Slashdot Mirror


Getting Paid To Abandon an Open Source Project?

darkeye writes "I'm facing a difficult dilemma and looking for opinions. I've been contributing heavily to an open source project, making considerable changes to code organization and quality, but the work is unfinished at the moment. Now, a company is approaching me to continue my changes. They want to keep the improvements to themselves, which is possible since the project is published under the BSD license. That's fair, as they have all the rights to the work they pay for in full. However, they also want me to sign a non-competition clause, which would bar me from ever working on and publishing results for the original open source project itself, even if done separately, in my free time. How would you approach such a decision? On one side, they'd provide resources to work on an interesting project. On the other, it would make me an outcast in the project's community. Moreover, they would take ownership of not just what they paid for, but also my changes leading up to this moment, and I wouldn't be able to continue on my original codebase in an open source manner if I sign their contract."

9 of 654 comments (clear)

  1. The dark side (tm) by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't begin to imagine the power of the dark side.

    --
    Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    1. Re:The dark side (tm) by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's obviously already a heretic whose head should be put on a pike and bandied around the halls of the FSF, because, well, duh, BSD licensing is practically the same thing as throwing your code in a junkyard or landfill. It's a travesty.

      Now everybody get your torches and pitchforks, and chant "G-P-L," repeatedly if you will.

    2. Re:The dark side (tm) by mechsoph · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, when did the Red Cross become evil?

    3. Re:The dark side (tm) by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      And pray they don't read slashdot, since your complete negotiating strategy will be available online. Way to go..

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:The dark side (tm) by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "That exchange is just as frequently attributed to George Bernard Shaw, and occasionally to Groucho Marx. Nobody seems to have a source, though, so it's pretty likely that none of them said it!"

      It was me, I did it in a bar awhile back....was hilarious.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:The dark side (tm) by Sneftel · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was the lamest In Soviet Russia joke ever.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
  2. let me get this straight... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, they're offering to pay you to go fork yourself?

  3. Re:What I would do is this... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they did not accept that, I would forbid them to use any code from the project, and bring down the wrath of the relevant copyright laws, if they were not prepared to abide by the licensing terms.

    Highly aggressive and completely clueless, not a good combination.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  4. Re:Sell out if you want but don't sell out cheap by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    how many of you would look down on him for "selling out" for USD1 billion?

    Depends. Are we talking 2009 dollars or 2010 dollars?

    --
    I hate printers.