Slashdot Mirror


Spectacular Fossil Forests Found In US Coalmine

Smivs passes along a report up on the BBC about the fossil forests found in coal mines in Illinois. "The [US-UK] group reported one discovery last year, but has since identified a further five examples. The ancient vegetation — now turned to rock — is visible in the ceilings of mines covering thousands of hectares. These were among the first forests to evolve on the planet, [according to] Dr. Howard Falcon-Lang... 'These are the largest fossil forests found anywhere in the world at any point in geological time. It is quite extraordinary to find a fossil landscape preserved over such a vast area; and we are talking about an area the size of [the British city of] Bristol.' The forests grew just a few million years apart some 300 million years ago; and are now stacked one on top of another."

46 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Note on Units by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cities of Bristol is now an accepted measurement of area? And here I thought I was paying attention to SI conventions. How many libraries of congre

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    1. Re:Note on Units by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duh,
      47 libraries of congress to a Bristol measured at 47 degrees Reaumur 83 furlongs above knee level,
      Man, I've know that for about a microcentury.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:Note on Units by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone with worldly knowledge knows that Bristol was the standard unit of measurement for area within the British Empire for over 200 years. It seems I'll have to break it down for you ignorant Americans:

      Bristol has an area of 1,184,832,000 square feet (source)
      The Library of Congress has an area of 2,100,000 square feet (source)

      Therefore 1 Bristol (and TFA's fossilised forest) == 564.2 Libraries of Congress

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    3. Re:Note on Units by the_B0fh · · Score: 5, Funny

      It depends on how pregnant that Bristol is.

      OK, bad bad taste. My coat's the one full of shot.

    4. Re:Note on Units by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm accustomed to American news reports converting approximate metric quantities into foolishly precise non-metric numbers. (6213 miles, for example, or 220 pounds.) When this story hits the US news, the fossils will be 81% the size of Bristol, TN or 124% the size of Bristol, CT. (Those numbers are made up off the top of my head, so no correction from Wikipedia-crazed doofuses is necessary, BTW.)

    5. Re:Note on Units by plopez · · Score: 4, Funny

      And how many firkins of beer could you keep at 45 deg. F for a fortnight assuming an ambient 70 deg temp assuming that each dram (weight, not fluid) of coal has 1373 btus of energy. Please state all simplifying assumptions. Keep 3 sig. figs.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Note on Units by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but these units don't properly convert. The Library of Congress isn't a measure of area, but of data storage. 1 Library of Congress = about 10 terabytes. (Oddly, this is easy to discover by googling "1 Library of Congress in megabytes". Google itself doesn't do the conversion, but the equivalence is in the top search results.)

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    7. Re:Note on Units by Trogre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hope this guy's address isn't anywhere near Switzerland...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Note on Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Answer: 0.000

      Simplifying Assumption: I drank it all.

    9. Re:Note on Units by sokoban · · Score: 3, Funny

      My coat's the one full of shot.

      Unfortunately, Bristol's baby's daddy's latex coat was not full of shot. That's why she is now pregnant.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    10. Re:Note on Units by moortak · · Score: 3, Informative

      He did.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    11. Re:Note on Units by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Awe common, you guys are too rough.

      Parent had a somewhat vaguely pertinent comment.

      You know Seagate named a line of harddrives Barracuda; just so they'd have a bunch of jokes on hand when someone asked about missing bites.

      Here's to hoping I used the ; properly, probably not, since I'm just guessing.

  2. What I find more interesting by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    are the places where there is both coal and limestone. The same place that was once a forest that got fossilized then got covered by the sea. Scratch through the limestone and you find fossilized sea shells etc. Go deeper and you find fossilized twigs and leaves.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:What I find more interesting by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The top of Mount Everest is partially limestone.

    2. Re:What I find more interesting by bendodge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's because it was all covered with water at one point.

      --
      The government can't save you.
  3. Ten Thousand Square Meters by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

    A hectare is fine, too.

