Slashdot Mirror


Has Google Redefined Beta?

netbuzz writes "Someone finally took the time to do a count of all the Google apps marked 'beta.' And with fully 45% of its products carrying that familiar tag — including 4-year-old Gmail — Google says there's an explanation: Beta doesn't mean to them what it has long meant to the rest of the tech community. 'We believe beta has a different meaning when applied to applications on the Web,' says a company spokesman."

24 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. I prefer the old definitions: by Chemisor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alpha: it doesn't work.
    Beta: it still doesn't work.

    1. Re:I prefer the old definitions: by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Funny

      And to continue on that

      Release Candidate: It might work, but it probably won't
      Gold: It still doesn't work, but users are great bugtester
      SP1: Still not done, has some bugs left and misses some funtionality
      SP2: This one might actually be done, try at your own risk though

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:I prefer the old definitions: by Smivs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Re Gmail being beta, does this mean when it's 'finished' it will be Alpha mail?

    3. Re:I prefer the old definitions: by idlehanz · · Score: 5, Funny

      And one more SP3: The last release you'll see for this product because getting revenue from a new product is cheaper than fixing any more bugs.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    4. Re:I prefer the old definitions: by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Software Development Lifecycle

      Alpha- short for "It's alpha-lly crap"

      Beta - short for "It's still alpha-ally crap, but it's beta than it was"

      Release - short for "it still release-tinks, but we've gotta publish"

      Gold - Short for "it's gold-arn awful, but at least it's out the door"

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  2. Perhaps they should be more wary.... by mblase · · Score: 3, Funny

    I seem to recall that Stavro Muller intentionally added the Beta label to one of his own restaurants, with catastrophic results.

    1. Re:Perhaps they should be more wary.... by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mr T says: I ain't eatin no beta-carotene, sucka!

      --
      which is totally what she said
  3. Re:"Has Google Redefined Beta?" by Phylarr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would, but the tags are still in Beta.

    --
    "Choosing to refrain from producing another person demonstrates a profound love for all life" [vhemt.org]
  4. Still in Beta?!? by r33per · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can say is that we're out of beta: we're releasing on time.

  5. Google is Following in Humpty Dumpty's Footsteps by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.

    --- Humpty Dumpty

  6. as if anyone is in a position to argue? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    google could redefine a cucumber as a small nocturnal mammal, and the whole world would fall in line. google search is all of our collective recall. it's the 800 pound gorilla of the web. it can make any word mean anything they want it to

    call it a "google mind trick"

    World: Let us see Gmail move out of beta.
    Google: [with a small tweak of the spider] You don't need to see Gmail move out of beta.
    World: We don't need to Gmail move out of beta.
    Google: Beta does not have the meaning you think it has.
    World: Beta does not have the meaning I think it has.
    Google: You believe beta has a different meaning when applied to applications on the Web.
    World: I believe beta has a different meaning when applied to applications on the Web.
    Gmail: Move along.
    World: Move along... move along.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Yes... by stoofa · · Score: 3, Funny

    And they have redefined 'no evil' too.

  8. Re:That's just plain stupid by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well for a company that can't spell Googol correctly, I'm not surprised they would not be using the word Beta correctly. We're just lucky they haven't started spelling it Baitah, Beata, or Bayta.
     
    Jonah HEX

  9. Obligatory by ChefInnocent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then perhaps, someone should tell them, "I do not think that word means what you think it does."

  10. Re:That's just plain stupid by ZwJGR · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the contrary, the birth date you supplied quite definitively indicates that Google is a young company.
    It's only been around for 3 weeks after all... ;)

    --
    There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
  11. Problem solved! by DanOrc451 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google should just use the tried-and-true "Under Construction" animated gif instead. Blinking text is a plus.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  12. Re:That's just plain stupid by darth+dickinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ask your wife/girlfriend/SO if getting a BJ from someone else is considered sexual relations. Go ahead, we'll wait.

  13. Re:Capitalism is dying by Vectronic · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Marxism has now confirmed: Capitalism is dying"

    You woulda got modded funny if you left it at that...well, at least by me...

  14. Re:That's just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just how life works. If you're important enough you can do whatever you want.

    There, fixed it for you.

    See, you replaced a word, while google would've changed the definition :-)

  15. They said it a few years back by hamtronix · · Score: 2, Funny

    They said it all in an April Fools joke a few years ago. The following is verbatim from http://www.google.com/googlegulp/faq.html Man, if you pressure us, you just drive us away. We'll commit when we're ready, okay? Besides, what's so great about taking things out of beta? It ruins all the romance, the challenge, the possibilities, the right to explore. Carpe diem, ya know? Maybe we're jaded, but we've seen all these other companies leap headlong into 1.0, thinking their product is exactly what they've been dreaming of all their lives, that everything is perfect and hunky-dory â" and the next thing you know some vanilla copycat release from Redmond is kicking their butt, the Board is holding emergency meetings and the CEO is on CNBC blathering sweatily about "a new direction" and "getting back to basics." No thanks, man. We like our freedom.

  16. Re:That's just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A rose named "anal discharge" would not be so appealling. A child named "Vagina Slime" would not be so nice.

  17. Re:That's just plain stupid by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they're just too lazy to change the logo?

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  18. Re:That's just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wait for what? The acquisition of wife/girlfriend/SO or of the BJ?

  19. Re:That's just plain stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's just how life works. If you're important enough you can do whatever you want.

    You misunderstand the parent.

    You're simply not THAT important