Slashdot Mirror


Streaming Election Night Broadcast TV?

kakapo writes "A couple of years ago, we dumped our cable TV, and don't have much luck getting old-fashioned broadcast where we live. That's fine — we can download or netflix almost anything we want to see, and it is great not to pay the Comcast tax every month. Problem is, now I want to watch the election live, complete with talking heads, pundits, glitzy graphics and all the rest, rather than reading about it on a website. So, is there any way to download network TV / CNN / MSNBC in real time — I don't mind paying. And yes, we could visit friends, but ideally our kids would watch the first part and then go to bed — and a sitter would be expensive if we have to wait until late for the result."

56 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Yes by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go here and click on "live video."

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll spoil the election for you: McCain wins.

    2. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dave Byrd, is that you?

    3. Re:Yes by robinsonne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll spoil the election for you: McCain wins.

      ... and America loses ...

      I think we lose regardless of whichever of the two wins. (It would take a miracle for any of the 3rd party ones to win.)

    4. Re:Yes by mongoose(!no) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, only winning move is not to play....

      I was really excited to vote in this election (as I missed bing born early enough for the the last one by a few weeks), but both the canidates seem like incompetent panderers. I cast my vote hoping that my canidate will return to how he was before the primaries, and not pander to his party so much.

    5. Re:Yes by knorthern+knight · · Score: 5, Informative

      The magic incantation is...

      mplayer -playlist http://www.cnn.com/video/live/cnnlive_1.asx

      *WITHOUT* the "[cnn.com]" in brackets at the end (damn you Slashdot). I'm running it on linux, and watching CNN right now.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    6. Re:Yes by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not the CNN TV feed... that's window #1 out of CNN Pipeline, an internet-only service.

    7. Re:Yes by Eskarel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They both supported the bailout because the bailout had to happen. It should have had teeth the way the UK one did(everyone at the top of every bank the UK government socialized got fired) and it probably should have had a better plan than "we'll buy lot of your stock, but we're the government so we can't own a private corporation and so we despite owning the vast majority of your company we won't have voting rights", but the banks themselves needed to be bailed out even if the individuals didn't.

      They don't both support the war(at least not identically, yes both support afghanistan, but Obama wants out of Iraq).

      Redistribution of wealth depends an awful lot on how they do it. McCain will continue the usual republican model where they "create wealth" so that rich people can be richer making everyone else comparatively poorer. I'm not entirely sure what Obama will do in the end, a hand out to everyone doesn't work, but providing people with health care, protections at work, free education, and general assistance to ensure that rather than working hard to make someone else rich some of their hard work is rewarded by making them a little bit wealthier is a redistribution of wealth I can get behind.

      The current system of wealth distribution is flawed. The folks who do the work get barely enough to get by, the folks who run the companies(even if they didn't build them and don't contribute to them) get paid bucketloads, and the scum sucking stock trading weasels make even more playing the market game at the expense of everyone else(including the companies that the stock market is supposed to provide investment captal for).

    8. Re:Yes by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be in your boat if Hillary had won and Palin weren't on the ticket. I can't stand either of them. It's amazing how similar they are, while holding diametrically opposed sociopolitical beliefs. I do agree with you that, in the event McCain wins, he goes back the man he was in 2000 and kicks some serious congressional butt and fixes the deficit and debt before he starts handing money back.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:Yes by lilomar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have my head hacked off by some religious lunatic versus an infinitesimal chance[...]

      You seem to be under the impression that having your head hacked off is guaranteed, in reality (you should visit some time) it's much less likely than someone in government looking at your private information.

      (yes, yes, I know, you have nothing to hide... send me your passwords then, so I can watch your email)

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  2. Hulu.com? by sohmc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hulu had streaming live feeds of the debates. I'd think they'd have some sort of streaming feed come election day. Also, I know CNN has streaming feeds of some of their programs.

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
  3. Check the Cable feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you tried plugging a TV into the cable feed? A lot of times, the cable company won't bother implementing a cancellation, figuring that reclaiming the box is good enough and saving the cost of a truck roll. It's possible that you'll still have analog basic cable on that "disconnected" cable line. Alternately, you could sign up for one month of limited Analog Cable for $15.

    1. Re:Check the Cable feed by drpimp · · Score: 2, Funny

      "smoked up" ??? I've heard of smoked OUT, but never UP. I know I am being picky but shit I had to read the post twice to realized you weren't talking about giving him a BJ!

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    2. Re:Check the Cable feed by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no no, when you let someone smoke your weed, you're smoking them out. "Smoking up" just means you gave them a smoke cured ham. But don't worry, lots of people get confused on those two (especially with the memory loss that comes from all that ham).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  4. Really? by psychicninja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google found this first thing: http://www.dvguru.com/2006/11/06/election-day-coverage-streaming-overload/ and that was just a quick search. Does this really need to be a front-page discussion?