  4. why looking at the ceiling? by nietsch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I don't understand from the article (yes I RTFA) is why this fossil forrest needs to be viewed from below? Was all the commercially interesting coal beneath the tree fossils, or is there a scientific reason to approach it bottom up?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:why looking at the ceiling? by omris · · Score: 5, Informative

      The coal was produced primarily by rotting leaves and soil, which yes, would have been under the trees.

      So you have a layer of petrified leaves and trees and a layer of coal beneath it. They take out the coal and you get a really big long cave, where you can look up at the bottom of the fossil bed.

      Cool stuff. Now I'm waiting patiently for someone to mention the global warming comment.

    2. Re:why looking at the ceiling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      global warming comment

    3. Re:why looking at the ceiling? by kesuki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      well, finding that in a very short period of time, of natural global warming, that rainforests are replaced with giant ferns is a little disheartening. http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html

      this is a wonderful find, oh and BTW the area where the coal was mined was actually a peat bog, that turned into a forest in the carboniferous period, then turned into sea several times and then back into a forest, and was also a ferny weedy place. most likely earthquakes from changes in plate tectonics played a huge role in how the land mass changed, from being above land, below land, and the erosion of nearby mountains provided the silt to cover the land when it was above ground.

      so no the coal was not the result of the forest, although it may have added slightly to the coal, when it was submersed, most coal is formed from wetlands where vastly more biomass concentrates and is preserved from decaying due to water covering it thus preventing microbes from getting the oxygen to decay the plant matter. if you want coal you look for places where the water was stagnant like prehistoric wetlands, or former continental shelf areas.

    4. Re:why looking at the ceiling? by Paltin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Think about a peat bog forming--- thick layer of plant material that will later be turned to coal.

      As the oceans begin to transgress (the 50-cent geologist term for sea level rise), the existing forest is quickly buried and you end up with a snapshot of the forest remaining. After removing all the coal, you end up with a cave where you look up to the interesting part. Well, interesting for me, since I'm a paleontologist. :)

      Interestingly, this work is only done because the coal mining company is really, really, nice. They don't have any real incentive to let paleontologists in after they're done with operations. Kudos to them!

  5. Great! by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's burn it!

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    1. Re:Great! by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 2, Funny

      but do fossilized witches float?

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    2. Re:Great! by GayBliss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This one has been burning since 1962 and could continue to burn for another 1000 years.

  6. Some better images by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some images better than the crappy one with TFA. Or just go to the source: http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/research/coal/fossil-forest/

    1. Re:Some better images by couchslug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The funny thing about atheists is that most of them will never understand the irony of their faith."

      Atheism is merely the absence of theism.

      Anything else a person may attribute to their non-theism or use to explain it is their problem/baggage, but it isn't atheism. Atheism is a "faith" like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Some better images by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Atheism is a "faith" like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

      Gaah, I'm really quite sick of this mantra. For one thing.. it's a mantra. That does not make sense.

      For another, if you put as much effort into not collecting stamps as most of the atheists on slashdot put into not believing in god, people would be suggesting support groups for your aphilatelism problem.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Some better images by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Gaah, I'm really quite sick of this mantra."

      Then be sick of it, but it is still accurate. One may be theism-free quite easily. One may also defend their right to not be imposed upon by the agendas of the superstitious, and as superstitions are vigorous they sometimes require vigorous opposition.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Some better images by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fine, how about a new mantra? If atheism and religion were sex ....

      Atheism would be like masturbation - you know you're there by yourself, but hell, you're having a good time!

      Religion would be like masturbating with a happy face drawn on your hand - it's still only you, but you like pretending that you're not alone.

    5. Re:Some better images by Digital+End · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's saying it's inaccurate. I think something like "Athiesm is to faith as bald is to hair color" or "Athiesm is to faith as naked is to fashion" would be better

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    6. Re:Some better images by quantaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Atheism is a "faith" like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

      Gaah, I'm really quite sick of this mantra. For one thing.. it's a mantra. That does not make sense.

      Actually it does. Faith is believe in something for which there is insufficient evidence, not believing in something for which there is insufficient evidence does not require faith.

      For another, if you put as much effort into not collecting stamps as most of the atheists on slashdot put into not believing in god, people would be suggesting support groups for your aphilatelism problem.

