Slashdot Mirror


Australia Mulling a Nationwide Vehicle-Tracking System

An anonymous reader writes "It seems that as political support for Australia's version of the national ID card is waning, the powers that be have found a far more effective way to catalog the populace. CrimTrac, an Australian government agency responsible for designing technical solutions to aid policing, is due to hand in a $2.2 million scoping study for the introduction of a nationwide automatic number plate recognition system (ANPR). It seems that as well as ANPR, the system will also collect images of drivers and passengers with high enough resolution for identification purposes. All ANPR data collected would be made available to participating agencies in real time, and retained for five years for future investigations."

176 comments

  1. on-start service. by woodchip · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you call the gov't up when you get lost and ask them for directions? "Help! I don't know where am I, but i see a kangaroo and the toilets are flushing backwords"

    1. Re:on-start service. by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surely you're in the bathroom. Just chase the 'roo out.

      Also - Toilets flushing backwards? Doesn't that mean stuff comes *out* of the bowl and flies up at you? Urgh

    2. Re:on-start service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Help! I don't know where am I, but i see a kangaroo and the toilets are flushing backwords"

      For those whose knowledge of Aussie plumbing is limited to that one episode of the Simpsons, Australian toilets do not flush backwards. The design they use does not produce any swirling motion at all.

    3. Re:on-start service. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      For those whose knowledge of Aussie plumbing is limited to that one episode of the Simpsons, Australian toilets do not flush backwards.

      Oh thank god, I wouldn't want to shower and shampoo the rug after every use.

      The design they use does not produce any swirling motion at all.

      It doesn't involve a jet engine strapped to the top does it?

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    4. Re:on-start service. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Also - Toilets flushing backwards? Doesn't that mean stuff comes *out* of the bowl and flies up at you? Urgh"

      As an Aussie I would just like to point out that things do fly out of dunny's - that's why the redbacks live under the seat.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:on-start service. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      +1 Painful!

  2. ANPR already in UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    already up and running in Britain admittedly without the photos (but we've got 1 cctv cam per 14 people in this gulag ^H^H^H^H^H country anyway)

    1. Re:ANPR already in UK by ijakings · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeh but thats counting all of the private entity Cameras. There seems to be a widespread myth these days that every camera you see everywhere is linked together. So that perhaps a mean with a white beard and an over exuberant use of visa vis can watch us 24/7.

      A fraction of the cameras are owned and controlled by the government and even then, from the limited information ive obtained from watching crime programs, getting detailed information accross even county borders isnt easy.

      Take off the tinfoil hat please.

    2. Re:ANPR already in UK by ijakings · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just realised that i replied to an AC, what a waste.

    3. Re:ANPR already in UK by sentientbeing · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ive spent the last few years working with IT departments at airports and other major networked UK sites providing cabling and telecom services. Ive been to many of the secret rooms and surveilance areas of these places.
      Im not trying to disappoint the CCTV-Tinfoilhatters abroard in the US, but nobody sits in a room like Lex Luthor spying on individuals and following them about their business with camera. It is an extremely BORING pastime. The guys running these networks generally spend all their time releasing remote doors, monitoring queue lengths, opening car parking barriers and signing out keys for storerooms.

      or reading The Sun.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    4. Re:ANPR already in UK by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand why people insist upon putting cameras everywhere. The terrorists that struck on 9/11 walked past several security cameras, and not one of them was flagged. They still boarded the plane & committed their crime.

      Cameras are worthless, except for very simplistic uses like issuing automatic speeding tickets.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    5. Re:ANPR already in UK by wisty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cameras might change the behavior of rational criminals, but not crazy criminals. I expect that the crazy criminals will stay crazy (and get caught), while the rational criminals will invest in false plates or stolen cars, and balaclavas. Or maybe Ned-Kelly masks.

    6. Re:ANPR already in UK by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cameras aren't best used for realtime monitoring in some big room.

      They're best used for retroactive analysis. Somebody becomes a person of interest, and now once you know where they were at any point in history you can find out everywhere they've ever been, everybody they've ever talked to, everywhere anybody they've ever talked to has been, and where they are right now.

      I'm sure the first place we'll see these abused is in civil cases. Divorce cases come to mind very quickly.

    7. Re:ANPR already in UK by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Cameras are best used for retroactive analysis. If somebody is suspected [of being part of the French Resistance], and you know they [bombed a Nazi munitions factory], you can find out everywhere they've ever been, everyone they've ever talked to, and possibly uncover their [secret meeting place to eradicate the French Patriots once and for all.]

      Cameras are simple spying, the tool of control freak politicians, and they make the fight for liberty nearly-impossible.
      We should not give the government the power to spy on its own citizens.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    8. Re:ANPR already in UK by mlts · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, footage from private cameras can be obtained with a search warrant, or for civil cases, a motion of discovery can be made, with threats of criminal charges coming next should the footage not be present. At best, one can say they have a destruction policy of x days of footage to protect themselves.

      So, in an indirect way, cameras are often linked together, as an attorney or DA can demand footage from a number of places to put together a gestalt base of evidence.

  3. Yes by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only we had more data available, we could stop all crime!

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Yes by networkzombie · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, as historical data reveals, there is a slight chance this will help catch more criminals but it will not reduce crime.

    2. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, but I believe it falls more into the disincentive category.

    3. Re:Yes by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      well since Australia really is nothing but an overgrown prison anyway I'd say they're wasting their money.

      This will also look good to all those people that were thinking of emigrating there. This study was probably funded by the Canadian government ;)

    4. Re:Yes by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only we had more data available, we could stop all crime!

      but what would we do without politicians?!

      oh, you mean, if only THEY had more data...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    5. Re:Yes by jacquesm · · Score: 1, Troll

      Something similar is currently happening along the Mexican / Texas border ;)

      And I hear they're trying to increase the average IQ of Alaska by moving some of their people to Washington...

    6. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australian's may be stupid, but at least they are not $700 Billion stupid :)

    7. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. We're not quite able to read thoughts, for example, thus leaving people to participate daily in thoughtcrime. But we're working on it.

    8. Re:Yes by trout007 · · Score: 1

      When did the term "punishment" start to be used for putting violent criminals in jail? I really don't care about punishing violent criminals. They have showed they can't be trusted with freedom so they need to removed from society.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    9. Re:Yes by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      You stole that line from Helen Clarke, Prime Minister of New Zealand. When asked her opinion of the migration of New Zealanders to Australia, she remarked that "it would raise the collective IQ of both countries!"

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    10. Re:Yes by mpe · · Score: 1

      If only we had more data available, we could stop all crime!

      It's perfectly possible for too much data to actually hinder activities such as crime prevention and investigation. Someone who dosn't realise this is halfway to creating a positive feedback loop already.

    11. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be Illinois.

  4. Australia Card? by deniable · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the summary: "support for Australia's version of the national ID card is waning." Um, what national ID card?

    So what exactly is the Hawke government going to do now?

    1. Re:Australia Card? by a.ameri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mod parent up. The summary is (as usual) inflammatory and misinformed. There is no scheme, legislation or proposal in Australia or any of its states for a national ID card.

      The closest it got to being implemented was in 1985 during the Hawke government's Australia Card bill. This was at the height of the Hawke Labor government's popularity, and it got the government into so much trouble and lost the government huge capital clout. Hawke dissolved the parliament and held new elections, but still was unable to pass the bill. Later on, a Royal Commission heavily criticised the idea and put the mater to rest. See this for more details.

      ANPR is right now, a "scoping study". Australia is nowhere close to perfect, but it has strong civil institutions, and you can make sure that heads will roll and blood will spill if this gets anywhere close to being proposed as a bill. Since then the law has moved in the complete opposite direction. The Privacy Act (1988) specifically mentions that no unique identifier issued by a government agency or corporation can be used by another entity for the purpose of identification. In practice, this means things such as driver's license number, a Tax File Number (equivalent to U.S SSN), or the medicare number can not be used by any corporation or agency other than the one which issued it in the first place, for identification.

      Right now, this is a classic example in Australia of the state vs. individual liberties, taught in any university course about identity and privacy. I've met many 'ordinary' (read: not politically active) people across all fields of society, from social workers to lawyers and IT managers, and even the newer generation who is too young to remember the debate first hand (like myself) is definitely acquainted with the subject and its implications. So, unless the poster somehow managed to time travel from 1985, "public support for national card in Australia is wanning" is like saying "public support for Hillary's health care bill is wanning" or "public support for president Nixon is wanning".

      The issue did come to surface once again, after former Liberal (which here means Conservative) Prime Minister Howard made some comments about it in 2005 after the London bombings, but even then it was heavily frowned upon and both parties knew better than to include it into their agenda.

      Australia is nowhere close to perfect, but it has strong civil institutions. This is a "scoping study". The moment the study is published, if it recommends anything remotely close to implementing CimTrack's ANPR, you can make sure that heads will roll and blood will spill in the electorate.

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    2. Re:Australia Card? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      this means things such as driver's license number, a Tax File Number (equivalent to U.S SSN), or the medicare number can not be used by any corporation or agency other than the one which issued it in the first place, for identification.

      What about a license plate to a car?

    3. Re:Australia Card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I wish the US had politiicans as interested in privacy and personal freedoms, as Australia does. As to developing a nationwide recognition system for cars, do like much of the US did, let people apply for "E-Z passes" for their car, and then use them for tolls and for tracking speeds and locations traveled. Costs the country nothing, and actually makes money for some private company. Every account holder gives the company money up front, which can be used to play the float, earning interest for the company as well. And it's not the government spying, it's just a company making it easier to get through the tolls. And lots of folks, like me, voluntarily keep it in their car, stuck on their windshield. For a time, lots of folks used to keep it in a bag that supposedly made it unreadable, but then they passed a law saying it was illegal to hold it up on your windshield when driving through an E-Z pass toll.

    4. Re:Australia Card? by andersking · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no scheme, legislation or proposal in Australia or any of its states for a national ID card.

      We possibly got close with the "Access Card" though. This is, i think, what the summary was refering to. http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,19450464-15441,00.html

    5. Re:Australia Card? by rohan972 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Privacy Act (1988) specifically mentions that no unique identifier issued by a government agency or corporation can be used by another entity for the purpose of identification. In practice, this means things such as driver's license number, a Tax File Number (equivalent to U.S SSN), or the medicare number can not be used by any corporation or agency other than the one which issued it in the first place, for identification.

      Interesting theory, but your TFN is probably known by your employer, your bank, centrelink (social security), your superannuation fund as well as the tax office. Of course, you don't have to give it, you could just pay 46.5% tax instead. Now that's freedom of choice to keep your privacy! With the growth of the Family Tax Benefit and other centrelink payments a very large proportion of the population is on some form of government payment. Since many of them have the government take it from one hand as PAYG tax only to put it back in the other as FTB, there seems to be no purpose to it but to increase government control of the population and to force the people into a position where they are always reporting their activities, income and other personal details to the government.

      Don't be fooled by the occasional head rolling and the rhetoric of liberty in this country. The liberty of the people is dependent on being able to thwart government power. We occasionally thwart the power of individual politicians, maybe even a party, but not of the government institutions themselves. The peoples power to thwart government is specific to the branch of government. For the legislative we have the power of elections, but the majority of voters don't seem to be able to understand economic theory, monetary policy, the nature of government and liberty or logic well enough to make a decision based on anything but propaganda. For the judicial we have jury trials but I find few and far between are the people who understand the concept of jury nullification, people think that jury trials are about finding the truth (which is partly right) but don't understand the importance of being able to dismiss unjust prosecutions. For the executive there is the right to bear arms and we gave it up.

      All three of these citizen's powers were used in the forming of this country during the events surrounding the Eureka Stockade. The government was resisted by force, couldn't find juries to bring guilty verdicts on the rebels, and the leader was subsequently elected to the Legislative Assembly of Victoria. Can you honestly say you think anything remotely resembling these events could happen today? I think it would be almost impossible to find a jury that would find in favour of people on firearms charges because their cause was just. It seems likely that even the possession of (unlicensed) firearms would be enough to secure convictions, let alone firing of police, regardless of the cause. Even if you could find a jury to release them though, the thought that they could become elected representatives? Preposterous.

      Australians in general are not the freedom loving people we once were, and the ones who are here are not present in sufficient numbers to have any real influence on an election. You can look forward to things getting worse. Just look at some of the comments on the linked article in favour of this.

    6. Re:Australia Card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your forgetting the medicare access card. That was due to be rolled out this year wasn't it? A card with biometric identification. A card which every Australian would need if they were to access government services. A biometric of almost every Australian citizen stored in a centralized database. sounds very much like a national ID card to me. That was only scrapped by the incoming labor government at the beginning of the year was it not?

    7. Re:Australia Card? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As to developing a nationwide recognition system for cars, do like much of the US did, let people apply for "E-Z passes" for their car, and then use them for tolls and for tracking speeds and locations traveled. Costs the country nothing, and actually makes money for some private company. Every account holder gives the company money up front, which can be used to play the float, earning interest for the company as well. And it's not the government spying, it's just a company making it easier to get through the tolls. And lots of folks, like me, voluntarily keep it in their car, stuck on their windshield. For a time, lots of folks used to keep it in a bag that supposedly made it unreadable, but then they passed a law saying it was illegal to hold it up on your windshield when driving through an E-Z pass toll."

      Well, one can always still just not use the EZ pass system, and just pay cash. I do this..takes a few seconds longer, but, not that big a deal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Australia Card? by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      Don't you think Australia came pretty close in the last year or two?

      With nearly every adult australian receiving some kind of benefit at some point in their lives, having a social security card with photo, identity and address both visible and embedded, all linked to one enormous nationwide database and available to everyone from employers to your local pharmacist. That was actually more scary than what the Hawke-Keating government proposed.

      Never was a more true statement made than that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. To call out against people raising concerns about this kind of thing as being "inflammatory" works against the very basis of free society.

      And it never stops - just look at the current government's obsession with setting up the equivalent of the great firewall of China to filter all internet traffic in the country.

    9. Re:Australia Card? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wish the US had politiicans as interested in privacy and personal freedoms, as Australia does.

      Yes, I believe you do. Being a native American who migrated to Australia 25 years ago, I can claim a bit of insight. The thing is, Australian politicians are mostly Australians. This means they mostly understand that being too nosy without cause will result in a cluster of friends explaining all about drop bears when you regain consciousness.

      Our EZ passes are called "eTAGs"

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    10. Re:Australia Card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may have been referring to the Access Card which was blown out of the water when Labour won the last election. Had they not, your replacement medicare card would had a chip in it with your details including a colour photo.

      So, on to the debate as to whether the UHI (universal health identifier) is another crack at it...

