Slashdot Mirror


Is Open Source Different In Europe Than In the US?

An anonymous reader writes "The first Europe Open Source Think Tank just concluded and Larry Augustin posted some interesting observations on open source in Europe versus the US. Essentially, he says that users in Europe care more about the open source nature of a product than do US users. US users are just trying to save a buck while European users actually care about access to the source code. Do Slashdot readers observe the same thing? Are the reasons for using open source software different in other parts of the world as well?"

38 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. For shame by illuminum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are we Americans really this stupid on this many levels?

    1. Re:For shame by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yes. From TFA:

      Primary reason for adopting Open Source:
      -(Europe) Avoid vendor lock-in.
      -(US) Cost.

      Key driver of commercial Open source business creation:
      -(Europe) Creation of a local software industry.
      -(US) Venture capital/entrepreneur-driven to create big business and make money for investors.

      Dual licensing business models.:
      -(Europe) Not true open source. Proprietary business models using Open Source for PR and marketing.
      -(US) Widely accepted as the most common Open Source business mode

      Software sales model.:
      -(Europe) Channel oriented: VARs and SIs.
      -(US) Direct.

      Open Source business models.:
      -(Europe) Service and support subscription focused; 100% open source software.
      -(US) Don't want to be in services business. The focus is on products, typically proprietary add-ons or an Enterprise Edition paired with an Open Source product edition.

      Expectations around "Open Source" products:
      -(Europe) All code is available under Open Source. There is often a community governance of community participation model.
      -(US) Same, but not necessarily all products are available under an Open Source license. Commercially licensed versions of the products are commonly available. Projects are managed by a commercial vendor.

      ...and the best reason for using open source anywhere: Not having to worry about those pesky BSA raids!

    2. Re:For shame by johannesg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Primary reason for adopting Open Source:
      -(Europe) Avoid vendor lock-in.
      -(US) Cost.

      ...because let's be brutally honest here: the US cares less about sending money to Redmond, Seattle than Europe does. For Europe it means a loss of value on the continent, but for the US the money stays 'at home', and contributes to local jobs, taxes, etc.

      So yes, Europe cares about Open Source in a different way than the US. It might very well be the only way that serious software development in Europe can compete with the US...

    3. Re:For shame by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But were there Americans involved in these discussions, or just a bunch of Europeans talking about what Americans think?

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    4. Re:For shame by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well... one could argue that that is precisely the mark of stupidity ;)

    5. Re:For shame by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also from TFA:

      This isn't a scientific survey, but reflects opinions I heard consistently from multiple people over the two days of the conference:

      I have a salt shaker if you'd like a grain with that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:For shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In all honesty being that I work for a Global company, Europe has I think a much higher quality of life. They are not rushed, they take their time and smell the roses. They have more free time as well and vacations. I am a geek as well and as a geek when I take vacation I typically end up looking into a new technology or exploring something I do not have the time for while working. However I get interruptions while I am on vacation from work as well.

      Therefore, they take the time to look through the source code. Here in the US, we do not have the time, so basically we just buy something that gets done what we need to get done open source or not. Even if had the source code we wouldn't look at it. There are applications we have purchased in the company that we also purchase the source code for, however when we have problems we do not look at the source we call support, because we need an answer and we need it now.

    7. Re:For shame by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, in the US, companies are more interested in reliability

      You misspelled "liability".

    8. Re:For shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A loss of money to the continent? Who the hell thinks of Europe as a single financial entity. Where the money is going is the last thing that anyone ever thinks about.

    9. Re:For shame by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your first paragraph makes no sense. If it were true, then things would be the other way round - Europe would be worried a lot more about the cost of software than vendor lock in. As it is, if this article is correct it means that Americans don't care about feeding money into their economy, they only want stuff to be free and don't care as much if there is vendor lock-in. While Europeans are happy to pay money to American companies as long as it means they have a choice.

