Slashdot Mirror


Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization?

Piranhaa writes "At the major corporation I work for, there is currently a single person who decides what software to approve and disapprove within the organization. I've noticed that requests from users for open source Windows programs get denied, nearly instantaneously, on a regular basis. Anything from Gimp, to Firefox, even to Vim don't make the cut due to the simple fact that they are open source. Closed source programs from unknown vendors have a much better chance at approval than Firefox does. The whole mentality here is that anybody can change the source of a project, submit it, and you never know what kind of compiled binary you're going to get. I'm a firm believer in open source code, but I also know closed source has its place. So what would be the best way for me to argue, with all the facts, to allow these people to come to their own conclusion that open source is actually good? Would presenting examples of other big companies moving to open source work, and if so what are some good examples? Or can you suggest any other good approaches?"

1 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Don't bother by jellomizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Has any one though of asking why he rejected the software... It could be as simple as you or your small group is the only one proposing the applications, and you all fill out the forms wrong or don't explain a good business decision for it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.