      I tried to believe in God when I was younger, I really did, but the evidence was so overwhelming that I finally accepted that there was no god.

      Not believing in God is very easy for me. Theism, when I tried it, was extremely difficult for all the contradictions I had to ignore.

      However, one place I do expend some effort is going out like this and explaining my views to theists. The reason I expend this effort is I've seen the damage that religion does and I'm quite honestly trying to make the world a better place.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  7. no, no by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    The GP post asked about "libraries of congre," clearly a misspelling of "libraries of conger" as in [[daggertooth pike conger]], a species of fish. So we're really talking upwards of 7,000 libraries of conger rather than 47 libraries of congress.

  8. I've seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dad and grandfather used to work in the coal mines in the southwest Virginia and eastern Kentucky area. They used to find bits of fossilized plants all the time.

    Though I doubt they found anything as largescale as what is presented in the article, my grandfather did bring out of a mine a fossil tree trunk/root system that he placed in his front yard. I very distinctly remember playing on it as a child, it was quite large.

  9. Re:300 million years ago??????? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You realize, don't you, that you're suggesting that coal seams have been laid down within the past 100 years? Thinking about it rationally would suggest to you that these items were dropped in the coal mine by miners, not laid down along with the coal. Or how do you propose they got there, to be found many meters below ground?

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  10. Re:Anything else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  11. Re:Anything else? by Paltin · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/415 There's the link to the abstract from their work last year.

  12. Why in a UK News Site by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this not a big enough story for US news companies to cover?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  13. Atheism requires faith by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The absence of theism is not an absence of faith. For that you want agnosticism. Atheists require faith to believe that there is no God, and nothing else outside their perceived world. In reality, this viewpoint requires more faith than any religion, because all religions offer "proof" that they are true. Not so for atheism.

    1. Re:Atheism requires faith by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Atheists require faith to believe that there is no God, and nothing else outside their perceived world. In reality, this viewpoint requires more faith than any religion, because all religions offer "proof" that they are true.

      Nonsense - you simply need analytical ability and a basic grasp of logic.

      Using your "logic", you would likewise require proof in order to believe that there is no Santa Claus. In fact, NOT believing in Santa Claus would actually require more faith than believing in Him, since the TV shows Him to us all the time, and we even see Him at the mall during the Christmas season.

      The absence of theism is not an absence of faith. For that you want agnosticism.

      Also wrong. Agnosticism is the way you approach a problem, not an answer to a problem. If you're agnostic about a question, that means that you accept that it can never be 100% proven or disproved. It doesn't answer the question of whether you think there is a god, though. It just means that your willing to consider both possibilities, and weigh them in a fair manner.

      Technically speaking, I'm agnostic about the existence of Santa Claus. I can never prove for certain that he DOESN'T exist. But that doesn't mean that the chances of him existing or not existing are 50/50. I can use logic, observation, and deductive reasoning to come to the most likely conclusion, and I can even assign it a rough probability.

      In the end, everything does come down to belief, since no question can be answered with 100% certainty. But there is a WORLD of difference between belief based on scientific observations and critical thinking, and a belief based on blind faith.

    2. Re:Atheism requires faith by Sabz5150 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Firstly, I'd love to see some of this "proof". Secondly, there is no faith required in the idea that something does not exist. That's like saying I need faith to say that there isn't an invisible pterodactyl sitting on the back of my chair. Religion requires faith in something you cannot readily prove the existence thereof (like my pet pterodactyl), whereas I don't need any faith to say "Nope, there's no pterodactyl there."

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    3. Re:Atheism requires faith by Copid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The absence of theism is not an absence of faith. For that you want agnosticism. Atheists require faith to believe that there is no God, and nothing else outside their perceived world. In reality, this viewpoint requires more faith than any religion, because all religions offer "proof" that they are true. Not so for atheism.

      Person A: "I believe that 499,999 of the 500,000 religions out there are false. I reject their evidence. I accept one of the 500,000 religions, mainly because {I accept their evidence, I had a religious experience, My parents raised me that way, It makes me feel good, etc.}."

