Slashdot Mirror


International Spam Ring Shut Down

smooth wombat writes "An international spam ring with ties to Australia, New Zealand, China, India, and the US is in the process of being shut down. Finances of members in the US are being frozen using the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 while the FBI is pursuing criminal charges. The group sent spam advertising male enhancement herbs and other items using a botnet estimated at 35,000 computers, and able to send 10 billion emails per day. The Federal Trade Commission monitored the group's finances and found that they had cleared $400,000 in Visa charges in one month alone."

12 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Jeez you people... by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just stop buying stuff advertised by spam already.

    1. Re:Jeez you people... by ari_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I want to punch every one of those assholes who buys products advertised by spam e-mail in his face. I've been saying for years that, if the supply of gullible idiots with credit cards dried up, the spammers would reduce their efforts drastically.

    2. Re:Jeez you people... by master5o1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe to apply for a credit card, instead of beiing age>=18*, there should be a gullible test.

      *
      If age >= 18 then can get a credit card;
      else only with parental consent.

      --
      signature is pants
    3. Re:Jeez you people... by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And if pig's could fly...

      The OP's point was pointless. An astoundingly small percentage of the population responds to Spam. There is no way imaginable to magically stop every single ignorant, insecure, chump with a credit card from using it for herbal penis pills.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Jeez you people... by antic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And those people are not going to be reading Slashdot. That's why I'm surprised that the government and ISPs have not cooperated to mount a branded effort to discredit spam (risk of stolen credit card, product not showing up, etc) and educate the masses.

      If spam is a burden for ISPs (extra bandwidth, plus complaining users) surely they'd jump on board a campaign if a government or organised group could provide good educational materials.

      We watch awkward anti-piracy spiels in cinemas before movies, why couldn't ISPs incorpoate anti-spam messages into their sites, marketing material, bills, etc?

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    5. Re:Jeez you people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And if pig's could fly...

      The OP's point was pointless. An astoundingly small percentage of the population responds to Spam. There is no way imaginable to magically stop every single ignorant, insecure, chump with a credit card from using it for herbal penis pills.

      We could lace the herbal penis pills with cyanide. Then they'd only buy once.

  2. We got mentioned! by MavEtJu · · Score: 5, Funny

    An international spam ring with ties to Australia, New Zealand, China, India, and the US is in the process of being shut down.

    China: > 1 billion people.
    India: > 1 billion people.
    USA: > 300 million people.
    Australia: > 21 million people.
    New Zealand: > 4 million people.

    But the most important thing, we got mentioned!

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  3. This won't solve anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your post advocates a

    ( ) technical (x) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    (x) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
    ( ) The police will not put up with it
    ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    (x) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    ( ) Asshats
    (x) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    (x) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    (x) Extreme profitability of spam
    ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
    been shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    ( ) Whitelists suck
    (x) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    (x) I don't want the government reading my email
    ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    (x) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

  4. Fines for those in NZ by The+Ancients · · Score: 5, Informative

    $200,000 fines are being aimed at three of the offenders here in New Zealand:

    http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/8D970CCB86C6155ACC2574E200636699

    1. Re:Fines for those in NZ by tulmad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A $200k fine for people involved in a business doing $400k/month in transactions. Yup, that'll teach 'em!

      --
      "In case of emergency, break glass. Scream. Bleed to death."
  5. Three Rings by plover · · Score: 5, Funny


    Three Rings spamming the Elven-kings for Cialis to buy,
    Seven for the Dwarf-lords to refinance their home of stone,
    Nine for Mortal Men lacking in size,
    One for the Dark Lord reading his pr0n
    In the Land of Mordor where the Spammers lie.
    One Ring to spam them all, One Ring to find them,
    One Ring to fleece them all and in their greed bind them
    In the Land of Mordor where the Spammers lie.

    --
    John
  6. Re:Of Spammy Ring... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some doggerel we pen
    Despising both men
    If McCain wins, what then?
    Vietnam Shave

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make