Slashdot Mirror


Canada Election Result Bad News For DMCA Opponents

An anonymous reader writes "For those with a stake in the opposition of Jim Prentice's C-61, the Canadian DMCA, this previous week's election results will be displeasing. The Conservative Party, which promised to reintroduce the DMCA if elected, gained 19 seats this election, mostly at the expense of the flagging liberal party, a mere 12 short of a majority government. The increase in Conservative representation, as well as the relatively low profile of this issue amidst other, more pressing concerns, increases the likelihood that the son of C-61 will come to fruition. On a positive note, the number of MPs supporting Geist's copyright pledge has increased to 34. Given the Conservative Party's historic disregard of public opinion, however, the efforts of the copyright-pledge MPs will have to rally the full opposition across three major parties in order to defeat the bill. A mere 12 MPs now stand between the Canadian public and the MAFIAA's hungry maw."

6 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. The people have spoken by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very few outside of geeks care about the DMCA.

  2. n00bs by Daimanta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " Given the Conservative Party's historic disregard of public opinion"

    And give Slashdot's historic disregard of non-bias, I think we're tied.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:n00bs by spazdor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry to say it, but the Reform merger ruined the tories.

      "Unite the Right" really amounted to a bunch of secular, principled conservatives compromising to quasi-fundamentalist American style conservative values. It got them elected, but at what cost?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  3. The ironic catch-22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The consequences of first-past-the-post is that the most powerful party gets even MORE power, while less powerful parties get less than they deserve (analogy of making the rich richer and the poor poorer).

    The irony is that only the most powerful party at any given time would be able to change this undemocratic reality, and shift to proportional representation. But obviously, they don't want to, because that'll reduce their power. It's the opposition which always supports changing FPTP to proportional (which will increase their power). But lo and behold, as soon as the opposition becomes the primary party, they immediately go to the start of the paragraph and realize they don't want the change anymore. Now, the former power holders want to change, but they no longer have the power.

    The only party who can change the system, don't want to change it, and those that want to change it, can't. This statement will hold true regardless of which party is in power.

    Beautiful irony, isn't it?

  4. Re:What the Hell is Wrong with Canada? by andytrevino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Conservatives have NOT been in control of the USA for the last eight years..

  5. Re:What the Hell is Wrong with Canada? by ice_nine6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our conservatives != your conservatives.