Google Adopts, Forks OpenID 1.0

An anonymous reader writes "Right on the heels of Microsoft's adoption of the OpenID protocol by announcing their intention to enable OpenID authentication against all Live IDs, Google has announced their intention to join the growing list of OpenID authentication providers. Except it turns out they're using their own version of OpenID that is incompatible with everyone else. It seems that Google will be using their own 'improved' version of OpenID (based upon research and user feedback of the OpenID system) which isn't backwards compatible with OpenID 1.0/2.0, in hopes of improving end-user experience at the cost of protocol compatibility and complexity."

Comments

Slightly Conflicting Vision Statements

[eldavojohn]

OpenID's vision statement:

OpenID eliminates the need for multiple usernames across different websites, simplifying your online experience.

Everyone else's vision statement:

Fuck OpenID, I'm in control now.

Re:Slightly Conflicting Vision Statements

[Anonymous Coward]

EMBRACE AND EXTEND!!!!

oh...wait...I'm confused, this a Google article, not a microsoft article

Re:Slightly Conflicting Vision Statements

[Cassius Corodes]

Oh god... I dont know who to love and who to hate any more!

Re:Slightly Conflicting Vision Statements

[mr_mischief]

Google:

1) write a good search engine
2) ???
3) grow to critical mass where you can guarantee yourself users
4) embrace
5) extend
6) release extensions to the community
7) get users based on 1-5 using the new system
8) advertise the hell out of everything to the users on this system, too
9) profit!
10) repeat steps 4 through 9

Microsoft:

1) write decent BASIC tools
2) ???
3) get someone else's OS preloaded by IBM and ride their coattails to ubiquity
4) embrace
5) extend
6) close off extensions
7) hook users through lock-in created in steps 3 through 6
8) extinguish open system
9) profit!
10) repeat steps 4 through 9

The '???' steps come a little early in these. Sorry about that.

Re:Slightly Conflicting Vision Statements

[sortius_nod]

It truly is a sign of the apocalypse.

Microsoft being "un-evil" and Google eviling it up.

don't be evil

[Evan Meakyl]

just fork it!

Re:And this is why...

[Anonymous Coward]

"Microsoft in its current form will likely be dead in less than a decade", you ummm, underestimate the power of the dark side young jedi. microsoft will likely outlive everyone with userids equal to yours and lower. :3

Re:so lets see slashdot bias at work

[uberjack]

I imagine that at some point in the future, Google will 'fess up to having been a subsidiary of Microsoft all along. Dr. Zoidberg: "It was me! I'm the hero!"

Re:Google... learning more from Microsoft everyday

[Mozk]

They drank Flavor Aid at Jonestown.

Re:Google... learning more from Microsoft everyday

[UltraAyla]

Sensational press 2, Rational thinking .5?

Don't forget irrational thinking, -2i!

Re:Google... learning more from Microsoft everyday

[rivetgeek]

Apparently you dont code CSS much...

Oh, no, it's happening again!

[Goodgerster]

The cycle of a hip young company usurping the stagnant incumbents, only to become a stagnant incumbent itself, continues.
Where is Google's successor?

Re:How to judge what's going on

[dhasenan]

There is nothing similar in the 2.0 OpenId standard.

HAHA DISREGARD THAT, I DON'T READ STANDARDS

Re: Google Version!!

[TaoPhoenix]

Embrace, Beta, Languish!

Re:Google... learning more from Microsoft everyday

[Anonymous Coward]

Don't forget irrational thinking, -2i!

I think you meant -2e.

What you posted was imaginary thinking :)

Re:Snarky AC comment

[Raenex]

Maybe you should know who you're talking to

He did say "Get over yourself", didn't he?

:)

As the Great Bill O'Reilly Once Said...

[ryanvm]

Fork it! We'll do it live!