      It's also pretty funny that you somehow think American software is magically superior to any equivalent software coded in Europe, unless that software is open source? Games perhaps aren't "serious software" but they tend to require more serious coding skills than developing other commercial client-side software, and there are plenty of talented European and Asian development houses. I don't know a lot of commercial office software, but how about SAGE?

      Sure, most big software houses have their headquarters in the US, and Europe is the home of Linux and a lot of good open source apps. But look back again at your quote, and you could see that is because the US cares about money, and Europe cares about encouraging innovation and giving people good products. It is not necessarily because Europeans somehow can't code good code unless they are doing it for free.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:For shame by sickboy1969c · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In America we call that Lazy, Elitists, who do not contribute positive to the overall society. (there is more to the world then just source code)

      Your hardworking, salt of the earth capitalists have really contributed a lot of positive things to your society. Hmmm, USD 10 billion a day in Iraq or USD 700 billion to bail out Wall St etc but not a dime for affordale socialised medicine... give me lazy elitism any day!

    11. Re:For shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly. Their employees are in Washington state, where your business is supposed to pay income tax because there's no payroll tax. But they put their financial offices in (IIRC) Colorado, so their profits are filed in a state with a payroll tax on the (no) employees, but no income tax.
        This way Microsoft dodges paying any more than a bare minimum of taxes, while still enjoying the taxpayer-bought benefits of Washington state.

        Privatize the profits, socialize the costs. It's the American way!

    12. Re:For shame by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, but it's not elitist for the middle class to be paid fair value for their work, and to be able to enjoy the fruits of their own labours.
      This idea that your primary function in society is to make other people richer (because this is what you're doing when you work harder for the same pay) is distinctly North American. Europeans don't look down on us because they think we're inherently inferior, they look down on us because we go around with "sucker" written on our heads, and let a small, elite minority take advantage of us.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    13. Re:For shame by sickboy1969c · · Score: 5, Informative

      Medicare - gotta be over 65! Medicaid - heaven help me if I earn over USD 15,907 and live in NY State with wife and three kids - too much income! SCHIP - be careful, you might earn too much (greater than ca. 3.5 x the poverty level) and then your access would be severely cut. They all look good on paper. Sorry, I guess I meant that communist ideology of universal healthcare, but whatever you call it, there seems to be, anecdotally at least, a lot of people without easy access to care. At least that's what Michael Moore told us ;-P

    14. Re:For shame by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Consider this: French workers are more productive per hour worked than US workers. We just work more hours per year. At least for me, productivity should be a measure of units of output per unit of input. If you consider 'wealth created per worker-year', the US is highly productive. If you want to consider 'wealth generated per worker-hour', the French are more productive. It is not all clear to me that the French are 'lazy', they just have different values.

      As to the 'elitist' charge. The US economy is great for the financial elite, but miserly with respect to anyone with a median salary or lower. In a lab in Europe, the lab assistants got food subsidies at the excellent cafeteria. The lab ran a nice Mercedes bus that picked them up from each of the nearby villages - a nice perk given the cost of gas. So, who is favoring the elite - France or the US?

      --
      Think global, act loco
    15. Re:For shame by ZTiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd agree that most American's are workaholics. I work for a multinational company and our IT guy that does site installations always comments on how he rushes to get through an installation while the Euro guys are looking at him like he is crazy because he will stay at work 12 hours while he is there. We have a good laugh when he went to Spain and they were gone for 2 hours in the afternoon and came back with alcohol on their breath. I wonder how a 24x7 IT shop that has business critical systems compares between America and Europe?

    16. Re:For shame by Tim+Browse · · Score: 5, Funny

      In America we call that Lazy, Elitists, who do not contribute positive to the overall society.

      In Europe we call that bad punctuation.

