Slashdot Mirror


Biologist (Almost) Creates Artificial Life

Aditya Malik writes "Wired has an interesting story up about how a lab led by Jack Szostak, a molecular biologist at Harvard Medical School, is building 'protocells' from artificial molecules which are very close to satisfying the conditions for being 'alive.' 'Szostak's protocells are built from fatty molecules that can trap bits of nucleic acids that contain the source code for replication. Combined with a process that harnesses external energy from the sun or chemical reactions, they could form a self-replicating, evolving system that satisfies the conditions of life, but isn't anything like life on earth now, but might represent life as it began or could exist elsewhere in the universe.' This obviously raises some questions about creationism, not to mention some scary bio-research-gone-wild scenarios."

1 of 539 comments (clear)

  1. wait....creationism!? by nimbius · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what is there to question about creationism? its not science. in fact, its right up there with scientology as far as im concerned.

    heck, opening a can of beans does just as much to call creationism into question as this scientist.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.