Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Michael Robertson Sued Over Missing Linspire Cash

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the transparency-whether-you-like-it-or-not dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Blogger and ex-Linspire CEO Kevin Carmony reports that Michael Robertson has been sued by a Linspire shareholder to get to the bottom of what happened to Linspire's assets. One hundred shareholders have been left uninformed as to what happened to the company and its assets after Linspire was sold to Xandros a few months back."

65 comments

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    better get used to the feeling of my massive first post lodged up your faggot ass, you homos!

  2. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He freed the money as part of his Open Vault Software initiative.

  3. What assets? by Onaga · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux isn't profitable...

    1. Re:What assets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here is a serious side of that question, since I am seriously curious: What did Linspire earn money from? How do they make $20 million in profit when anybody can download their competition, Ubuntu and CentOS and etc, for free? What was their business model and who was paying them money?

    2. Re:What assets? by wastedlife · · Score: 4, Informative

      OEMs. A lot of the cheap-ass linux desktops at Fry's and Walmart used to be sold running Lindows/Linspire (I think gOS and Xandros have stolen that market). Also, I believe they were looking to sell their "Click N Run" package manager for use in Ubuntu and possibly other distros.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  4. BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    This is what it would be like, if the majority of people were athiests.
    ATHIEST KID: Mom, I'm going to go fuck a hooker.
    ATHIEST MOM: Okay, son.
    ATHIEST KID: Afterwards, I'm going to go smoke pot with my friends, since it's "not addictive."
    ATHIEST MOM: Okay, come home soon!

    The athiest kid leaves the room. The father comes home from work several minutes later.

    ATHIEST DAD: Hey!
    ATHIEST MOM: Hi, honey! I'm pregnant again. I guess I'll just get another abortion, since "fetuses don't count as human life."
    ATHIEST DAD: Okay, get as many abortions as you want!
    ATHIEST MOM: Oh, and don't go in the bedroom.
    ATHIEST DAD: Why not?
    ATHIEST MOM: There are two gay men fucking eachother in there.
    ATHIEST DAD: Why are they here?
    ATHIEST MOM: I wanted to watch them do it for awhile. They just aren't finished yet.
    ATHIEST DAD: Okay, that's fine with me!

    Suddenly, their neighbor runs into the house.

    ATHIEST NEIGHBOR: Come quick, there's a Christian outside!
    ATHIEST MOM: We'll be right there!

    The athiest couple quickly put on a pair of black robes and hoods. They then exit the house, and run into the street, where a Christian is nailed to a large, wooden X. He is being burned alive. A crowd of athiests stand around him, all wearing black robes and hoods.

    RANDOM ATHIEST: Damn you, Christian! We hate you! We claim to be tolerant of all religions. But we really hate yours'! That's because we athiests are hypocritical like that! Die, Christian!

    THE END

    Scary, isn't it?

    1. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jack, jack jack.

      I wish you'd just go back to writing your hilarious cartoons.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by cthulu_mt · · Score: 2, Funny

      A +++

      Would subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    3. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Where's your neighborhood? I'm not sure I want to live there - but visiting would be entertaining.

    4. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Keep 4chan copypasta on 4chan newfag

    5. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Nice try novice but this is obviously bullshit because no self-respecting atheist woman would have an abortion when a fully born baby for sacrifices is much more valuable.

      On a serious note, I'm glad you can't prove God exists so we'll never have to take your childish beliefs seriously.

    6. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by toadlife · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here you go!

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    7. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, if Business - Jesus = Theft + Corruption, it follows that Business = Theft + Corruption + Jesus!

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    8. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Mod parent down.

      Anyone who can't spell "atheist" is a troll.

    9. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Jesus Christ, Christians are IDIOTS!

    10. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by the_womble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, if Business - Jesus = Theft + Corruption, it follows that Business = Theft + Corruption + Jesus!

      Both you and the GP are assuming that Business and Jesus can run together. In fact there are well fundamental incompatibilities between the output Business produces and the input expected by Jesus.

      It is worth noting that other claimed incompatibilities are pure FUD.

      The problem has been repeatedly highlighted by Jesus developers, and the project lead has recommended uninstalling business and similar proprietary apps. This has been unpopular with Business advocates and probably contributed to his legal difficulties.

      The most reliable approach is to use only software meeting the standards set by the Christ Software Foundation. Some people have taken this approach, but they have had to be willing to accept limited access to some codecs.

      Some people have managed to run Money while Jesus executes in a separate VM, but this is probably not a good idea. Jesus is really designed to run as a hypervisor.

