Slashdot Mirror


EU Wants Removable Batteries In iPhones

MojoKid writes "Current regulation, introduced with the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) in July of 2006, primarily sought to prevent the unnecessary use of toxic metals in batteries as well as making it easier to recycle and dispose of used batteries. The updated 'New Batteries Directive,' as discussed in New Electronics by Gary Nevision, would go much further. Article 11 of the directive, as currently written, would require that devices must be made in such a way as to allow batteries, either for replacement or at end of life for disposal to be 'readily removed.' Of course, Apple's iPhones and iPods wouldn't meet this requirement, as it stands. It's obvious that an iPhone battery replacement program could be considered a cash cow for Apple as well."

16 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Mooo by LMacG · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean this iPhone battery replacement program?

    $85.95! That's a lot of milk.

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    1. Re:Mooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      When the battery costs 12$ to buy yeah, I'd say 74$ in profit for replacing the battery is a lot of milk.

    2. Re:Mooo by who+knows+my+name · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is positive legislation. It is going to ensure that customers have cheaper and competitive ways to replace batteries.

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    3. Re:Mooo by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      $15.. do it yourself. I have changed out the batteries in three IPods already.

    4. Re:Mooo by Mascot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Beats me. I bought my only iPod without realizing the insane cost of battery replacement. When the battery failed after less than a year of low use, I spent a few bucks more than the battery replacement would have cost me and bought something non-Apple (twice the storage, three times the battery life, if I remember correctly). I have stayed away from Apple products ever since.

      While there are stories of those with batteries that seem to last forever, the general feeling I get is that Apple keep marginalizing their battery capacity to shrink their products. Less capacity equals more frequent recharging which means they run out of cycles that much sooner.

    5. Re:Mooo by David_Hart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Want to know where to take your used batteries, two words: Radio Shack

    6. Re:Mooo by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe that you're looking for this:

      An iPhone that had a user replaceable battery would be an iPhone that sucks a little more than the current one, and IMHO it would not be a net benefit.

      Heck I own an (2G) iPhone and I am quite happy with it, but justifying the lack of an user replaced battery this way is just silly. He could try arguing that way no third party batteries will find their way into iPhones and explode, but there has been a fine share of iPods exploding and melting down as well. I refuse to believe that adding a suitable battery compartment like every other fucking phone manufacturer out there has done would make the iPhone suck more. If the iPhone 3G hadn't done away with the recessed earphone plug he'd say it was a feature designed to get the dust out of there or something. Geez.

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  2. Re:Back handed protectionism by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of times I'd agree with you (the EU is HIGHLY protectionist) but in this case it doesn't work. Go to any cell phone outlet in Asia - look at even the Chinese-only or Korean-only cell phones. ALL have removable batteries. Samsung, Motorola, LG, Palm, RIM, pretty much everyone uses replaceable batteries. Except Apple.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  3. I agree on principle, but: by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

    The flip side of the coin is then Apple handheld products, like everything else, will be subjected to the usual flood of crappy, knock-off, sub-standard aftermarket batteries we've all come to know and hate passionately. Apple may have designed these devices in such a way that they've created a monopoly on battery replacement, but on the other hand at least you know you're getting a proper battery.

  4. Re:iPhone??? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Informative

    My Sansa E2?? doesn't have an easy popout battery that I can find. I haven't looked close enough but it has a few screws on the back.

    To some people what's the difference between a tiny screwdriver and a case splitter for the iPod. If I did get inside it's not like the battery is something I could go down to Best Buy and get. So how is it any more easily replaced?

  5. Re:400 recharges by Altus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fractional charges only count as fractional charges. If your iphone is at 80% and you plug it into your computer and it charges up to 100% that is only 1/5th of a charge. You can do that 5 more times before you have even used a single recharge.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  6. Re:iPhone??? by rpmayhem · · Score: 2, Informative

    I assume you are talking about the e2xx series. The battery is very easy to replace. The replacement kit even comes with instructions and a screw driver. Only costs $20. http://go.shopsansa.com/content/batterykit Both my wife and I have e2xx series players. We love them. One of the big draws was the replaceable battery for $20.

