Slashdot Mirror


MySpace Digital Music Service Is DRM-Free

Anti-Globalism sends word that MySpace flipped the switch on its online, ad-supported, DRM-free music service that will "... give its roughly 120 million users free access to hundreds of thousands of songs from the world's largest recording labels. Unlike much of the material at Apple's iTunes store, the music sold through MySpace's new service won't contain the protections that limit how many times a track can be copied. MySpace is hoping to set itself apart from iTunes even further by allowing its users to create an unlimited number of playlists containing up to 100 songs apiece, a sharing concept similar to music services already offered by Imeem and Last.fm."

12 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Bad summary by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 3, Informative

    Myspace doesn't sell anything. If you want to buy a song you have to purchase it from Amazon through the link provided. Otherwise you use Myspace's music player.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  2. What a confusing article by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Informative
    FTFA:

    ...will give its roughly 120 million users free access to hundreds of thousands of songs ..

    ...and...

    ...the music sold through MySpace's new service...

    Which is it? Again, FTFA:

    ...won't contain the protections that limit how many times a track can be copied.

    ...and...

    ...the music can be played only on personal computers connected to the Internet and listeners have to tolerate advertising splashed across the screen.

    Sound like the track copying limit is "zero", since it appears you can only play it with a custom player in a browser.

    1. Re:What a confusing article by Otter · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two different services: a free, ad-supported streaming player and a DRM-free purchase option through Amazon.

    2. Re:What a confusing article by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pandora doesn't shove advertising down their viewer's throats. Also, pandora has a ton more listeners

      Additionally, Myspace has yet to put this out there, and has yet to put prices out there. Just wait to see how much they charge and then people will start talking. Remember that if it's anything more than apple's 99cents it will be thrown aside as uncompetitive.

      Also, since people are purchasing the songs on the same site they listen on, I suspect myspace some kind of way to weasel out of getting charged for the fees (they're not legal fees btw), that Pandora is being charged.

      Lastly, Pandora doesn't sell the music themselves. They sell it through others.

  3. Misleading by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFA:

    The catch: the music can be played only on personal computers connected to the Internet and listeners have to tolerate advertising splashed across the screen.

    So it sounds like MySpace has made a listening service that allows you to listen to music, but probably has something resembling DRM to keep you from keeping it, listening to it offline, or putting it on portable players.

    If you actually want to *buy* the music and keep it without DRM, it shuffles you off to Amazon. Amazon, of course, offers a pretty good DRM-free MP3 store.

    Unlike much of the material at Apple's iTunes store, the music sold through MySpace's new service won't contain the protections that limit how many times a track can be copied.

    Which is kind of misunderstanding the issue. iTunes doesn't control how many times a track can be copied, but rather how many devices are authorized to play it. But anyway...

    MySpace appears to be in a better position to take on iTunes because its site has always emphasized music.

    Weird comments like this are peppered throughout the article. Sounds like someone has beef. The author of the article (like the author of the summary) seem hellbent on painting this as an iTunes killer. However:

    Despite its musical bent, MySpace isn't positioning its service as an iTunes killer. "We see this as more of a complement to what Apple is doing and create even more demand for digital music devices,"

  4. Do what you want with "commercial" music by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...but leave indie artists alone please. Myspace, IMHO anyway, is much more important to the music community because of its ability to allow non-commercial, non-signed artists to put their music and group information out there for everyone to see. The big labels have their own mechanism, and Myspace catering to this with DRM-free music is awesome - but please, don't let it affect the indie artists. Keep it where it is, because it works!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  5. iTunes doesn't "limit how many times" you can copy by vought · · Score: 3, Informative

    MySpace's new service won't contain the protections that limit how many times a track can be copied.

    iTunes doesn't do this. You can burn to CD or copy any iTunes track unlimited times.

    iTunes does restrict playlists to ten CD burns, but copying the contents to another playlist resets the counter. The summary is poorly informed.

  6. Re:Free, eh? by basotl · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are two components to this.

    The portion of the "service" where they link to Amazon music for downloading is the real DRM free music.

    --
    HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
  7. Re:iTunes Info Wrong by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have iTunes and I've got a number of playlists with over 100 songs, though I've not tried the "unlimited number of playlists" feature just yet...

    Every time I see one of these articles I think "iTunes, or the iTunes Music Store".

    They're very different animals, and ultimately do very different things. The music store has some restrictions (because there's no way in hell the labels would have allowed it), but the actual iTunes software imposes no such limitations.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. OT: Submitter links to Nazi website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'll just leave this here

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=955999&cid=24911097

  9. Only 96kbit Audio by szyzyg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Myspace's on demand audio is encoded at a somewhat crap quality of 96kbit/sec

    imeem is 33% better with 128kbit audio

  10. Re:neat by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or Iron Maiden, Weird Al, AC/DC, Airbourne....

    While i agree Ja Rule is horrible, painfull shit not even worthy to call noise, let alone music, there's plenty of good bands up there too, including thousands of Indie bands