    11. Re:Australia Card? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      You speak a damning truth that seems damn near impossible to face in this day and age. Our current governments are no better than organised crime, the minor parties corrupted by the larger players, no chance to alter the systematic abuse of the population.

      I think another Eureka stockade could work, in that there was a great injustice witnessed by the population and they reacted accordingly. I'm just hoping that the many injustices we've dealt with lately can trigger such widespread discontent, there is still an indominatble spirit in the Australian character that's impossible to break, or so I would have thought.

    12. Re:Australia Card? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Our current governments are no better than organised crime

      Or considerably worse perhaps. Live in a rural area, with your family and neighbours armed and organised crime probably won't be able to touch you. Try arming yourself against the government and you will certainly perish.

      no chance to alter the systematic abuse of the population.

      It can be done, but requires considerable efforts to educate people. For a serious effort at change, I would recommend Ron Paul's strategy of infiltrating a major party rather than a new party like the ldp. I would start with the nationals.

      I think another Eureka stockade could work, in that there was a great injustice witnessed by the population and they reacted accordingly.

      Start another Eureka now and you will quickly die or spend the rest of your life in prison labelled as a terrorist. The men at Eureka already had widespread support in the population and their had already been unrest at other mine fields. They could not convince a jury to convict and the first acquittal was followed by a victory march of over 10,000 people. If you think you could shoot a cop or another government officer and have 10,000 people cheering for you now, you are very badly mistaken.

      You have to consider that they also did not have voting rights then (one of their grievances) and now we do. If you had anything like the public support that the gold miners had, you could determine the outcome of the next election. You need lots of support to win an action like that, if you had it you wouldn't need to start shooting, IMO. I do believe in the right to bear arms, but I also think we should be very reluctant to take up arms against our own government.

      The difficulty isn't changing the government, that's the easy part. The hard part, and the most necessary, is waking up the people to liberty and self-reliance. There are a huge amount to people who are demanding systematic abuse from the government. It's needed to diminish that first.

    13. Re:Australia Card? by edgr · · Score: 1

      There is no scheme, legislation or proposal in Australia or any of its states for a national ID card.

      There is no scheme now, but only since the 2007 election. The Howard government proposed a de-facto national ID card. It is now scrapped.
      This was definitely at least a proposal, see eg The Office of the (Australian Government) Privacy Commissioner. It got far enough that there was an "Office of the Access Card" set up (since closed down, url of www.accesscard.gov.au no longer active).

  5. something we can use by z3d4r · · Score: 2, Funny

    load the band up onto the back of a flatbed truck, then hoon around while pretending to perform.

    request the resulting footage under the freedom of information laws, then release as the video to your latest single.

    --
    You shall know him by his Sig
  6. Australians! Wear clown masks every time you drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  7. More uses for a Bill Oddie mask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If it is good enough for Top Gear it is good enough for us

    Or maybe a Geoff Kennett, Pauline Hanson...

    Next we'll be asked to dobb-in a neighbour!

  8. I have only one thing to say. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Funny

    A long stick, a roll of duct tape, and a can of spray paint will trump even the most expensive traffic cameras.

    1. Re:I have only one thing to say. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Alternatively you can just mount the kerb, it's allot easier.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:I have only one thing to say. by Fumus · · Score: 1

      That's why I have my plates drawn CAPTCHA-style, fo!

    3. Re:I have only one thing to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an old car tyre full of gasoline can work wonders as well.

    4. Re:I have only one thing to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a plastic bag full of glue

    5. Re:I have only one thing to say. by mangu · · Score: 1

      A long stick, a roll of duct tape, and a can of spray paint will trump even the most expensive traffic cameras.

      That's why they need *more* cameras, so the other cameras will catch you doing that.

    6. Re:I have only one thing to say. by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      nah, cling film.

      If it is stretched out tight, with no air bubbles, you can't even see that it has been tampered with but it will be unable to read anything

      Now kiddies, don't go out and tamper with those cameras

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
  9. Re:Australians! Wear clown masks every time you dr by stonedcat · · Score: 1, Funny

    OP is obliviously lying. I see that text plain as day.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
  10. No ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    ... crime will stop, when the last human being on the planet dies.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:No ... by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, crime will stop when the second to last person dies.

    2. Re:No ... by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, crime will stop when the second to last person dies.

      I don't know about that. When I am all alone some of things I do to myself are a crime too :)

    3. Re:No ... by electrictroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Anything you do to yourself, since nobody else is harmed, is not a crime.

      The only reason certain "self" activities like masturbation, smoking dope, or committing suicide are outlawed is because we got a bunch of petit-dictators (aka control freaks) who want to control everybody else. There's no justifiable reason to outlaw these activities as long as the only person I am harming.... is myself.

      "No person has a right to harm another. And that's all the government should restrain him." - Thomas Jefferson

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    4. Re:No ... by ufoolme · · Score: 1

      No, crime will stop when the second to last person dies.

      puts a whole new spin on being a crime fighter...

    5. Re:No ... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Aaah but you'd be the de facto king (or other term if you wish, you're the king!) and so you could declare any law you want. Now while you COULD make everything you do illegal, it'd be a funny thing to do.

    6. Re:No ... by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      No, crime will stop when the second to last person dies.

      Not if that last person is into necrophilia.........

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    7. Re:No ... by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Johnny Law disagrees with you. Things you do to yourself can be crimes, whether they *should* be or not is the question.

    8. Re:No ... by zobier · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the last person left on the planet, so either there is no Johnny Law or they're it. I guess that person could make laws against their own behaviour but that is a matter for themself.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    9. Re:No ... by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Not if the last person alive busts him/herself for growing and using marihuana!

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    10. Re:No ... by morganga · · Score: 1

      If you were the last person alive and you killed yourself, it would be a crime against humanity.

    11. Re:No ... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I think the concept of crime is broader than laws. Slavery was once legal, but we still consider it a crime against humanity.

      The last person on Earth could do something like cover the planet in toxic waste. While that might not be illegal to that person, subsequent lifeforms that come to settle on Earth (or humans that have been living of-earth and return) might consider it a crime.

      There's also the scale of humanity to consider. If humankind went beyond the planet earth, would the last human on Earth be breaking laws of humanity, which continues elsewhere? Would our laws be instituted on a per-planet basis, or will we have moved to laws or codes of conducts that apply to our species, rather than geographical areas?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    12. Re:No ... by zobier · · Score: 1

      I think there's a distinction to be made there between law and morality, it's a fascinating philosophical discourse though. I hope people studying law are considering these scales/factors.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  11. Re:on-star service. by woodchip · · Score: 1

    Really? You just saved me an expensive ticket on an international flight.

  12. CrimTrac is an interesting company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I did some work as a contractor for CrimTrac a few years ago and they had this fingerprint recognition system that went into enormous detail in a single finger print, not just the swirls and where the lines were but it analysed the actual mini-ripples along the edges of each of the lines. Even if you had less than 10% of the total fingerprint it would still find matches by the sequence of ripples along a single line.

    1. Re:CrimTrac is an interesting company by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      yeah right, so all that will do is increase the false positive rate.

      partial prints are just that, partials and should not be used for ID purposes, but hey, what do I know.

      In some countries it seems to not matter who they get behind bars, as long as there is somebody associated with the crime it's good enough.

      Same with DNA testing, it's best at *freeing* people, unless there is an exact match.

      Getting very few crime cases solved is going to bring you full tilt into a police state.

      See 'England'...