    11. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could become one of the greatest Green Party slogans, and drag the corporation hating conspiracy nuts right in (at least this time around: Thanks Bear Stearns!): Put it on the front of a shirt with the new ARPA half-ass half-elephant logo, and a typical Green Party logo on the back.

    12. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rules 1 and 2. Also, I've never seen this copypasta on 4chan.

    13. Re:BUSINESS - JESUS = CORRUPTION AND THEFT by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Is their daughter hot?

      ATHIEST DAUGHTER: Hi ozphx, I hear you have a massive cock!
      ATHEIST OZPHX: Why yes, I certainly do, young lady!
      ATHIEST DAUGHTER: Mind if I ride it for a while? I hear premarital sex is fun!
      JESUS: Hell yes, give that slut one for me!
      ATHIEST OZPHX: Thanks Jesus!

      THE END

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  5. I thought there wasn't much more to say... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...other than the caption in the article, "Michael Robertson - Greedy, crook or just incompetent?"

    Then I found this earlier entry: http://kevincarmony.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2008-07-12T08:40:00-07:00&max-results=7

    It gives details on the company's structure and what Roberts was doing to steal money from the company. Interesting stuff.

    --
    Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
    1. Re:I thought there wasn't much more to say... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whoops! That link will take you to a page full of entries. Here is the direct link to the specific entry:

      http://kevincarmony.blogspot.com/2008/07/michael-robertson-speaks-intentions.html

      --
      Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
    2. Re:I thought there wasn't much more to say... by ray-auch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like things are the same the world over... with the key words being "minority shareholder".

      Unless it's a public company (and sometimes even then) that tends to mean you have the right to get shafted (and not a lot else).

      The majority (which could well be the guy you fell out with plus the one or two he bribed) can vote you down and do pretty much what they want - including selling for much less than the company is worth, or just diluting your equity to worthless. Of course, they'll be involved in whatever corporate entity benefits from the transaction - and you won't.

      Oh, you might have lots of fancy contracts protecting minority shareholder rights etc. - but in the end they'll just be more worthless paper to file with the share certificates.

      No no, I'm not bitter, not at all :-/

    3. Re:I thought there wasn't much more to say... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oh, you might have lots of fancy contracts protecting minority shareholder rights etc. - but in the end they'll just be more worthless paper to file with the share certificates.

      Did you sue?

  6. What? by No2Gates · · Score: 0

    Wait, I thought since I founded the company, that I got to keep the cash. What is all this accounting mumbo-jumbo about? Sarbanes-Oxley? Who is he?

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  7. LNL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Linspire is not Linux ... it's a mutant created using a Linux kernel but designed around interoperability with MS Windows-type programming. Programs for Linspire are/were not free and certainly were not Linux ... actually there was very little about it that was Linux or even Linux-like. They were trying to make money off of being "not MS and not Linux, either".

    1. Re:LNL by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, Linspire was as much linux as any other distro. It was KDE with all the usual programs, though most of them renamed. It included proprietary codecs and a commercial dvd player, but was 99% open source and had a 100% open source derivative freespire.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:LNL by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      They were trying to make money off of being "not MS and not Linux, either".

      How do they explain it "not selling"?

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    3. Re:LNL by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Um, well then its Linux. Linux is just a kernel, nothing more, if it has the Linux kernel, its Linux. Now I think maybe you meant its not GNU/Linux or something along that lines of that perhaps.

    4. Re:LNL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is not if it was as linux as any other distro, but if it was as GNU.

  8. Ummm... by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I fail to see how Linspire was ever profitable. It didn't offer anything revolutionary and was basically Debian/Ubuntu with a few extra features that no one cared about. Can someone please enlighten me on how Linspire was ever a force in the market?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Ummm... by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

      It doesn't matter - if it was bought out, the shareholders are entitled to value for their shares, no matter how little that might be. Wouldn't you be pissed off if you held a couple thousand shares and got deprived of your $1.25?

    2. Re:Ummm... by Vectronic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think Linspire was every really profitable, nor was it ever a "force in the market" this is just about a couple shareholders wondering where the money they thought they were going to get...went...

    3. Re:Ummm... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how Linspire was ever profitable. It didn't offer anything revolutionary and was basically Debian/Ubuntu with a few extra features that no one cared about. Can someone please enlighten me on how Linspire was ever a force in the market?

      I believe they made their money with OEMs and retail stores that were stupid enough to by their products and attempt to resell them.

    4. Re:Ummm... by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I fail to see how Linspire was ever profitable.

      Didn't Linspire get $20M from Microsoft for changing its name from Lindows?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Ummm... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      As I recall, Walmart shipped Linspire as the OEM OS for a while. Deals like that tend to infuse quite a bit of cash into a small company like Linspire. Michael Roberts might have you believe that they had hundreds of engineers pouring their souls into improving Windows compatibility, but that's most likely Roberts being Roberts. (Which is to say an extreme exaggerator at best, an outright liar at worst.) Their actual burn rate doesn't sound like it was all that high based on the descriptions of the company.

      --
      Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
    6. Re:Ummm... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Well there's their Walmart deal, I believe they also got some money out of Microsoft as well.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    7. Re:Ummm... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "It didn't offer anything revolutionary and was basically Debian/Ubuntu with a few extra features that no one cared about"

      Isn't there a similiar relationship between Linux and UNIX?

    8. Re:Ummm... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``I fail to see how Linspire was ever profitable. It didn't offer anything revolutionary and was basically Debian/Ubuntu with a few extra features that no one cared about.''

      A lot of businesses profit by selling what someone else already does better for free.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    9. Re:Ummm... by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I do remember seeing Linspire CDs for sale at Fry's right next to the OEM Windows CDs. All the other linux distros were stuck it the linux section, far far away. Walmart sold Linspire systems as well. So some effective attempt at marketing it and getting product placement was made. Doesn't rule out embezzlement, but I think a good effort was made by the company to challenge the MS juggernaut. If I were a shareholder I would strongly question a lack of profit.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    10. Re:Ummm... by schotty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although mostly true, as a former user, I can say the presentation + CNR was what made it a hit with the userbase.

      CNR was the icing on the cake -- the package cake. Red Hat and Novell never had that. Now Canonical has something like it bundled with Ubuntu, as does Fedora with their own. Plus it was one of the cleaner KDE based desktops I have ever used. Coming from a diehard GNOME/Fluxbox guy -- that should be taken as some praise.

      The only issue I saw with the distro was a lack of updates to the kernel. As we all know the kernel adds so much more than just some update, but rather more and imporved device support. It was awful at times to not have properly working modules when Fedora, SuSE, and Mandriva did.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    11. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had some friends working at Xandros at the time. What heard was the Linspire sub-contracted all that work out to Xandros. So I don't think they had that many people working on it in house. I do know that the Xandros people did a fair bit of work, but I'm not 100% sure how much was free software and how much was proprietary.

      It's interesting the Xandros ended up buying Linspire and the Linspire investors ended up with no money. Seems a bit fishy to me...

    12. Re:Ummm... by ozphx · · Score: 1

      You mean retail stores whose customers expect things like "DVD playback" to work?

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  9. I worked for Robertson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And this doesn't surprise me. He is a pretty shady character. He was the typical, ego-crazed rich guy who loved pushing everyone else around.

    Ever since he tried to defend running as root, I never trusted the guy.

    1. Re:I worked for Robertson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ever since he tried to defend running as root

      Well, how do you expect him to empty your bank accounts if you don't let him in through the back-end?

    2. Re:I worked for Robertson by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd empty my balls if ellen page would let me in through her back-end

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:I worked for Robertson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked for Michael Robertson at MP3.com. I was there pre-IPO. MP3.com was a wonderful place to work. My favorite gig ever. But dealing with Michael was the least pleasing aspect of the whole thing. He was incredibly arrogant, rude, and obnoxious.

      I'll never forget how he treated this intern kid who was somebody's personal assistant or something. He said he was looking for some big meeting or something. I knew there was a meeting going on in the main conference room so I pointed him that way and followed him there to make sure he found it. He went in to the meeting presumably already in progress and said "I'm so and so's assistant here for such and such meeting" and Michael said "No you aren't, get out!" The poor dude was crushed and I felt bad for having steered him into Michael's venom.

      I did ok financially out of MP3.com having sold the first quarter of my options as soon as they vested (the rest weren't worth much though) so I don't hold any grudge over money (although I know plenty who do and feel like Lindows and other ill-conceived ventures were funded using THEIR money after he cratered their stock options) I just feel bad for how he treated people.

      I once heard one of the tech guys complaining about how Michael loved to say "If I gave you a million dollars could you make this work?!?!" And of course they did because they were rock stars and of course he didn't because he was a bastard.

      Of course, Kevin Carmony was a douche and a half as well and I'm not surprised he had problems at Lindows. He definitely doesn't really get the Free Software thing or he never would have had anything to do with it. They were both trying to take advantage of the "suckers" who give their work away for free.

      Posting anonymously because lots of ex-mp3'ers read /. and I still have to work in this town.

    4. Re:I worked for Robertson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for both Robertson and Carmony. I found Robertson to be as you described, but Carmony was great to work for. He and Robertson had lots of disagreements, and it was Robertson who refused to have a free version and such. First thing Carmony did when becoming CEO was to create Freespire, make CNR free, open source the CNR client, and so on. Robertson was one of the worst people I have ever worked for, Carmony one of the best.

    5. Re:I worked for Robertson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it was not Steve Jobs
      ?

  10. Click N Run by HalAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Click N Run was one aspect responsible for their fame. They would take the care to improve and provide pre-configured desktop software in an interface that made it easy to install the software. This was before Synaptic Package Manager was able to do the same thing. Also, before they were called "Linspire", they had the controversial name "Lindows", which connoted that they were trying to provide a Linux desktop that would do things most typical Windows users wanted. A lot of users tried to switch to Linux many times but were frustrated by the experience, so this really had the power to draw a lot of people in. I think that Ubuntu and Fedora succeeded where Linspire failed though.

    --
    Twinstiq, game news
  11. A fool and his money... by haggie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Michael Robertson makes Charles Ponzi look legit. Investing in a Robertson start-up is moronic. You would get a better return if you had put $200K in an IndyMac savings account.

    1. Re:A fool and his money... by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      No joke. Being from San Diego myself, there's no way I would work for, nor invest in, a Robertson-headed company. Back in the day, my brother interviewed at MP3.com after graduating from UCSD, when MP3.com was still a hot property. It was his good fortune that another company made him an offer first, and he took it. Not to say that Robertson's vision of one way digital music ought to work was necessarily a bad one, but he himself doesn't strike me as being all that capable of successfully implementing a visionary idea. Also, he almost certainly had to have known that he couldn't beat the record companies in court and that they would come after him hard. Whether he's dumb, a crook, or both shall be left as an exercise for the reader.

  12. Habitual Failure by bedouin · · Score: 1

    Every project this guy has touched has turned to shit.

  13. Slow news day or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    I can't believe this kind of tripe is making the rounds at /. What's next? Bill Gates reveals his favorite color is peach?

    Puhlease

  14. Hey let's do the Lindows rock! by Legion_SB · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Assets going lower now... going lower now... how loooow can they go?

    First you do the steal and run
    Embezzlement is so fun!
    Lots of money in my house
    Keep it quiet, don't tell the spouse!

    Kevin Carmony, stupid hick!
    Wants the cash back, what a dick!
    All around the Lindows clock!
    Hey let's do the Lindows rock!

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  15. Roll back by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Time to start back-dating invoices and generating fake receipts. Not that he would actually be able to do that...I mean you would have to know people who were experts in computer....oh wait.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  16. bwahaha by clusterlizard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like a good trainwreck, I can't stop watching

    --
    i took a bitchslapping for natalie portman
  17. Re:Ummm... Could it be that Linspire was... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    very unlinspiring?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  18. Listening to a used car salesman like Carmony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Linux isn't profitable...

    Yeah, because according to Carmony were all pirating someones IP right?

    Kevin Carmony, Darl McBride.
    Separated at birth.

  19. teach me to enjoy the feeling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'cause hetero's like me want to know, lonely girl, lonely girl...

  20. Former Fan by minus-sign · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually liked Linspire. The idea was simple and could have been very profitable: a Linux based OS that was professionally supported. You pay for patches and updates and know it retains support because, well, you pay for it. It didn't work out that way, but the theory was sound. Sorry to see its gone so very very bad.

  21. I actually liked Linspire. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I don't like Linspire, which I got preinstalled on a PC, so much as I liked the idea behind CNR, Click N Run. I got it more than 2 years ago yet CNR hasn't done much since. They were supposed to create clients for other Linux distros but all they have now is Ubuntu and one other.

    Falcon

    --
    Should there be a Law?
  22. What other manure piles should we avoid? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    For the /. record, what other projects should we be aware of?

    Curious,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:What other manure piles should we avoid? by revxul · · Score: 1

      Robertson was behind the original mp3.com, founded in 1997, which had an immense amount of independent music for free on it. I miss that site. He screwed it up in 2000 with my.mp3.com, a service in which users could register their CD collection and then stream it from the mp3.com servers from mp3s the site itself had ripped and stored. They were financially eviscerated via lawsuits and sold off to Vivendi Universal in 2001. Vivendi just couldn't make it work and dismantled the site entirely. The whole collection of independent music was tanked and the site was sold off to CNet in 2003. It is now a shadow of what it used to be.

      --
      Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    2. Re:What other manure piles should we avoid? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      Interesting, my brother lost the one online portal he had for his original music when that site tanked. (He's since moved onto MySpace.) I'd wondered what had happened to mp3.com... Thanks for the description.

      Are there any other projects of Robertson's that we should know about?

      Cheers,

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    3. Re:What other manure piles should we avoid? by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 1

      According to the judge in EMI's case against mp3tunes.com he now operates mp3tunes.com and sideload.com.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful