that's what they used on the very first plane to ever break the sound barrier. And that was a long time ago so they're even better now! Apparently alcohol is more powerful than on the ground. I mean I lit a fire with 91% isopropyl and it was a little puff compared to gasoline but I think they're using ethanol or something like that that's a little better.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  23. Another advantage of alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it's easy to color using various metal salts. Blue flames, purple flames, yellow flames -- I notice the video has a red flame. Probably added a dash of strontium chloride. Fair bet all the racers will have "signature" colors to help the audience track which is which.

  24. Where's the ... tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So where's the "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag?

  25. anyone else remember this? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

    i read an article, several years ago, in either the print version of popular mechanics or popsci, can't remember which, talking about this new sport, calling it nascar for the 21st century, etc. the most interesting part (to me, at least) was that these races would be telecasted in real time, and that the viewing audience would have a chance to install a rocket racing simulation client on their PCs which would alow them to virtually race the real life competitors in real time, with PC competitors who actually beat the RL competitors eligible of winning prizes, etc. anyone else remember that at all, or am i just crazy?

    1. Re:anyone else remember this? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      ahh... wikipedia knows what i speak of. from the rocket racing league entry : "Races would take place on a race course two miles long, one mile wide, and 1500 feet in the air. A typical race would take about one hour, and fans would be able to see multiple camera views, including cockpit, "on-track," "side-by-side" and wing-angle views. Additionally, a computer game is planned which will interface with racer position data in real time over the internet, allowing players to virtually compete with the rocket pilots."

  26. Re:Hmmm, little disappointed. Where is the Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moran. He's actually from Phobos. A mass-extinction event resulted in his parents placing him in an escape capsule, and aiming at the Earth, more specifically, Texas. Predicted to be the place where he'd fit in most easily. What they hadn't accounted for, was the fact that his programming skills, while only average on Phobos due to the high levels of Jolt cola and maths problems present in its environment, would far exceed any that existed in Mesquite in the 80s and 90s.

    Jump forward some years. The man we know as John Carmack has accumulated enough money to develop rocket engines, in an attempt to return to his home planet. By securing this deal with the RRL he now has access to a ready supply of test pilots. Its only a matter of time now before he succeeds in escaping the Earth's gravity, returning to Phobos and leaving the world of videogame engines bereft of a figurehead.

  27. Can We Spell 'Komet', Hmmmm? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    I am unimpressed.

    The Me163 Komet has a far better rate of climb than that white turkey ... and can shoot down bombers too!

    I just happen to know where one's sitting too. Wonder if they left the keys in it?

    Toad, Rocket Toad

  28. XCor engine better tuned. Pink exhaust for Armadil by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    A LOX-Alcohol flame should be blue, as in the X-cor video. Pink is a sign of a cool and imperfect combustion. further the X-cor engine shows the standing-wave bunsen-like effect of optimal tuning, and the ability to start and restart. Both companies are intending a gradual development into an orbiter. Let's wish them well.

  29. Re:XCor engine better tuned. Pink exhaust for Arma by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

    A LOX-Alcohol flame should be blue,

    The LOX/liquid methane plumes are blue, but LOX/ethanol is faint orange.

    as in the XCOR's plane.

    XCOR's plane burns LOX/kerosene, which burns bright orange.

    Pink is a sign of a cool and imperfect combustion.

    In the case of Armadillo's plane, it's actually a sign of "plume seeding," where chemicals are added to the exhaust to make the plume more dramatic and distinct, especially in broad daylight. To the naked eye that "pink" plume is actually brilliant red. But it's so bright that the video overexposes it and it ends up seeming pink.

    further the X-cor engine shows the standing-wave bunsen-like effect of optimal tuning,

    I assume you're talking about "Mach diamonds," which Armadillo's engines have as well. This page shows that, as well as what the LOX/ethanol plume looks like with and without seeding: http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=358

    and the ability to start and restart.

    Which the Armadillo engines have.