    17. Re:For shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      true. but they're for sure not elite nor, i'm afraid, are they a minority...for me, as an european, it is really scary to watch the u.s. drifting into some kind of dark age. not that i'm not aware of the fact that it always worked like that, but now it's no scandal anymore if guys like bush and cheney are at power. pretty scary vultures if you ask me. not that it'd be all roses in europe, but we not into war at the moment. nobody (besides some weapon industry lobbyists maybe) beliefs here in the benefits of militant actions. a true mess you're into now. i hope you manage somehow to reinvent your ideals - independence and freedom not oppression. the hole case, by the way, reminds me of rome. a nation which could just bear it's inner tensions through a steady militant expansion, but i guess these times are gone forever.

    18. Re:For shame by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's very impressive, how your leaders brainwashed you into confusing lazyness with the freedom of leisure instead of being a slave of a company, and seeing elitism (like in, being the best) as something bad.

      Well... It's your life. If you want to be a Joe Slave, so be it.
      But as soon as those that take advantage of you in this way endanger us too, you're putting me in danger by supporting them. And that's where I have a problem with you.
      Luckily I see it as the best, to help you, instead of punishing you.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    19. Re:For shame by quenda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amazing isn't it? The US government spends more money per-capita on health care than Australia, Canada, Japan or most European governments do, but still has no universal heath care.

  2. Primary vs Secondary by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use Open Source for two reasons ....

    I like Open Source ideals (free, as in speech)
    I like Open Source results (free as in beer)

    I also live in the US, so please categorize me correctly in the "save money" column, until I move to Europe, when you should categorize me in the other column.

    This isn't an XOR problem, so who cares which is "more important", especially when the result for using Open Source is the same either way?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Primary vs Secondary by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For me, the biggest benefit is avoiding license hassles. Saving money and "yuo have teh sorce code so fix it yuorself" are both great also, but take a back seat to being able to just stick an install CD into another machine without having to worry about licensing.

    2. Re:Primary vs Secondary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, and also if you want to try new software it makes it much easier. Simply download it and go ahead. No need to worry whether you have some restricted trial version. And if you decide to use it, you don't need to care about getting the paperwork done for getting the money (which might not apply widely, but where I am this is a big hassle, and from "Hey we should use it" to "Hey the package has been delivered" usually 3 months pass by).

    3. Re:Primary vs Secondary by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "There is nothing inherent to open source that guarantees that it will cost less to buy than proprietary code"

      This is 100% false. Even if the proprietary code supplier gives code away, the support costs are set by the proprietary source vendor, not by open market. With Open Source, one can change support vendors or even grow your own support at any time. Vendor lockin is a cost, even if the actual cost is less up front, it rarely is long term.

      And that is just for Source Code support. Now, lets talk about data lockin and now we're really adding to the long term costs.

      I currently manage a system that has YEARS of data locked in a proprietary format, and the software just plain sucks. But there is no easy (ie "cheap") way to move to another vendor at this point. So, we are stuck, until it becomes too painful to live with.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Primary vs Secondary by db32 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please find your CD jacket, turn it upside down, light a candle, and read the reflection of the antipiracy sticker in the mirror. This is your 50 digit registration code. Once you enter your registration code the software will use your modem to dial 1-900-act-ive1 to activate your software. If you do not have a modem please write down the code on a 3x5 piece of paper and include a self addressed stamped envelope and we will send you a second registration code that you will enter before calling 1-900-act-ive2 to speak with a live representitive that does not speak your native language that will give you your activation code.

      Once activation is complete every time you start the software it will connect to our server that is online most of the time to verify your access. This process is very quick due to our server's high speed 56k modem. Also, periodically while you are using the software it will take a screenshot and send it to the server for a specialist to determine if you are using the software in accordance with the EULA. This is to ensure the highest quality service support.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    5. Re:Primary vs Secondary by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sigh. There go my mod points, but I had to speak.

      What I really care about open source is that you are practically guaranteed that the bugs will be fixed. You just have to report them (except in rare cases where the actual project is obsolete or it simply sucks).

