Slashdot Mirror


Researchers To Build Underwater Airplane

coondoggie writes to tell us that DARPA seems to still be having fun with their funding and continues to aim for the "far out." The latest program, a submersible airplane, seems to have been pulled directly from science fiction. Hopefully this voyage to the bottom of the sea is of the non-permanent variety. "According to DARPA: 'The difficulty with developing such a craft come from the diametrically opposed requirements that exist for an airplane and a submarine. While the primary goal for airplane designers is to try and minimize weight, a submarine must be extremely heavy in order to submerge underwater. In addition, the flow conditions and the systems designed to control a submarine and an airplane are radically different, due to the order of magnitude difference in the densities of air and water.'"

10 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Crazy DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Airplanes underwater??? This is crazy talk! Next they will wants subs that fly!

    1. Re:Crazy DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're on the right track. Imagine a submersible aircraft carrier that launches flying submarines. Consider your mind blown.

    2. Re:Crazy DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can I buy some pot from you?

  2. Re:Steve Fossett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linky

    Steve Fossett's Unfinished Project
    Posted by kdawson on Sunday October 05, @02:36AM
    from the ocean-flying dept.
    Transportation Science Technology
    MazzThePianoman writes "Steve Fossett left behind a secret vessel project called the Deep Flight Challenger. Fossett was funding the development of a winged submersible being designed by Hawkes Ocean Technologies in California. The intent was for the vehicle to be capable of travel to the very bottom of the ocean -- the Mariana Trench, more than 11,000 meters beneath the surface. 'It would have dramatically, dramatically opened the oceans for exploration. It would have been a game changer,' said Graham Hawkes, the designer. Testing had been completed at Department of Defense facilities. Field testing was only four weeks away when Fossett's untimely death, a year ago, put the project on hold." Hawkes Ocean Technologies owns the design but the vehicle itself is owned by Fossett's estate.

  3. Steve Fosset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't have anything to say, but everybody else is posting stuff with "Steve Fosset" as the title.

  4. start with mother nature by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    study up on flying fish and flying squid

    then dabble in cormorants and water beetles

    once again, mother nature was here first and has a lot to teach us about where to start

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. Water is 830 times more dense than air by XSpud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before they go too far with the designs, DARPA might want to check their figures for the densities of water and air. Last time I checked they differed by a lot more than "an order of magnitude" and I'd think this might be important.

  6. Requisite Futurama Quote by egyptiankarim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We're taking over 150 atmospheres of pressure!"

    "How many atmospheres can this ship take?"

    "Well, it's a spaceship, so I'd say anywhere between 0 and 1."

    --
    Eek!
  7. Re:Steve Fossett by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was Fossett's project I believe. They already have a design and partial prototype yes?

    I think they've built a prototype, yes. Unfortunately, the test of the prototype of Fossett's follow-on project, an airplane that can fly underground, ended in disaster.

    Too soon?

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  8. diametrically opposed is good! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're saying how the requirements for submersibles and aircraft are diametrically opposed. That's good! If they were only kinda in opposite directions, that'd be a challenge. But calling on my vast electrical engineering knowledge (and what is mechanical engineering but electrical engineering with molecules instead of electrons?), I can tell you this is easy. What do you do if you discover that your current is diametrically opposed to what you want? That's right, you flip the terminals around, and bam your current is spot on!

    So, using the same principle. In air you want the plane light and lift high because gravity means the natural tendency of the plane is to go downward and you want to go up. Underwater, gravity turns into buoyancy and your plane would naturally want to go up when you want it to go down. This sounds like our current problem -- we have a plane that flies perfectly in air, but in water goes the opposite direction of what we want. So what do we do? Yeah, we just flip it. Now the "lift" of the wings is pointed down. All you need then is an engine that works in air and water, and either a crew compartment that rotates to stay vertical, or sturdy straps and training for pilots to maneuver while upside-down. Done!

    I just but the reversed-wing thing is actually used in some high speed submersible. Exercise on how to make it work in either direction above/below water left as an exercise for the DARPA grantee.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are