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      um...yeah, i'm sure the question is about the elections taking place in 2006. . .

      LETS DO THE TIME WARP AGAAAIIIIINNNNNN!

    2. Re:Really? by bedroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. You may immediately think "Google" and be able to type in the appropriate search, but not everyone is so astute. That's why we have /., and putting it on the front page does better to ensure that everyone who might think to ask will see it. There's also something to be said for the potential for variety of information you'll get here versus Google. Maybe not so much for the quality...

  5. Anything for non americans? by Splab · · Score: 3, Informative

    This election is pretty much sealing the fate of the western world as we know it; we are quite a lot of people very very interested in the results.

    1. Re:Anything for non americans? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Informative

      No it isn't
      Let me fill you in.
      If McCain wins odds are that we will have a Democratic majority on congress.
      The end result is that it should keep things somewhat in the center. Or very little will get done that doesn't have a universal support.
      If Obama wins we will have a Democratic congress. Truth is that I would bet that it will also go more towards the center but if they start really messing up then in two years congress will shift back towards the Republicans and we will again have balance.
      If Obama or McCain really mess up we fire them in four years and get a new president.
      In the end it will not be the end of the world.
      Geez I don't like Obama's energy policy since it is not as pro nuclear as I would like. I am not all that fond of McCain's tax plan. Or Obama's "Guess what folks. You can not give a tax cut to someone that already pays zero or gets more back than they pay in. That is called charity."
      Truth is I doubt it matter much one way or the other. I don't think their is a great man running for president this year but I also don't think their is a monster running.
      Chill out and relax.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Anything for non americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Obama or McCain really mess up we fire them in four years and get a new president.

      Like we did with George W Bush?

    3. Re:Anything for non americans? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really.
      The president can only do what Congress allows. That is what I find so funny about people freaking out over the president.
      There are checks and balances in the system one person can not mess it up that bad in just four years.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Anything for non americans? by MaxEmerika · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This analysis reminds me of discussions taking place around 2000, when the prevailing wisdom was that it would not make one bit of difference who got elected. We were wrong then, and you are wrong now.

    5. Re:Anything for non americans? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd agree with most of what you say were it not for Sarah Palin. That woman puts the fear of God in me, and I'm an atheist! Can you imagine someone in the President's seat who doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is without having to phone a friend? We had a retard in the oval office for 8 years and it has been an unmitigated disaster. Lord help us if the American voters once again show disdain for educated people as 'elitists.'

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:Anything for non americans? by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes I have. And yes most Americans have faith in checks and balances.
      The invasion of Iraq passed with huge support from both Democrats and Republicans.
      Also with a lot of support of other countries at the time.
      The Economy? Not just Bush's fault. Take a look at all the other countries that have had the same thing happen to them at this time. We have been going from bubble to bubble since Clinton. No one was willing to deflate the bubble but bubbles don't last for ever.

      If you think one person has that much power for good or evil you are just clueless.
      Bush is just easy to blame since he is the president. The number of people involved is huge and isn't even limited to a single country.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Anything for non americans? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't go to Yale if you are retard

      You do if your daddy is one of the most influential people in the country and he wants you to.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  6. Listen instead by duffbeer703 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any decent AM radio station will have full-time election coverage, and radio news is generally 1000% better than the swill that you see on TV.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Listen instead by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 5, Informative

      AM or your local FM NPR station if you can pull it in. I've found NPR's live election coverage to be quite good.

    2. Re:Listen instead by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree and plan on finding out what Americans do on Election Day via shortwave radio from BBC or Radio Sierra-Leon or some other non partisan source on my antique Halicrafters. I am by the way IN the US and a US citizen. Ever consider some other country could run a propaganda station? they might call it..oh I don't know... " Voice of America"...or something....

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Listen instead by jemtallon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed. I have the same problem browsing slashdot in lynx. I always get halfway through a comment and fall asl

  7. Slingbox by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you have a friend with a slingbox you could use that.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  8. Why watch at home? by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While CNN, MSNBC, and Faux News, are all likely to have live streaming feeds of election results, it might be more worthwhile to head to your local sports bar. They'll very likely have the election results on, and they have a reasonable supply of alcohol as well, which will come in handy no matter who wins (if your candidate of choice wins, you celebrate; if the other guy wins, you drown away your sorrows),... ;-)

    1. Re:Why watch at home? by MazzThePianoman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess you forgot the part where the poster said he had kids and did not want to get a sitter? Then again alcohol could quiet the kids well enough as well.