  13. Yeah, not in my lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok just give me a moment....
    Hahahaha, hahahaahahahaha!
    I'll believe it when I see it, even if such system were to be implemented and they changed every single camera I'd doubt if they'd cover even a third of Australia roads.
    It's painful for them to even get roads setup at all! Even the cameras we do have don't work, so they just turn them off.

  14. I'm all for this system by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

    but only if it's to tag known criminals.

    That means the politicians have to get one first.

    1. Re:I'm all for this system by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know you were kind of joking, but I think that would be a great test for any new law like this. Something to go in the constitution. Any politician voting to approve any new monitoring law has to make all data collected about them (and their family?) publicly available in as near to real time as possible for the duration of their term of office, and a few years afterward, just to make sure.

      If the law gets in, the monitoring is only put in on a trial basis for (say) 6 months, after which the politicians are given the opportunity to change their mind about their vote (eg the law is put to vote again).

      If any politician doesn't want to vote for such a law on that basis, then that's probably a pretty good indicator that the law is too intrusive.

    2. Re:I'm all for this system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a better idea: why not simply limit the amount of power and revenue at the hands of those who control the business of government, so that they can't implement these spending schemes of oppression no matter how hard they try?

      The power elite who control government spend and oppress because they have the means to do it, and they know that it benefits their elite class at the expense of everyone else. Make no mistake about it: as long as power exists, it WILL be abused for exactly that purpose. Who says? Thousands of years of human history.

  15. Re:on-star service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be cheaper to make a video call...collect

  16. Hey, I am serious! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Spending millions to billions of dollars to put in place a system that people don't want, spending hundreds of dollars per camera when they are totally vulnerable to being disabled at any time for mere pennies, is a BAD IDEA!!!

    1. Re:Hey, I am serious! by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      Spending millions to billions of dollars to put in place a system that people don't want, spending hundreds of dollars per camera when they are totally vulnerable to being disabled at any time for mere pennies, is a BAD IDEA!!!

      Oh wait, lets see here... Australian governments wasting money on things that either a) no one wants b) don't work, or c) are unneeded.

      Hmm
      http://www.ourwater.vic.gov.au/programs/water-grid/sugarloaf Building a $750M pipeline from the Goulburn river system to a dam near Melbourne to boost Melbourne's water supply, even though the Goulburn HAS very little to no water in it

      http://www.myki.com.au/ The Myki transport ticketing system. Already it is way over budget and almost 2 years late http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myki

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:Hey, I am serious! by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the pipeline project is that they are also going to add some sort of lining to a number of waterways, and some sort of other improvements, so that a lot of the water that is lost due to drainage is recovered. That will increase the overall amount of water collected by the Goulburn system, and they will be piping some of that increase into Melbourne.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  17. Welcome to the Global Village by mangu · · Score: 0

    we've got 1 cctv cam per 14 people in this gulag

    It's not a gulag until they start imprisoning people arbitrarily. A country filled with surveillance is not a police state, it's more like a small village. Beware of gossip, act as if someone's always watching you.

    Of course, surveillance *can* be used by a police state, but it can be used against the state as well. Remember the Nixon tapes.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, surveillance *can* be used by a police state, but it can be used against the state as well.

      Not if the police state makes it unlawful for anyone but themselves to use surveillance. In the UK, you'll more than likely have your camera taken off you if the police spot you filming them.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Of course, surveillance *can* be used by a police state

      You know what else can be used by a police state? Pens! Clearly any country that uses a pen is a police state.

      (not arguing with you, simply backing up your point).

    3. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Not if the police state makes it unlawful for anyone but themselves to use surveillance. In the UK, you'll more than likely have your camera taken off you if the police spot you filming them.

      Please cite the law that allows them to do this.

    4. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please cite the law that allows them to do this

      Simple: it's behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace. IANAL, but this covers everything the police don't want you to do. They don't have to obtain a conviction - they merely arrest you, take you for questioning, confiscate your camera then let you go without charge some hours later.

      You will then have been summarily imprisoned for a period of time - although you were never found guilty of any crime.

      This is purely deterrence (and very effective it is, too) to stop anyone from doing anything they don't like. You won't get beaten up and officially nothing happened - except that you have been grossly inconvenienced and maybe lost your camera, too. As with any bullying regime, this type of action is executed with impunity as the police involved will not have to answer to anyone, or justify their actions.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    5. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but this covers everything the police don't want you to do.

      And how many times have the police been had to account for doing this in a court of law? If you allow your police to abuse your rights, you don't deserve the rights.

    6. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The police in the UK already have the power to detain people arbitrarily. So that piece of the fascist puzzle is already in place for a gulag. All you need is some leader to take advantage of said legislation, but hey, by then its too late..
      By the way, did you know that before the first world war, you could travel and live ANYWHERE in the world freely and without restriction? Passports were put in place to control the flow of people during the war. Guess what? The legislation was never revoked after the war. We just live with it, and it has got progressively More suppressing over the years. Do you really think governments have your interests at heart when it comes to personal freedoms?

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    7. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by gary_7vn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in Canada and every time I try to take pictures of the police, I am either told to stop, or am questioned, or in some cases have been told to delete the pictures! This just happened to a friend who was taking pictures of police practicing riot control. I get the message. Try it some time. It may not be illegal but it is not a good idea. Do a search on this, police harassment of people taking their pictures is absolutely common in various Western countries.

    8. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      And what's equally common is not doing anything about police harassment it seems. If you allow them this control over you, then you can't be surprised when they exert it.

    9. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by cdrom600 · · Score: 1

      I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that police chiefs in Britain can now prohibit photography (and confiscate cameras) if they deem it necessary for security, or something like that.

    10. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Please cite the law that allows them to do this.

      It's already happened here.

    11. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      I agree that what they are doing is wrong, but realistically what can I, or anyone do? Have you ever tried to actually resist in a situation like that? There's a good chance you would get arrested. And aren't you blaming the victim here a little bit? It's kind of like saying to a rape victim, you should have fought back! The police have immense power and use it fearlessly. What would you have done? Serious question.

    12. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance you would get arrested.

      Then you get to sue them for false arrest.

      What would you have done? Serious question

      I'd have asserted my rights in a non-violent, calm manner and then found a civil rights lawyer to sue the police for any abuses of their position.

    13. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Please cite the court records of your cases where you sued to prevent this.

      Says the guy who was thrown up against the wall by the state police in Oregon, 1976. Talk is cheap, asshole.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    14. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      You know what? If you sue and win, the taxpayers pay the bill. The cops don't. Even if you win, the cop who harrassed you doesn't lose his job. Lawsuits only work as a punishment when the sued parties lose when the lose. This does not happen when you sue governmental entities. If you sue the government, the taxpayer loses. Which is you.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    15. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      the taxpayers pay the bill. The cops don't. Even if you win, the cop who harrassed you doesn't lose his job

      If it's as widespread as people in this thread indicate, the government wouldn't be able to afford the lawsuits without sending everyone to the poor house, which would result in massive lay-offs which would result in a lot more people on the dole (we actually look after those who can't find employment), which would result in even more taxes being needed, etc, etc.

      Instead they'd have to force the police to stop doing the expensive behaviour or make it legal (in which case you've got a more serious problem).

    16. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Please cite the court records of your cases where you sued to prevent this.

      I've never had a desire or need to video-tape the police. I don't even own equipment that would allow me to do so. I simply said, when asked, what I would do if I ever were in such a situation.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Privacy Masks? by EdIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People will start wearing masks.

    Personally, I have always wanted an excuse to wear a burqa. Yes, I am serious too. When we get to the point that facial recognition is everywhere I am just going to start obscuring my face. If I have to do that then I want to be comfortable doing it. Naked underneath a burqa seems to be a good place to start. I am only half kidding.

    That will be a pretty weird looking world when you have to protect yourself head to toe to obtain a little privacy.

    You think it won't happen? You think I am overdoing it a little? They are going to keep that data for FIVE YEARS. You think they won't sell access to it, illegally or otherwise? Of course they will. You better not cheat on your wife or girlfriend. Go to happy finish massage parlors in the middle of day. Basically do anything you want to be private, since it will be a trivial matter to find out EVERYWHERE you have been for the last 5 years.

    1. Re:Privacy Masks? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Masks? Wow, that's a good idea. I was rather considering waiting until 2054 and inject myself with something very painful that makes my face turn very ugly just like Tom Cruise did in Minority Report. But yeah, a mask, that's a good idea too..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Privacy Masks? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "You better not cheat on your wife or girlfriend. Go to happy finish massage parlors in the middle of day. Basically do anything you want to be private, since it will be a trivial matter to find out EVERYWHERE you have been for the last 5 years."

      There IS a way to deal with that, which is to flaunt that which would normally be restrained by "shame" and conventional mores. Grow an "outlaw biker" (the real ones) attitude and just don't give a fuck, and encourage others to behave likewise. Creative ways to manipulate the fact one is under surveillance in order to distract people who rely on that surveillance will offer themselves as well.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Privacy Masks? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      I thought of that too, except that it's already outlawed to wear most types of masks in public "because then we can't ID you if you *might* be a criminal!!"

      But yes, I see this as a major flashpoint, and it would open up the next fashion wave.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    4. Re:Privacy Masks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget too, if legit people have access to it, so do criminals. Look at all the security breaches of laptops being left, backup tapes being lost, and the show-stopper hacks recently.

      Does the Aussie government really want all this data potentially in the hands of an enemy who would want to do an attack on their country? Knowing where everybody is, is probably some of the most choice intel information one can get, especially for timing an attack to kill as many civilians as possible.

      In no way should that info be collected, much less stored in one location. Foreign governments who hate Australia would pay billions to compromise or coerce someone, or just send a commando team to physically grab that data.

    5. Re:Privacy Masks? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That is why you wear a burqa.

      1) It is an expression of your religious beliefs.
      2) If they demand to lift up the burqa, you inform them before hand you are naked and request a female officer.
      3) If the female officer wishes to know why you have a penis, you tell her that you born that way but medical science will correct God's mistake soon enough.

      Believe it or not, ALL of that will fly in court. It does already. Look up case law (in the US at least) about transvestites and pre-op transexuals having rights to go into the womens bathrooms.

      Now I don't wish to take advantage of that community by any means, and I am not disrespecting them at all. I will have no problem however using that to further my agenda for privacy at all costs, since it does help them too in the end (no pun intended).

    6. Re:Privacy Masks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naked underneath a burqa seems to be a good place to start. I am only half kidding.

      Which half?

  20. Time for the sunglasses, false beard and large hat by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    and (highly reflective) sun-vizor

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  21. Re:Australians! Wear clown masks every time you dr by deniable · · Score: 1

    Or do it in KKK hoods and an unmarked police car. Oh wait, it's been done.

  22. Countermeasures? by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, this is a technical problem begging for a technical solution. What's it take to detect cameras and hit them with a laser? A watt or so should do to fry the image sensor.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Countermeasures? by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      Does anybody remember the Slashdot article about some 'emerging tech' which, when detecting a flash, would fire an image backwards through a lens.. and thus project it for a brief second such that it was part of the photo? It was on here this year. If this was easy to do and not patented (it is), it'd be easy to beat speed cameras. Just flash back an image saying FUCK YOU.

    2. Re:Countermeasures? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Jcr is a suspect for damaging government property, because the camera was working just fine as of 11:38:13 seconds and ceased to work at 11:38:15 after his vehicle passed."

      Gang,

      in its various incarnations including the rest of YRO, this is *the* signature theme of our century. It's gonna take something really culturally decisive to resolve this. Simple "low level" tricks will not quite work.

      The reason why is that cumulatively, the ideas proposed so far have been logically inconsistent! Unfortunately, prosecuting attorneys seem to enjoy crushing people with logically inconsistent motivations.

      I don't have the answers. All I know is that the macro problem is *really tough*.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    3. Re:Countermeasures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, this is a technical problem begging for a technical solution. What's it take to detect cameras and hit them with a laser? A watt or so should do to fry the image sensor.

      -jcr

      However in NSW, laser pointers are illegal

    4. Re:Countermeasures? by jcr · · Score: 1

      This is why the countermeasure devices should be stuck on the back of police cars while they're parked at the doughnut shop.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  23. Top Secret Fact: USA Already has it: RFID in tire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    TOP SECRET FACT:Most modern cars have tracking transponders ALREADY!

    Spy transmission chips embedded in tires that can be read REMOTELY while driving.

    Yup. My brother works on them (since 2001).

    The us gov T.R.E.A.D. act (which passed) made it illegal to sell new passenger cars lacking untamperable RFID in the tires allowing efficient scanning of moving cars.

    Your tires have a passive coil with 64 to 128 bit serial number emitter in them! (AIAG B-11 ADC v3.0) . A particular frequency energizes it enough so that a receiver can read its little ROM. A ROM which in essence is your GUID for your TIRE. Multiple tires do not confuse the readers. Its almost identical to all "FastPass" "SpeedPass" technologies you see on gasoline keychain dongles and commuter windshield sticker-chips. The US gov has secretly started using these chips to track people.

    Its kind of like FBI "Taggants" in fertilizer and "Taggants" in Gasoline and Bullets, and Blackpowder. But these car tire transponder Ids are meant to actively track and trace movement of your car.

    Taggant chemical research papers :
    Â http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk3/1980/8017/801705.PDF
    (remove spaces in url from slashcode if needed)
    [amazing document deleted by feds recently]

    The chips in your tires are for forensic "after the fact" database tracking, from databases collected on highway choke points, It can be done in real time too though.

    I am not making this up. Melt down a high end Firestone, or Bridgestone tire and go through the bits near the rim (sometimes at base of tread) and you will locate the transmitter (similar to 'grain of rice' pet ids and Mobile SpeedPass, but not as high tech as the tollbooth based units). Sokymat LOGI 160, and Sokymat LOGI 120 transponder buttons are just SOME of the transponders found in modern high end car tires. The AIAG B-11 Tire tracking standard is now implemented for all 3rd party transponder manufactures [covered below].

    It is allegedly for QA and to prevent fraud and "car theft", but the US Customs service uses it in Canada to detect people who swap license plates on cars when doing a transport of contraband on a mule vehicle that normally has not logged enough hours across the border. The customs service and FBI do not yet talk about this, and are starting using it soon.

    A secret initiative exists to track all funnel-points on interstates and US borders for car tire ID transponders (RFID chips embedded in the tire).
    The governement can then either look back in databases to see wheere and when your car drove, and OCR liscense plates at tool or Customs can
    build the database up even better without the feds needing to visit your home to get your RFID GUIDs.

    More sinister, it is near impossible to buy tires without the vendor in the USA filling out federal paperwork of what VIN the recipient car is!