      With "freeware" or proprietary software, you are doomed to accept what the vendor tells you. Oh look, there's a bug! Want to report it? Good luck with that! Specially if it's a product already discontinued by the vendor (i.e. Microsoft Visual Foxpro), where they'll only care about security bugs.

      Another good example of an abandoned project was Proxomitron. Remember that one? It was freeware. But guess what, the author had a car accident and died. He never released the source so his project just died.

      And what to say, dammit, what to say about the f***ing piece of crap called Internet Explorer!?!?!?!? Is it free as in beer? Yes! Can it be fixed and improved by the community? HELL NO!

      I may not contribute back to the sofware pool (yet) and I haven't donated money to projects, but does that make me a greedy bastard? No (the reason why I can't donate money to Open Source is because I don't have a credit card, and no, I don't live in the US so everyoen who blames it on me can simply STFU). I just happen to be in the group of people who care about having software that won't disappear when the author dies or when it's discontinued, leaving me with LOTS AND LOTS OF HEADACHES every time the company I work at requires me to use an OBSOLETE AND DEFECTIVE PIECE OF SH**!

  3. I'd be curious about this. by filesiteguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I (a Californian) use OSS at home and at work simply because it is better than most of the closed-source offerings. I also prefer open source so that I know what is running the application, or at least know more than a few eyes are looking through it. I feel it is more secure that way.

    I'd be happy to pay for OSS if needed. I do pay for my openSUSE versions and Crossover Office.

  4. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have some OSS out there, and the ONLY donations I've gotten in 3 years and 22,000+ downloads have been from EU countries. US people (of which I am one) just complain that I don't log into their servers, install the software, customize it, etc. for free for them. They (US users) seem offended when they ask me to customize the software for their company and I quote them a price. And then one [US user] even had the nerve to customize my front end, and then try and charge people for the software package!

  5. Re:EU Attitudes In General Are Different by outcast36 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, Europeans are drinking delicious beer and have cooler cell phones. I always hunt these guys out and drink with them. Of course, I have a blackberry from ancient times and they all get a laugh at my expense. Good times.

  6. If it's mission critical... by torsner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I collegue of mine with an excellent track record as IT and R&D manager in the European Call Center industry once said (and I agree):

    - "if the application is mission critical, then we need the source"

  7. Re:Get real by Chrisje · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you sure about that? Can you substantiate that claim with some numbers and quote a source?

    In the 80's you saw a lot of creative programming come out of the Eastern Block, from what then still were Soviet satellite states. They had to squeeze all the functionality they could get out of bad/cheap/old hardware and therefore made software on a shoestring budget that really did interesting things. To this day you have very decent software development shops in unlikely places like Slovenia, Bulgaria and whatnot.

    Then there are the "celebs". Linus Torvalds, as you might recall, is Finnish, "DVD" Jon Johansen is Norwegian and Matthias Ettrich of KDE Fame is German. I know a fair amount of Germans that did/do open source stuff, and Suse is originally German. Furthermore, Israel boasts a very high quality R&D community in both commercial and Open Software while Computer gaming was invented by a British professor with an overgrown oscilloscope and time to kill.

    All in all I have to be a little bit skeptical about that post of yours. After all, Americans surely didn't invent cars and motorcycles, and to this day they can't build 'm properly either. I very much doubt they invented the Linux kernel. :-D

  8. Re:EU Attitudes In General Are Different by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend of my dad's told me the different between NA and Europe once. He said North Americans live to work, while Europeans work to live. I've found it to be quite true, myself not withstanding.

