Apple Declares DRM War On Sneaker Hackers
theodp writes "Nicholas Carr is not pleased that Apple has applied for a patent to extend DRM to tennis shoes and other articles of clothing. Apple apparently views tennis-shoe DRM as a way to head off a potential plague of sneaker hacking. 'Some people,' the patent application observes, 'have taken it upon themselves to remove the sensor from the special pocket of the [iPod-linked] Nike+ shoe and place it at inappropriate locations (shoelaces, for example) or place it on non-Nike+ model shoes.'"
God damn it, not another bizarro world. Hope I can slide again soon.
I think it's more of a counterfeiting thing. There are tons of fake Nikes coming from Asia that are honestly way worse in quality, durability, and comfort. So that's gotta end. But plugging an ethernet cord into my shoes once a week or they'll stick to the floor and refuse to move, that's a problem. Oh and weigh you too. I don't know that's for sure what they're going to do so I guessed based on their previous products. So their implementation is probably gonna be some ridiculous idea that won't fix anything but it is a bad problem.
Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
The Martin Guitar company is considering whether to file a patent on DRM on its guitar strings - the company notes that "some players" are fitting Martin-manufactured strings to "non-Martin labeled guitars." IT'S AN OUTRAGE!
Disclaimer: The above is not true - except the outrage bit.
I'm not an Microsoft fan because of their tendency to use proprietary standards, etc, but I can appreciate that they build a good user experience for people that are perhaps not as technically inclined. But I think it's definitely moving towards the point where you (as TFA says) are embarrassed to be a Microsoft fan. This sort of action is just petty.
that hack seems harmless enough. however, i'm not so sure that Podophile is the best name for a website.
I guess this spells the demise of sneakernet
I'm sorry, I stopped reading when you used the term Web 2.0 like it meant something.
As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
True. They're trying to own your sole.
I *had* decided to get a Mac the next time I got a new computer. Not now. Good job.
Apple: Still not as bad as Micro$oft. But we're trying. God damn, we are trying.
The sensor is great. The integration with the iPod is cool. The fact that Nike only makes one width of shoe (and that their "medium" is pretty much a narrow) means I can't have this technology? Hmmm...maybe we should get some sort of ADA-for-tech law passed so that you can hack something to make it work for you if it doesn't work as sold...
"Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
podophile.com?! But this is about sneakers, which go on feet; wouldn't the proper prefix be...
Oh. Never mind.
OK, I'd be careful of the whole social networking thing. I'm pretty sure that if you meet a potential spouse through this, the rights on your first born child are forfeit to Apple, Nike, and AT&T.
however, i'm not so sure that Podophile is the best name for a website.
Best marketing pitch ever: iPod - so awesome, you'll molest it for hours.
you have to pay an extra, hidden Apple-tax to do so.
That sounds about right for Apple. Its similarly impossible to run MacOS on anything except approved Apple hardware thanks to DRM.
besides, that was a very pedestrian joke anyway.
"iPod - to your child what tail is to a salamander !"
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
just walk away
rewriting history since 2109
Are you trying to tell me Web 2.0 does not mean anything? Then how exactly would you explain why so many web pages are served by hosts called www2.somedomain.tld?
Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
We're all engineers here buddy, if you want to meet marketing folks; I'm sure you can find some on fark or something...
If for no other reason than your eternal soul.
You are welcome on my lawn.
bash, which appears to be down for now, had the best explanation of web 2.0.
You generate the content, we make the money.
meh
Oh wait, so now you need your iPod to tell you what your feet are doing? Interesting!
iPod: You just have been ran over, please lower your volume, pay more attention, and ask the paramedics to pick up the other shoe about 100ft. north west.
If you think pedophilia is funny, you are going to laugh your ass off when I rape your sister.
You're going to look pretty fucking stupid when you rape his sister to prove your point, then it turns out that she's 37 years old.
There are many better solutions than lugging around an iphone while you run.
If you're using the phrase "lugging around" for, at most, a 5 ounce device, I don't think you're in the target market for a running shoe. But don't worry, I'm sure they're releasing the I-Hoveround soon.
This sentence no verb.
'ped' and 'pedo' can also refer to feet:
and since he's talking about modifying running shoes with pedometers in them, maybe he could call his site, pedoph... oh, wait....