Slashdot Mirror


"BlueTrack" Mouse More Advanced Than Laser, Optical

ThinSkin writes "Just when you thought laser and optical mice were enjoying their reign on mousepads worldwide, Microsoft has to come along and introduces their 'BlueTrack Technology,' a mouse tracking system that aims to work on virtually any terrain short of mirrored and reflective surfaces. ExtremeTech reviews the Explorer Mouse and Explorer Mini Mouse, both of which are powered by Microsoft's newest sensor, to see just how well this technology works. Testing on granite, carpet, marble, and other surfaces, the reviewers were impressed with the responsiveness of BlueTrack, but they also noted that laser mice were competitive on these surfaces as well. Even though the mice didn't get a recommendation from the reviewers (price being a major concern), they did admit that this BlueTrack is the best tracking system available today. MaximumPC has some pictures and a brief technical interview."

16 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last time I checked, accelerometer-based position tracking alone didn't work too well as speeds become offset more and more over time, that is as errors accumulate your cursor would start to move even when the mouse isn't moving. However I guess that coupled with a more traditional tracking to add more precision to quick movements, it could be a great thing!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  2. All the buttons in the world by EdZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll stick with my MX Revolution. I've yet to find a mouse with the same number of buttons arranged in an equally usable manner. And yes, I DO use all of them.

  3. Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    The Explorer Mouse uses a proprietary, Microsoft-designed complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) chip with advanced algorithms and pixel architecture for more precise tracking.

    Get it through your heads, fellows: Proprietary is not an advantage. Patented is not an advantage. Don't go crowing about it! Proprietary is what brought us Windows. Are we supposed to be impressed and go "ooh, more of that"?

    1. Re:Mice by ozphx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? Yes it is. Its an especially big advantage if the proprietary+patented new tech is actually better.

      Of course some open source people might have a cry about "teh evils", but to me that sentance means "You must buy the cool new tracking from us."

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    2. Re:Mice by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Propriety" and "patented" are there to show you that they're the only game in town with this technology, and that you can feel secure in buying from them without having to do anything like compare to other vendors, or anything else the intelligent consumer is supposed to do.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Mice by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Proprietary is not an advantage. Patented is not an advantage.

      That's not from the article per-se, it's from MS's press release that the article quotes. The article tells you it's a quote and uses a different font even so it's pretty obvious.

      Patented and proprietary are advantages to MS's investors. That's why they put it in the press release.

  4. Just what we need... by dangitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    We got some hands-on time with this handsome wireless mouse and were impressed by its tracking accuracy, stylish design, and mesmerizing blue glow.

    Yeah, because we haven't got enough glowing gadgets. I'm not sure who considers "mesmerizing" as a positive aspect of consumer electronics. End the madness, people! Or are you too hypnotized by blue LEDs to move?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  5. Weird by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was very convinced that optical sensors was LESS picky than laser ones. Everyone I know have had issues with laser ones (ok, I may not have heard any complaints on the Logitech G5 but..)

    Haven't read the article though, just woke up. (My mouse is an optical Razer DeathAdder and works good as long as there are no huge contrasts on the material or on my white melamine (?) desk or white paper. Brown table, piece of unbleached paper box, pants, all good.)

  6. Re:seriously... by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhm...
    So you want to spend $120 a year on crap vs. $100 for something good?

    Now that makes a whole lot of sense..

  7. Re:seriously... by Columcille · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you'd rather spend $120/yr than $100/yr and get a lower quality product? And people wonder why the economy is in trouble.

    --
    I love my sig.
  8. Trackball by envelope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use a trackball, it works well on any surface at all - sand, carpet, wood, jello, etc.

    --

    appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
  9. How about a trackball? by Fumus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use my trackball (Logitech TrackMan Wheel) almost exclusively for everything except playing FPS games.
    It just fricking rocks. After fiddling around with sensitivity and getting used to in (one or two days) it's the best mouse I ever had.
    Never again will I run out of space or need to lift my hand and reposition the mouse.

    Of course people who use mice to draw stuff will be somewhat crippled by it, as I have a little more difficulty when using it in order to doodle something quick in paint, but what self-respecting artist uses a mouse as their main drawing interface?

  10. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the article suggests that the BlueTrack mouse only has around 800 dpi resolution/sensitivity. but considering that most laser mice have 2000-3200 dpi, BlueTrack doesn't seem more advanced than lasers. the only advantage i can see is that it works on more surfaces than laser mice can. but so do conventional optical mice, which can already go up to 1600 dpi.

    the Explorer Mouse is not very impressive or groundbreaking. i'd rather get a hi-res laser or optical mouse by Logitech at a lower price.

  11. Re:Specs better but Technology Point-Less by Starcub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah I could care less about the tracking system myself, I still use an old MS Intellimouse ball mouse. No batteries to replace, no lag, and good enough tracking. I really don't need an LED on my mouse, or weights, or other gimmicks. All I really want is solid construction that will last.

    I might be tempted to upgrade if there was a significant reason to do so, like for example, the inclusion of an analog thumb hat switch similar to what the Saitek Cyborg mouse has. Unfortunately, I've yet to see a useable implementation. The Cyborg has a intrusive shelf on the bottom, so either you put your thumb on the shelf (awkward), you to put your thumb on the switch. Another gives no room at all to put the thumb, 'cause the switch takes up the entire face. Still another put it out of normal reach of the thumb forcing awkward finger positions to use it. Just a 4 position hat and not analog...

    Quite odd that nobody can seem to get it right.

  12. Re:Yeah by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be honest the parent is probably the target market, i.e. gamers. No-one else spends more than £10 on a mouse because there is no need to, the technology and usability of a £10 mouse is perfect.

    Since anyone buying an expensive mouse probably also buys expensive mouse pads, this thing is doubly pointless.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  13. Re:Yeah by gadabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i bought a razer mouse. not for the blue lights (the only reason i installed the razer driver was to turn the lights off), the gaming gimmick angle, or the razer name, but because it was the only mouse in either of the stores i went to that had the buttons i needed (5) and was actually comfortable in my hand and on my skin. i felt like a chump shelling out 40 bucks for a mouse, but after 2 years with it, i'm VERY glad that i did - especially when i use someone else's computer and their $17 mouse.

    without a comfortable, durable interface, a computer is pretty damn useless, imo.

    --
    the united states is a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced -- frank zappa