Slashdot Mirror


FOSS Multicast Document Sharing?

Jawdy writes "I am currently leading a small game development project with artists and developers scattered all over the country. Getting together is somewhat difficult, but we try to do this every couple of months. We often share all kinds of documents with each other, and even do so while using IM clients (GTalk and MSN), but this winds up being a tedious process of: send document; read and edit; send back; rinse and repeat. What I wanted to ask fellow slashdotters is, if anyone knows of any FOSS software that can handle IM (or even voice chat), Whiteboard and document sharing — where we can all see the document, pass around 'editing rights' and edit live. Even several small apps that handle the individual components would help out!"

125 comments

  1. VCS by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 0

    Google "revision control".

    1. Re:VCS by jopsen · · Score: 1

      That would be my advice too... If one needs to integrate IM, etc. just tell your normal IM program to store logs in a directory under revision control...
      But for communication I'd suggest a mailinglist or similar, Google Groups perhaps...

    2. Re:VCS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Version Control is the right answer.

      The Wikipedia article on version control is a good place to start.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_control

      My own preference is Distributed Version Control and in particular "git".
      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_(software)
      and this: http://git.or.cz/

    3. Re:VCS by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      That's what I set up for our office. It's not perfect but you do get a lot of functionality right out of the gate. Document sharing, chat, shared calendars. No one had trouble adapting, many were already forwarding mail to a Gmail account anyway.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    4. Re:VCS by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google "revision control".

      No, "collaborative editing". Revision control gives a tedious process of: commit document; update; read and edit; commit; rinse and repeat. Wikipedia says that Abiword and Google Docs (among others others) probably do what's asked for here.

    5. Re:VCS by master5o1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      what about lather, rinse, repeat?

      --
      signature is pants
    6. Re:VCS by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Revision control isn't fantastic; right now, I'm not aware of any that can merge changes to an OpenOffice or MS Office document. LaTeX would work, but most people don't know LaTeX. I imagine with XML-based word documents we'll see revision control plugins to merge the underlying XML instead of the binary files that contain them, but last time we looked at this it wasn't there yet.

    7. Re:VCS by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      Hi. Thanks for this - GoogleDocs will definately help with all text elements (storylines, screenplay/scripts and even code), so I think we'll start implementing this. Our biggest problem is still concept images, model renders, screenshots etc. But thanks! Jawdy

    8. Re:VCS by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      You can insert images into docs and spreadsheets. Organize them logically into a doc file and now you have revisions and multi-editing.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  2. Abiword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Abiword has an experimental plugin to allow collaborative document editing. Otherwise, I'd suggest just using Google Docs.

  3. Google Docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about Google Docs?

    It's not an F/OSS solution, but it supports ODT, DOC, and just about everything else, and allows for the cooperative editing that you're looking for.

    Plus, you have the added advantage of not needing to host and upkeep some app.

    1. Re:Google Docs by johnkzin · · Score: 4, Informative

      And, Google Docs also has a built-in "IM" feature. The "Discuss" tab on the right lets you see who is currently looking at the document, and IM each other right in that tab, for discussion/coordination/etc.

      I'd highly recommend it. We recently used it on a spreadsheet for a planned data center power outage, with all of the sysadmins IM'ing at the same time, and all we would each mark the "up/down" collumn of the sheet as we finished with a bunch of machines (over 300 total). And we had one spot that was a counter for how many were still up or down. It also kept track of shutdown/start-up order, responsible sysadmin, and dependencies. Instead of being like a mad-house we've had in previous outages, this one was almost like a ballet. Very useful tool.

      So, yes, Google Docs may not technically be "Open Source", but it is free, and I bet you'll find it to be amazingly useful for what you want.

    2. Re:Google Docs by master5o1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nah nah mate... this is much better.

      --
      signature is pants
    3. Re:Google Docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A spreadsheet to manage 300 machines?

      Do you guys really have any idea what you are doing?

    4. Re:Google Docs by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Do you guys really have any idea what you are doing?"

      Your post might have been of any interest if you included any hint about your tested alternatives.

      Sorrily, you didn't.

    5. Re:Google Docs by malachid69 · · Score: 1

      Personally I use Google Docs for this purpose.

      While I agree that it is not technically 'open source'... From the Google Data API:

      Google gives you a personal, worldwide, royalty-free, non-assignable and non-exclusive licence to use the software provided to you by Google as part of the Services as provided to you by Google (referred to as the âoeSoftwareâ below).

      --
      http://www.google.com/profiles/malachid
  4. What kind of documents? by Noksagt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google documents or Zoho or some other gratis (but typically proprietary) "cloud" solution might be reasonable.

    If you're fine with text-only, you have a lot of options. VIM and EMACS both allow collaborative editing, you can share a screen session, or you can get a specialized collaborative editor (such as Gobby and ACE) or a specialized framework, such as DocSynch

    If you need light-weight word processing, Abiword has a plugin for real-time collaboration.

    Heavier weight word processing of DOCX can be done with Plutext.

    If you need more graphical documents & the above doesn't seem to fit AND if you have a small group of friends who you trust, I'd just go "simple" & host with VNC or some other remote desktop protocol.

    As far as other pieces, there is a lot of good F/OSS voice/IM/whiteboard software. Coccinella and ekiga are good examples.

    1. Re:What kind of documents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gobby is a great solution as noted above. The gobby deva are very far along in developing a collaborative editing framework (infinote) which will hopefully spur many more apps to fit this need. There is also ongoing development of a KDE 4 plugin which makes use of the infinote framework.

    2. Re:What kind of documents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see anything in Vim's documentation about collaborative editing. What am I missing?

    3. Re:What kind of documents? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Run it inside a Screen session.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Screen

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    4. Re:What kind of documents? by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for all of those! Our biggest problem is definately images, and Coccinella looks like it'll fit the bill. I had used Marratech before, and it's whiteboard feature allowed you to load images which can then be "edited" or painted over, which Coccinella looks like it'll do. Thanks!

  5. OpenH323 by Zarhan · · Score: 4, Informative

    OpenH323 is basically Netmeeting, but OSS version. Mind you, it uses (surprise) H.323 protocol, and not all firewalls like it (since it requires connectivity to both directions).

    http://openh323.sourceforge.net/

    1. Re:OpenH323 by macxcool · · Score: 1

      it uses (surprise) H.323 protocol, and not all firewalls like it

      http://openh323.sourceforge.net/

      You could also use ssh to create a tunnel for the H.323 data. The firewall wouldn't mind that too much ;-)

  6. Google docs is an easy first thing to try by aachrisg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd try google docs first. You can share live copies of documents (word processing files + spreadsheets), including keeping revision history and simultaneous live edits.

  7. Document Sharing - Dropbox by Compholio · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, for the "document sharing" and "editing rights" part you could use Dropbox.

  8. I used google document... by fasuin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... and liked it. Share your doc or xls file, modify it and everybody will immediately see it. you can also use the integrated chat board

  9. One Word ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    gobby , does exactly what you are looking for in gnome. I'm sure there are KDE and Windows and OSX Clients too

  10. iChat by Foofoobar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My coworker is often out of the country and I need to work on code with him. We use iChat to share documents and workspace to work on code at the same time and share ideas. It has voice and video as well. I highly recommend this to everyone who has to telecommute.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:iChat by lokpest · · Score: 1

      What part of FOSS was it you didnt understand?

    2. Re:iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great, but most of my coworkers use windows, some linux and the marketing departament uses apple, can iChat work in this environment?.

    3. Re:iChat by Foofoobar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well... you gotta comprimise. I have looked for a FOSS app that does everything iChat does and it just doesn't exist. There are some 'half-implemented' Jabber efforts which do it via a browser with Flash and are buggy but nothing that comes close to this good of a finished product. Honestly I do connect to most of my Linux boxes via shell anyway and with Bootcamp/VMWare, you can install Windows if you have to.

      It may be proprietary but Apple has turned out to be the best portable environment for the developers at the last couple jobs I have been at; it's the reason I got one because all the java devs at my last job used Macbook Pros and they were able to telecommute and interface more easily than the Windows or Linux members of the team.

      I love FOSS but this is where I drop it... when a good product makes me pay for it.
      But then again, this is where FOSS's strength is; in finding these products that rely on a platform and replacing them with an open version.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    4. Re:iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So your answer is NO, iChat will not work in this environment, force all employees to buy a mac is not an acceptable compromise where i live.

    5. Re:iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suggesting the majority of people involved each buy $1k+ new hardware is not a "compromise" by any stretch of the imagination.

    6. Re:iChat by Foofoobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well depends on your priority. For me, having a decent portable environment that was easily compatible with all environments was very crucial. Good development tools, easy communication amongst teammates, etc. If that is not a priority in the longrun, then yes, I'd say don't spend the money. It was my team mates that tipped me over to 'the Mac side' and I still run most of my FOSS tools on it (Eclipse, OpenOffice, Gimp, etc) but the communication and collaboration tools were DEFINITELY something that enabled me to telecommute and interact with my teammates like no other platform or software package allowed.

      So, mark me as a troll (even though I'm stil saying that FOSS will replace this) but for now, this IS the best tool on the market that's FREE for collaboration. It just happens to be tied to the Mac OS.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    7. Re:iChat by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      In other words, it's not "free," because it requires a software (and hardware) dongle.

      (Screw the OSS aspect, I'm just talking price...)

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    8. Re:iChat by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Except the poster did, in fact, specify FOSS in the question. Also, if they don't work exclusively Mac already, it's not free. Bundled with the OS doesn't mean free, it means "costed as part of the OS." That's part of why OEMs can say "With thousands of dollars worth of software!" when they sell these things. Also, the poster specified that it is a small (thus, unlikely to be able to afford computer replacement) game development project (thus, unlikely to be targeting OSX anyway). No one's dissing iChat... it just doesn't meet like 90% of the poster's requirements.

    9. Re:iChat by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Well I agree. You do have a point. That was the original specification. But people who are unaware of Macs and think iChat is only an IM app may not be aware of how good of a collaboration tool it is above all others that actual cost. I think the post above yours put it best by saying that the sofwatre was free it just requires a software (and hardware) dongle. :)

      Still my point was to offer to a fellow developer an app that has been really helpful in bringing telecommuting developers together to coloborate. It may only work with Mac but it works well with all platforms.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    10. Re:iChat by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Elaborate on what you mean here?

      It may only work with Mac but it works well with all platforms.

      I don't believe that the screen sharing is open-protocol or anything like that; thus, it seems very single-platform, at least for the use case that is presented.

    11. Re:iChat by archkittens · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      if you dont mind proprietary solutions, might i suggest cisco meetingplace. it works very well, even with "express", which we've recently shown off to the C-level parade at my workplace

      being a rather medium sized organization (muni level government organization with approx. 3880 employees), we paid a bit more than a smaller company would for the product, but let me brag about it for a moment:

      • screencasting
      • integrated chat
      • runs as a browser plugin
      • integrated conference calling
      • scheduled or ad-hoc meetings
      • high quality streaming video
      • LDAP integration
      • integrated presence

      the list can go on for quite a bit. cisco is premium, but i can honestly say you get what you pay for. scott adams seemed to like it, anyways... http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/partners/news/2006/pr_prod_06-12.html

    12. Re:iChat by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      My apologies. Badly formed sentence. It may only work on Mac but Macs work well with all platforms. I learned this after switching. I can easily interface with my Ubuntu desktop, Debian servers, Windows network, printers, play media files, etc. It's practically the perfect medium between Windows and Linux. Sure I have to give up a little FOSS but I support it elsewhere. Just because I use one Mac machine to develop on doesn't mean I don't use FOSS on that Mac or have other Linux boxes.

      If you can point to something else that works as well, I'll definitely give it a shot but I tried myself to find FOSS alternatives but they just don't exist... not this robust anyway.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  11. Citrix, gotomeeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.gotomeeting.com has worked for me in the past--it's not free, you need a good network connection--and of course it only works with windows which makes it miserable in any suitable environment. But I did get it set up for the executive types, and between its ability to broadcast the desktop, and shift focus between individuals it worked pretty well.

    1. Re:Citrix, gotomeeting by Foldarn · · Score: 1

      I second this. My workplace also utilizes GotoMeeting (www.gotomeeting.com) and while it's based off of VNC if I remember correctly, it seems to perform far better. Like it was said above, it's not free, but it gives a lot. It also provides audio conferencing if everybody calls Citrix's phone line and enter the meeting ID. This means nobody needs any kind of audio conferencing solution since they provide it.

  12. AbiCollab for Document sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://abicollab.net/ ?
    I haven't tried it personally, but if it's any help, yeah. (:

  13. Personally I would abstract this away from the app by Froze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For really simple interactivity, I would suggest something along the lines of

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/vnc-reflector/

    Let one person do the application hosting and get your committee to VNC to that host. Then everybody can do everything, including applications that don't have shared edit features built in.

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
  14. VNC by tg2k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Any number of VNC server/clients can do this, though passing control is probably not as easy as with something designed for meetings.

    But as others have said, use a version control system for anything offline. I recommend Subversion if you want FOSS, but there are tons of alternatives such as Git, Mercurial, etc.

    1. Re:VNC by Visoblast · · Score: 1

      I've used VNC for this sort of thing before, but on a LAN and everyone was pretty close by. Even so, it let us all look at the same document, and edit it and see the changes live. It may take some tweaking to get good performance over the internet, but I think it's doable.

      After this, the document is saved on the system with the VNC server. Then it can be put into a revision control system.

      --
      "Luncheon meats make the sawdust in your stomach explode."
      • -- Crow T. Robot
  15. Shared remote desktop with VNC by Fryth · · Score: 1

    You could start a VNC server on a computer running applications that you'd use in your meeting, such as office applications. Then have everyone connect using a shared session. TightVNC is what I use, but the feature is standard across any VNC implementation. In the options dialog, you can "Request Shared Session."

  16. Sharepoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you are serious about developing this game, you *will* need to be in touch with non-nerd crowd.

    I would dance with the devil and choose Sharepoint - as a service. There are several service providers who provide Sharepoint sites for you for mere 10-15 euros per month.

  17. wiki / trac / subversion by sugarmotor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    trac / subversion / wikimedia?

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  18. Dabbleboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out Dabbleboard. It was written by a friend of mine. There is a video showing you how it works.

    http://www.dabbleboard.com

    1. Re:Dabbleboard by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      This looks incredibly useful! The "upload other images to use in dabbleboard" part is exactly what we need! Looks like we may start using GoogleDocs for text and this for Images! Thanks!

  19. Gobby by siDDis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gobby is an open source client-server application which supports multiple documents in one session, document synchronisation on request, password protection and an IRC-like chat for communication.

    1. Re:Gobby by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      Their site didn't load for me - but Wiki shed some light on the project! Looks good, and has all the collaborative items in one client/server setup. Definately going to investigate this one further, thanks!

  20. kablink, by simoncrute · · Score: 1

    Icecore now known kablink may be what you need.
    http://www.kablink.org/

    It's the opensource version of Teaming + Conferencing now owned by Novell (used to be SiteScape)

    Disclaimer. I work for them and I've not used this software.

  21. Eclipse Communication Framework by toby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ECF is an integrated Jabber (XMPP)-based protocol that allows collaborative work. Introduction here. "Real-time communication and collaboration features for teams using Eclipse such as peer-to-peer file sharing, remote opening of Eclipse views, screen capture sharing, and real-time shared editing."

    Other Jabber products you might find useful are Coccinella with whiteboarding, etc.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Eclipse Communication Framework by jd · · Score: 1

      If you then add the MICE MBone tools, you get the remainder of what's wanted - video, audio, whiteboard and primitive shared text editor. It's a damn shame MICE stopped development of the tools because they are good, easy-to-use and modular. Modular is very important. Most modern videoconferencing tools are monolithic, all but impossible to extend and are just not designed for anything I'd consider "real work". They're toys. Powerful toys, but this is something software developers really need to grasp. If you can't make a program do more than what it was designed for, it really is just a toy. If you can't maintain it (won't isn't important) or extend it (and that includes meaningful 3rd party plugins as well as your own code) then it has no sustainable value.

      Windows XP has a lot of immediate value, but it's not sustainable so is just an executive toy no different from a top-end Ferrari. Hey, you can get places in a top-end Ferrari, so there's clear immediate value there too, but closed-source cars and closed-source OS' cannot be maintained and must eventually fail beyond any hope of recovery. The only benefit they have given, beyond the merely functional which could have been obtained other ways, was momentary pleasure. That is the function of a toy. Airfix and Matchbox produced equally good toys for younger children.

      The same is true in the videoconferencing world. You absolutely do not want a toy for serious work, because toys break and you can't afford things that break. Jabber is good in that respect. It is not a toy. Netmeeting is. The MICE tools are not toys, though they lack a maintainer. Internet Phone and White Pine's version of CU-SeeMe, from the same era, are toys because you can't use them at all now.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Eclipse Communication Framework by jasonm23 · · Score: 1

      Yep I was going to say, ECF plus any other collaborative tools (Trac, Jira ... RedMine! as long as they have a SCM integration, ticket tracking and a Wiki ... the rest is a bonus or fluff.) You also should implement SCM for product versioning control... immediate collaboration is one thing but historic control of the project is also EXTREMELY beneficial. Git or SVN are both nice. (despite SVN bashing by Linus T) Quick note: SubEthaEdit (mentioned below) is like ECF but drawbacks are... 1. Propietory/Closed/$$$ 2. Lacks integration.

  22. Wiki is essential by toby · · Score: 1

    I've used Trac a lot for distributed projects - the integration is very nice.

    This guy seemed to want real time colloboration, though, which is why I referenced Eclipse Communication Framework in other post, rather than a wiki.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Wiki is essential by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

      I see, ok. Wasn't clear to me.

      Then I guess, simply, just have a chat then and let one participant make the changes in a wiki or similar.

      Is there a way to access a shared desktop over the network simlutaneously? So then you'd say in the chat "let me write" and then that one person moves the mouse, type, etc... .. take turns, etc. This way, any application would become "shareable" without any code change (OO / IDE's / Gimp / etc)

      Just need to set up a machine that can be accessed by all.
      Stephan

      --
      http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    2. Re:Wiki is essential by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      VNC is what you need there... although it'll feel boggy as hell.

    3. Re:Wiki is essential by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      I have thought about using a Wiki, but it seems overkill for our purposes... well, it seems that way at the moment! Could get a few more months down the line and wished I'd set one up early - 20/20 hindsight and all that.

  23. Microsoft SharedView by figleaf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One more alternative you can look at: SharedView. It works over the firewall unlike several other apps.

    1. Re:Microsoft SharedView by rundgren · · Score: 0

      He's asking for FOSS, and you give him M$ ?? AND it gets you a +5 Interesting.. *Sigh*

    2. Re:Microsoft SharedView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Offtopic

    3. Re:Microsoft SharedView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you abbreviate "microsoft" with a dollar sign? and it gets you a +5 insightful.. *sigh*

      in seriousness though, "M$" stopped being funny about the second or third time it was used. if you read "the moon is a harsh mistress", review when manny was lecturing mycroft about what constitutes "funny".

  24. OpenDocMan by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Not exactly what you want, but Opendocman works very well for document sharing and control: http://www.opendocman.com/

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  25. Wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered setting up a password protected wiki?

    Online editing, version control, and you can upload any documents (at least with mediawiki, if you change LocalSettings to allow uploads of .doc or .pdf files).

    1. Re:Wiki by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      This actually seems a good option that will provide more flexibility than a standard document editor.

      You can embed media in the page or store it externally, you can create 'documents', tag them by usage, set edit permissions rather specifically (depending on the wiki backend chosen), it is fully open source (depending on the wiki backend chosen), it can be easily viewed by others who do not have write access, and easily navigated as a reference - many doc sharing softwares, such as Google Docs, make cross referencing and hierarchical referencing frustrating, and for those who are only invited to view the doc, it can be downright difficult.

      For an Anonymous Coward, this person's got a good common sense suggestion.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  26. Out of the box on OLPC by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    The "write" activity on olpc supports collaborative editing out of the box using Jabber as a transport. I think it is a derivative of Abiword - but in any case it is open source.

    I actually use it quite often, having a group document is a favorite activity among the olpc g1g1 kids - the usual take turns adding a sentence to a silly story type thing. (I never fully grew up.)

  27. Inkscape by molo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is only for whiteboarding (not document sharing), but Inkscape can share a workspace over XMPP (Jabber) protocol. The feature is sometimes called Inkboard.

    More info here: http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/WhiteBoard and here: http://inkboard.sourceforge.net/

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Inkscape by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Inkscape is a great product for the whiteboarding side of this problem.

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
  28. 37signals by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    37signals has a number of apps that do these things. Campfire is web IM (with logging, file upload, etc.) and Basecamp is essentially a personal wiki with calendaring and other features.

    1. Re:37signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i 2nd basecamp+campfire
      u get project management with timelines,milestones,whiteboard,IM,to-do lists, and some message board thing. document sharing is available in the paid version only

  29. FOSS? And you use MSN? by bucketoftruth · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Use openfire and a Jabber client like Psi/Gajim/Pidgin.

    Use Alfresco for document sharing.

  30. RCS, or depends on document type... by Willbur · · Score: 1

    There are three possibilities that I see here:

        i) Use a revision control system. There are a bunch of good ones: git, monotone, darcs, bzr, subversion... This will give you ability to have people edit and share the documents.
          It'll work better if you use document formats that are text based. e.g. unzipped ODF or latex for 'word processing'
          These systems are very much collaborative, but are move away from 'instant' communications to 'parallel' editing with an assisted merge step.

        ii) If you move away from RCS based thoughts to direct collaborative editing, then things get more complex. I only know of collaborative editors that edit one type of document. (and there is good reason for this - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_transformation )
        I know that inkscape (FOSS SVG editor) has a collaborative editing module based on Jabber comms. There are numerous collaborative text editors that people might point you towards.

          iii) The third option is Google docs. For text this is ok. For images you can try to use their presentation software, but it is clunky for that purpose - use inkscape instead.

  31. In terms of document sharing: by Angostura · · Score: 1

    I'd recommend DropBox. Not, FOSS I know, but you get 2Gigs of storage gratis, and it is great. Skype is going to be the obvious solution for IM and voice, leaving you witj whiteboarding

    1. Re:In terms of document sharing: by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      I use a whiteboarding plugin with skype, it appears in addons and is free.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  32. Google Docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://docs.google.com/

    Especially works great if you're using other Google stuff like Gmail & GTalk.

  33. Abiword? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT, but how is Abiword these days? I'm running KDE 3.5, so I won't really have a chance to run it again until KDE-4 is really stable enough for my desktop. The last time I tried it a few years ago, it was alright, but I seem to remember having formatting problems. Has it matured a good bit in the last two years or so?

    I'm really excited about the new koffice, but is Abiword worth a look, as well?

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Abiword? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I really like Abiword.

      It is my favorite word possessor as someone who doesn't do much but type the odd page or few.

      Starts up fast, takes the important features (for that kind of editing) and makes them easy to find.

      That being said, Kword2, is awesome (if not stable).

      I am fairly neutral in feeling to KDE 4 (all the apps aren't done, and stability/performance aren't so great, maybe because I use Nvidia binary drivers). The plasma doesn't yet work stably for me, and is slow slow slow. I go back and forth on how I feel about oxygen window decorations, and the panels don't ever do what I want them too.

      That being said, I LOVE the way QT4 handles tool windows and toolbars. Being able to put them wherever I want, and float them, and tab them. Also, the tool sensitive (changes based on what is selected) tool window in Kword2 is fantastic. The interface is just excellent.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Abiword? by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      Abiword is great. It can open ODF, MS Word Docs, and a variety of other files. (It can't save MS Word Docs though, it saves as RTF.)

      It does have a few problems, though most of the time you won't encounter them. One I found once had to do with pasting a formatted header... Another I have, I think has to do with different character sets.

      But, if you only work in AbiWord, and you don't go messing with other word processors, then most of the time it will work great.

      Loads fast, works well, has built in grammar checker (underlines in green, though doesn't tell you why it needs looking at), spell checker, saves in a simple XML format which can be read in a text-editor if needed etc.

      Give it a try. I have both OpenOffice.org and AbiWord, and unless I'm doing something complicated, or sharing with MS Office, I use AbiWord for almost all my word processing needs.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
  34. iChat and SubEthaEdit by RatPh!nk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Very sweet solution if you have access to OS X. SubEthaEdit has very nice integration with iChat and will likely do much of what you ask right out of the box including multi-person live editing. Good luck

    --
    Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
  35. Cosider a wiki by einar.petersen · · Score: 1

    If you collaborate on documents I would seriously consider a wiki - http://www.dokuwiki.org/dokuwiki is extremely simple to set up. You get revision control - Plug In structure for ODF/PDF export, easy editing etc. Plus a wiki is accessible even from a simple mobile browser with no extra installation needed. Multicast... well - More or less accessible to all at the same time. Looking forward to see this thread develop, as it could prove to be immensely helpful for any FOSS organization/project.

    --
    MS, ALS, Aphasia ? http://globability.org - Me http://einarpetersen.com
  36. Use monotone by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    monotone -- a distributed revision control system -- everyone has a copy of the entire repository. The style of use is to commit frequently, even before any kind of code review, sync frequently, and decide which of the things committed and synced are in the final system later, after discussion, by certifying the revisions you decide to use.

  37. google docs? by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    If you can handle the limited nature of their word processor.

  38. red5 server + openmeeting by ogrisel · · Score: 1

    The red5 opensource flash application server along with the openmeetings video conference / whiteboard application might help for organizing voice + video meetings. Clients just require a flash 10 plugin in their browser. opeenmeetings allows for uploading/sharing office files with live preview using openoffice + pdf2swf and image files with imagemagick and also add a nice desktop sharing feature.

  39. Not FOSS and Mac Only by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    but subethaedit has some cool text editing collaboration functionality.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  40. How is that not just Wiki + IM? by MartinSchou · · Score: 0

    How is that not just Wiki + IM?

    Set up a Wiki with authorization required to do anything, maybe put it on an odd port too.

    The wiki will tell you if someone else is editing a document if you click edit.
    You always have stuff published with the newest changes.
    You will have history to check changes etc.
    You can comment on documents without it changing the document.
    You can attach files to your documents.

    The only thing it won't really do without some added plugins is live multiedit and whiteboard for pictures/diagrams etc.

    IM ... well, you already said it can be multiple programs.

    The only wiki I've done any kind of work with is JSPWiki, and that has the above mentioned functionality. Others may have more/less features, so just find one that fits your needs and programming skills (if you want to make new plugins that help your team)

  41. VMukti by Gocho · · Score: 1

    Here you go... http://www.vmukti.com/ It integrates with Asterisk and it has Video Conferencing capabilities.

  42. Virtual World by Dazza39 · · Score: 1

    Why not use something like a Project Wonderland https://lg3d-wonderland.dev.java.net/? It gives you application sharing (VNC on win32 and X on Linux, etc). Also gives you 3D audio, chat, an avatar, a whiteboard and even the ability to phone into the world from a landline (hardware allowing). You can customize the area, add photos using Flickr http://blogs.sun.com/wonderland/entry/flickr_friday. Worth considering IMHO.

  43. not oss but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's freeware, and it's working great!

    Dropbox

  44. Create and share documents... for FREE by ywharton · · Score: 1

    Try https://www.acrobat.com./ It gives you access to Buzzword, ConnectNow, My Files (file locker) and the ability to create and share documents... and best of all, its all FREE.

  45. Coword & CoOffice by Hitechwizard · · Score: 1

    There is an application called CoWord & CoOffice (http://cooffice.ntu.edu.sg/coword/) that sounds like it will do what you are needing to do. It requires M$ Word, but it was the only thing we found that allowed multi-user simultaneous document editing. Maybe one day this same functionality will show up in OpenOffice (HINT HINT!)

  46. Re:nVidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    nVidia binary drivers != stable. For an exercise in frustration, though, try ATI's fglrx^&$%$%+++carrier lost

  47. wiki by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

    use a wiki.

    i've been using confluence for a couple of years now, and cant imagine any sort of collaborative document writing without it.

    there are plenty of plugins, including a recent whiteboard thing ( havent used it myself ), and you can always use skype/msn/other instant messaging in the background.

  48. KabLink by Conficio · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might have a look at http://kablink.org/ from the former SiteScape (now Novell). I'm not sure if their current open source offering includes the voice collaboration server. I think it used to. Also lots of collaboration tools, although id does not seem to include a collaborative white board in the FOSS version.

    --
    Busy helping non technical users of OpenOffice.org - http://plan-b-for-openoffice.org/
  49. DimDim.com by grandrollerz · · Score: 1

    DimDim.com seems to have most of what you are looking for and is open source.

    1. Re:DimDim.com by Jawdy · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, it does have (almost) all that we need! I've got so many apps to choose from - you'd think that I could find these things from the right sort of Google search and use of keywords...

  50. I Wrote That Once.... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    I wrote almost exactly that spec at an internship a few years back. It was a generic collaboration package, had whiteboard, chat, "email", hooks for writing new modules, even a crappy voice chat (raw PCM over UDP, since I never could figure out how to make the Java Speex module work). The only real problem was that the primary deployment was LAN-only, so I never had to optimize it for internet speeds/latencies. I have no idea who the code belongs to, I was working for a civilian agency in DoD (the Army Research Institute), so I suppose there's a chance it falls under one of the "government products are public domain" rules.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  51. Draftastic by vruba · · Score: 1

    (Warning: self-link.)

    Draftastic is a web-based collaborative editor that avoids lock contention issues and works without JavaScript, among other good things.

    It's free for a single document. Paid accounts get more documents, a permission system, and so on.

    (Not OSS, but built using mostly open-source technology. We've contributed a few patches already, and are hoping to find other ways to "give back to the community".)

  52. dimdim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try dimdim

  53. PBWiki by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

    I like Wikis.

    Haven't used it in a while, but I used PBWiki to organize all of my online table-top RPGs.

  54. Mac app by matria · · Score: 1

    This is not exactly a direct response to the question as asked, since it's not F/OSS. That aside, Mac users can use SubEthaEdit http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/, and share a single document with each user's focus and changes being highlighted with a selected color. It uses the Apple "bonjour" protocol, but the concept shouldn't be all that difficult to implement in other software. I'm not aware of any at the moment, however.

  55. Assembla.com by KristofferG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make an account at www.assembla.com it features everything you need. Supports: Direct filesharing, SVN, IM jabber server, Wiki, Scrum, Trac, Mercury aso Its without doubt the best alternative for low-budget or no-budget software development.

  56. WBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install skype and try out whiteboardmeeting.

    More info at http://www.whiteboardmeeting.com

    Plus there are other whiteboard programs for skype aswell that you can try and that allow simultaneous editing of one document.

  57. Lotus "Bluehouse" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you given Lotus "Bluehouse" a try. It is a SaaS collaborative offering from IBM. As of now in Beta mode but supports versioned document sharing and provides sametime for chat. As it is a SaaS offering you would just need your browser + sametime client install.

    You can go here - https://bluehouse.lotus.com to check it out

  58. Zimbra by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    Hi There,

    Zimbra is an open source email platform which has a document store and wiki-esq functionality. The latest version also has an instant messenger etc.

  59. Do like Canonical. Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.opencroquet.org

  60. Parent post is NOT redundant. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some Moderators seriously do NOT understand the use of the "redundant" modifier in answers to a "Ask Slashdot" topic.

    The parent topinc is NOT redundant. It answers the topic, with a good answer (google docs) and brings some further information to the table (simultaneous live edits)

    Although it sometimes can be annoying to see multiple posts with the same suggestion (similar to a "me too"). However in this case, if you look carefully you can see the parent post, and most others who suggested Google Docs, have all posted at the same time (around 8:22pm). It is therefore reasonable to assume that this is not intended to be a "me too" post. Therefore it is unfair to mark this as redundant.

    Also take into account, the person who asked the question may be looking at popularity,a nd many people suggesting "google docs", together with WHY, may help that person make a better decision.

    I hope the "redundant" mod given to the parent is properly meta moderated, as it is unfair.

    --
    Have a nice day!
    1. Re:Parent post is NOT redundant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is redundant. Even if the OP was posted 10000 years before, it would still be redundant now that several "use google docs" posts are there.

      Other posts mentioning google docs cover more information. So it's absolutely fair to mark the OP as redundant, irregardless of when it has been posted.

  61. I am doing exactly this for a modding team... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    And the answer we're using is MediaWiki. Before we used MediaWiki we used GoogleDocs, but MediaWiki suits us better.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  62. vic, vat, wb, nte, sd by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 1

    Years ago there used to be a collection of FOSS software that did just what the poster was describing. I don't know the status of those pieces of software are today, but its all been done before.

    --
    __________________________________
    Free your mind - Flush your toilet
  63. Gobby Slashdotted? by meonkeys · · Score: 1

    Dang, looks like perhaps the Gobby Web site went down under the load. Anyone have a mirror? I just set up a Gobby server and want my coworkers using Windows and Mac to be able to try it out, if clients exist for those platforms.

  64. What about Campfire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.campfirenow.com/

    I have never had to use it... looks pretty good...I use the "Ta-Da Lists" site...

    just a suggestion...

  65. Re:Personally I would abstract this away from the by Jawdy · · Score: 1

    I hadn't even thought about using VNC for "multicast" purposes. Heck, I didn't even know it could be done! This one will definately help regarding some of the more obscure or cpu-hungry apps and editors that we have to use. Thanks!

  66. wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use a wiki instead of documents

  67. Zimbra can do it ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.zimbra.com

    - Email
    - Tasks
    - Docs
    - calendar
    - Zimblets
    - Briefcase

    And have Ajax UI, HTML and Mobile as well :)

    You can collaborate pretty well with Zimbra. I am a happy Zimbra customer.

  68. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    webhuddle does application sharing, text chat, and voice chat. (There is some support for slide markup. But once you have application sharing an arbitrary drawing application can be used for whiteboard as well.)
    https://www.webhuddle.com/
    and
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/webhuddle

  69. concurrent editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a few years ago I proposed this at the software company I was at and was laughed out (thanks jeff, ryan, shaun) I have some code for a modular, scriptable (python) concurrent editng system, but it dosn't do much yet, I fully expect one of you to beat me to the punch. the idea is (oh you all go ahead and start laughing now) that one client opens a document, people connect to it, each with THEIR OWN INDEPENTANT cursor, and concurrently edit the document, each person able to save a local copy. servership is passed till the parting of the last client. I agree there are only particular scenarios where it works, but I fully belive it would enable a large team to work on a small project really efficiently.

    1. Re:concurrent editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think you were beat in 1968,

      http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html

      Clip 25 :o)

  70. a Wiki! by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

    Maybe a Wiki will help you. As for exchanging files, a perhaps an FTP/HTTP/Samba server? Or each one of your running such an app?