Slashdot Mirror


Review of Discovery Institute's Evolution Textbook

Darwinned writes "Intelligent Design is still a hot topic, as evidenced by recent legislation mandating that it be taught in school. Pro-ID group Discovery Institute has released an evolution textbook for use in schools, but a review shows it to be chock full of bad science and questionable reasoning. 'The book doesn't only promote stupidity, it demands it. In every way except its use of the actual term, this is a creationist book, but its authors are expecting that legislators and the courts will be too stupid to notice that, or to remember that the Supreme Court has declared teaching creationism an unconstitutional imposition of religion.'"

2 of 756 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Evolution textbook!? by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The fall of the Islamic intellectual tradition wasn't entirely born of their own fundamentalism. It followed the sack of Baghdad by the Mongol horde. The centre of a civilisation stretching from India to Spain, full of the intellectual riches and history of all Eurasia, all burned. The loss of the Library at Alexandria was bad. This was worse.

    There followed a long decline. Wars, on and off, with the crusaders of Europe raiding into the Middle East. Various rulers of Arabic and Persian and Turkish dynasties competing for domination of the Islamic world. A gradual eclipse as the nations of Europe set about building their empires. And finally irrelevance, a culture respected only insofar as it provides crude oil to its betters. Small wonder that a civilisation brought so low from such a glorious past turns to its god for answers, and finds dark counsels.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  2. Re:Evolution textbook!? by blahplusplus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Therefore, the seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and deficiency. Thus the duty of the man who investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth is his goal, is to make himself an enemy of all that he reads, and, applying his mind to the core and margins of its content, attack it from every side. He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency."--Ibn al-Haytham

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-haytham

    This is what too few human beings do, they always trust in what they have been taught... when much of what they know is fraught with error. I am weary of anything I say as well as anything any other man says, that cannot be demonstrated. Therefore, I only defend what can be demonstrated.

    The majority of people do not take the above view, they are overconfident in what they think they know when they hardly know anything at all.