NYT Ponders the Future of Solaris In a Linux/Windows World
JerkBoB links to a story at the New York Times about the
future prospects of Sun's Solaris, excerpting: "Linux is enjoying growth, with a contingent of devotees too large to be called a cult following at this point. Solaris, meanwhile, has thrived as a longstanding, primary Unix platform geared to enterprises. But with Linux the object of all the buzz in the industry, can Sun's rival Solaris Unix OS hang on, or is it destined to be displaced by Linux altogether?"
Actually there are quite a few features found in Linux not found in FreeBSD or PC-BSD. Like write access to NTFS, inotify, many journalled file systems, user-space FS, multiple kernel virtualization methods and client optimizations, stable LVM, et al
And how about those forklift upgrades that FreeBSD seems to love... no "apt-get dist-upgrade" foolishness for BSD. Oh no... it's time to format!
...Steve
Die Solaris Die!!!!
Sorry, that was a little animated, but it gets the point across.
So, you're basically a Solaris fanboi. Got it.
...Steve
ebuilds FTW!
Bullshit. It's not the license. It's the huge PR machine behind it. IBM and all big boys supporting Linux are really selling hardware and are using Linux to commoditize enteprise software. If anything, the GPL scares people away as it is hostile to small software houses. Now, look at the Windows software ecosystem with its myriad software houses. Are you enlightened now?
Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
My name is Cmdrtaco--I find your cock delicious and would like to subscribe it into my mouth.