Intel Unveils 6-Core Xeon 7400
JagsLive recommends CNet coverage that begins "Intel officially unveiled its six-core 'Dunnington' Xeon 7400 processor Monday ... As expected, Intel launched the Dunnington chip for high-end servers ... The Xeon 7400 is also one of the first Intel chips to have a monolithic design. In other words, all six cores will be on one piece of silicon. To date, for any processor having more than two cores, Intel has put two separate pieces of silicon ... inside one chip package."
I think they're really making 8-core chips but their factories are primitive so normally only about six of them work.
These chips are all defective. I wouldn't buy one and neither should you.
No sig today...
I would love to get a new mobo and one of these chips and install it in my Mac.....oh wait, nevermind.
6 = 8 - 2 broken cores ?
... and a moisturizer strip for a cool, refreshing finish.
UTF-8: There and Back Again
Hey, 6 is a power of 2. It's 2^2.585, to be inexact.
i might finally be able to play crysis on my vista ultimate machine? i mean, granted, my pc will look more like a LHC when im through with it...but a few black holes are worth it
Good people go to bed earlier.
2^(log2(6)) to be exact.
OFC if your dealing with server, then it does make a difference for example Unisys 96 core offering (*nix & possible mac only) would be able to hold 256 SQL server databases ... or vista pro
IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
Pentium 1 user, aren't you?
My god... it’s full of stars...
... and each one will have it's own processor core.
When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
And how will you power it build your own nuclear power plant?
Thankfully the core Python developers have been telling us that continued hardware development of adding more cores is simply not happening. Furthermore, this evolution of continued development is simply wrong, bad, and is silly. To make matters worse, we are all delusional and no one is running more than one core and anyone leveraging more than one core is using their computer poorly and inefficiently.
Thankfully, here very soon, we'll all reason that Intel, AMD, ATI, and NVIDIA are all doing the wrong thing and making use of additional cores (and especially SMP) is always the worst way of increasing concurrency.
In all seriousness, hopefully these guys will realize they are dreaming and actually bother to increase scalability with sane, proper, scalable, and programmer friendly methods for doing so.
64 cores should be enough for anybody.
If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
I'm holding out for a 12 core processor.
I'm also holding out for a razor blade with 6 blades, screw those wimpy 5 blade razors that Tiger is pitching right now. (F*ck, I have a beard, why do I want a razor blade? Screw it, I'm still waiting for 6 blades.)
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
Watt you say?
You have no chance to survive make your time.