Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Open-Source DRM Ready To Take On Big Guns

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the when-good-code-goes-bad dept.

Barence writes "An open-source digital rights management (DRM) scheme says it's ready to supplant Apple and Microsoft as the world's leading copy protection solution. Marlin, which is backed by companies such as Sony and Samsung, has just announced a new partner program that aims to drive the DRM system into more consumer devices. 'It works in a way that doesn't hold consumers hostage,' Talal Shamoon told PC Pro. 'It allows you to protect and share content in the home, in a way that people own the content, not the devices.' When asked about the biggest problem of DRM — that customers hate it — he argued that 'the biggest problem with DRM is people have implemented it badly. Make DRM invisible and people will use it.'"

9 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. How can it be both effective and invisible? by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't get it... If DRM works, it restricts what you do. If it restricts what you do, it's not inivisible. How is this implementation different from any other DRM?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:How can it be both effective and invisible? by theaveng · · Score: 5, Informative

      I visited their website. It appears to be based on the tried-and-true "license" model where you must buy a license in order to use a program... or in this case, play a song. The obvious flaw is that is the server goes down, no more license.

      And of course licensing is typically an annual payment plan. I don't want to "rent" my purchased songs year-after-year-after-year.

      http://www.marlin-community.com/technology/how_marlin_works

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    2. Re:How can it be both effective and invisible? by Hojima · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is exactly why it's so useless to prevent pirating of digital media. As long as the purchased information is streamed into an output device, it can be pirated. You don't even need software for it, as there can be hardware as such as monitors and speakers that can be rigged to record their output.

      --
      Help fight spam
    3. Re:How can it be both effective and invisible? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Line patch cords work... but it takes only a couple of minutes on google to find the answer...

      http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=11045

      dbpoweramp is an awesome program. by using that setup I can convert an entire book in a few minutes instead of taking the hours the book is long.

      Honestly, did you even try to search? I typed in audible to mp3 and it was link #5

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Re:How it's theoretically different by theaveng · · Score: 4, Informative

    No it works on licensing. You can copy the song as many times as you want, including over the internet with friends, but you can't use the song until you obtain a license.

    I hate licensing. It's too much like renting. I want to OWN the device, program, song, whatever; not rent it.

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  3. Re:How it's theoretically different by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're saying then that I can't loan a copy of a book I own to a friend or family member because it's copyright infringement. That's utter and complete bullshit.

    No, he's saying that can't make a complete copy of a book you own and give it to a friend or family member because it's copyright infringement. And he's right. The difference between loaning a book and "loaning" an MP3 is that once you'd "loaned" your buddy a song, he has complete access to it whenever he wants. More importantly, he has complete parallel access to it with you. Only one instance of the song was paid for, yet two people are able to enjoy its use at any time, perhaps simultaneously.

    If I have physical media that I legally purchased, I should be able to loan that media out to whoever the hell I want to, and it's nobody's damned business.

    Agreed. If you have an iPod with songs on it that you purchased, you should absolutely be allowed to lend someone that physical media -- that is, the iPod -- and let them use it as long as they want. And you can. You cannot, however, just send them the songs off your iPod, for reasons stated above.

  4. Not "open source" by lucas_picador · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article linked here is the only place on the web that makes the peculiar, and false, claim that Marlin is "open source". Marlin's own creators make no such claim; they only claim that it operates on "open standards", which is quite a different can of worms.

    No story here, just one careless reporter and one careless ./ submitter.

  5. Even easier... by gravyface · · Score: 5, Informative

    Set your recording device to be "wav" or "what I hear" or something similar in your soundcard's mixer's "recording" view. Grab Audacity, hit record, then hit play on *insert_audio_source_here* No signal loss from using the physical outputs.

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:Even easier... by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      Set your recording device to be "wav" or "what I hear" or something similar in your soundcard's mixer's "recording" view.

      Secure Audio Path (Windows XP) or Protected User Mode Audio (Windows Vista) is mixed into the output after the "what you hear" patch point. But line-out to line-in works just as well, and the quality loss is negligible for a typical overcompressed pop song.