Slashdot Mirror


Indian Woman Convicted of Murder By Brain Scan

Kaseijin writes "Neuroscientist Champadi Raman Mukundan claims his Brain Electrical Oscillations Signature test is so accurate, it can tell whether a person committed or only witnessed an act. In June, an Indian judge agreed, using BEOS to find a woman guilty of killing her former fiancé. Scientific experts are calling the decision 'ridiculous' and 'unconscionable,' protesting that Mukundan's work has not even been peer reviewed. How reliable should a test have to be, when eyewitnesses are notoriously fallible? Does a person have a right to privacy over their own memories, or should society's interest in holding criminals accountable come first?"

23 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. They think... by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... they can reliably read someone's mind to determine whether they committed a crime?

    That is mental.

    1. Re:They think... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Funny

      And even if you get an abnormal reading it may not be caused by guilt - it may be because the subject is unsettling.

      I could kill the operator of the scanner with a thought. Simple countermeasures.

      Just concentrate on an imagine of a combination of Goatse, Tubgirl, 2g1c, and Lemon Party. Instant aneurysm.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:They think... by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seems like a Pyrrhic victory.

    3. Re:They think... by Poltras · · Score: 4, Funny

      I could kill the operator of the scanner with a thought. Simple countermeasures. Just concentrate on an imagine of a combination of Goatse, Tubgirl, 2g1c, and Lemon Party. Instant aneurysm.

      So that's what the title means with Indian Woman Convicted of Murder By Brain Scan. Murder by Brain Scan - the googles do nothing...

  2. DHS has to be involved! by fishthegeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dang and I thought the DRM in Vista was bad. I had no idea that BEOS could determine if I witnessed a crime.

    I knew that it was ahead of it's time but Geesh! Does anyone know what version he is using?

    Just goes to show, there is no security by obscurity! Hopefully those Haiku guys will get it up and running soon!

    --
    load "$",8,1
  3. Just goes to show.. by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..BEOS has always been way ahead of the competition!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  4. Convicted by BeOS! by snarfies · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear the judge has ordered that she be imprisoned inside a giant NeXTcube.

  5. Re:Did anyone else ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah. I was hoping to read about how if you put a brain scan machine up to 11 the person's head explodes. But no.

  6. Un documented feature by Pheez · · Score: 2, Funny

    With an undocumented feature like that, I'm surprised BeOS isn't still around.

  7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's right. And if you want to stand up for women's rights vote McCain Palin 2008! Palin - Because women are always the victim (tm).

  8. Re:5th by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    At first blush this sounds like a high-tech form of seeing if the witch can float.

    Ah. So it's a machine to determine if she's made of wood?

  9. If you don't allow it by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    You will be a terrorist supporter and friend to the paedophiles. Don't even think of preventing use of this weapon against perverts and terrorists.

    Think of the Children (but not in that way... we will know).

  10. Miss Scarlet, in the Study, with the MRI by merfle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Murder by brain scan?! And they tell us these tests are safe...

  11. obligatory firefly reference by jedijoe9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who rad the headline and thought: "Also, I can kill you with my brain."

  12. Re:5th by KeithJM · · Score: 5, Funny

    psychics are real despite what the blowhard freak James Randi would have you believe.

    Ok, I will grant that psychics are real. It's just their supernatural abilities that are fake.

  13. Re:5th by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, it determines if she weighs the same as a duck.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  14. Everyone knows... by kiehlster · · Score: 4, Funny

    That if you want true accuracy, you have to go for the Vulcan mind meld. No one's going to argue about the validity of Vulcan logic.

  15. Re:I see Phrenology by Libertarian001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does the study of the size of Walt's asshole have to do with this? From "Men at Work."

  16. Re:Did anyone else ... by AngryNick · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty turning the brain of John Doe into a Cheeto(tm) by way of MRI."

  17. BEos? by arelas · · Score: 2, Funny

    And to think I can hardly get my video driver loaded in it...

  18. what if by someone1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if James Randi has a psychic power of neutralizing other para guys?
    Then he catches them in an alley and sucks their brain out.
    No wonder they don't dare to fight him.
    Ooops, sounds like i watched too much Heroes...

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  19. Re:5th by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the dog is just a good listener.

  20. Re:The developed world has similar attitudes by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

    You seem to believe that people should be imprisoned for being attracted to children. Around 25-33% of men are aroused by children*; who is going to pay for that level of imprisonment?

    That is not a problem for America. You just lack a positive attitude, over here we're AmeriCAN not AmeriCAN'T.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire