Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Finds Grass Greener In Ireland

theodp writes "Facebook announced it has chosen tax-haven Dublin for its international HQ, but not all are buying COO Sheryl Sandberg's line about local world-class talent being the motivation behind the move. The Irish Times recently reported that Irish subsidiaries owned by US multinationals are opting to convert to unlimited liability status, concealing the financial performance of their Irish operations from public view. They include Microsoft's incredibly profitable Irish subsidiaries Round Island One and Flat Island Company, Google Ireland Holdings, and a subsidiary of Apple Computer. The conversions have occurred as US tax authorities have increased their scrutiny of international mechanisms used by American multinationals to reduce their taxes at home."

20 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. the US tax code by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is a politician's wet dream of byzantine unfairness and vote buying

    1. Re:the US tax code by GlobalColding · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole tax and governing apparatus is rotten to the core. Money gets wasted without adequate oversight or explanation where it goes. We, the people, are getting shafted and gamed by the people who are supposedly on our payroll. This evolutionary path leads to people learning how to game the people in charge. You can no longer say that "the house always wins"...

    2. Re:the US tax code by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      > You can no longer say that "the house always wins"...

      You're right. Sometimes it's the Senate.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    3. Re:the US tax code by philspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole tax and governing apparatus is rotten to the core. Money gets wasted without adequate oversight or explanation where it goes. We, the people, are getting shafted and gamed by the people who are supposedly on our payroll.

      In all of history, has it EVER been different?

  2. I guess they need to save money while they can by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because IMO Facebook is just another fad and will go the same way as Friends Reunited when something new and shinier comes along or the novelty wears off. Very few trendy websites stay trendy for more than a few years - its only the interesting ones that survive and theres a limit to how much aquaintances boring lives and silly little games can keep you interested over a long period of time.

    1. Re:I guess they need to save money while they can by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Viol8, you've been bitten by a zombie!
      Click here to transfer all your private information to a untrusted 3rd party.

    2. Re:I guess they need to save money while they can by Miamicanes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Plus, Facebook has (at least) one fundamental flaw: it assumes you WANT everyone who you're "friends" with to indiscriminately know about everyone ELSE you're "friends" with. It ignores the fact that you don't necessarily WANT your kid brother (or coworkers, or parents) reading about your wild weekend (or at least not the full details you'd share with your best and closest friends).

      What's needed is a social networking site with a concept of groups as containers for acquaintances and other groups, applying permissions in the order of default-deny, groups with permission, groups denied, individuals permitted, individuals denied. THEN, when you post something, you'd be able to specify its visibility scope across those groups... possibly, even creating fake or munged entries for some groups to see in lieu of "real" entries, and NO way for acquaintances to discern which group(s) they're in, or even which groups exist at all.

      Then, you could create a safe, bland (semi-)public page for (almost) everyone to see, but let the appropriate acquaintances see things appropriate to their relationship with you... and possibly even maintain one or more "parallel universes" that completely override each other for people with two or more groups of friends that should (ideally) NEVER encounter each other (parents and drinking buddies being an obvious example). Ideally, you could even set up one or more "duress" passwords that logged you in as an admin for your profile with access to only a subset of your real one, in case someone like a girlfriend or family member coerced you into logging in with them present to "prove" something. By allowing an unlimited number of duress passwords with unlimited groups and parallel universes, you'd effectively achieve plausible deniability... nobody could ever force you to reveal things, because they could never know for sure whether you were logged in with a duress password or your real one.

      The sad thing is, a feature like THIS would be the perfect way to monetize something like Facebook... keeping the current model free, but charging monthly or annual fees to add more sophisticated group management and/or depth.

    3. Re:I guess they need to save money while they can by edmicman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They already have something like this. It's called the Internet. I can have my group of Facebook friends, my self-hosted blog where people know it's me, my self-hosted blog at a different registered domain under a pseudonym where I can post my propaganda, my Flickr stream, my Google Groups persona, my Slashdot persona, and my personas at any number of other forums/communities.

  3. It's not the taxes or the talent by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the Guinness. Just tastes better the closer you are to St. James's Gate.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  4. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The solution to the US going further in the hole every day isn't more taxes, it's to stop pissing away money like $700 billion is pocket change.

    --
    Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  5. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by hobbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey, you guys all but invented "letting the market decide", so if you're not the most attractive country in which to pay tax, surely you'll be redressing that through competition, not regulation?!

    --
    "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  6. duh by einer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Corporations seek environments where they can generate the most profit. Get over it. America is quickly becoming a business unfriendly environment. Taxation, absurd regulations (for example, you CAN'T test 100% of your cattle for BSE no matter how much your customers want it, or how competative it will make you), insane legal exposure...

    Welcome to the "service economy."

  7. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 4, Informative

    In fairness, the $700 billion may be a cure for the billions that were pissed away before, but it is hard to tell these days.

    --
    ~ Ron Fitzgerald
  8. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Adam Smith was a Scot, not an Irishman.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  9. No Patriotic duty by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Gregory v. Helvering Supreme Court Justice Learned Hand was quoted as saying:

    "Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands."
    Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935).

    The fact is tax avoidance is a key part of keeping taxation in check. If it gets oppressive, you move. In this way, governments compete for taxpayers.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  10. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't you know, it's important for the economy to pass it as quickly as possible. Not because the economy would stop, but because a 2 day delay meant 400+ pages of unrelated pork and complications to the tax code.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Re:Avoiding US taxes by setting up overseas by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The middle-class need tax relief. So let's tax the big companies they all work for much more heavily.

    This will surely help the middle-class employees of these large greedy companies. In order to remain competitive in this global economy these large companies must move out of the USA because the taxes are so burdensome here.

    Thanks Obama! That really helped a lot!

  12. Re:Local world-class FINANCIAL talent by Azghoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Ireland is smarter than us in how they go about attracting corporate dollars... ... and you fault THEM for it?

    Maybe if we were a little more competitive companies wouldn't bother fleeing there. Just a thought.

  13. McCain called it? by natedubbya · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of you may remember the Presidential debate only 6 days ago. As soon as I saw this story, I recalled McCain's argument for lowering business taxes. He used a very specific example...Ireland.

    You can see the video here with the Ireland remark highlighted.

    I took the liberty of transcribing McCain's words. Not to go totally partisan up in here....but you gotta give him props for calling this one:

    The business tax. Right now, United States of America business pays the second highest business taxes in the world, 35%. Ireland pays 11%. Now, if you're a business person, and you can locate any place in the world, then obviously if you go to the country where it's 11% tax versus 35, you'll be able to create jobs, increase your business, make more investment, etc. I want to cut that business tax. I want to cut it so that businesses remain in America and create jobs.

  14. Re:Local world-class FINANCIAL talent by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ireland is not smarter. We are just desperate.

    You must understand that Ireland, as a country, had nothing. The most common phrase I hear from older people about the past is: "This country had nothing". The sad fact is, beneath it all, Ireland still has nothing. We have no natural resources, a low population, poor infrastructure, no significant industrial base. We are an island, and communications with the continent have always been expensive, slow and prone to monopolies. Corruption is and always was a very serious problem. We have a weak judiciary, a rather inept legislature and an effective one-party system. None of these points is a crippling issue, but you must understand that Ireland was never traditionally an attractive place to invest.

    The low corporation tax rate is the only, and I mean the only , thing that this country has to attract foreign investment. No one is very happy with this, least of all ordinary people who have to pay ~45% income tax rates to make up for the attractive 12.5% taxes paid by corporations and yet still have to put up with a substandard public service. Ireland is a leader in the race to the bottom, and it cannot be denied that this policy has paid off. Big fish like Microsoft, Pfizer, Dell, Intel, etc have contributed substantially to Ireland's transition from a second world country in 1990, to a ... well talk to me after the current crisis is over, but I'll say for now a first world one.

    The low corporation tax had lead to some substantial anomalies. Former Taoiseach Garret Fitzgerald has argued for years that Ireland's official GDP figures are grossly misleading, with a very small amount of foreign companies contributing a sizeable fraction of GDP(If I remember correctly, Pfizer's Viagra operation in Cork alone was said to account for 3% of GDP). But because the tax rate is so low, these profits will largely be sent back to their home countries, and the country will not see the benefit(as much).

    Make no mistake, Ireland has made a Faustian deal with multinational companies. If even one, just one, major american company decides to pack up and head elsewhere, this country will feel the impact for many years. The company might consider its presence relatively small in global terms, but in Irish terms Microsoft's Dublin office is akin to Ma Bell in its heyday. At this point, we literally cannot afford to ever increase the corporation tax rate to anywhere near the rate in England or the continent. If we do, one or more multinational companies will leave, and the country will go under.

    Many of these same reasons lay behind the bail out of Irish banks this week by the government. Our banks are small in global terms, but if they go down, we go down with them. (And they were going down. Ireland's housing crisis is exactly the same as in the US only even more extreme). Before you mention it, I will say that yes, this country as a whole has been mismanaged. For many years. I and most people living here are chronically aware of this fact.

    Ireland has changed substantially in the last ~15 years. But I must stress that our great national fear has never gone away. That fear is that the country will become utterly bankrupt, and everyone in it will be reduced to abject poverty. "This country was a disaster." I've been told this over and over ad nauseum since I was old enough to speak. Even the cubs of the Celtic Tiger, for all their confidence, are dimly aware of this fact. Despite all the mobile phones and iPods, green beer, SUV's, wine counters, foreign holidays, etc, etc, Irish people collectively have not and will never let go of this one, real and ever present terror that they will be, as a nation, pauperised. Again. It has happened over and over and over. In the 1930's, the 1950's and the 1980's, and that's just in the modern era.

    Ireland still, to this day, has very little going for it, and people here will do everything they can to avoid going back to nothing. As such, I seriously doubt that they

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!