      --
      "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" Franklin
    2. Re:Why watch at home? by samkass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And as for the baby sitter... Virginia's polls close at 7pm, and if/when Obama takes that state, the election is basically over, so you probably won't have to pay her/him much overtime this year.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  9. C-SPAN streams live by NevDull · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the things you want to watch which are covered on C-SPAN, you can see C-SPAN 1, 2, and 3, and C-SPAN Radio here.

  10. Screw that... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I'm going to take a sleeping pill right after work and try to sleep through the whole thing. There's no point in watching it "unfold" - the next day my guy will either be President Elect or not, and my watching breathless talking heads constantly reanalyzing the same data isn't going to change it one way or another.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Screw that... by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was true of Decision 2000 also, except the "next day" part. It's called 'history'. We should look into it while we still have it.

  11. Re:Same thing with the World Series by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am wondering the same thing about tonight's World Series game on Fox. Anyone answer that question?

    Baseball/Football/Basketball jealously guard their broadcast rights.
    The only way to stream those things live is off the official website or through a premium membership (aol/msn/real networks/i'm not sure who anymore) after paying for it.

    CNN is a lot easier. It's on their website for free.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  12. Re:Same thing with the World Series by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I found a helpful link for you here.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
  13. Local sports bar? by whitelabrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I say head on over to one of those kinds of sports bars will all the TV's an see if they're broadcasting it. Stream the beer instead.

  14. Comcast Tax? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean seriously. If you were to go to McDonalds and buy a Big Mac would you be paying an Big Mac tax?

    It's a price.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Comcast Tax? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you were to go to McDonalds and buy a Big Mac would you be paying an Big Mac tax?

      If I went to McDonald's and the only way to get a Big Mac was with Fries, a Coke, and a Sundae (with wonderful "extra" options like salad, milk, and coffee available only if I purchase a "base" value meal), you sure as hell can bet I'd see it as a "tax".

      Of course, the solution is to not go to McDonald's. Right up until I realize that McDonald's has been granted a monopoly in my area. Going to Burger King requires that I MOVE 30 miles away because they can only serve local residents. Worse yet, nice restaurants have all been driven out of business by a government-sponsored monopoly. So my options are currently go to McDonald's and pay the McTax, or don't go out to eat.

      THAT is how Comcast is a tax.

  15. this is some sort of archetype by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    the "i don't own a tv and i have to tell everyone about it" guy

    in answer to your question: who cares? why do you feel the need to tell everyone you don't own a tv? that's the real subtext of your question

    and if you think that's a smarmy answer, well then i have a real answer for you: GO BUY A TV. GET CABLE OR SATELLITE. END OF STORY. your brain will not melt, you will not be contributing to the downfall of western civilization. really. or, go ahead and listen to the various unnecessary technical gymanstics you must perform offered in this thead. instead of simply going and getting yourself a simple, harmless television

    the onion was prescient: Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television

    this is some sort of genuine subculture. and if not owning a television turns one into a vainglorious buffoon, then please, everyone should own a television, for the sake of a healthy sense of humility. sheesh

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  16. Site is flakey. Here are direct links. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    The C-SPAN site uses a flakey AJAX framework to try to sniff your stream reader. Unfortunately it's broken for some browsers. That seems to include firefox - including the version on my Ubuntu Feisty install which I keep up-to-the-minute with the upgrade tool.

    So I've reverse-engineered it enough to find URLs for the underlying streams.

    Here are direct links to the realplayer streams for C-SPAN, C-SPAN2, and C-SPAN3.

    = = =

    PS: I haven't been able to figure out how to construct similar links for archived shows. If anybody else can mange that, please follow up with it. Thanks.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  17. FOX by inzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    i believe Fox has the best coverage - i hear it's pretty balanced, and covers all the policy issues; I'm sure they'll have a stream with not too many adverts

    1. Re:FOX by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a faint suspicion the OP was being sarcastic.

  18. Direct tv will have 8 feeds on one channel in HD by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Direct tv will have 8 feeds on one channel in HD

  19. C-SPAN by Rayge · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could watch the live stream from http://www.cspan.org/

  20. Good Luck by aarenz · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, I am betting that the whole thing will be embroiled in troubles with all electronic voting machines and close recounts. I doubt that we will hear an official winner in several states until days or maybe weeks later. Second, suggest getting one of the digital converter boxes and an amplified antenna. Will serve you well for a long time into the future and provide a very good signal even when you normally get static on the old analog over the air. I work for a broadcast group and we have tested digital converter boxes in hard to recieve locations like condos and office buildings with some pretty good success.

    Overall I say save the money and wait for the hubub to end after two weeks of the electronic version of hanging chads.

  21. Sigh. Only 6 more days of this BS by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enough with the Obama rumor nonsense. It isn't so much that nobody believes the stories that he's an adulterous socialist cryptomuslim alqaida mole whose really a citizen of Queen Maud Land. (Though you have to admit that the evidence is, to put it mildly, laughable.) It's just that nobody cares.

