Slashdot Mirror
Tying Knots With Light
thedreadedwiccan points out a summary of a recently released physics paper about tying knots with light. A pair of researchers showed that a relatively new solution to Maxwell's equations allows light to be twisted into stable loops. They are designing experiments to test the theory now, and it could have a big impact on fusion technology. The paper's abstract is available at Nature, though a subscription is required to see the rest. Quoting:
"In special situations, however, the loops might be stable, such as if light travels through plasma instead of through free space. One of the problems that has plagued experimental nuclear fusion reactors is that the plasma at the heart of them moves faster and faster and tends to escape. That motion can be controlled with magnetic fields, but current methods to generate those fields still don't do the job. If Irvine and Bouwmeester's discovery could be used to generate fields that would send the plasma in closed, non-expanding loops and help contain it, 'that would be extremely spectacular,' Bouwmeester says."
Anybody who is anybody saw the flux capacitor in what 1984 - this is old work. the flux capacitor had loops and curves etc.
If Irvine and Bouwmeester's discovery could be used to generate fields that would send the plasma in closed, non-expanding loops and help contain it, 'that would be extremely spectacular,' Bouwmeester says."
Bouwmeester continued by saying that light is, "way cool" and the ability to tie knots with it would be, "totally freaking awesome".
Please tell me this is getting me closer to owning a light saber. PLEASE!!!
Even so, why do I think this is not actually going to work? Because for the last fifty years, fusion power has been constantly just twenty years in the future, that's why. The authors don't claim a solution to fusion containment, they are talking about possible new ways of trapping photons or creating condensates.
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
The real question is was a silver hammer necessary?
The (slashdot) summary really does miss some of the key points, and emphasize the "fusion containment" aspect, which I doubt anyone takes seriously as a use of this. One of the points that I think is key is the whole subject of homotopy groups (which I've really just learned about).
Maxwell's equations (and the wave equation, the Helmholtz equation in momentum space, etc.) have a family of solutions characterized by various parameter values. When you first start learning physics, you typically only allow real-valued wavevectors, which leads to only propagating waves and so on. Later on, you start to realize (as did George Green around 150 years ago, and Newton realized experimentally) that allowing for complex wavenumbers is more appealing mathematically (because it allows for more complete solutions), and actually leads to physically realizable solutions that propagating waves just don't give you. The effect of passing from real to complex wavenumbers is, on the face of it, crazy, but easily understandable once the analysis is carried out, and simple to visualize on an Argand diagram.
However, homotopy groups (if I understand it correctly) say that there may be other solutions to such equations (in nonlinear/dispersive media) which one can't get to from just simple replacements of real with complex numbers, and so forth---these divisions are the "families" of solutions. There just isn't a simple projection from one family of solutions to another, and the solutions of from one may bear no resemblance to the solutions from other famililes. This means that there may, in sufficiently complicated systems, be physically realizable behaviors which a system may fall in to, which aren't describable by the "usual" solutions of the equations. Of course, Maxwell's equations work wonderfully in all situations I've ever heard of (no concession to the "Electric Universe" wackos!), so perhaps nature, for some reason, won't allow other families of solutions to make themselves known on any scale I know of.
1. How do you bend light without passing it through matter or using a grav field that will crush the experiment?
2. If they can bend light, why are we using electron beams for crt's?
3. If you could build loops of light can they be modulated to store information and read it back again?
Doc Oc was Spiderman 2. The villain in Spiderman 3 was conforming to societal pressures, security guards outside of Hot Topic, and running out of mascara and hair spray.
These science publishers are as evil or worse than the RIAA/MPAA with this paywall BS. To paraphrase, science is too important to be left to those that can pay 40 bucks per paper. I can't understand why Google, who wants to "organize the world's information", has not done anything to prevent the world's most valuable information from being inaccessible.
That is all.
Help stamp out iliturcy.