    Photos of tracking chips before molded deep into tires! :
    http://www.sokymat.com/index.php?id=94
    Link is deleted now but company that bought the tire snitch chip company makes passport scanners for the feds now : http://www.aaitg.com/index.php?id=23

    PLEASE LOOK AT THAT LINK : Its the same shocking tire material I have been trying to tell people about since the spring of 2001 on slashdot.

    a controversial dead older link was at http://www.sokymat.com/sp/applications/tireid.html
    (its gone off archive.org internet way back repository now too)

    (slashdot ruins links, so you will have to remove the ASCII space it insertes usually into any of my urls to get to the shocking info and photos on the enbedded LOGI 160 chips that the us gov scans when you cross mexican and canadian borders.)

    You never heard of it either because nobody moderates on slashdot anymore and this is probably +0 still. It has also never appeared in print before and is very secret.

    Californias Fastpass is being upgraded to scan ALL responding car tires in future years upcoming. I-75 may get them next in rural funnel po

  24. Re:Fuck the ALP by PenguSven · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're an idiot, the ANPR scoping study was initiated LONG before the ALP won government.

    --
    What is...?
  25. Re:on-star service. by electrictroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if Australians used American-made toilets (with swirling motion), they still wouldn't spin backwards. How water spins down a drain is related to the design of the unit, not the earth's rotation. (urban legend).

    BACK TO ARTICLE:

    "Only criminals need fear tracking of their cars," is the most common defense to this proposal. My response: "And what if the government makes travel a crime? Then we ALL become criminals." Why would government make travel a crime? Well besides the obvious case of dictatorship, there's also the possibility a government might outlaw travel for environmental reasons. Or because oil is scarce.

    A person is not truly free unless he has the right to travel whereever he wishes without restraint or monitoring.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  26. Re:Time for the sunglasses, false beard and large by deniable · · Score: 1

    How about tinted windows? Harsh Australian sun and all that.

  27. Use IR laser diodes by cheros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An IR laser diode that is left unfocused will do the trick.
    It won't zap the sensor, but unless they have used a decent IR filter it will saturate the chip to the point of not registering anything else.

    Reasons why you may want to avoid doing this:
    - no idea if there will be retinal damage if someone else looks at it
    - ANY camera will get upset, so an traffic monitoring will show up your car as worthy of close inspection
    - AFAIK, anything that hinders reading your license plate by whatever means is illegal (it is in most of the countries I've been in, no idea about AU).

    This is NOT a tech problem, it is a political one. As long as the population doesn't make it VERY clear they disagree with what is going on, their government will continue to seek ways to waste a lot of taxpayer money. I'm willing to bet money on the UK ID Card scheme getting nuked if there is a change of government (AFAIK that is an election pledge), that's why they're so pushy about implementing it in at least some form (hence the contract announcements etc etc) - the intention is to make it hard to roll back.

    You know, I can recall times when being in politics was something respectful. I'm obviously old..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:Use IR laser diodes by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Reasons why you may want to avoid doing this:

      The recent classification of various lasers under weapons licensing laws.

    2. Re: Use IR laser diodes by cheros · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point, because that differs per country. I live in a country where I can just order such a laser out of a catalog and use it - no limit on acquisition (well, to a limit - importing some of the more powerful versions like the stuff sold at wickedlasers would probably require justification).

      However, where I would get in trouble is the consequences of that use. If I blind someone, or (as per topic) I use it to prevent camera recording of, say, my license plate or me (they check for seatbelts as well) - that's the point where the law would rightfully come down on me like a tonne of bricks.

      To me, this approach makes sense. Some products like DVD writers use quite powerful lasers, and as long as they stay inside that case that's perfectly OK - it would be impractical to ban DVD writers because they contained a product that COULD be misused. Only when you remove them and do something different with them becomes it a dangerous matter.

      I've been through this exercise when checking ways to preserve privacy, and the answer here too is that technological countermeasures just start off an arms race on what is in essence not a technical problem - it is a political one. What the Chaos Computer Club did in Germany was good in this context: they took the fingerprint problem right back to the politicians involved..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  28. Re:on-star service. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    My response: "And what if the government makes travel a crime? Then we ALL become criminals."

    In that case it'd be more effective to just stand in the road, that way they don't have to hunt you down.

    I love the "What if they do something different in the future" arguments. What if the government declares martial law and starts using chemical warefare on its own citizens? Surely we mustn't have an army so we can stop such a catastrophe!

  29. STATE/LOCAL vehicle tracking already? by ufoolme · · Score: 1

    When I always read items like this, concerning nationwide objective the first thing that comes to mind is ... the project of 2.2m would have only been funded if localised projects were already active and effective.
    If it was for a totally new adventure the funding would have been a lot more than 2.2million.
    The technology isn't complex.. (blah blah blah)
    And most cities here have tollways when a 100s of camera's, its native not to think the intelligence agencies ain't already hacking about with them.

  30. Counter-invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Many Australians (including myself) already own the counter-invention to the ANPR Camera: The venerable cricket bat!

    Perfect for brute-force attacks. If the target device is placed out of reach, the system is scalable: the batsman can be aided by an assistant with the cricket ball module.

    1. Re:Counter-invention by deniable · · Score: 1

      Or go out in the bush where the wildlife crossing signs accumulate bullet holes.

  31. I'm okay with this, IF.... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    I'm actually okay with this, assuming its all automated, and the police require a warrant to gain any information from the system (and they can only get the information specified by the warrant).

    1. Re:I'm okay with this, IF.... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      ... And you trust your govt. to follow all those rules? That's just it - why should they? Bush has broken the spirit of the laws more times than popcorn in a large movie bucket.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:I'm okay with this, IF.... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      If the police want they can break into my home, use a confiscated weapon (not declared) and then kill all of us. They probably won't get caught. And yet I trust them not to do this. Having cameras is the least of what I trust the police with.

    3. Re:I'm okay with this, IF.... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Do you drive? If so, you should know that this will be heavily abused, and are a fool for supporting it.

  32. All major decisions should be done with referendum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least give the people who the country -belongs to- the right to have it run -their way-! Simple, isn't it? Why should we accept something we don't want? - What's the point??
    Referendums would be very easy these days, just let people vote with their phones, and you would get a real quick, cheap indication of what people want...
    Come on, we live in a digital age, - -Use it!-

    Let the people decide, it's their country!

  33. already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already been done..
    here, well sort of.

  34. Re:on-star service. by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    That's not so crazy. There are a number of countries, like Australia, England and of course America that are pretty much going crazy with the control of the populace stuff. Russia used to have "internal passports" and if you wanted to travel to certain places you needed permission. Being caught traveling without permission was indeed a crime. The current trend toward kontrol resembles the get tough on crime meme, that has resulted in draconian and counter-productive policies such as the 3 strikes law in America. The dynamics are similar with pols vying to come up with ever "tougher" (read stupider and or more authoritarian) policies and laws.

  35. Refining archaic tech by Nodamnnicknamesavial · · Score: 0

    It begs the question, in my opinion, why were are still using numberplates at all? Aren't there better way to keep track of vehicles at this point - seems to me that tracking devices in general might also help prevent theft to a large extent.. of course providing they couldn't be disabled easily, which.. yeah... would be a difficult feat?

    --
    I have spoken'eth.
  36. Re:on-star service. by electrictroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    History shows that all governments eventually become tyrannical in nature. (For example Rome started as a Republic, devolved into an Imperium, and finally ended as a dictatorship.) More recently, we have our own President spying on us with the US PATRIOT Act giving him power to tap all phone conversations everywhere.