      Person B: "I agree with person A about the first 499,999 religions. I also think that because the evidence for the 500,000th one looks a whole lot like the other 499,999 {It makes claims that are hard to reconcile with observed fact, Provides no real hard evidence to distinguish it from other ridiculous sounding stories, etc.}, I don't believe in that one either."

      Person B is, by your definition, exercising more faith than person A? As I see it, all of those religions offer insufficient "proof" that they are true in the face of the incredibility of their claims, so I reject them.

      If I claim that God exists and created us three days ago with memories intact, and the evidence that I offer is what appears to be the face of Barry Bonds on a piece of toast, does it take more faith to reject that claim or to accept it? Or is the only rational option to reserve judgment?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  14. This one since 1884 by Sanat · · Score: 5, Informative

    This one is a few miles from my house.

    n 1884, coal miners working the Black Diamond mine in New Straitsville, southeastern Ohio, went on strike when the Columbus and Hocking Coal and Iron Company cut their pay from 60 cents a ton to 40 cents. Legend has it that other miners, unhappy with the work stoppage, loaded several coal cars with oil-soaked firewood and rolled them into the mine.

    It's hard to imagine what benefit they anticipated, but I bet they never dreamt of what resulted.

    For the next 122 years and counting, the underground fire, called the Devil's Oven, has burned in the coals seams around the Monday Creek area. At times the fires have been prominent and close to the surface. In fact, in the 1930's tourists came to the area to watch their guides cook meals over smoking holes in the ground.

    During the depression, a WPA crew was dispatched to the area to fight the fire, with indifferent success.

    The Ohio Department of Natural Resources estimates that to date the Devil's Oven has consumed 276 million tons of coal, or 20 square miles of the black gold. Today the fire is burning about 40 feet underground... from blog of Tom Barlow

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  15. Re:Football Fields by shawb · · Score: 2, Funny

    American or European football?

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  16. I'm one of the geologists involved in the discover by slashdotsyncline · · Score: 5, Informative

    Greetings folks,

    I'm Scott Elrick from the Illinois State Geological Survey, one of the researchers involved in the original discovery. Here's a little background:

    * This current story is an extension of a story from a year ago. When the story broke, I popped onto Slashdot to answer questions - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=232903&cid=18936603 (ignore the misspellings in those posts!)

    * As a result of the publicity, I used some of the guts of my postings above to put together this webpage: http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/research/coal/fossil-forest/fossil-forest.shtml I tried to make a 'general public' kind of site that covers most of the basics and posted all of the pictures we took.

    * From the guts of the webpage, I put together a magazine article for 'Outdoor Illinois' on the discovery. Here's a PDF (direct link) of the article - http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/research/coal/fossil-forest/Outdoor-IL-art.pdf

    * By the end of the year we made it into the top 100 stories of 2007 in Discover magazine - http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jan/fossils-of-a-300-million-year-old-forest-found

    * There should be an article coming out in Smithsonian magazine about the discovery in a few months time.

    Now to the current news.

    Our colleague Dr. Howard Falcon-Lang of the University of Bristol, UK is heading up a multi year research effort to examine the Desmoinesian - Missourian boundary in the Middle Penn. Howard, Bill DiMichele of the Smithsonian Institute, John Nelson and myself of the ISGS, Isabel Montañez of UC Davis and Neil Tabor of SMU will all be collaborating to work out the paleobotanical, sedimentologic, CO2, and climate history of this large scale climate transition. Really this is more an announcement of further research than of results!

    As flat as Illinois is, we do have a pretty good record of this transitional period Rocks in Illinois? Who knew!

    Cheers!

    p.s. I covered a fair amount of ground in my previous postings last year in terms of answering questions. I'll pop back later this evening and see if any more pop up though.

  17. Breasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Bristol City" is also cockney rhyming slang.

  18. Re:Slow, gradual change... out the window by Urkki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was a long time (like millions of years?) between the forests getting buried. So it could even have been a volcano erupting repeatedly every million years. Or a river where "mother of all floods" would happen with periodic climate shifts (like Milankovitch cycles), causing thousands of years worth of mud deposits to be suddenly released. Huge glacial lakes bursting are one source of huge sudden floods, and they can be triggered both by climate change and by volcanoes.