China's First Spacewalk
Smivs writes "The BBC reports that China will launch its third manned space mission in late September, according to state-run news agency Xinhua.
The Shenzhou VII flight will feature
China's first-ever space walk, which will be broadcast live with cameras inside and outside the spacecraft.
For the spacewalk, two crew members will go into the spacecraft's vacuum module. One yuhangyuan (astronaut) will carry out the spacewalk; the other is there to monitor the activity and assist in case of an emergency.
Two types of spacesuits — one made in China, the other from Russia — will be carried up on the flight.
It is unclear why China has opted for two different types of spacesuit.
Spaceflight analyst Dr Morris Jones commented that China might want to test the suits against each other. Alternatively, he said, it might not be ready or willing to fly a mission exclusively with its own suits."
...and I can't stand by to let it happen! To arms, people, they're going to censor the IIS's wifi!
Hmm..Well, while I wish the Chinese astronauts the best of luck and hope they get back safely, I doubt that the film is going to be "Live" More likely? A nice safe delay of, oh...a hour to make sure that nothing gets shown that's not supposed to be shown.
China has too much media control to trust something as unpredictable as live TV, especially in a situation where so many things could go wrong.
On that note, good luck! Maybe this'll get us off our asses and back up into space! A little competition never hurt nobody.
I'm just asking myself how they decided which of the two astronauts will have the honor to try the Chinese spacesuit?
China is fast tracking their progress in space, and they're doing pretty good risk management to get it done. They used Russian experience when designing their capsule system (their spacecraft has a number of big similarities to the Soyuz capsule, very very big similarities, and now they're taking up a backup suit in case a design flaw appears during the test that would affect a rescuer. It's a fine idea and doesn't indicate some big uncertainty about their own design, it shows a clear headed decision to trade a possible nationalistic PR win for a measured, risk aware backup plan that puts the lives of their Taikonauts ahead of the usual spin goals.
I'm not a huge fan of PRC in general, but their space program has been well executed so far. They're making good use of available data while still innovating on their terms instead of having to build everything from scratch.
All nine of you are totally busted for pretending you read the article, since the link doesn't work.
If I were the yuhangyuan on the tether, I'd be yelling "You Hang You On!" like crazy!
Joy luck, gentlemen.
Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
Because the first type of suit doesn't come in child sizes
UTF-8: There and Back Again
The reference makes no sense if it's referring to Spaceballs. The bubble around Druidia (the air shield) was intended to keep the air in, not the people. The people could presumably come and go as they pleased as long as they knew the combination (which, coincidentally, is the same combination I have on my luggage).
As NASA has defined it, only US space-going individuals may claim the title "astronaut." Further, they cannot be civilians, at least according to an article in the latest Wired.
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/16-09/ff_starcity?currentPage=6
A permanent moonbase is like the war in Iraq: Sure, some profit off it but essentially you are throwing money away.
Yeah, just like the war in Iraq, except without the part about, you know, killing people.
The US is still a very rich country (not, granted, as rich relative to the rest of the world as we were in the 1960s, but still) and we can afford to do things that don't show an immediate profit. Speaking as someone who has seen war up close and personal -- and whose father was one of the people who made the moon landings happen -- I'd much rather have us spending money on space exploration than on wars of aggression.
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.