    Why give some future tyrant the tools to abuse his power & track all travel? We should limit government power every chance we get, to guard against that future tyrant *before* he arrives on the scene.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  37. Re:on-star service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh goodie!
    Report comings and goings of hookers/mistresses to and from congresscritters abodes, Report all commonwealth vehicles, both marked and unmarked visisting red light districts. Together with the tie up of mobile phone cell triangulation. Once a hacker has the wireless intercepts in place, everybody can mine this information. Just because the cops play with this now (to raise revenue) does not mean others can collect the same information for mavolent purposes. Too bad journalists aren't stupid enough - they walk or take a bus/train/bicycle, or a loaner car. That webcam on the window sill- well, thats just to observe the weather , wink wink.

  38. Re:on-star service. by aurispector · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Agreed. The whole idea is incredibly stupid. "CrimTrak"? If they know someone is a criminal, go to his house, his parent's house or his girlfriend's house. 95% of the time he'll be there. For the other 5%, we need panopticon video surveillance of the general population! It's obvious! How ever did we make it to 2008? The criminals should have killed us all by now without this technology!

    Please, somebody, somewhere cut me a f*cking break and stop this stupidity.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  39. Re:on-star service. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    I agree. Hence my example of not having an army to protect against future tyranny.

  40. Australia Choices? by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Certainly a reasonable post. However note to a man not one has discussed to the other side of the issue. How far and by what means should law enforcement do it's job without constituents lambasting them for their failures (and they will most assuredly fail)? A weighty question, but then privacy is weighty and plenty have commentary on that.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  41. If they wait, they'll get it for free. by bbbad · · Score: 1

    The current love affair with GPS units can be extrapolated as follows. Gov. mandates blackbox GPS units. Features. - Warns you if you speed, - logs your trip data - tells you your speeding - prints out tickets if you break a trtaffic rule... you get the picture?

  42. Unfortunately... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    The thing people who try to impose crap like this never seem to realize is that it's easy to track honest people as they go about their daily business. People with bad intent can usually defeat systems like this with about five minutes' thought. Meanwhile, the information being collected infallibly winds up being spread around to friends of the collectors. Canadian Social Insurance Numbers were assigned exclusively for tax purposes. Now, you get video store clerks asking for your SIN when you apply for a damned movie card.

    Bottom line: the only criminals who get caught by these systems are the dummies. So the end result is just a little Darwinian natural selection for your crooks while all the rest of us lose freedom and privacy.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  43. Re:Top Secret Fact: USA Already has it: RFID in ti by base3 · · Score: 1

    Taggant chemical research papers :
    Â http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk3/1980/8017/801705.PDF
    (remove spaces in url from slashcode if needed)
    [amazing document deleted by feds recently]

    The taggant article from Princeton's site wasn't deleted; its URL just changed. It's here.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  44. Re:on-star service. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Australia is *far* more down to earth than the US government.

    It would be quite a powerful crime fighting tool being able to get a bank robber's licence plate number and being able to track them within minutes of the robbery.

  45. Re:on-star service. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Actually, keeping the army weak is pretty important to preventing martial law. Or haven't you been to Iraq, Iran, Argentina, or Russia in the last 20 years?

  46. Re:on-star service. by weetabeex · · Score: 1

    If by *far* more down to earth you mean they only occupy countries for oil^H^H^Hstability purposes, instead of invading, you are damn right.

  47. Re: Epic Fail by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I have seen far too many CHAINED stories of the following variety:

    1. "Let's collect all this data! It might help us catch one terrorist!"

    2. "The only people who have to fear this data are criminals, so go back to the San Terradino Free University."

    3. News in YRO: "Today an employee lost the laptop with 5 million records of the tracking database."

    4. Anonymous posts the database on the net.

    5. Everyone starts blogging. "Ooh, I wonder why you went to the Red Light District, hmm?"

    We're headed towards a Sixties-ish explosion over this stuff within a decade. The pressure can't build forever.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  48. Re: "Outlaw attitudes" by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Except that "Outlaw attitudes" tend to be frowned upon by employers. Oops.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  49. Re:on-star service. by lgftsa · · Score: 1

    You mean the license plates they stole/duplicated from the car in the airport long-term parking garage, which is the same model and color as the getaway car they stole last week?

    Serious criminals will work around the system, and dumb ones will still hide out at their girlfriend's place.

    Other ways of getting "clean" cars include carjacking, holding families hostage, or simply killing the owner(s).

    sigh

  50. In soviet New Zealand ... by psycho+sparky · · Score: 1

    The police have a working prototype ANPR system mounted in a patrol car which automatically looks up every plate it recognises.

    http://www.111emergency.co.nz/EVENT-PoliceCollege08/PoliceCollegear.JPG
    http://www.111emergency.co.nz/PoliceCollege08.htm

    1. Re:In soviet New Zealand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The newly formed NZTA is starting trials of ALPR gear under the guise of using the data for generating Estimated Journey Time data, some trials have already been undertaken for gathering data for tolling. There is no privacy officier at the orginisation and there is talk of using ALPR systems put in place for one reason for other uses in the future.

  51. Re:on-star service. by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Yes, and bank robbery, like all other crimes, are at such an horrendous all-time high. This will certainly nip this problem in the bud!

  52. Re:on-star service. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Erm if they stole plates, the system would still work because the camera would still see those numbers driving around.

    What those numbers mean are irrelevant - If someone gets the licence plate of the robbers, then the cameras can follow them.

  53. Where Are The Freedom-Lovers? by jackvalor · · Score: 1

    The world is looking more and more like a prison complete with a ball and chain tied to everyone's ankles.

    There's a popular quote that was used during the American revolutionary war, "Give me liberty or give me death". I'd rather die than willingly become a drone.

    1. Re:Where Are The Freedom-Lovers? by skegg · · Score: 0

      Your proposal is acceptable.

  54. Re:on-star service. by Fluffeh · · Score: 0

    Even if Australians used American-made toilets (with swirling motion), they still wouldn't spin backwards. How water spins down a drain is related to the design of the unit, not the earth's rotation. (urban legend).

    Hey buddy! Learn your science! The location of the "American Made" toilet with the swirly water thing would spin in reverse in the southern hemisphere. It's called the Coriolis Force and you can read about it right here.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  55. Re:on-star service. by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Goodness me, I need coffee. I want to flame my own post for gramatical errors.

    The sad untold truths about being a grammar-nazi.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  56. Re:on-star service. by glittalogik · · Score: 1

    We can take care of the other 5% by inviting them to a party, apparently.

  57. Re:on-star service. by jlarocco · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I don't give a shit. I don't know about Australia, but the police here, in America, have done a wonderful job catching bank robbers without needing to know where I am.

    Is crime really so bad in Australia that it's just easier to treat everybody like criminals in the first place?

  58. Re:on-star service. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    "And what if the government makes travel a crime?"

    Strangely ironic if they did - given the country was founded on forced transportation of criminals.

    Just saying.

    This is coming from a 7th generation Austrailan. ;P

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  59. Re:on-star service. by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

    I can actually see it being introduced... Slowly but surely our freedoms are being reduced "for our own good" by a government that wishes to micromanage our lives, yet is unable to manage our country.

    Limiting our freedom to travel is only another step in the road to total tyrannical dictatorship "for our own good."

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
  60. License Plate Reading Technology by lefin1 · · Score: 1

    This technology of machine reading license plates is already being used in California: http://cbs8.com/features/crimefighters/story.php?id=109994

  61. Re:on-star service. by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

    Who would use their own car in a bank robbery... or rob a bank without a mask... Or not have a car ready somewhere to switch. If you don't do any of these things already then you don't need a surveillance system to catch you.