    --
    I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
  9. Eh, I agree by gravis777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that in the US, the mass population that is, NOT the IT crowd, likes Open Source because they are trying to save money. The perfect example of this is Open Office. Let me tell you, my mom, pastor, sister, and my best friend all could care less if they had access to the source code. I would be shocked if a single one of them could program "Hello World". However, they LOVE the thought of not shelling out a couple of Hundred bucks to Microsoft. Not because they hate Microsoft, but because they want to save money. The sister I mentioned earlier also just graduated graphic arts school, and is a Gimp user, not because she has access to the source code or anything like that, but because it is free.

    I pieced together a few computers for a church before, and we went Linux with Open Office, once again, because its free.

    None of these were because they thought Linux, Open Office, or Gimp were better, in fact, all of these people would have prefered the pay program. People like free. People will do stupid stuff to get stuff for free. You know how many users I had to remove spyware and viruses from because they tried installing free 3D or Living Screensavers, 1000 free smilies at smily central, or animated coursers? In fact, I have tons of friend's myspace pages that I refuse to goto until they clean up their code and get rid of all those evil ActiveX and JavaScript controls.

    You ought too see how many people will drive 30-45 miles across town to save 20 cents a gallon on gas. I point and laugh at those people.

    Yet, not a single one of these people mind paying $18 for a pizza, $24.95 a month for dialup, or $120 a month for their cable bill.

  10. I don't buy it on dual licensing by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, off the top of my head, these are the "European" Open Source (tm) projects I can think of:
    • KDE - GPL, but depends on QT which started is/was dual licensed.
    • Linux - GPL.
    • MySQL (now part of Sun) dual licensed
    • InnoDB (now part of Oracle) dual licensed
    • Virtual Box (German, now part of Sun) dual licensed.

    So of the 6 European Open Source projects I can name of the top of my head, 4 are dual licensed.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Holy FUD Batman! by Facetious · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I make it a point to ignore Anonymous Cowards, but holy crap! That is one of the most blatantly false pieces of FUD I've seen in some time. To wit:

    you DO get vendor lock-in with FOSS, because you can't use anything EXCEPT FOSS.

    That's an oldie but a goodie and completely untrue. It hails back to some really ancient anti-GPL FUD (think Bill Gates and "viral" licensing).

    in the US, companies are more interested in reliability- hence why they will BUY commercial software when there are "free" alternatives.

    It couldn't have anything to do with the power of marketing over the simple minds of PHBs? Or the FUDspinners like you? Or ignorance of FOSS alternatives?

    ask any company about the nightmare of going from OpenSQL to a real SQL database. Not only is it insanely difficult, but the FOSS alternative is vastly inferior.

    What the hell is OpenSQL? Is it a fork of MySQL or PostgreSQL? And surely by "real SQL" you don't mean MS's pitiful SQL Server?

    But hey, if you'd rather have source code than a product which works well, more power to ya. Most people just don't consider work time to be play time, that's all I'm sayin'.

    You assume FOSS doesn't work well. It works great, thank you very much. Most people consider putting well built, peer reviewed software in place a huge time and money saver, but if you prefer to wait on hold for tech support for your favorite piece of payware, more power to ya'.

    I know, I know. Don't feed the trolls.

    --
    Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
  12. how is FOSS "free, as in speech"? by pbhj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What does OSS have to do with "free, as in speech". OSS is not about avoiding government censorship (is it?) it's free /libre/, free to use and abuse, free to modify, free to alter and adapt, free to better for your needs or those of others ... I don't see how that has anything to do with "free, as in speech"?

    I'm guessing that in Europe people like FOSS because it's free-libre and free-gratis, whilst in America the populous doesn't know what "libre" means [oh God I hope I spelt it right!] and so make some weird analogy with free speech that misses the mark entirely. Surely "free, as in speech" would be for warez that can't be sold legally but can be given away due to some loophole?

    But I'm open to being wrong.

    Seriously though can't we just all agree to use libre and gratis?

    [Ya, probably flamebait, but everyone loves a barbecue, right?!]

  13. Re:Say what? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and some people have a problem with understanding what a generalization is... which, once again, appears to point to another common U.S. American failing -- the notion that it is all about "me" somehow.

