Hacker Conventions Ranked By Bandwidth-Per-Visitor
An Anonymous Coward writes "Ever wondered how much bandwidth you will get at a hacker con? This web page tells you how much. It shows the total bandwidth and bandwidth for each visitor for all the recent hacker cons." It looks like Defcon attendees get the short end of the stick, while those at metarheinmain chaosdays are practically swimming in bandwidth. There are a lot of other cons (a few examples listed here) which I'd like to see added to this list.
You'd have to be pretty crazy and/or desperate to risk using the provided bandwidth at DefCon (or any hacker con) for that matter. Regardless of how much faith you may have in the people running the network, you're surrounded on all sides by people who would like nothing more than to steal your information. While at DefCon, stay away from the ATMs and if at all possible stay away from the network entirely.
Color me stupid, but I don't understand why anyone would care how much bandwidth per atendee is available at a hacker convention. You don't got to *do* hacking, you go to learn about hacking from people in the same building (thus requiring little to no B/W). And from what I have heard about Defcon you are best to not bring any of your own devices at all, lest you end up hacked yourself and on the wall of shame.
Location plays a major part in how much bandwidth is going to be available. Beyond being just dependent on the ISP based on location and what companies are available there, you also have to look at which building it is being held in. DEFCON may have gotten the short end of the stick because the owners of the building they used would only allow so much. Not that a lot is needed (at least in comparison to how many participants are there)... nobody exactly goes to DEFCON to torrent an HD movie.
"The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec^2" -Marcus Dolengo
There has to be at least one press member there that decides to go check his e-mail...
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
...BiMonSciFiCon?!? of all the cons, that is obviously the most important
i've had just about enough of your vassar bashing.
It'd be interesting to see the bandwidth statistics for the annual ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics conference. With tens of thousands of visitors and thousands of full-conference attendees (a huge portion of which are on their laptops all week), I've yet to see a SIGGRAPH conference that didn't bring a convention center's networking to its knees (as well as most surrounding hotel networks). Of course, the per-person bandwidth is relatively low with so many users, but it would be interesting to see the statistics throughout the week regardless.
Especially for such a massive conference that is accustomed to the sustained high-tech audio/video load and with organizers that try to anticipate the high-usage (and have a corresponding budget to prepare), I suspect that there are considerably more bits transferred during SIGGRAPH than most any other conference through sheer size alone.
Cheers!
Sean
I was too slow! Goddamn this lousy con wifi access!
DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
Ummm, it's a hacker convention- Why would they purchase their own bandwidth when there's wireless in the office above?
We dont pay for our bandwidth... We get it for free and even the largest german internet provider asks us if they could peer with us.
https://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1348-Camp07-NetworkStats.pdf (the line had at least 300MBit for 1800 attendees ) Hope Number Six had a 45mb uplink, but only 10mb was used due to a bad cable connection and roughly 3000 attendees straight from network operator from the convention) someone can contact dragorn on nycwireless.net or watch the closing ceremonies of the last hope for the specs this year