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  62. Re:on-star service. by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

    I am an Aussie, and when I was a kid I tried many times in vain to convince the water in my bathtub and basin to drain out counter-clockwise. In fact I don't recall ever seeing water drain counter-clockwise. If the coriolis effect does not impact the direction that water spins in as it drains, then I can only postulate that it must have an effect on the way that tubs and basins are manufactured!

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  63. Re:Top Secret Fact: USA Already has it: RFID in ti by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

    Hm-m-m. Tin foil hat tight tonight?

    --
    I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
  64. Re:Australia Card? We've got one already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the Australia Card. And it's for our own protection.

    Tried to post a present to a relative lately? Govt ID please!

    Tried to retrieve a package from the postal system? Govt ID please!

    Tried to walk or drive around Sydney at night? Govt ID please!

    Tried to hire accomodation at Rottnest? Govt ID please!

    Tried to open a bank account? Govt ID please! [1]

    About the only thing you don't need your Govt ID (passport or driver's license) is to vote. Then they just ask who you are.

    When Hawke tried it there were lots of "papers, comrade" jokes. And the idea was soundly rejected with some of the largest mass demonstrations in Australia's history. But, quietly, quietly it's been slipped into the system.

    First "uniform" licenses with optional photographs
    Then the photographs became mandatory - but we'd never require them for ID
    Then it became illegal to drive without carrying your license (most states only required that you present it within 24hrs)
    Then it became necessary to use a DL or PP to post packages
    And now the NSW police can demand to see proof of identity. Not always legally, but proving that to the arresting officer is left as an exercise for the reader.

    And we get silly crap like http://www.firstaid.net.au/proofofidentity.php where you need to prove your identity just to do a first aid course.
    And of course a DL (aka Australia Card) is the simple option.

    [1] You can use some other ID but it's just about impossible to get your 100 points without a DL or Passport

  65. Re:on-star service. by lorelorn · · Score: 1
    Well, no. Australia is very similar to the US in that:

    1. The police currently do a good job of catching bank robbers, and

    2. Idiots will still suggest Orwellian overraction to their invented 'problems'.

    I used to work in the banking industry so I can attest to 1, and 2 is self evident.

  66. Re:on-star service. by Yoozer · · Score: 1

    there's also the possibility a government might outlaw travel for environmental reasons. Or because oil is scarce.

    As long as you have a souped-up Pursuit Special you're probably free to go where you want. Just make sure to avoid the biker gangs.

  67. Mod parent down - Access Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up. The summary is (as usual) inflammatory and misinformed. There is no scheme, legislation or proposal in Australia or any of its states for a national ID card.

    Wrong.
    It was canned.

    Next time, do your research before replying.

    Ah, and, captcha: repress
    How.. appropriate.

  68. Re:on-star service. by lgftsa · · Score: 1

    Sorry I wasn't clear enough. My point is that the cameras log the plates, not the people.

    They change to another vehicle as soon as they're out of sight of cameras and witnesses. It'll take time to work out the changeover, if ever. They can use car parks, shopping centers, mass transport, deserted areas, etc. Hey, take the magnetic plates along, there's lots of blue 2005 model Camrys around, there's probably a score within a minute's drive of where I work. It might not be discovered for days.

    This is not a tracking system, it only gives hits on time, place and direction. What happens between those hits is unknown, and there's a delay in use of the system.

    The vehicle has at least a couple of minutes before it's entered into a live tracking system. By then, the vehicle might be in a locked garage and the people are long gone.

    The investigation is then like any other - the camera system has been just as helpful as any witness who saw the vehicle drive away from the scene of the crime, no more.

  69. Re:Australia Card?- Spend a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having had some involvement with ANPR here in the UK, I can confirm he's going to spend an absolute fortune. The ANPR software is charged on a per camera basis for at least £2500 each (it's only a lousy driver & some pretty shoddy OCR software too, and is unreliable as anything), plus the control softare and very expensive support.

    He will also spend a lot of time meeting some incredibly nice salesmen, or may have already done that. They will disappear shortly to leave him with some very unhelpful support people.

  70. Re:on-star service. by donaldm · · Score: 1

    Australia is *far* more down to earth than the US government.

    It would be quite a powerful crime fighting tool being able to get a bank robber's licence plate number and being able to track them within minutes of the robbery.

    In principle you are right however a bank robber with any clue will steal a car and use that for the robbery then dump the car and change to one or even two other cars to throw of the police. If the thieves are blatant they may even catch a train or bus (sans masks of course).

    Actually the police have more chance of identifying a thief from the crime scene and can arrest them while protecting themselves and the public. High speed chases may catch a thief in the end but when a thief perceives they don't have anything to loose they don't care about their life or anyone else's.

    What is scary is not so much the thief (yes they are rat bags) but the Governments who erode human rights by using the "greater protection excuse". It is debatable that it provides greater security for the average citizen but the greater the surveillance the more it can be abused but of course we all know that could never happen.

    On a side note in NSW Australia where I live all speed and red light cameras require signs warning that a camera is ahead while other states don't have to do this. This is what we would call revenue raising so the NSW Government made it mandatory to have signs placed to avoid being seen as money grabbing (I think it was also close to an election as well). Speed cameras even in NSW do catch speeders (normally doing 10 km/h over the posted limit) but only those who excessively speed and are not paying attention. They did try to get the cameras painted black in some areas but the voter backlash would have made doing this political suicide.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  71. Re:on-star service. by electrictroy · · Score: 1

    The coriolis force does NOT affect how water spins down a drain.

    As I said, that is an urban legend. (Maybe YOU need to learn your science.) In fact my water drains one way 50% of the time, and the other way the other 50% of the time.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  72. Re:on-star service. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    That is absolute bullshit. For a tenth of the price, they could hire adequate manpower to make such technology pale in comparison for that intended purpose.

    The real purpose, the big brother surveillance of every minutae of our life by our opressive dictators is being trialled in Australia for a wider market. We're just the test population before it is rolled out in larger shores, a testbed to iron out the kinks in the plan to dominate every facet of our life.

    This is the end of our liberty, the end of our fraternity and equality too. We are no longer free men, we are slaves to masters we are all too willing to support and succumb to.

  73. Re:on-star service. by aurispector · · Score: 1

    Heh. They ran a sting like that around here by sending them notices that they won a prize and to come pick it up. Criminals are pretty stupid.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  74. Re:Privacy Masks? The Ned Kelly Appreciation Soc. by vortexau · · Score: 1

    > t's already outlawed to wear most types of masks in public
    > "because then we can't ID you if you *might* be a criminal!!"

    > But yes, I see this as a major flashpoint, and it would open up the next fashion wave.

    ALL it needs is a fashion to be seen in public wearing a Ned Kelly mask! If a car is FULL of "Ned Kellys", then WHO was actually driving?

    http://www.beechworth.com.au/nedkellyhelmet.jpg

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  75. Re: "Outlaw attitudes" by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Except that "Outlaw attitudes" tend to be frowned upon by employers.

    Any more than wearing burqas or otherwise concealing your whole body? I doubt it. I think most businesses would embrace an "outlaw attitude" much more readily than the "I have something to hide" attitude.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  76. Yeah, but... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    ... spray paint is a lot easier to apply.

    Hey, almost forgot! (4) Piece of string.