    The 80's was probably one of the most damaging eras for the U.S. where culture and society are concerned. "Looking out for number one" is a ridiculously selfish notion that has resulted in making "everyone else" a competitor or even an enemy of sorts.

    There are indeed a lot of people who do not neatly fall into the category I describe. But, the masses are what I speak... the masses to which that marketers very successfully appeal.

  14. Re:For shame Since you brough up $700B, well by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think they should make DAMNED sure the FBI has the widest latitude in US HISTORY to sift out and bring charges against all those involved in the fraud the got us to this point. The execs involved should be tracked by biometrics and SSN and deprived every step of the way forward if they try to take on jobs (private or as "advisors" to the government entities that will have to dig us out of this morass) that make more than $100,000 a year involved in financial sector work. If they can come up with a $20,000,000 a year job shitting eggs, then good for them, but NOT another $20M + bonuses job in the financial, insurance, reinsurance, commodities, real (fake) estate or the similar industries. But, once identified as fraudsters, they need to be jailed, and i dare say, their assets taken from them and their families' usage/access. SOME of the execs might even deserve to be hanged by the neck or electrified for bilking the public, destabilizing the global economic engines, and lying and holding back on the true state of the "financial armageddon" we now face.

    Sure, borrowers can fib or go NINJA/NINA (No Income, No Job/Assets// No Income/No Assets) route on the paperwork, an end up lying of misrepresenting information and facts, but THAT is what the lenders, underwriters, and other processors are supposed to weed out. So, as for blame weight, assign 25% fault to the poor schmo borrowers who CHASED that "merkun homeownership dream (only to witness it ever increasing in acquisition cost, and elusive unless they lie to get into that home...) But, many of the lenders/processors/verifiers were pressured workers or outright greedy assholes (and NEED to be vilified) who most likely felt:

    "Well, if WE don't process these loans, then our competitors WILL. So, that means we lose out on commissions, bonuses, and quarterly reportable income/revenues. So, FUCK IT! Hells Bells! Full speed ahead!"

    Now, they want to be bailed out cuz loans and the like supposedly are the oil/lubricant of the US market. They should let wall street crash and re-set itself. *IIII* am in debt, and ***IIII**** do NOT get the chance to have some of that $700 BILLION to "reset" my poor, money-mismanaging ass.

    THINK, everyone, what $700 B could do:

    - rebuild a number of US cities

    - pay for the unemployment (yes, social network support) benefits of those who (not the fucking execs) are SURELY going to be laid of without a golden parachute

    - pay for the education costs of those currently in college (how many other countries spending less on military matters actually fully subsidize their education-seeking populations, and are the better for it?)

    -pay for costs of those who dropped out of college to work to pay off school loans, only to be screwed by the failed economy, take on lower-income jobs that yield too little income to (without resorting to criminal activity) service those federal school loans

    - fund the startup ventures of people such as myself who have low income, no assets, no FFF (friends, fools families to co-sign), and no one we can trust to NOT screw us out of our entrepreneurial ideas. We could be linked up with SBA SCORE advisors, mentored, kept on track, and become the new employers more deserving of the $700B than the bastards and bitches who greedily brought the US and rest of the world to the brink of disaster.

    These crooked administration and financial jerks are all too keen to exhort "let the market self-correct" but all to willing see corporate welfare bailouts help THEM and their cronies, but not the public. The "experts" LIED about the extent of the previous bailout costs, and not these assholes in DC want a blank check and no accountability on an initial checking account of $700B. If bush gets what he and his cronies want, then probably $300B of that will go to the execs, a few mortgage companies, and the rest will be so ineffectual as to have us seeing 8 months from now another bailout package of $1.5 TRILLION being asked for.

    Find them, charge them, de-asset them, and ban their return to financial markets, then jail them, and execute some of them as examples.

    (steps down from soap box)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"