    Why should they? He's different from the idiot who's now in power and the senile fool who's the alternative. That's all anybody cares about.

    1. Re:Sigh. Only 6 more days of this BS by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should they? He's different from the idiot who's now in power and the senile fool who's the alternative. That's all anybody cares about.

      Exactly. As a Brit, viewing from overseas, McCain looks pretty much the same as Bush. Old, rich, right-wing guy. So the election looks like: Vote for McCain, because you think Bush did OK. Or vote Obama, and hope that that guy has some intelligence, a more worldly view, and morals. Mind you, I thought in 2004 that the US population couldn't be *that* silly to re-elect Bush. Mind you - fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

    2. Re:Sigh. Only 6 more days of this BS by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I couldn't even pretend to know something Gordon Brown has ever said

      I could take a stab at it... "C'mon, bloody hell! When will Blair retire?"

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Sigh. Only 6 more days of this BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      What Would Ralph Nader Do?

      Nada?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  22. answer seems obvious by discojohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

    slingbox

  23. Re:Same thing with the World Series by senorpoco · · Score: 2

    http://www.channelsurfing.net/ has most sports events streamed live.

  24. Better Election Live Coverage Links by rubypossum · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I find your link to CNN to be humorously incorrect but fun nonetheless. The true links to live election coverage are MS-NBC, Fox News and CNN. Be sure to wait until election day to tune in!

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. - Hunter S. Thompson
  25. We are on the same channel. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I realize that some people would consider these ideas "extreme", but on the other hand, what we have been seeing has been rather extreme. Maybe it is time for extreme ideas.

    Here is what I would do:

    (1) Pass law (and, I hope, amend the Constitution), to the effect that no campaign contributions, gifts, or other compensation shall be given to current or campaigning politicians, other than from individual citizens who are eligible to vote. No entity that does not actually vote (i.e., anybody but individual citizens) may contribute to political interests in any way. Foreign interests may not contribute in any way. Violation by any party (i.e, anyone offering OR accepting money or goods in violation of this provision) shall be guilty of a Federal felony punishable by NOT LESS than 2 years in solitary confinement in a Federal penitentiary.

    (This means that CEOs cannot take corporate profits (created by the employees), and use them to support politicians to whom the company's employees would strongly object. Similarly, it would prevent worker unions from taking member dues and using those to support politicians who are not approved by the members. Only individuals could contribute. So: if an individual felt that a candidate would benefit the corporation they work for, they are free to donate. If the employee felt that the candidate might threaten their bargaining position by voting anti-union, then they are free to donate to THEIR favorite (up to the maximum). BUT... this prevents organizational "bigwigs" from taking money from their "underlings" and using it against them. ONLY INDIVIDUALS QUALIFIED TO VOTE COULD CONTRIBUTE TO CAMPAIGNS. Period. Emphasis on "individuals". Not companies, not unions. Companies do not vote, unions do not vote. People do. There is no reason that ANY entity other than a VOTER should be able to influence politics. If a company CEO or a union president want to talk to their legislators... they can. With exactly as much influence as anybody else.)

    (2) Limit each contribution to a fixed percentage of the average (mean, not median or mode) income of a private adult citizen of the United States. That would limit the influence of the disgustingly wealthy, and bring things back to the idea of "one voice, one vote".

    (3) While I am all for privacy, this is an area that has been screaming for openness: the names of each individual contributor to political causes must be made public. I choke over this one, but there appears to be no realistic alternative.

    (4) Campaign contributions, even a nickel, must NEVER be tax-deductible.

    Now for the fun stuff...

    (5) AUTOMATIC EXPIRATION OF UNNECESSARY LAWS. While there must be exceptions for some projects that require long-term funding (I am open for ideas on that), ALL Federal legislation (laws) will be subject to review after a period of no more than 3 years from passage (not the "effective" date). In order for a Federal law to remain in effect, the legislature must publicly review and renew the law before the 3 years is up. If they fail to do so, the law automatically expires. There are several benefits to this idea:
    • (a) Defunct laws that are still in effect (you might be surprised how many there are) will automatically lose force and become null. This is a MAJOR benefit for the citizenry, who have more and more found themselves facing ancient laws that they did not even know about, and which are arbitrarily enforced. (I just watched a video about this. Did you know that you could be prosecuted by the Federal Government for a FELONY, for possessing a fish that is illegal to possess in Honduras... because of the laws of HONDURAS, not even American law? There is a federal law that makes it illegal to possess a fish if there is a law against its possession in ANY of the countries that are signatory to ANY treaties with the United States! This is TRUE. And if they changed their laws, you would still be prosecutable under Federal law, even though you had no way to know abo