  7. Re:cash cow how? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Could you please point me to the model you have? I can only find 4-8GB flash players. One review even has It's bulky for a flash player. as a "The Bad".

    I just went to Insignia's website and found 2 models. A 4GB MP3 player and an 8GB Video/MP3 player. (Aside from their website seemingly written by 2 completely different groups, both had different units, 4GB in metric, 8GB in English)

    4GB
    Dimensions:
    15mm X 46mm X 102mm (.59" X 1.8" X 4.0")
    Weight: 0.068 kg (2.4 oz)

    8GB
    Dimensions:
    10.16mm X 40.65 mm X 83.83mm (0.4" X 1.6" X 3.3")
    Weight: 0.060kg (2.1 oz.)

    This is the specs for the current Nano (which comes in 8 or 16 GB).
    Dimensions:
    6.2mm X 38.7mm X 90.7mm (0.24" X 1.5" X 3.6")
    Weight:
    0.037 grams (1.3 ounces)

    And here's a "big ole" iPod Classic.
    Dimensions:
    10.5 mm X 61.8 mm X 103.5 mm (0.41" X 2.4" X 4.1")
    Weight: .140 kg (4.9 ounces)

    So by "not making the device any larger" you mean making the device larger? Not to mention the for the difference between the Nano and the Insignia, you could go up to a Classic and have 15X the storage space.

  8. Re:iPhone users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    What tool with mod points modded this informative?

  9. Re:Why apple doesn't do this... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it. 10 years of Apple products is more than convincing:
    iPod->iPod touch (notice how thin it got)
    iBook->MacBook Air (notice how small/thin it got)

    And you use the word "anticompetitive" in a funny way. You make it sound like Apple's business motive is making money off battery replacements. Apple sells iPods/Macs/iPhones, not batteries. The battery is an incidental, and probably even less profitable than the iTunes store.

    The thin design has multiple benefits for Apple:

    Higher product density (therefore higher profits per cubic foot storage)
    Smaller products are cheaper to ship (lower costs per cubic foot shipping)
    Smaller products require less packaging (lower cost per unit)
    Smaller products require less material (lower cost per unit)

    So there are many reasons beyond design or anticompetitive to make things small/thin

  10. non replaceable batteries by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's a business decision designed on purpose to make people want to upgrade more often than they need to. "oh well, this battery sucks now and the new models are out anyway, and..." That's how that works. Even larger ticket items with batteries like laptops that still have a good used market are almost invariably sold when the built in batteries are mostly hosed, it's a psychological deal there. Especially when the OEM replacement battery is half what the unit is worth, or even more. A variant on planned obsolescence. Anytime there is a hassle for user serviceability with any appliance or gadget, look in that direction. Look at cellphones, this is common as anything, the batteries can typically cost more than another brand new cheap phone of similar make/model. Here's a better analogy, inkjet printers and replacement carts. I don't know how many people just go get another cheap as heck printer once they get sticker shock on a black and white and color cartridge, compared to the cost of yet another cheap inkjet. I know it is false economy, but these manufacturers always seem to do this with parts and so on. I've never done the study but it would be intertesting to say take a car, and see how much it would cost to recreate it all with replacement parts at normal car parts store and then at dealers retail prices. I bet a 20 grand car would cost over a hundred grand if you tried to build one that way.

    Anyway, I like that they are forcing the issue, sealed blackbox gadgets are not any sort of fav for me, just gives me the creeps being a long time nerd and tinkerer. If I can't open it up and play, I don't want the dang thing (probably why I don't own an ipod or iphone). I remember a long time ago going out and getting a long torx screwdriver just so I could take my mac (first computer I owned) 512k apart (still have it, BTW). That was annoying. Couldn't just use a normal phillips or anything. Just wanted to see the inside, hated not being able to do it easier without a special tool. Hate that "special tool" nonsense that manufacturers love..anything to gouge a few more pennies out of you or make it a hassle so you use their "special" repair shops.