Slashdot Mirror


Apple Plans To Make Chips For Handhelds

Preedit writes "Apple plans to get into the business of designing microprocessors for handheld devices, according to legal papers that are part of a dispute between IBM and one of its top technology executives. IBM is suing Power chip expert Mark Papermaster for allegedly violating a non-compete agreement and accepting a job at Apple. In court papers, IBM claims Apple wants Papermaster 'to design microprocessors for incorporation in a variety of electronic devices, including handheld devices.' The suit, according to Infoweek, also notes that Apple earlier this year bought out P.A. Semi. IBM thinks it knows why."

11 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Gosh and I wondered what they'd do with P.A. Semi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you buy a mobile chip designer what else are you going to do with it?

  2. Good luck with that~ by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Good luck with that~ by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Informative
  3. Re:Steve's plans for world domination? by argent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve's more like Henry Ford than Big Brother. Any color you want as long as you don't want page-up and page-down keys.

  4. IBM has a case by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Informative

    except non-compete agreements were ruled unconstitutional

    And rightly so, I shall add. Non-compete agreements are total crap and I hope IBM gets smacked down hard in court over this frivolous lawsuit.

    What, you thought I was going to support IBM on this one? Don't believe everything you read in the subject line ;o)

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:IBM has a case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I prefer French law on non compete. If you have one of your employee sign a non compete, three conditions must be respected:
      -limited scope on geography
      -limited scope on time
      and the better one
      -while your former employee is unemployable due to the non compete, you must pay him a compensation for his unemployability. I don't remember how much but it's a certain percentage of the salary.

    2. Re:IBM has a case by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Informative

      don't know about the first one, but IBM seems to be meeting the last two requirements:
      -they're only asking that he refrain from working for Apple or another direct competitor for one year.
      -they offered to pay him a year's salary (on top of his default compensation package) in exchange for his abidance with the non-compete clause.

      while i think that non-compete clauses definitely have some potential for abuse by employers, i don't think IBM is being that unreasonable in this instance.

  5. I predict this will be a failure by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple chips are bland and only favored by dieters and health nuts. Now if the company was called 'Tortilla,' well, then...that would be delicious!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  6. Re:non-compete == BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stealing designs is already illegal in the first place. Non compete agreements prevent you from taking a similar job after your current job has been terminated, even if you have no intention to steal your former employer's trade secrets.

    The real aim of non compete agreements is to lower your negotiation power. Take this salary cut, and no you can't go to the competition because of the non compete.

  7. Re:non-compete == BS by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they can't keep you there by treating you well, providing you opportunity to grow or paying you well. Then why does a company deserve to hold a monopoly on your employment?

    The other problem with non-competes is that there have been numerous cases where employees are laid-off, but their NC are enforced preventing them from getting jobs in the industry.

    Also a company should not be defined by an individual contributor. A company's success depends greatly on the culture and teamwork within that company. Something that is not easy to export (or import, as many merged companies have found out).

    Also "trade secrets" and patents are outside of the scope of a non-compete clause. And you are liable for civil damages if you distribute trade secrets. Even if you no longer work for that company.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  8. Re:Gosh and I wondered what they'd do with P.A. Se by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chip designing these days is like the child game you used to play called connecting the dots.

    People use the term SoC(system on chip) to describe them. It's actually quite modular. Basically you can license a arm core or a mips core and put in all your other blocks(PCI, USB, ethernet) all on the same chip, so if Apple were to license the ppc architecture from IBM I'm sure IBM would be happy. I doubt thats what they are doing since the iPhone is based on ARM.

    Not a lot of people design processors from scratch anymore.

    Unless he designs the processor from scratch he's really not competing. I can't imagine apple doing something that stupid.

    That article alludes to his experience with low power. He probably knows a few tricks on how to reduce power load. This is the expertise they are drawing from. He isn't competing with IBM; MIPS, ARM and intel is.